-
Algorithmic Complexity of Isolate Secure Domination in Graphs
Authors:
Jakkepalli Pavan Kumar,
P. Venkata Subba Reddy
Abstract:
A dominating set $S$ is an Isolate Dominating Set (IDS) if the induced subgraph $G[S]$ has at least one isolated vertex. In this paper, we initiate the study of new domination parameter called, isolate secure domination. An isolate dominating set $S\subseteq V$ is an isolate secure dominating set (ISDS), if for each vertex $u \in V \setminus S$, there exists a neighboring vertex $v$ of $u$ in $S$…
▽ More
A dominating set $S$ is an Isolate Dominating Set (IDS) if the induced subgraph $G[S]$ has at least one isolated vertex. In this paper, we initiate the study of new domination parameter called, isolate secure domination. An isolate dominating set $S\subseteq V$ is an isolate secure dominating set (ISDS), if for each vertex $u \in V \setminus S$, there exists a neighboring vertex $v$ of $u$ in $S$ such that $(S \setminus \{v\}) \cup \{u\}$ is an IDS of $G$. The minimum cardinality of an ISDS of $G$ is called as an isolate secure domination number, and is denoted by $γ_{0s}(G)$. Given a graph $ G=(V,E)$ and a positive integer $ k,$ the ISDM problem is to check whether $ G $ has an isolate secure dominating set of size at most $ k.$ We prove that ISDM is NP-complete even when restricted to bipartite graphs and split graphs. We also show that ISDM can be solved in linear time for graphs of bounded tree-width.
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Algorithmic Aspects of 2-Secure Domination in Graphs
Authors:
J. Pavan Kumar,
P. Venkata Subba Reddy
Abstract:
Let $G(V,E)$ be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A dominating set $S \subseteq V(G)$ is called a $2$-\textit{secure dominating set} ($2$-SDS) in $G$, if for every pair of distinct vertices $u_1,u_2 \in V(G)$ there exists a pair of distinct vertices $v_1,v_2 \in S$ such that $v_1 \in N[u_1]$, $v_2 \in N[u_2]$ and $(S \setminus \{v_1,v_2\}) \cup \{u_1,u_2 \}$ is a dominating set in $G$. The…
▽ More
Let $G(V,E)$ be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A dominating set $S \subseteq V(G)$ is called a $2$-\textit{secure dominating set} ($2$-SDS) in $G$, if for every pair of distinct vertices $u_1,u_2 \in V(G)$ there exists a pair of distinct vertices $v_1,v_2 \in S$ such that $v_1 \in N[u_1]$, $v_2 \in N[u_2]$ and $(S \setminus \{v_1,v_2\}) \cup \{u_1,u_2 \}$ is a dominating set in $G$. The $2$\textit{-secure domination number} denoted by $γ_{2s}(G)$, equals the minimum cardinality of a $2$-SDS in $G$. Given a graph $ G$ and a positive integer $ k,$ the $ 2 $-Secure Domination ($ 2 $-SDM) problem is to check whether $ G $ has a $ 2 $-secure dominating set of size at most $ k.$ It is known that $ 2 $-SDM is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we prove that the $ 2 $-SDM problem is NP-complete for planar graphs and doubly chordal graphs, a subclass of chordal graphs. We strengthen the NP-complete result for bipartite graphs, by proving this problem is NP-complete for some subclasses of bipartite graphs namely, star convex bipartite, comb convex bipartite graphs. We prove that $ 2 $-SDM is linear time solvable for bounded tree-width graphs. We also show that the $ 2 $-SDM is W[2]-hard even for split graphs. The Minimum $ 2 $-Secure Dominating Set (M2SDS) problem is to find a $ 2 $-secure dominating set of minimum size in the input graph. We propose a $ Δ(G)+1 $ $ - $ approximation algorithm for M2SDS, where $ Δ(G) $ is the maximum degree of the input graph $ G $ and prove that M2SDS cannot be approximated within $ (1 - ε) \ln(| V | ) $ for any $ ε> 0 $ unless $ NP \subseteq DTIME(| V |^{ O(\log \log | V | )}) $. % even for bipartite graphs. A secure dominating set of a graph \textit{defends} one attack at any vertex of the graph. Finally, we show that the M2SDS is APX-complete for graphs with $Δ(G)=4.$
△ Less
Submitted 5 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Algorithmic Complexity of Secure Connected Domination in Graphs
Authors:
Jakkepalli Pavan Kumar,
P. Venkata Subba Reddy,
S. Arumugam
Abstract:
Let $G = (V,E)$ be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A connected (total) dominating set $S \subseteq V$ is a secure connected (total) dominating set of $G$, if for each $ u \in V \setminus S$, there exists $v \in S$ such that $uv \in E$ and $(S \setminus \lbrace v \rbrace) \cup \lbrace u \rbrace $ is a connected (total) dominating set of $G$. The minimum cardinality of a secure connected (…
▽ More
