Showing 1–25 of 25 results for author: Koutsoupias, E

Balancing Participation and Decentralization in Proof-of-Stake Cryptocurrencies

Authors: Aggelos Kiayias, Elias Koutsoupias, Francisco Marmolejo-Cossio, Aikaterini-Panagiota Stouka

Abstract: Proof-of-stake blockchain protocols have emerged as a compelling paradigm for organizing distributed ledger systems. In proof-of-stake (PoS), a subset of stakeholders participate in validating a growing ledger of transactions. For the safety and liveness of the underlying system, it is desirable for the set of validators to include multiple independent entities as well as represent a non-negligibl… ▽ More Proof-of-stake blockchain protocols have emerged as a compelling paradigm for organizing distributed ledger systems. In proof-of-stake (PoS), a subset of stakeholders participate in validating a growing ledger of transactions. For the safety and liveness of the underlying system, it is desirable for the set of validators to include multiple independent entities as well as represent a non-negligible percentage of the total stake issued. In this paper, we study a secondary form of participation in the transaction validation process, which takes the form of stake delegation, whereby an agent delegates their stake to an active validator who acts as a stake pool operator. We study payment schemes that reward agents as a function of their collective actions regarding stake pool operation and delegation. Such payment schemes serve as a mechanism to incentivize participation in the validation process while maintaining decentralization. We observe natural trade-offs between these objectives and the total expenditure required to run the relevant payment schemes. Ultimately, we provide a family of payment schemes which can strike different balances between these competing objectives at equilibrium in a Bayesian game theoretic framework. △ Less

Submitted 11 July, 2024; originally announced July 2024.

Comments: 37 pages, 16 figures, accepted for publication at The 17th International Symposium on Algorithmic Game Theory (SAGT)

Tiered Mechanisms for Blockchain Transaction Fees

Authors: Aggelos Kiayias, Elias Koutsoupias, Philip Lazos, Giorgos Panagiotakos

Abstract: Blockchain systems come with the promise of being inclusive for a variety of decentralized applications (DApps) that can serve different purposes and have different urgency requirements. Despite this, the transaction fee mechanisms currently deployed in popular platforms as well as previous modeling attempts for the associated mechanism design problem focus on an approach that favors increasing pr… ▽ More Blockchain systems come with the promise of being inclusive for a variety of decentralized applications (DApps) that can serve different purposes and have different urgency requirements. Despite this, the transaction fee mechanisms currently deployed in popular platforms as well as previous modeling attempts for the associated mechanism design problem focus on an approach that favors increasing prices in favor of those clients who value immediate service during periods of congestion. To address this issue, we introduce a model that captures the traffic diversity of blockchain systems and a tiered pricing mechanism that is capable of implementing more inclusive transaction policies. In this model, we demonstrate formally that EIP-1559, the transaction fee mechanism currently used in Ethereum, is not inclusive and demonstrate experimentally that its prices surge horizontally during periods of congestion. On the other hand, we prove formally that our mechanism achieves stable prices in expectation and we provide experimental results that establish that prices for transactions can be kept low for low urgency transactions, resulting in a diverse set of transaction types entering the blockchain. At the same time, perhaps surprisingly, our mechanism does not necessarily sacrifice revenue since the lowering of the prices for low urgency transactions can be covered from high urgency ones due to the price discrimination ability of the mechanism. △ Less

Submitted 12 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

A proof of the Nisan-Ronen conjecture

Authors: George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, Annamaria Kovacs

Abstract: Noam Nisan and Amir Ronen conjectured that the best approximation ratio of deterministic truthful mechanisms for makespan-minimization for $n$ unrelated machines is $n$. This work validates the conjecture. Noam Nisan and Amir Ronen conjectured that the best approximation ratio of deterministic truthful mechanisms for makespan-minimization for $n$ unrelated machines is $n$. This work validates the conjecture. △ Less

Submitted 27 January, 2023; originally announced January 2023.

