-
Four universal growth regimes in degree-dependent first passage percolation on spatial random graphs II
Authors:
Júlia Komjáthy,
John Lapinskas,
Johannes Lengler,
Ulysse Schaller
Abstract:
In this paper we study a version of (non-Markovian) first passage percolation on graphs, where the transmission time between two connected vertices is non-iid, but increases by a penalty factor polynomial in their expected degrees. Based on the exponent of the penalty-polynomial, this makes it increasingly harder to transmit to and from high-degree vertices. This choice is motivated by awareness o…
▽ More
In this paper we study a version of (non-Markovian) first passage percolation on graphs, where the transmission time between two connected vertices is non-iid, but increases by a penalty factor polynomial in their expected degrees. Based on the exponent of the penalty-polynomial, this makes it increasingly harder to transmit to and from high-degree vertices. This choice is motivated by awareness or time-limitations. For the iid part of the transmission times we allow any nonnegative distribution with regularly varying behaviour at $0$. For the underlying graph models we choose spatial random graphs that have power-law degree distributions, so that the effect of the penalisation becomes visible: (finite and infinite) Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs, and Scale-Free Percolation. In these spatial models, the connection probability between two vertices depends on their spatial distance and on their expected degrees. We prove that upon increasing the penalty exponent, the transmission time between two far away vertices $x,y$ sweeps through four universal phases even for a single underlying graph: explosive (tight transmission times), polylogarithmic, polynomial but sublinear ($Θ(|x-y|^{η_0})$ for an explicit $η_0<1$), and linear ($Θ(|x-y|)$) in their Euclidean distance. Further, none of these phases are restricted to phase boundaries, and those are non-trivial in the main model parameters: the tail of the degree-distribution, a long-range parameter, and the exponent of regular variation of the iid part of the transmission times. In this paper we present proofs of lower bounds for the latter two phases and the upper bound for the linear phase. These complement the matching upper bounds for the polynomial regime in our companion paper.
△ Less
Submitted 5 October, 2023; v1 submitted 21 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Four universal growth regimes in degree-dependent first passage percolation on spatial random graphs I
Authors:
Júlia Komjáthy,
John Lapinskas,
Johannes Lengler,
Ulysse Schaller
Abstract:
One-dependent first passage percolation is a spreading process on a graph where the transmission time through each edge depends on the direct surroundings of the edge. In particular, the classical iid transmission time $L_{xy}$ is multiplied by $(W_xW_y)^μ$, a polynomial of the expected degrees $W_x, W_y$ of the endpoints of the edge $xy$, which we call the penalty function. Beyond the Markov case…
▽ More
One-dependent first passage percolation is a spreading process on a graph where the transmission time through each edge depends on the direct surroundings of the edge. In particular, the classical iid transmission time $L_{xy}$ is multiplied by $(W_xW_y)^μ$, a polynomial of the expected degrees $W_x, W_y$ of the endpoints of the edge $xy$, which we call the penalty function. Beyond the Markov case, we also allow any distribution for $L_{xy}$ with regularly varying distribution near $0$. We then run this process on three spatial scale-free random graph models: finite and infinite Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs, and Scale-Free Percolation. In these spatial models, the connection probability between two vertices depends on their spatial distance and on their expected degrees.
