Bribery Can Get Harder in Structured Multiwinner Approval Election
Authors:
Bartosz Kusek,
Robert Bredereck,
Piotr Faliszewski,
Andrzej Kaczmarczyk,
DuĊĦan Knop
Abstract:
We study the complexity of constructive bribery in the context of structured multiwinner approval elections. Given such an election, we ask whether a certain candidate can join the winning committee by adding, deleting, or swap** approvals, where each such action comes at a cost and we are limited by a budget. We assume our elections to either have the candidate interval or the voter interval pr…
▽ More
We study the complexity of constructive bribery in the context of structured multiwinner approval elections. Given such an election, we ask whether a certain candidate can join the winning committee by adding, deleting, or swap** approvals, where each such action comes at a cost and we are limited by a budget. We assume our elections to either have the candidate interval or the voter interval property, and we require the property to hold also after the bribery. While structured elections usually make manipulative attacks significantly easier, our work also shows examples of the opposite behavior. We conclude by presenting preliminary insights regarding the destructive variant of our problem.
△ Less
Submitted 20 January, 2024; v1 submitted 1 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
Robustness of Greedy Approval Rules
Authors:
Piotr Faliszewski,
Grzegorz Gawron,
Bartosz Kusek
Abstract:
We study the robustness of GreedyCC, GreedyPAV, and Phargmen's sequential rule, using the framework introduced by Bredereck et al. for the case of (multiwinner) ordinal elections and adopted to the approval setting by Gawron and Faliszewski. First, we show that for each of our rules and every committee size $k$, there are elections in which adding or removing a certain approval causes the winning…
▽ More
We study the robustness of GreedyCC, GreedyPAV, and Phargmen's sequential rule, using the framework introduced by Bredereck et al. for the case of (multiwinner) ordinal elections and adopted to the approval setting by Gawron and Faliszewski. First, we show that for each of our rules and every committee size $k$, there are elections in which adding or removing a certain approval causes the winning committee to completely change (i.e., the winning committee after the operation is disjoint from the one before the operation). Second, we show that the problem of deciding how many approvals need to be added (or removed) from an election to change its outcome is NP-complete for each of our rules. Finally, we experimentally evaluate the robustness of our rules in the presence of random noise.
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