Incentives Against Power Grabs or How to Engineer the Revolution in a Pooled Proof of Stake System

Authors: Aggelos Kiayias, Elias Koutsoupias, Aikaterini-Panagiota Stouka

Abstract: Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain systems, especially those that allow stakeholders to organize themselves in ``stake-pools'', have emerged as a compelling paradigm for the deployment of large scale distributed ledgers. A stake-pool operates a node that engages in the PoS protocol and potentially represents a large number of smaller stakeholders. While such pooled PoS operation is attractive from va… ▽ More Proof-of-Stake (PoS) blockchain systems, especially those that allow stakeholders to organize themselves in ``stake-pools'', have emerged as a compelling paradigm for the deployment of large scale distributed ledgers. A stake-pool operates a node that engages in the PoS protocol and potentially represents a large number of smaller stakeholders. While such pooled PoS operation is attractive from various angles, it also exhibits a significant shortcoming that, so far and to the best of our knowledge, has not been sufficiently understood or investigated. Pooled PoS operation, to be effective and not lead to sub-optimal dictatorial or cartel-like configurations, should enable the stakeholders to revoke and re-delegate their stake in a way that is aligned with their incentives. However, given that stake-pool operators are exactly those entities who determine what transactions are to be recorded in the ledger, they are quite likely to form a cartel and censor any transaction they want, such as those that attempt to adjust the current stake-pool lineup. In this way, a power grab takes place, where the stake-pool cartel perpetuates its control over the PoS system. We first model and observe formally the emergence of the above problem in pooled PoS systems, and then we describe an anti-censorship mechanism that takes advantage of the underlying cryptographic functions of the ledger and the nature of peer-to-peer networks to diffuse information without suppression. We provide a thorough game-theoretic analysis of this mechanism discovering various types of Nash equilibria which demonstrate that the ``revolution'', i.e., the strategic decision of pool members to withdraw support from a censoring cartel as well as the pool operators to step down, can be incentivized, under suitable and plausible conditions in the utility functions of the involved participants. △ Less

Submitted 16 November, 2021; originally announced November 2021.

Comments: 2021 IEEE International Conference on Decentralized Applications and Infrastructures (DAPPS)

Journal ref: 2021 IEEE DAPPS, 2021, pp. 1-10

Truthful allocation in graphs and hypergraphs

Authors: George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, Annamaria Kovacs

Abstract: We study truthful mechanisms for allocation problems in graphs, both for the minimization (i.e., scheduling) and maximization (i.e., auctions) setting. The minimization problem is a special case of the well-studied unrelated machines scheduling problem, in which every given task can be executed only by two pre-specified machines in the case of graphs or a given subset of machines in the case of hy… ▽ More We study truthful mechanisms for allocation problems in graphs, both for the minimization (i.e., scheduling) and maximization (i.e., auctions) setting. The minimization problem is a special case of the well-studied unrelated machines scheduling problem, in which every given task can be executed only by two pre-specified machines in the case of graphs or a given subset of machines in the case of hypergraphs. This corresponds to a multigraph whose nodes are the machines and its hyperedges are the tasks. This class of problems belongs to multidimensional mechanism design, for which there are no known general mechanisms other than the VCG and its generalization to affine minimizers. We propose a new class of mechanisms that are truthful and have significantly better performance than affine minimizers in many settings. Specifically, we provide upper and lower bounds for truthful mechanisms for general multigraphs, as well as special classes of graphs such as stars, trees, planar graphs, $k$-degenerate graphs, and graphs of a given treewidth. We also consider the objective of minimizing or maximizing the $L^p$-norm of the values of the players, a generalization of the makespan minimization that corresponds to $p=\infty$, and extend the results to any $p>0$. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

Towards the k-server conjecture: A unifying potential, pushing the frontier to the circle

Authors: Christian Coester, Elias Koutsoupias

Abstract: The $k$-server conjecture, first posed by Manasse, McGeoch and Sleator in 1988, states that a $k$-competitive deterministic algorithm for the $k$-server problem exists. It is conjectured that the work function algorithm (WFA) achieves this guarantee, a multi-purpose algorithm with applications to various online problems. This has been shown for several special cases: $k=2$, $(k+1)$-point metrics,… ▽ More The $k$-server conjecture, first posed by Manasse, McGeoch and Sleator in 1988, states that a $k$-competitive deterministic algorithm for the $k$-server problem exists. It is conjectured that the work function algorithm (WFA) achieves this guarantee, a multi-purpose algorithm with applications to various online problems. This has been shown for several special cases: $k=2$, $(k+1)$-point metrics, $(k+2)$-point metrics, the line metric, weighted star metrics, and $k=3$ in the Manhattan plane. The known proofs of these results are based on potential functions tied to each particular special case, thus requiring six different potential functions for the six cases. We present a single potential function proving $k$-competitiveness of WFA for all these cases. We also use this potential to show $k$-competitiveness of WFA on multiray spaces and for $k=3$ on trees. While the DoubleCoverage algorithm was known to be $k$-competitive for these latter cases, it has been open for WFA. Our potential captures a type of lazy adversary and thus shows that in all settled cases, the worst-case adversary is lazy. Chrobak and Larmore conjectured in 1992 that a potential capturing the lazy adversary would resolve the $k$-server conjecture. To our major surprise, this is not the case, as we show (using connections to the $k$-taxi problem) that our potential fails for three servers on the circle. Thus, our potential highlights laziness of the adversary as a fundamental property that is shared by all settled cases but violated in general. On the one hand, this weakens our confidence in the validity of the $k$-server conjecture. On the other hand, if the $k$-server conjecture holds, then we believe it can be proved by a variant of our potential. △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