We show that as the penalty-function, i.e., $μ$ increases, the transmission time between two far away vertices sweeps through four universal phases: explosive (with tight transmission times), polylogarithmic, polynomial but strictly sublinear, and linear in the Euclidean distance. The strictly polynomial growth phase here is a new phenomenon that so far was extremely rare in spatial graph models. The four growth phases are highly robust in the model parameters and are not restricted to phase boundaries. Further, the transition points between the phases depend non-trivially on the main model parameters: the tail of the degree distribution, a long-range parameter governing the presence of long edges, and the behaviour of the distribution $L$ near $0$. In this paper we develop new methods to prove the upper bounds in all sub-explosive phases. Our companion paper complements these results by providing matching lower bounds in the polynomial and linear regimes.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2024; v1 submitted 21 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Nearly optimal independence oracle algorithms for edge estimation in hypergraphs
Authors:
Holger Dell,
John Lapinskas,
Kitty Meeks
Abstract:
We study a query model of computation in which an n-vertex k-hypergraph can be accessed only via its independence oracle or via its colourful independence oracle, and each oracle query may incur a cost depending on the size of the query. In each of these models, we obtain oracle algorithms to approximately count the hypergraph's edges, and we unconditionally prove that no oracle algorithm for this…
▽ More
We study a query model of computation in which an n-vertex k-hypergraph can be accessed only via its independence oracle or via its colourful independence oracle, and each oracle query may incur a cost depending on the size of the query. In each of these models, we obtain oracle algorithms to approximately count the hypergraph's edges, and we unconditionally prove that no oracle algorithm for this problem can have significantly smaller worst-case oracle cost than our algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 26 April, 2024; v1 submitted 7 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Instability of backoff protocols with arbitrary arrival rates
Authors:
Leslie Ann Goldberg,
John Lapinskas
Abstract:
In contention resolution, multiple processors are trying to coordinate to send discrete messages through a shared channel with sharply limited communication. If two processors inadvertently send at the same time, the messages collide and are not transmitted successfully. An important case is acknowledgement-based contention resolution, in which processors cannot listen to the channel at all; all t…
▽ More
In contention resolution, multiple processors are trying to coordinate to send discrete messages through a shared channel with sharply limited communication. If two processors inadvertently send at the same time, the messages collide and are not transmitted successfully. An important case is acknowledgement-based contention resolution, in which processors cannot listen to the channel at all; all they know is whether or not their own messages have got through. This situation arises frequently in both networking and cloud computing. The most common acknowledgement-based protocols in practice are backoff protocols - variants of binary exponential backoff are used in both Ethernet and TCP/IP, and both Google Drive and AWS instruct their users to implement it to handle busy periods.
In queueing models, where each processor has a queue of messages, stable backoff protocols are already known (Håstad et al., SICOMP 1996). In queue-free models, where each processor has a single message but processors arrive randomly, it is a long-standing conjecture of Aldous (IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 1987) that no stable backoff protocols exist for any positive arrival rate of processors. Despite exciting recent results for full-sensing protocols which assume far greater listening capabilities of the processors (see e.g. Bender et al. STOC 2020 or Chen et al. PODC 2021), this foundational question remains open; here instability is only known in general when the arrival rate of processors is at least 0.42 (Goldberg et al. SICOMP 2004). We prove Aldous' conjecture for all backoff protocols outside of a tightly-constrained special case using a new domination technique to get around the main difficulty, which is the strong dependencies between messages.
△ Less
Submitted 22 October, 2022; v1 submitted 31 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Faster Exponential-time Algorithms for Approximately Counting Independent Sets
Authors:
Leslie Ann Goldberg,
John Lapinskas,
David Richerby
Abstract:
Counting the independent sets of a graph is a classical #P-complete problem, even in the bipartite case. We give an exponential-time approximation scheme for this problem which is faster than the best known algorithm for the exact problem. The running time of our algorithm on general graphs with error tolerance $\varepsilon$ is at most $O(2^{0.2680n})$ times a polynomial in $1/\varepsilon$. On bip…
▽ More
Counting the independent sets of a graph is a classical #P-complete problem, even in the bipartite case. We give an exponential-time approximation scheme for this problem which is faster than the best known algorithm for the exact problem. The running time of our algorithm on general graphs with error tolerance $\varepsilon$ is at most $O(2^{0.2680n})$ times a polynomial in $1/\varepsilon$. On bipartite graphs, the exponential term in the running time is improved to $O(2^{0.2372n})$. Our methods combine techniques from exact exponential algorithms with techniques from approximate counting. Along the way we generalise (to the multivariate case) the FPTAS of Sinclair, Srivastava, Štefankovič and Yin for approximating the hard-core partition function on graphs with bounded connective constant. Also, we obtain an FPTAS for counting independent sets on graphs with no vertices with degree at least 6 whose neighbours' degrees sum to 27 or more. By a result of Sly, there is no FPTAS that applies to all graphs with maximum degree 6 unless $\mbox{P}=\mbox{NP}$.
