Showing 1–5 of 5 results for author: Ladewig, L

Knapsack Secretary Through Boosting

Authors: Andreas Abels, Leon Ladewig, Kevin Schewior, Moritz Stinzendörfer

Abstract: We revisit the knapsack-secretary problem (Babaioff et al.; APPROX 2007), a generalization of the classic secretary problem in which items have different sizes and multiple items may be selected if their total size does not exceed the capacity $B$ of a knapsack. Previous works show competitive ratios of $1/(10e)$ (Babaioff et al.), $1/8.06$ (Kesselheim et al.; STOC 2014), and $1/6.65$ (Albers, Kha… ▽ More We revisit the knapsack-secretary problem (Babaioff et al.; APPROX 2007), a generalization of the classic secretary problem in which items have different sizes and multiple items may be selected if their total size does not exceed the capacity $B$ of a knapsack. Previous works show competitive ratios of $1/(10e)$ (Babaioff et al.), $1/8.06$ (Kesselheim et al.; STOC 2014), and $1/6.65$ (Albers, Khan, and Ladewig; APPROX 2019) for the general problem but no definitive answers for the achievable competitive ratio; the best known impossibility remains $1/e$ as inherited from the classic secretary problem. In an effort to make more qualitative progress, we take an orthogonal approach and give definitive answers for special cases. Our main result is on the $1$-$2$-knapsack secretary problem, the special case in which $B=2$ and all items have sizes $1$ or $2$, arguably the simplest meaningful generalization of the secretary problem towards the knapsack secretary problem. Our algorithm is simple: It $\textit{boosts}$ the value of size-$1$ items by a factor $α>1$ and then uses the size-oblivious approach by Albers, Khan, and Ladewig. We show by a nontrivial analysis that this algorithm achieves a competitive ratio of $1/e$ if and only if $1.40\lesssimα\leq e/(e-1)\approx 1.58$. Towards understanding the general case, we then consider the case when sizes are $1$ and $B$, and $B$ is large. While it remains unclear if $1/e$ can be achieved in that case, we show that algorithms based only on the relative ranks of the item values can achieve precisely a competitive ratio of $1/(e+1)$. To show the impossibility, we use a non-trivial generalization of the factor-revealing linear program for the secretary problem (Buchbinder, Jain, and Singh; IPCO 2010). △ Less

Submitted 10 August, 2022; originally announced August 2022.

Best Fit Bin Packing with Random Order Revisited

Authors: Susanne Albers, Arindam Khan, Leon Ladewig

Abstract: Best Fit is a well known online algorithm for the bin packing problem, where a collection of one-dimensional items has to be packed into a minimum number of unit-sized bins. In a seminal work, Kenyon [SODA 1996] introduced the (asymptotic) random order ratio as an alternative performance measure for online algorithms. Here, an adversary specifies the items, but the order of arrival is drawn unifor… ▽ More Best Fit is a well known online algorithm for the bin packing problem, where a collection of one-dimensional items has to be packed into a minimum number of unit-sized bins. In a seminal work, Kenyon [SODA 1996] introduced the (asymptotic) random order ratio as an alternative performance measure for online algorithms. Here, an adversary specifies the items, but the order of arrival is drawn uniformly at random. Kenyon's result establishes lower and upper bounds of 1.08 and 1.5, respectively, for the random order ratio of Best Fit. Although this type of analysis model became increasingly popular in the field of online algorithms, no progress has been made for the Best Fit algorithm after the result of Kenyon. We study the random order ratio of Best Fit and tighten the long-standing gap by establishing an improved lower bound of 1.10. For the case where all items are larger than 1/3, we show that the random order ratio converges quickly to 1.25. It is the existence of such large items that crucially determines the performance of Best Fit in the general case. Moreover, this case is closely related to the classical maximum-cardinality matching problem in the fully online model. As a side product, we show that Best Fit satisfies a monotonicity property on such instances, unlike in the general case. In addition, we initiate the study of the absolute random order ratio for this problem. In contrast to asymptotic ratios, absolute ratios must hold even for instances that can be packed into a small number of bins. We show that the absolute random order ratio of Best Fit is at least 1.3. For the case where all items are larger than 1/3, we derive upper and lower bounds of 21/16 and 1.2, respectively. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: Full version of MFCS 2020 paper