On the Nisan-Ronen conjecture

Authors: George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, Annamaria Kovacs

Abstract: The Nisan-Ronen conjecture states that no truthful mechanism for makespan-minimization when allocating $m$ tasks to $n$ unrelated machines can have approximation ratio less than $n$. Over more than two decades since its formulation, little progress has been made in resolving it and the best known lower bound is still a small constant. This work makes progress towards validating the conjecture by s… ▽ More The Nisan-Ronen conjecture states that no truthful mechanism for makespan-minimization when allocating $m$ tasks to $n$ unrelated machines can have approximation ratio less than $n$. Over more than two decades since its formulation, little progress has been made in resolving it and the best known lower bound is still a small constant. This work makes progress towards validating the conjecture by showing a lower bound of $1+\sqrt{n-1}$. △ Less

Submitted 7 June, 2021; v1 submitted 29 November, 2020; originally announced November 2020.

Comments: Improvements on presentation

Fairness and Efficiency in DAG-based Cryptocurrencies

Authors: Georgios Birmpas, Elias Koutsoupias, Philip Lazos, Francisco J. Marmolejo-Cossío

Abstract: Bitcoin is a decentralised digital currency that serves as an alternative to existing transaction systems based on an external central authority for security. Although Bitcoin has many desirable properties, one of its fundamental shortcomings is its inability to process transactions at high rates. To address this challenge, many subsequent protocols either modify the rules of block acceptance (lon… ▽ More Bitcoin is a decentralised digital currency that serves as an alternative to existing transaction systems based on an external central authority for security. Although Bitcoin has many desirable properties, one of its fundamental shortcomings is its inability to process transactions at high rates. To address this challenge, many subsequent protocols either modify the rules of block acceptance (longest chain rule) and reward, or alter the graphical structure of the public ledger from a tree to a directed acyclic graph (DAG). Motivated by these approaches, we introduce a new general framework that captures ledger growth for a large class of DAG-based implementations. With this in hand, and by assuming honest miner behaviour, we (experimentally) explore how different DAG-based protocols perform in terms of fairness, i.e., if the block reward of a miner is proportional to their hash power, as well as efficiency, i.e. what proportion of user transactions a ledger deems valid after a certain length of time. Our results demonstrate fundamental structural limits on how well DAG-based ledger protocols cope with a high transaction load. More specifically, we show that even in a scenario where every miner on the system is honest in terms of when they publish blocks, what they point to, and what transactions each block contains, fairness and efficiency of the ledger can break down at specific hash rates if miners have differing levels of connectivity to the P2P network sustaining the protocol. △ Less

Submitted 4 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

On the Nisan-Ronen conjecture for submodular valuations

Authors: George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, Annamaria Kovacs

Abstract: We consider incentive compatible mechanisms for a domain that is very close to the domain of scheduling $n$ unrelated machines: the single exception is that the valuation of just one machine is submodular. For the scheduling problem with such cost functions, we give a lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ on the approximation ratio of incentive compatible deterministic mechanisms. This is a strong informat… ▽ More We consider incentive compatible mechanisms for a domain that is very close to the domain of scheduling $n$ unrelated machines: the single exception is that the valuation of just one machine is submodular. For the scheduling problem with such cost functions, we give a lower bound of $Ω(\sqrt{n})$ on the approximation ratio of incentive compatible deterministic mechanisms. This is a strong information-theoretic impossibility result on the approximation ratio of mechanisms on relatively simple domains. The lower bound of the current work assumes no restriction on the mechanism side, but an expanded class of valuations, in contrast to previous general results on the Nisan-Ronen conjecture that hold for only special classes of mechanisms such as local, strongly monotone, and anonymous mechanisms. Our approach is based on a novel characterization of appropriately selected smaller instances that allows us to focus on particular type of algorithms (linear mechanisms), from which we extract a locality property that gives the lower bound. △ Less

