-
A barrier for further approximating Sorting By Transpositions
Authors:
Luiz Augusto G. da Silva,
Luis Antonio B. Kowada,
Maria Emília M. T. Walter
Abstract:
The Transposition Distance Problem (TDP) is a classical problem in genome rearrangements which seeks to determine the minimum number of transpositions needed to transform a linear chromosome into another represented by the permutations $π$ and $σ$, respectively. This paper focuses on the equivalent problem of Sorting By Transpositions (SBT), where $σ$ is the identity permutation $ι$. Specifically,…
▽ More
The Transposition Distance Problem (TDP) is a classical problem in genome rearrangements which seeks to determine the minimum number of transpositions needed to transform a linear chromosome into another represented by the permutations $π$ and $σ$, respectively. This paper focuses on the equivalent problem of Sorting By Transpositions (SBT), where $σ$ is the identity permutation $ι$. Specifically, we investigate palisades, a family of permutations that are "hard" to sort, as they require numerous transpositions above the celebrated lower bound devised by Bafna and Pevzner. By determining the transposition distance of palisades, we were able to provide the exact transposition diameter for $3$-permutations (TD3), a special subset of the Symmetric Group $S_n$, essential for the study of approximate solutions for SBT using the simplification technique. The exact value for TD3 has remained unknown since Elias and Hartman showed an upper bound for it. Another consequence of determining the transposition distance of palisades is that, using as lower bound the one by Bafna and Pevzner, it is impossible to guarantee approximation ratios lower than $1.375$ when approximating SBT. This finding has significant implications for the study of SBT, as this problem has been subject of intense research efforts for the past 25 years.
△ Less
Submitted 8 July, 2023; v1 submitted 27 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
-
Most direct product of graphs are Type 1
Authors:
Diane Castonguay,
Celina M. H. de Figueiredo,
Luis Antonio Kowada,
Caroline Reis Patrão,
Diana Sasaki
Abstract:
A \textit{$k$-total coloring} of a graph $G$ is an assignment of $k$ colors to its elements (vertices and edges) so that adjacent or incident elements have different colors. The total chromatic number is the smallest integer $k$ for which the graph $G$ has a $k$-total coloring. Clearly, this number is at least $Δ(G)+1$, where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. When the lower bound is reached, th…
▽ More
A \textit{$k$-total coloring} of a graph $G$ is an assignment of $k$ colors to its elements (vertices and edges) so that adjacent or incident elements have different colors. The total chromatic number is the smallest integer $k$ for which the graph $G$ has a $k$-total coloring. Clearly, this number is at least $Δ(G)+1$, where $Δ(G)$ is the maximum degree of $G$. When the lower bound is reached, the graph is said to be Type~1. The upper bound of $Δ(G)+2$ is a central problem that has been open for fifty years, is verified for graphs with maximum degree 4 but not for regular graphs.
Most classified direct product of graphs are Type~1. The particular cases of the direct product of cycle graphs $C_m \times C_n$, for $m =3p, 5\ell$ and $8\ell$ with $p \geq 2$ and $\ell \geq 1$, and arbitrary $n \geq 3$, were previously known to be Type 1 and motivated the conjecture that, except for $C_4 \times C_4$, all direct product of cycle graphs $C_m \times C_n$ with $m,n \geq 3$ are Type 1.
We give a general pattern proving that all $C_m \times C_n$ are Type 1, except for $C_4 \times C_4$. dditionally, we investigate sufficient conditions to ensure that the direct product reaches the lower bound for the total chromatic number.
△ Less
Submitted 27 October, 2021;
originally announced October 2021.
-
A new 1.375-approximation algorithm for Sorting By Transpositions
Authors:
L. A. G. Silva,
L. A. B. Kowada,
N. R. Rocco,
M. E. M. T. Walter
Abstract:
In genome rearrangements, the mutational event transposition swaps two adjacent blocks of genes in one chromosome. The Transposition Distance Problem (TDP) aims to find the minimum number of transpositions required to transform one chromosome into another, both represented as permutations. The TDP can be reduced to the problem of Sorting by Transpositions (SBT).
SBT is $\mathcal{NP}$-hard and th…
▽ More
In genome rearrangements, the mutational event transposition swaps two adjacent blocks of genes in one chromosome. The Transposition Distance Problem (TDP) aims to find the minimum number of transpositions required to transform one chromosome into another, both represented as permutations. The TDP can be reduced to the problem of Sorting by Transpositions (SBT).
SBT is $\mathcal{NP}$-hard and the best approximation algorithm with a $1.375$ ratio was proposed by Elias and Hartman. Their algorithm employs simplification, a technique used to transform an input permutation $π$ into a simple permutation $\hatπ$, presumably easier to handle with. The permutation $\hatπ$ is obtained by inserting new symbols into $π$ in a way that the lower bound of the transposition distance of $π$ is kept on $\hatπ$. The simplification is guaranteed to keep the lower bound, not the transposition distance.
In this paper, we first show that the algorithm of Elias and Hartman (EH algorithm) may require one extra transposition above the approximation ratio of $1.375$, depending on how the input permutation is simplified. Next, using an algebraic approach, we propose a new upper bound for the transposition distance and a new $1.375$-approximation algorithm to solve SBT skip** simplification and ensuring the approximation ratio of $1.375$ for all $S_n$.
We implemented our algorithm and EH's. Regarding the implementation of the EH algorithm, two issues needed to be fixed. We tested both algorithms against all permutations of size $n$, $2\leq n \leq 12$. The results show that the EH algorithm exceeds the approximation ratio of $1.375$ for permutations with a size greater than $7$. Finally, we investigate the performance of both implementations on longer permutations of maximum length $500$.
△ Less
Submitted 4 November, 2021; v1 submitted 30 January, 2020;
originally announced January 2020.
-
Cayley graphs and analysis of quantum cost for reversible circuit synthesis
Authors:
A. C. Ribeiro,
C. M. H. de Figueiredo,
F. L. Marquezino,
L. A. B. Kowada
Abstract:
We propose the theory of Cayley graphs as a framework to analyse gate counts and quantum costs resulting from reversible circuit synthesis. Several methods have been proposed in the reversible logic synthesis literature by considering different libraries whose gates are associated to the generating sets of certain Cayley graphs. In a Cayley graph, the distance between two vertices corresponds to t…
▽ More
We propose the theory of Cayley graphs as a framework to analyse gate counts and quantum costs resulting from reversible circuit synthesis. Several methods have been proposed in the reversible logic synthesis literature by considering different libraries whose gates are associated to the generating sets of certain Cayley graphs. In a Cayley graph, the distance between two vertices corresponds to the optimal circuit size. The lower bound for the diameter of Cayley graphs is also a lower bound for the worst case for any algorithm that uses the corresponding gate library. In this paper, we study two Cayley graphs on the Symmetric Group $S_{2^n}$: the first, denoted by $I_n$, is defined by a generating set associated to generalized Toffoli gates; and the second, the hypercube Cayley graph $H_n$, is defined by a generating set associated to multiple-control Toffoli gates. Those two Cayley graphs have degree $n2^{n-1}$ and order $2^n!$. Maslov, Dueck and Miller proposed a reversible circuit synthesis that we model by the Cayley graph $I_n$. We propose a synthesis algorithm based on the Cayley graph $H_n$ with upper bound of $(n-1)2^{n}+1$ multiple-control Toffoli gates. In addition, the diameter of the Cayley graph $H_n$ gives a lower bound of $n2^{n-1}$.
△ Less
Submitted 14 September, 2012;
originally announced September 2012.
