Skip to main content

Showing 1–8 of 8 results for author: LeBlanc, D

Searching in archive cs. Search in all archives.
.
  1. arXiv:2401.01501  [pdf, other

    cs.RO

    Evaluation of automated driving system safety metrics with logged vehicle trajectory data

    Authors: Xintao Yan, Shuo Feng, David J. LeBlanc, Carol Flannagan, Henry X. Liu

    Abstract: Real-time safety metrics are important for the automated driving system (ADS) to assess the risk of driving situations and to assist the decision-making. Although a number of real-time safety metrics have been proposed in the literature, systematic performance evaluation of these safety metrics has been lacking. As different behavioral assumptions are adopted in different safety metrics, it is dif… ▽ More

    Submitted 2 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

  2. arXiv:2312.04724  [pdf, other

    cs.CR cs.LG

    Purple Llama CyberSecEval: A Secure Coding Benchmark for Language Models

    Authors: Manish Bhatt, Sahana Chennabasappa, Cyrus Nikolaidis, Shengye Wan, Ivan Evtimov, Dominik Gabi, Daniel Song, Faizan Ahmad, Cornelius Aschermann, Lorenzo Fontana, Sasha Frolov, Ravi Prakash Giri, Dhaval Kapil, Yiannis Kozyrakis, David LeBlanc, James Milazzo, Aleksandar Straumann, Gabriel Synnaeve, Varun Vontimitta, Spencer Whitman, Joshua Saxe

    Abstract: This paper presents CyberSecEval, a comprehensive benchmark developed to help bolster the cybersecurity of Large Language Models (LLMs) employed as coding assistants. As what we believe to be the most extensive unified cybersecurity safety benchmark to date, CyberSecEval provides a thorough evaluation of LLMs in two crucial security domains: their propensity to generate insecure code and their lev… ▽ More

    Submitted 7 December, 2023; originally announced December 2023.

  3. arXiv:2308.12846  [pdf, other

    cs.RO

    Object level footprint uncertainty quantification in infrastructure based sensing

    Authors: Arpan Kusari, Asma Almutairi, Mark E. Gilbert, David J. LeBlanc

    Abstract: We examine the problem of estimating footprint uncertainty of objects imaged using the infrastructure based camera sensing. A closed form relationship is established between the ground coordinates and the sources of the camera errors. Using the error propagation equation, the covariance of a given ground coordinate can be measured as a function of the camera errors. The uncertainty of the footprin… ▽ More

    Submitted 24 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

    Comments: Submitted to IEEE Sensors journal

  4. arXiv:2110.07111  [pdf

    cs.RO eess.SY

    A Novel Traffic Simulation Framework for Testing Autonomous Vehicles Using SUMO and CARLA

    Authors: Pei Li, Arpan Kusari, David J. LeBlanc

    Abstract: Traffic simulation is an efficient and cost-effective way to test Autonomous Vehicles (AVs) in a complex and dynamic environment. Numerous studies have been conducted for AV evaluation using traffic simulation over the past decades. However, the current simulation environments fall behind on two fronts -- the background vehicles (BVs) fail to simulate naturalistic driving behavior and the existing… ▽ More

    Submitted 13 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

  5. arXiv:2109.11620  [pdf, other

    cs.RO eess.SY

    Enhancing SUMO simulator for simulation based testing and validation of autonomous vehicles

    Authors: Arpan Kusari, Pei Li, Hanzhi Yang, Nikhil Punshi, Mich Rasulis, Scott Bogard, David J. LeBlanc

    Abstract: Current autonomous vehicle (AV) simulators are built to provide large-scale testing required to prove capabilities under varied conditions in controlled, repeatable fashion. However, they have certain failings including the need for user expertise and complex inconvenient tutorials for customized scenario creation. Simulation of Urban Mobility (SUMO) simulator, which has been presented as an open-… ▽ More

    Submitted 23 September, 2021; originally announced September 2021.

  6. arXiv:1701.08915  [pdf, other

    eess.SY cs.RO

    Accelerated Evaluation of Automated Vehicles Using Piecewise Mixture Models

    Authors: Zhiyuan Huang, Ding Zhao, Henry Lam, David J. LeBlanc

    Abstract: The process to certify highly Automated Vehicles has not yet been defined by any country in the world. Currently, companies test Automated Vehicles on public roads, which is time-consuming and inefficient. We proposed the Accelerated Evaluation concept, which uses a modified statistics of the surrounding vehicles and the Importance Sampling theory to reduce the evaluation time by several orders of… ▽ More

    Submitted 30 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

    Comments: 11 pages, 13 figures

  7. arXiv:1607.02687  [pdf

    cs.OH

    Accelerated Evaluation of Automated Vehicles in Car-Following Maneuvers

    Authors: Ding Zhao, Xianan Huang, Huei Peng, Henry Lam, David J. LeBlanc

    Abstract: The safety of Automated Vehicles (AVs) must be assured before their release and deployment. The current approach to evaluation relies primarily on (i) testing AVs on public roads or (ii) track testing with scenarios defined in a test matrix. These two methods have completely opposing drawbacks: the former, while offering realistic scenarios, takes too much time to execute; the latter, though it ca… ▽ More

    Submitted 19 February, 2017; v1 submitted 9 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

    Comments: 11 pages, 11 figures

  8. Accelerated Evaluation of Automated Vehicles Safety in Lane Change Scenarios Based on Importance Sampling Techniques

    Authors: Ding Zhao, Henry Lam, Huei Peng, Shan Bao, David J. LeBlanc, Kazutoshi Nobukawa, Christopher S. Pan

    Abstract: Automated vehicles (AVs) must be evaluated thoroughly before their release and deployment. A widely-used evaluation approach is the Naturalistic-Field Operational Test (N-FOT), which tests prototype vehicles directly on the public roads. Due to the low exposure to safety-critical scenarios, N-FOTs are time-consuming and expensive to conduct. In this paper, we propose an accelerated evaluation appr… ▽ More

    Submitted 15 June, 2016; v1 submitted 16 May, 2016; originally announced May 2016.

    Comments: submitted to IEEE ITSC