Submitted 30 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Blockchain Mining Games with Pay Forward

Authors: Elias Koutsoupias, Philip Lazos, Paolo Serafino, Foluso Ogunlana

Abstract: We study the strategic implications that arise from adding one extra option to the miners participating in the bitcoin protocol. We propose that when adding a block, miners also have the ability to pay forward an amount to be collected by the first miner who successfully extends their branch, giving them the power to influence the incentives for mining. We formulate a stochastic game for the study… ▽ More We study the strategic implications that arise from adding one extra option to the miners participating in the bitcoin protocol. We propose that when adding a block, miners also have the ability to pay forward an amount to be collected by the first miner who successfully extends their branch, giving them the power to influence the incentives for mining. We formulate a stochastic game for the study of such incentives and show that with this added option, smaller miners can guarantee that the best response of even substantially more powerful miners is to follow the expected behavior intended by the protocol designer. △ Less

Submitted 17 May, 2019; originally announced May 2019.

Online Trading as a Secretary Problem

Authors: Elias Koutsoupias, Philip Lazos

Abstract: We consider the online problem in which an intermediary trades identical items with a sequence of n buyers and n sellers, each of unit demand. We assume that the values of the traders are selected by an adversary and the sequence is randomly permuted. We give competitive algorithms for two objectives: welfare and gain-from-trade. We consider the online problem in which an intermediary trades identical items with a sequence of n buyers and n sellers, each of unit demand. We assume that the values of the traders are selected by an adversary and the sequence is randomly permuted. We give competitive algorithms for two objectives: welfare and gain-from-trade. △ Less

Submitted 16 July, 2020; v1 submitted 28 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Better Bounds for Online Line Chasing

Authors: Marcin Bienkowski, Jarosław Byrka, Marek Chrobak, Christian Coester, Łukasz Jeż, Elias Koutsoupias

Abstract: We study online competitive algorithms for the \emph{line chasing problem} in Euclidean spaces $\reals^d$, where the input consists of an initial point $P_0$ and a sequence of lines $X_1,X_2,...,X_m$, revealed one at a time. At each step $t$, when the line $X_t$ is revealed, the algorithm must determine a point $P_t\in X_t$. An online algorithm is called $c$-competitive if for any input sequence t… ▽ More We study online competitive algorithms for the \emph{line chasing problem} in Euclidean spaces $\reals^d$, where the input consists of an initial point $P_0$ and a sequence of lines $X_1,X_2,...,X_m$, revealed one at a time. At each step $t$, when the line $X_t$ is revealed, the algorithm must determine a point $P_t\in X_t$. An online algorithm is called $c$-competitive if for any input sequence the path $P_0, P_1,...,P_m$ it computes has length at most $c$ times the optimum path. The line chasing problem is a variant of a more general convex body chasing problem, where the sets $X_t$ are arbitrary convex sets. To date, the best competitive ratio for the line chasing problem was $28.1$, even in the plane. We significantly improve this bound, by providing a~$3$-competitive algorithm for any dimension $d$. We also improve the lower bound on the competitive ratio, from $1.412$ to $1.5358$. △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2019; v1 submitted 22 November, 2018; originally announced November 2018.

Reward Sharing Schemes for Stake Pools

Authors: Lars Brünjes, Aggelos Kiayias, Elias Koutsoupias, Aikaterini-Panagiota Stouka

Abstract: We introduce and study reward sharing schemes (RSS) that promote the fair formation of {\em stake pools}\ in collaborative projects that involve a large number of stakeholders such as the maintenance of a proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain. Our mechanisms are parameterized by a target value for the desired number of pools. We show that by properly incentivizing participants, the desired number of sta… ▽ More We introduce and study reward sharing schemes (RSS) that promote the fair formation of {\em stake pools}\ in collaborative projects that involve a large number of stakeholders such as the maintenance of a proof-of-stake (PoS) blockchain. Our mechanisms are parameterized by a target value for the desired number of pools. We show that by properly incentivizing participants, the desired number of stake pools is a Nash equilibrium arising from rational play. Our equilibria also exhibit an efficiency / security tradeoff via a parameter that calibrates between including pools with the smallest cost and providing protection against Sybil attacks, the setting where a single stakeholder creates a large number of pools in the hopes to dominate the collaborative project. We then describe how RSS can be deployed in the PoS setting, mitigating a number of potential deployment attacks and protocol deviations that include censoring transactions, performing Sybil attacks with the objective to control the majority of stake, lying about the actual cost and others. Finally, we experimentally demonstrate fast convergence to equilibria in dynamic environments where players react to each other's strategic moves over an indefinite period of interactive play. We also show how simple reward sharing schemes that are seemingly more "fair", perhaps counterintuitively, converge to centralized equilibria. △ Less