△ Less
Submitted 9 September, 2021; v1 submitted 11 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
Stop** explosion by penalising transmission to hubs in scale-free spatial random graphs
Authors:
Júlia Komjáthy,
John Lapinskas,
Johannes Lengler
Abstract:
We study the spread of information in finite and infinite inhomogeneous spatial random graphs. We assume that each edge has a transmission cost that is a product of an i.i.d. random variable L and a penalty factor: edges between vertices of expected degrees w_1 and w_2 are penalised by a factor of (w_1w_2)^μfor all μ>0. We study this process for scale-free percolation, for (finite and infinite) Ge…
▽ More
We study the spread of information in finite and infinite inhomogeneous spatial random graphs. We assume that each edge has a transmission cost that is a product of an i.i.d. random variable L and a penalty factor: edges between vertices of expected degrees w_1 and w_2 are penalised by a factor of (w_1w_2)^μfor all μ>0. We study this process for scale-free percolation, for (finite and infinite) Geometric Inhomogeneous Random Graphs, and for Hyperbolic Random Graphs, all with power law degree distributions with exponent τ> 1. For τ< 3, we find a threshold behaviour, depending on how fast the cumulative distribution function of L decays at zero. If it decays at most polynomially with exponent smaller than (3-τ)/(2μ) then explosion happens, i.e., with positive probability we can reach infinitely many vertices with finite cost (for the infinite models), or reach a linear fraction of all vertices with bounded costs (for the finite models). On the other hand, if the cdf of L decays at zero at least polynomially with exponent larger than (3-τ)/(2μ), then no explosion happens. This behaviour is arguably a better representation of information spreading processes in social networks than the case without penalising factor, in which explosion always happens unless the cdf of L is doubly exponentially flat around zero. Finally, we extend the results to other penalty functions, including arbitrary polynomials in w_1 and w_2. In some cases the interesting phenomenon occurs that the model changes behaviour (from explosive to conservative and vice versa) when we reverse the role of w_1 and w_2. Intuitively, this could corresponds to reversing the flow of information: gathering information might take much longer than sending it out.
△ Less
Submitted 2 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
-
Approximately counting and sampling small witnesses using a colourful decision oracle
Authors:
Holger Dell,
John Lapinskas,
Kitty Meeks
Abstract:
In this paper, we design efficient algorithms to approximately count the number of edges of a given $k$-hypergraph, and to sample an approximately uniform random edge. The hypergraph is not given explicitly, and can be accessed only through its colourful independence oracle: The colourful independence oracle returns yes or no depending on whether a given subset of the vertices contains an edge tha…
▽ More
In this paper, we design efficient algorithms to approximately count the number of edges of a given $k$-hypergraph, and to sample an approximately uniform random edge. The hypergraph is not given explicitly, and can be accessed only through its colourful independence oracle: The colourful independence oracle returns yes or no depending on whether a given subset of the vertices contains an edge that is colourful with respect to a given vertex-colouring. Our results extend and/or strengthen recent results in the graph oracle literature due to Beame et al. (ITCS 2018), Dell and Lapinskas (STOC 2018), and Bhattacharya et al. (ISAAC 2019).
Our results have consequences for approximate counting/sampling: We can turn certain kinds of decision algorithms into approximate counting/sampling algorithms without causing much overhead in the running time. We apply this approximate-counting/sampling-to-decision reduction to key problems in fine-grained complexity (such as $k$-SUM, $k$-OV and weighted $k$-Clique) and parameterised complexity (such as induced subgraphs of size $k$ or weight-$k$ solutions to CSPs).
△ Less
Submitted 7 March, 2022; v1 submitted 10 July, 2019;
originally announced July 2019.
-
Phase Transitions of the Moran Process and Algorithmic Consequences
Authors:
Leslie Ann Goldberg,
John Lapinskas,
David Richerby
Abstract:
The Moran process is a random process that models the spread of genetic mutations through graphs. If the graph is connected, the process eventually reaches "fixation", where every vertex is a mutant, or "extinction", where no vertex is a mutant.