Let $G = (V,E)$ be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A connected (total) dominating set $S \subseteq V$ is a secure connected (total) dominating set of $G$, if for each $ u \in V \setminus S$, there exists $v \in S$ such that $uv \in E$ and $(S \setminus \lbrace v \rbrace) \cup \lbrace u \rbrace $ is a connected (total) dominating set of $G$. The minimum cardinality of a secure connected (total) dominating set of $G$ denoted by $ γ_{sc} (G) (γ_{st}(G))$, is called the secure connected (total) domination number of $G$. In this paper, we show that the decision problems corresponding to secure connected domination number and secure total domination number are NP-complete even when restricted to split graphs or bipartite graphs. The NP-complete reductions also show that these problems are w[2]-hard. We also prove that the secure connected domination problem is linear time solvable in block graphs and threshold graphs.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Algorithmic Aspects of Some Variants of Domination in Graphs
Authors:
Jakkepalli Pavan Kumar,
P. Venkata Subba Reddy
Abstract:
A set $S \subseteq V$ is a dominating set in G if for every u \in V \ S, there exists $v \in S$ such that $(u,v) \in E$, i.e., $N[S] = V$. A dominating set $S$ is an Isolate Dominating Set} (IDS) if the induced subgraph $G[S]$ has at least one isolated vertex. It is known that Isolate Domination Decision problem (IDOM) is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we extend this by showing t…
▽ More
A set $S \subseteq V$ is a dominating set in G if for every u \in V \ S, there exists $v \in S$ such that $(u,v) \in E$, i.e., $N[S] = V$. A dominating set $S$ is an Isolate Dominating Set} (IDS) if the induced subgraph $G[S]$ has at least one isolated vertex. It is known that Isolate Domination Decision problem (IDOM) is NP-complete for bipartite graphs. In this paper, we extend this by showing that the IDOM is NP-complete for split graphs and perfect elimination bipartite graphs, a subclass of bipartite graphs. A set $S \subseteq V$ is an independent set if G[S] has no edge. A set S \subseteq V is a secure dominating set of $G$ if, for each vertex $u \in V \setminus S$, there exists a vertex $v \in S$ such that $ (u,v) \in E $ and $(S \ \{v\}) \cup \{u\}$ is a dominating set of $G$. In addition, we initiate the study of a new domination parameter called, independent secure domination. A set $S\subseteq V$ is an Independent Secure Dominating Set (InSDS) if $S$ is an independent set and a secure dominating set of $G$. The minimum size of an InSDS in $G$ is called the independent secure domination number of $G$ and is denoted by $γ_{is}(G)$. Given a graph $ G$ and a positive integer $ k,$ the InSDM problem is to check whether $ G $ has an independent secure dominating set of size at most $ k.$ We prove that InSDM is NP-complete for bipartite graphs and linear time solvable for bounded tree-width graphs and threshold graphs, a subclass of split graphs. The MInSDS problem is to find an independent secure dominating set of minimum size, in the input graph. Finally, we prove that the MInSDS problem is APX-hard for graphs with maximum degree $5.$
△ Less
Submitted 12 February, 2020; v1 submitted 30 January, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Algorithmic Aspects of Secure Connected Domination in Graphs
Authors:
Jakkepalli Pavan Kumar,
P. Venkata Subba Reddy
Abstract:
Let $G = (V,E)$ be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A connected dominating set $S \subseteq V$ is a secure connected dominating set of $G$, if for each $ u \in V\setminus S$, there exists $v\in S$ such that $(u,v) \in E$ and the set $(S \setminus \{ v \}) \cup \{ u \} $ is a connected dominating set of $G$. The minimum size of a secure connected dominating set of $G$ denoted by…
▽ More
Let $G = (V,E)$ be a simple, undirected and connected graph. A connected dominating set $S \subseteq V$ is a secure connected dominating set of $G$, if for each $ u \in V\setminus S$, there exists $v\in S$ such that $(u,v) \in E$ and the set $(S \setminus \{ v \}) \cup \{ u \} $ is a connected dominating set of $G$. The minimum size of a secure connected dominating set of $G$ denoted by $ γ_{sc} (G)$, is called the secure connected domination number of $G$. Given a graph $ G$ and a positive integer $ k,$ the Secure Connected Domination (SCDM) problem is to check whether $ G $ has a secure connected dominating set of size at most $ k.$ In this paper, we prove that the SCDM problem is NP-complete for doubly chordal graphs, a subclass of chordal graphs. We investigate the complexity of this problem for some subclasses of bipartite graphs namely, star convex bipartite, comb convex bipartite, chordal bipartite and chain graphs. The Minimum Secure Connected Dominating Set (MSCDS) problem is to find a secure connected dominating set of minimum size in the input graph. We propose a $ (Δ(G)+1) $ - approximation algorithm for MSCDS, where $ Δ(G) $ is the maximum degree of the input graph $ G $ and prove that MSCDS cannot be approximated within $ (1 -ε) ln(| V |)$ for any $ ε> 0 $ unless $ NP \subseteq DTIME(| V |^{O(log log | V |)})$ even for bipartite graphs. Finally, we show that the MSCDS is APX-complete for graphs with $Δ(G)=4$.
△ Less
Submitted 30 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