Submitted 6 June, 2020; v1 submitted 30 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

The Online $k$-Taxi Problem

Authors: Christian Coester, Elias Koutsoupias

Abstract: We consider the online $k$-taxi problem, a generalization of the $k$-server problem, in which $k$ taxis serve a sequence of requests in a metric space. A request consists of two points $s$ and $t$, representing a passenger that wants to be carried by a taxi from $s$ to $t$. The goal is to serve all requests while minimizing the total distance traveled by all taxis. The problem comes in two flavors… ▽ More We consider the online $k$-taxi problem, a generalization of the $k$-server problem, in which $k$ taxis serve a sequence of requests in a metric space. A request consists of two points $s$ and $t$, representing a passenger that wants to be carried by a taxi from $s$ to $t$. The goal is to serve all requests while minimizing the total distance traveled by all taxis. The problem comes in two flavors, called the easy and the hard $k$-taxi problem: In the easy $k$-taxi problem, the cost is defined as the total distance traveled by the taxis; in the hard $k$-taxi problem, the cost is only the distance of empty runs. The hard $k$-taxi problem is substantially more difficult than the easy version with at least an exponential deterministic competitive ratio, $Ω(2^k)$, admitting a reduction from the layered graph traversal problem. In contrast, the easy $k$-taxi problem has exactly the same competitive ratio as the $k$-server problem. We focus mainly on the hard version. For hierarchically separated trees (HSTs), we present a memoryless randomized algorithm with competitive ratio $2^k-1$ against adaptive online adversaries and provide two matching lower bounds: for arbitrary algorithms against adaptive adversaries and for memoryless algorithms against oblivious adversaries. Due to well-known HST embedding techniques, the algorithm implies a randomized $O(2^k\log n)$-competitive algorithm for arbitrary $n$-point metrics. This is the first competitive algorithm for the hard $k$-taxi problem for general finite metric spaces and general $k$. For the special case of $k=2$, we obtain a precise answer of $9$ for the competitive ratio in general metrics. With an algorithm based on growing, shrinking and shifting regions, we show that one can achieve a constant competitive ratio also for the hard $3$-taxi problem on the line (abstracting the scheduling of three elevators). △ Less

Submitted 5 November, 2018; v1 submitted 17 July, 2018; originally announced July 2018.

Wealth Inequality and the Price of Anarchy

Authors: Kurtuluş Gemici, Elias Koutsoupias, Barnabé Monnot, Christos Papadimitriou, Georgios Piliouras

Abstract: Price of anarchy quantifies the degradation of social welfare in games due to the lack of a centralized authority that can enforce the optimal outcome. At its antipodes, mechanism design studies how to ameliorate these effects by incentivizing socially desirable behavior and implementing the optimal state as equilibrium. In practice, the responsiveness to such measures depends on the wealth of eac… ▽ More Price of anarchy quantifies the degradation of social welfare in games due to the lack of a centralized authority that can enforce the optimal outcome. At its antipodes, mechanism design studies how to ameliorate these effects by incentivizing socially desirable behavior and implementing the optimal state as equilibrium. In practice, the responsiveness to such measures depends on the wealth of each individual. This leads to a natural, but largely unexplored, question. Does optimal mechanism design entrench, or maybe even exacerbate, social inequality? We study this question in nonatomic congestion games, arguably one of the most thoroughly studied settings from the perspectives of price of anarchy as well as mechanism design. We introduce a new model that incorporates the wealth distribution of the population and captures the income elasticity of travel time. This allows us to argue about the equality of wealth distribution both before and after employing a mechanism. We start our analysis by establishing a broad qualitative result, showing that tolls always increase inequality in symmetric congestion games under any reasonable metric of inequality, e.g., the Gini index. Next, we introduce the iniquity index, a novel measure for quantifying the magnitude of these forces towards a more unbalanced wealth distribution and show it has good normative properties (robustness to scaling of income, no-regret learning). We analyze iniquity both in theoretical settings (Pigou's network under various wealth distributions) as well as experimental ones (based on a large scale field experiment in Singapore). Finally, we provide an algorithm for computing optimal tolls for any point of the trade-off of relative importance of efficiency and equality. We conclude with a discussion of our findings in the context of theories of justice as developed in contemporary social sciences. △ Less

Submitted 26 February, 2018; originally announced February 2018.