Our main result is an almost-tight bound on expected absorption time. For all epsilon > 0, we show that the expected absorption time on an n-vertex grap…
▽ More
The Moran process is a random process that models the spread of genetic mutations through graphs. If the graph is connected, the process eventually reaches "fixation", where every vertex is a mutant, or "extinction", where no vertex is a mutant.
Our main result is an almost-tight bound on expected absorption time. For all epsilon > 0, we show that the expected absorption time on an n-vertex graph is o(n^(3+epsilon)). In fact, we show that it is at most n^3 * exp(O((log log n)^3)) and that there is a family of graphs where it is Omega(n^3). In the course of proving our main result, we also establish a phase transition in the probability of fixation, depending on the fitness parameter r of the mutation. We show that no similar phase transition occurs for digraphs, where it is already known that the expected absorption time can also be exponential. Finally, we give an improved FPRAS for approximating the probability of fixation. Its running time is independent of the size of the graph when the maximum degree is bounded and some basic properties of the graph are given.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2019; v1 submitted 6 April, 2018;
originally announced April 2018.
-
Graph Ranking and the Cost of Sybil Defense
Authors:
Gwendolyn Farach-Colton,
Martin Farach-Colton,
Leslie Ann Goldberg,
Hanna Komlos,
John Lapinskas,
Reut Levi,
Moti Medina,
Miguel A. Mosteiro
Abstract:
Ranking functions such as PageRank assign numeric values (ranks) to nodes of graphs, most notably the web graph. Node rankings are an integral part of Internet search algorithms, since they can be used to order the results of queries. However, these ranking functions are famously subject to attacks by spammers, who modify the web graph in order to give their own pages more rank. We characterize th…
▽ More
Ranking functions such as PageRank assign numeric values (ranks) to nodes of graphs, most notably the web graph. Node rankings are an integral part of Internet search algorithms, since they can be used to order the results of queries. However, these ranking functions are famously subject to attacks by spammers, who modify the web graph in order to give their own pages more rank. We characterize the interplay between rankers and spammers as a game. We define the two critical features of this game, spam resistance and distortion, based on how spammers spam and how rankers protect against spam. We observe that all the ranking functions that are well-studied in the literature, including the original formulation of PageRank, have poor spam resistance, poor distortion, or both. Finally, we study Min-PPR, the form of PageRank used at Google itself, but which has received no (theoretical or empirical) treatment in the literature. We prove that Min-PPR has low distortion and high spam resistance. A secondary benefit is that Min-PPR comes with an explicit cost function on nodes that shows how important they are to the spammer; thus a ranker can focus their spam-detection capacity on these vulnerable nodes. Both Min-PPR and its associated cost function are straightforward to compute.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2023; v1 submitted 13 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Fine-grained reductions from approximate counting to decision
Authors:
Holger Dell,
John Lapinskas
Abstract:
In this paper, we introduce a general framework for fine-grained reductions of approximate counting problems to their decision versions. (Thus we use an oracle that decides whether any witness exists to multiplicatively approximate the number of witnesses with minimal overhead.) This mirrors a foundational result of Sipser (STOC 1983) and Stockmeyer (SICOMP 1985) in the polynomial-time setting, an…
▽ More
In this paper, we introduce a general framework for fine-grained reductions of approximate counting problems to their decision versions. (Thus we use an oracle that decides whether any witness exists to multiplicatively approximate the number of witnesses with minimal overhead.) This mirrors a foundational result of Sipser (STOC 1983) and Stockmeyer (SICOMP 1985) in the polynomial-time setting, and a similar result of Müller (IWPEC 2006) in the FPT setting. Using our framework, we obtain such reductions for some of the most important problems in fine-grained complexity: the Orthogonal Vectors problem, 3SUM, and the Negative-Weight Triangle problem (which is closely related to All-Pairs Shortest Path).