Improved Online Algorithms for Knapsack and GAP in the Random Order Model

Authors: Susanne Albers, Arindam Khan, Leon Ladewig

Abstract: The knapsack problem is one of the classical problems in combinatorial optimization: Given a set of items, each specified by its size and profit, the goal is to find a maximum profit packing into a knapsack of bounded capacity. In the online setting, items are revealed one by one and the decision, if the current item is packed or discarded forever, must be done immediately and irrevocably upon arr… ▽ More The knapsack problem is one of the classical problems in combinatorial optimization: Given a set of items, each specified by its size and profit, the goal is to find a maximum profit packing into a knapsack of bounded capacity. In the online setting, items are revealed one by one and the decision, if the current item is packed or discarded forever, must be done immediately and irrevocably upon arrival. We study the online variant in the random order model where the input sequence is a uniform random permutation of the item set. We develop a randomized (1/6.65)-competitive algorithm for this problem, outperforming the current best algorithm of competitive ratio 1/8.06 [Kesselheim et al. SIAM J. Comp. 47(5)]. Our algorithm is based on two new insights: We introduce a novel algorithmic approach that employs two given algorithms, optimized for restricted item classes, sequentially on the input sequence. In addition, we study and exploit the relationship of the knapsack problem to the 2-secretary problem. The generalized assignment problem (GAP) includes, besides the knapsack problem, several important problems related to scheduling and matching. We show that in the same online setting, applying the proposed sequential approach yields a (1/6.99)-competitive randomized algorithm for GAP. Again, our proposed algorithm outperforms the current best result of competitive ratio 1/8.06 [Kesselheim et al. SIAM J. Comp. 47(5)]. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: Full and revised version of APPROX 2019 paper

New Results for the $k$-Secretary Problem

Authors: Susanne Albers, Leon Ladewig

Abstract: Suppose that $n$ items arrive online in random order and the goal is to select $k$ of them such that the expected sum of the selected items is maximized. The decision for any item is irrevocable and must be made on arrival without knowing future items. This problem is known as the $k$-secretary problem, which includes the classical secretary problem with the special case $k=1$. It is well-known th… ▽ More Suppose that $n$ items arrive online in random order and the goal is to select $k$ of them such that the expected sum of the selected items is maximized. The decision for any item is irrevocable and must be made on arrival without knowing future items. This problem is known as the $k$-secretary problem, which includes the classical secretary problem with the special case $k=1$. It is well-known that the latter problem can be solved by a simple algorithm of competitive ratio $1/e$ which is optimal for $n \to \infty$. Existing algorithms beating the threshold of $1/e$ either rely on involved selection policies already for $k=2$, or assume that $k$ is large. In this paper we present results for the $k$-secretary problem, considering the interesting and relevant case that $k$ is small. We focus on simple selection algorithms, accompanied by combinatorial analyses. As a main contribution we propose a natural deterministic algorithm designed to have competitive ratios strictly greater than $1/e$ for small $k \geq 2$. This algorithm is hardly more complex than the elegant strategy for the classical secretary problem, optimal for $k=1$, and works for all $k \geq 1$. We derive its competitive ratios for $k \leq 100$, ranging from $0.41$ for $k=2$ to $0.75$ for $k=100$. Moreover, we consider an algorithm proposed earlier in the literature, for which no rigorous analysis is known. We show that its competitive ratio is $0.4168$ for $k=2$, implying that the previous analysis was not tight. Our analysis reveals a surprising combinatorial property of this algorithm, which might be helpful to find a tight analysis for all $k$. △ Less

Submitted 1 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

Comments: Full and revised version of ISAAC 2019 paper

Online Strip Packing with Polynomial Migration

Authors: Klaus Jansen, Kim-Manuel Klein, Maria Kosche, Leon Ladewig

Abstract: We consider the relaxed online strip packing problem: Rectangular items arrive online and have to be packed without rotations into a strip of fixed width such that the packing height is minimized. Thereby, repacking of previously packed items is allowed. The amount of repacking is measured by the migration factor, defined as the total size of repacked items divided by the size of the arriving item… ▽ More We consider the relaxed online strip packing problem: Rectangular items arrive online and have to be packed without rotations into a strip of fixed width such that the packing height is minimized. Thereby, repacking of previously packed items is allowed. The amount of repacking is measured by the migration factor, defined as the total size of repacked items divided by the size of the arriving item. First, we show that no algorithm with constant migration factor can produce solutions with asymptotic ratio better than 4/3. Against this background, we allow amortized migration, i.e. to save migration for a later time step. As a main result, we present an AFPTAS with asymptotic ratio $1 + \mathcal{O}(ε)$ for any $ε> 0$ and amortized migration factor polynomial in $1 / ε$. To our best knowledge, this is the first algorithm for online strip packing considered in a repacking model. △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2018; v1 submitted 15 June, 2017; originally announced June 2017.

Comments: An extended abstract of the paper has been published in APPROX 2017