Comments: 32 pages, 16 figures

Online Market Intermediation

Authors: Yiannis Giannakopoulos, Elias Koutsoupias, Philip Lazos

Abstract: We study a dynamic market setting where an intermediary interacts with an unknown large sequence of agents that can be either sellers or buyers: their identities, as well as the sequence length $n$, are decided in an adversarial, online way. Each agent is interested in trading a single item, and all items in the market are identical. The intermediary has some prior, incomplete knowledge of the age… ▽ More We study a dynamic market setting where an intermediary interacts with an unknown large sequence of agents that can be either sellers or buyers: their identities, as well as the sequence length $n$, are decided in an adversarial, online way. Each agent is interested in trading a single item, and all items in the market are identical. The intermediary has some prior, incomplete knowledge of the agents' values for the items: all seller values are independently drawn from the same distribution $F_S$, and all buyer values from $F_B$. The two distributions may differ, and we make standard regularity assumptions, namely that $F_B$ is MHR and $F_S$ is log-concave. We study online, posted-price mechanisms, and analyse two objectives: that of maximizing the intermediary's profit and that of maximizing the social welfare, under a competitive analysis benchmark. First, on the negative side, for general agent sequences we prove tight competitive ratios of $\varTheta(\sqrt{n})$ and $\varTheta(\ln n)$, respectively for the two objectives. On the other hand, under the extra assumption that the intermediary knows some bound $α$ on the ratio between the number of sellers and buyers, we design asymptotically optimal online mechanisms with competitive ratios of $1+o(1)$ and $4$, respectively. Additionally, we study the model were the number of items that can be stored in stock throughout the execution is bounded, in which case the competitive ratio for the profit is improved to $O(\ln n)$. △ Less

Submitted 27 March, 2017; originally announced March 2017.

The Infinite Server Problem

Authors: Christian Coester, Elias Koutsoupias, Philip Lazos

Abstract: We study a variant of the $k$-server problem, the infinite server problem, in which infinitely many servers reside initially at a particular point of the metric space and serve a sequence of requests. In the framework of competitive analysis, we show a surprisingly tight connection between this problem and the $(h,k)$-server problem, in which an online algorithm with $k$ servers competes against a… ▽ More We study a variant of the $k$-server problem, the infinite server problem, in which infinitely many servers reside initially at a particular point of the metric space and serve a sequence of requests. In the framework of competitive analysis, we show a surprisingly tight connection between this problem and the $(h,k)$-server problem, in which an online algorithm with $k$ servers competes against an offline algorithm with $h$ servers. Specifically, we show that the infinite server problem has bounded competitive ratio if and only if the $(h,k)$-server problem has bounded competitive ratio for some $k=O(h)$. We give a lower bound of $3.146$ for the competitive ratio of the infinite server problem, which implies the same lower bound for the $(h,k)$-server problem even when $k/h \to \infty$ and holds also for the line metric; the previous known bounds were 2.4 for general metric spaces and 2 for the line. For weighted trees and layered graphs we obtain upper bounds, although they depend on the depth. Of particular interest is the infinite server problem on the line, which we show to be equivalent to the seemingly easier case in which all requests are in a fixed bounded interval away from the original position of the servers. This is a special case of a more general reduction from arbitrary metric spaces to bounded subspaces. Unfortunately, classical approaches (double coverage and generalizations, work function algorithm, balancing algorithms) fail even for this special case. △ Less

Submitted 27 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

ACM Class: F.1.2

The Anarchy of Scheduling Without Money

Authors: Yiannis Giannakopoulos, Elias Koutsoupias, Maria Kyropoulou

Abstract: We consider the scheduling problem on $n$ strategic unrelated machines when no payments are allowed, under the objective of minimizing the makespan. We adopt the model introduced in [Koutsoupias, Theory Comput. Syst. (2014)] where a machine is bound by her declarations in the sense that if she is assigned a particular job then she will have to execute it for an amount of time at least equal to the… ▽ More We consider the scheduling problem on $n$ strategic unrelated machines when no payments are allowed, under the objective of minimizing the makespan. We adopt the model introduced in [Koutsoupias, Theory Comput. Syst. (2014)] where a machine is bound by her declarations in the sense that if she is assigned a particular job then she will have to execute it for an amount of time at least equal to the one she reported, even if her private, true processing capabilities are actually faster. We provide a (non-truthful) randomized algorithm whose pure Price of Anarchy is arbitrarily close to $1$ for the case of a single task and close to $n$ if it is applied independently to schedule many tasks. Previous work considers the constraint of truthfulness and proves a tight approximation ratio of $(n+1)/2$ for one task which generalizes to $n(n+1)/2$ for many tasks. Furthermore, we revisit the truthfulness case and reduce the latter approximation ratio for many tasks down to $n$, asymptotically matching the best known lower bound. This is done via a detour to the relaxed, fractional version of the problem, for which we are also able to provide an optimal approximation ratio of $1$. Finally, we mention that all our algorithms achieve optimal ratios of $1$ for the social welfare objective. △ Less