We also provide a fine-grained reduction from approximate #SAT to SAT. Suppose the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis (SETH) is false, so that for some $1<c<2$ and all $k$ there is an $O(c^n)$-time algorithm for k-SAT. Then we prove that for all $k$, there is an $O((c+o(1))^n)$-time algorithm for approximate #$k$-SAT. In particular, our result implies that the Exponential Time Hypothesis (ETH) is equivalent to the seemingly-weaker statement that there is no algorithm to approximate #3-SAT to within a factor of $1+ε$ in time $2^{o(n)}/ε^2$ (taking $ε> 0$ as part of the input).
△ Less
Submitted 23 November, 2020; v1 submitted 14 July, 2017;
originally announced July 2017.
-
A Fixed-Parameter Perspective on #BIS
Authors:
Radu Curticapean,
Holger Dell,
Fedor Fomin,
Leslie Ann Goldberg,
John Lapinskas
Abstract:
The problem of (approximately) counting the independent sets of a bipartite graph (#BIS) is the canonical approximate counting problem that is complete in the intermediate complexity class #RHΠ_1. It is believed that #BIS does not have an efficient approximation algorithm but also that it is not NP-hard. We study the robustness of the intermediate complexity of #BIS by considering variants of the…
▽ More
The problem of (approximately) counting the independent sets of a bipartite graph (#BIS) is the canonical approximate counting problem that is complete in the intermediate complexity class #RHΠ_1. It is believed that #BIS does not have an efficient approximation algorithm but also that it is not NP-hard. We study the robustness of the intermediate complexity of #BIS by considering variants of the problem parameterised by the size of the independent set. We exhaustively map the complexity landscape for three problems, with respect to exact computation and approximation and with respect to conventional and parameterised complexity. The three problems are counting independent sets of a given size, counting independent sets with a given number of vertices in one vertex class and counting maximum independent sets amongst those with a given number of vertices in one vertex class. Among other things, we show that all of these problems are NP-hard to approximate within any polynomial ratio. (This is surprising because the corresponding problems without the size parameter are complete in #RHΠ_1, and hence are not believed to be NP-hard.) We also show that the first problem is #W[1]-hard to solve exactly but admits an FPTRAS, whereas the other two are W[1]-hard to approximate even within any polynomial ratio. Finally, we show that, when restricted to graphs of bounded degree, all three problems have efficient exact fixed-parameter algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2019; v1 submitted 17 February, 2017;
originally announced February 2017.
-
Asymptotically Optimal Amplifiers for the Moran Process
Authors:
Leslie Ann Goldberg,
John Lapinskas,
Johannes Lengler,
Florian Meier,
Konstantinos Panagiotou,
Pascal Pfister
Abstract:
We study the Moran process as adapted by Lieberman, Hauert and Nowak. This is a model of an evolving population on a graph or digraph where certain individuals, called "mutants" have fitness r and other individuals, called non-mutants have fitness 1. We focus on the situation where the mutation is advantageous, in the sense that r>1. A family of digraphs is said to be strongly amplifying if the ex…
▽ More
We study the Moran process as adapted by Lieberman, Hauert and Nowak. This is a model of an evolving population on a graph or digraph where certain individuals, called "mutants" have fitness r and other individuals, called non-mutants have fitness 1. We focus on the situation where the mutation is advantageous, in the sense that r>1. A family of digraphs is said to be strongly amplifying if the extinction probability tends to 0 when the Moran process is run on digraphs in this family. The most-amplifying known family of digraphs is the family of megastars of Galanis et al. We show that this family is optimal, up to logarithmic factors, since every strongly-connected n-vertex digraph has extinction probability Omega(n^(-1/2)). Next, we show that there is an infinite family of undirected graphs, called dense incubators, whose extinction probability is O(n^(-1/3)). We show that this is optimal, up to constant factors. Finally, we introduce sparse incubators, for varying edge density, and show that the extinction probability of these graphs is O(n/m), where m is the number of edges. Again, we show that this is optimal, up to constant factors.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2018; v1 submitted 13 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
-
Amplifiers for the Moran Process
Authors:
Andreas Galanis,
Andreas Göbel,
Leslie Ann Goldberg,
John Lapinskas,
David Richerby
Abstract:
The Moran process, as studied by Lieberman, Hauert and Nowak, is a randomised algorithm modelling the spread of genetic mutations in populations. The algorithm runs on an underlying graph where individuals correspond to vertices. Initially, one vertex (chosen u.a.r.) possesses a mutation, with fitness r>1. All other individuals have fitness 1. During each step of the algorithm, an individual is ch…
▽ More
The Moran process, as studied by Lieberman, Hauert and Nowak, is a randomised algorithm modelling the spread of genetic mutations in populations. The algorithm runs on an underlying graph where individuals correspond to vertices. Initially, one vertex (chosen u.a.r.) possesses a mutation, with fitness r>1. All other individuals have fitness 1. During each step of the algorithm, an individual is chosen with probability proportional to its fitness, and its state (mutant or non-mutant) is passed on to an out-neighbour which is chosen u.a.r. If the underlying graph is strongly connected then the algorithm will eventually reach fixation, in which all individuals are mutants, or extinction, in which no individuals are mutants. An infinite family of directed graphs is said to be strongly amplifying if, for every r>1, the extinction probability tends to 0 as the number of vertices increases. Lieberman et al. proposed two potentially strongly-amplifying families - superstars and metafunnels. Heuristic arguments have been published, arguing that there are infinite families of superstars that are strongly amplifying. The same has been claimed for metafunnels. In this paper, we give the first rigorous proof that there is an infinite family of directed graphs that is strongly amplifying. We call the graphs in the family "megastars". When the algorithm is run on an n-vertex graph in this family, starting with a uniformly-chosen mutant, the extinction probability is roughly $n^{-1/2}$ (up to logarithmic factors). We prove that all infinite families of superstars and metafunnels have larger extinction probabilities (as a function of n). Finally, we prove that our analysis of megastars is fairly tight - there is no infinite family of megastars such that the Moran algorithm gives a smaller extinction probability (up to logarithmic factors).
△ Less
Submitted 5 May, 2016; v1 submitted 17 December, 2015;
originally announced December 2015.
-
Approximately counting locally-optimal structures
Authors:
Leslie Ann Goldberg,
Rob Gysel,
John Lapinskas
Abstract:
A locally-optimal structure is a combinatorial structure such as a maximal independent set that cannot be improved by certain (greedy) local moves, even though it may not be globally optimal. It is trivial to construct an independent set in a graph. It is easy to (greedily) construct a maximal independent set. However, it is NP-hard to construct a globally-optimal (maximum) independent set. In gen…
▽ More
A locally-optimal structure is a combinatorial structure such as a maximal independent set that cannot be improved by certain (greedy) local moves, even though it may not be globally optimal. It is trivial to construct an independent set in a graph. It is easy to (greedily) construct a maximal independent set. However, it is NP-hard to construct a globally-optimal (maximum) independent set. In general, constructing a locally-optimal structure is somewhat more difficult than constructing an arbitrary structure, and constructing a globally-optimal structure is more difficult than constructing a locally-optimal structure. The same situation arises with listing. The differences between the problems become obscured when we move from listing to counting because nearly everything is #P-complete. However, we highlight an interesting phenomenon that arises in approximate counting, where the situation is apparently reversed. Specifically, we show that counting maximal independent sets is complete for #P with respect to approximation-preserving reductions, whereas counting all independent sets, or counting maximum independent sets is complete for an apparently smaller class, $\mathrm{\#RH}Π_1$ which has a prominent role in the complexity of approximate counting. Motivated by the difficulty of approximately counting maximal independent sets in bipartite graphs, we also study the problem of approximately counting other locally-optimal structures that arise in algorithmic applications, particularly problems involving minimal separators and minimal edge separators. Minimal separators have applications via fixed-parameter-tractable algorithms for constructing triangulations and phylogenetic trees. Although exact (exponential-time) algorithms exist for listing these structures, we show that the counting problems are #P-complete with respect to both exact and approximation-preserving reductions.
△ Less
Submitted 18 April, 2016; v1 submitted 25 November, 2014;
originally announced November 2014.