Submitted 4 December, 2018; v1 submitted 13 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Blockchain Mining Games

Authors: Aggelos Kiayias, Elias Koutsoupias, Maria Kyropoulou, Yiannis Tselekounis

Abstract: We study the strategic considerations of miners participating in the bitcoin's protocol. We formulate and study the stochastic game that underlies these strategic considerations. The miners collectively build a tree of blocks, and they are paid when they create a node (mine a block) which will end up in the path of the tree that is adopted by all. Since the miners can hide newly mined nodes, they… ▽ More We study the strategic considerations of miners participating in the bitcoin's protocol. We formulate and study the stochastic game that underlies these strategic considerations. The miners collectively build a tree of blocks, and they are paid when they create a node (mine a block) which will end up in the path of the tree that is adopted by all. Since the miners can hide newly mined nodes, they play a game with incomplete information. Here we consider two simplified forms of this game in which the miners have complete information. In the simplest game the miners release every mined block immediately, but are strategic on which blocks to mine. In the second more complicated game, when a block is mined it is announced immediately, but it may not be released so that other miners cannot continue mining from it. A miner not only decides which blocks to mine, but also when to release blocks to other miners. In both games, we show that when the computational power of each miner is relatively small, their best response matches the expected behavior of the bitcoin designer. However, when the computational power of a miner is large, he deviates from the expected behavior, and other Nash equilibria arise. △ Less

Submitted 8 July, 2016; originally announced July 2016.

Comments: Accepted to EC '16

Selling Two Goods Optimally

Authors: Yiannis Giannakopoulos, Elias Koutsoupias

Abstract: We provide sufficient conditions for revenue maximization in a two-good monopoly where the buyer's values for the items come from independent (but not necessarily identical) distributions over bounded intervals. Under certain distributional assumptions, we give exact, closed-form formulas for the prices and allocation rule of the optimal selling mechanism. As a side result we give the first exampl… ▽ More We provide sufficient conditions for revenue maximization in a two-good monopoly where the buyer's values for the items come from independent (but not necessarily identical) distributions over bounded intervals. Under certain distributional assumptions, we give exact, closed-form formulas for the prices and allocation rule of the optimal selling mechanism. As a side result we give the first example of an optimal mechanism in an i.i.d. setting over a support of the form $[0,b]$ which is not deterministic. Since our framework is based on duality techniques, we were also able to demonstrate how slightly relaxed versions of it can still be used to design mechanisms that have very good approximation ratios with respect to the optimal revenue, through a "convexification" process. △ Less

Submitted 22 November, 2015; v1 submitted 12 October, 2015; originally announced October 2015.

Duality and Optimality of Auctions for Uniform Distributions

Authors: Yiannis Giannakopoulos, Elias Koutsoupias

Abstract: We develop a general duality-theory framework for revenue maximization in additive Bayesian auctions. The framework extends linear programming duality and complementarity to constraints with partial derivatives. The dual system reveals the geometric nature of the problem and highlights its connection with the theory of bipartite graph matchings. We demonstrate the power of the framework by applyin… ▽ More We develop a general duality-theory framework for revenue maximization in additive Bayesian auctions. The framework extends linear programming duality and complementarity to constraints with partial derivatives. The dual system reveals the geometric nature of the problem and highlights its connection with the theory of bipartite graph matchings. We demonstrate the power of the framework by applying it to a multiple-good monopoly setting where the buyer has uniformly distributed valuations for the items, the canonical long-standing open problem in the area. We propose a deterministic selling mechanism called Straight-Jacket Auction (SJA), which we prove to be exactly optimal for up to 6 items, and conjecture its optimality for any number of goods. The duality framework is used not only for proving optimality, but perhaps more importantly for deriving the optimal mechanism itself; as a result, SJA is defined by natural geometric constraints. △ Less

Submitted 15 January, 2018; v1 submitted 8 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

Near-Optimal Multi-Unit Auctions with Ordered Bidders

Authors: Elias Koutsoupias, Stefano Leonardi, Tim Roughgarden

Abstract: We construct prior-free auctions with constant-factor approximation guarantees with ordered bidders, in both unlimited and limited supply settings. We compare the expected revenue of our auctions on a bid vector to the monotone price benchmark, the maximum revenue that can be obtained from a bid vector using supply-respecting prices that are nonincreasing in the bidder ordering and bounded above b… ▽ More We construct prior-free auctions with constant-factor approximation guarantees with ordered bidders, in both unlimited and limited supply settings. We compare the expected revenue of our auctions on a bid vector to the monotone price benchmark, the maximum revenue that can be obtained from a bid vector using supply-respecting prices that are nonincreasing in the bidder ordering and bounded above by the second-highest bid. As a consequence, our auctions are simultaneously near-optimal in a wide range of Bayesian multi-unit environments. △ Less

Submitted 12 December, 2012; originally announced December 2012.

Approaching Utopia: Strong Truthfulness and Externality-Resistant Mechanisms

Authors: Amos Fiat, Anna R. Karlin, Elias Koutsoupias, Angelina Vidali

Abstract: We introduce and study strongly truthful mechanisms and their applications. We use strongly truthful mechanisms as a tool for implementation in undominated strategies for several problems,including the design of externality resistant auctions and a variant of multi-dimensional scheduling. We introduce and study strongly truthful mechanisms and their applications. We use strongly truthful mechanisms as a tool for implementation in undominated strategies for several problems,including the design of externality resistant auctions and a variant of multi-dimensional scheduling. △ Less

Submitted 20 August, 2012; originally announced August 2012.

A characterization of 2-player mechanisms for scheduling

Authors: George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, Angelina Vidali

Abstract: We study the mechanism design problem of scheduling unrelated machines and we completely characterize the decisive truthful mechanisms for two players when the domain contains both positive and negative values. We show that the class of truthful mechanisms is very limited: A decisive truthful mechanism partitions the tasks into groups so that the tasks in each group are allocated independently o… ▽ More We study the mechanism design problem of scheduling unrelated machines and we completely characterize the decisive truthful mechanisms for two players when the domain contains both positive and negative values. We show that the class of truthful mechanisms is very limited: A decisive truthful mechanism partitions the tasks into groups so that the tasks in each group are allocated independently of the other groups. Tasks in a group of size at least two are allocated by an affine minimizer and tasks in singleton groups by a task-independent mechanism. This characterization is about all truthful mechanisms, including those with unbounded approximation ratio. A direct consequence of this approach is that the approximation ratio of mechanisms for two players is 2, even for two tasks. In fact, it follows that for two players, VCG is the unique algorithm with optimal approximation 2. This characterization provides some support that any decisive truthful mechanism (for 3 or more players) partitions the tasks into groups some of which are allocated by affine minimizers, while the rest are allocated by a threshold mechanism (in which a task is allocated to a player when it is below a threshold value which depends only on the values of the other players). We also show here that the class of threshold mechanisms is identical to the class of additive mechanisms. △ Less

Submitted 22 July, 2008; originally announced July 2008.

Comments: 20 pages, 4 figures, ESA'08

On the performance of approximate equilibria in congestion games

Authors: George Christodoulou, Elias Koutsoupias, Paul Spirakis

Abstract: We study the performance of approximate Nash equilibria for linear congestion games. We consider how much the price of anarchy worsens and how much the price of stability improves as a function of the approximation factor $ε$. We give (almost) tight upper and lower bounds for both the price of anarchy and the price of stability for atomic and non-atomic congestion games. Our results not only enc… ▽ More We study the performance of approximate Nash equilibria for linear congestion games. We consider how much the price of anarchy worsens and how much the price of stability improves as a function of the approximation factor $ε$. We give (almost) tight upper and lower bounds for both the price of anarchy and the price of stability for atomic and non-atomic congestion games. Our results not only encompass and generalize the existing results of exact equilibria to $ε$-Nash equilibria, but they also provide a unified approach which reveals the common threads of the atomic and non-atomic price of anarchy results. By expanding the spectrum, we also cast the existing results in a new light. For example, the Pigou network, which gives tight results for exact Nash equilibria of selfish routing, remains tight for the price of stability of $ε$-Nash equilibria but not for the price of anarchy. △ Less

Submitted 10 May, 2008; v1 submitted 21 April, 2008; originally announced April 2008.