-
Constant Congestion Brambles
Authors:
Meike Hatzel,
Pawel Komosa,
Marcin Pilipczuk,
Manuel Sorge
Abstract:
A bramble in an undirected graph $G$ is a family of connected subgraphs of $G$ such that for every two subgraphs $H_1$ and $H_2$ in the bramble either $V(H_1) \cap V(H_2) \neq \emptyset$ or there is an edge of $G$ with one endpoint in $V(H_1)$ and the second endpoint in $V(H_2)$. The order of the bramble is the minimum size of a vertex set that intersects all elements of a bramble.
Brambles are…
▽ More
A bramble in an undirected graph $G$ is a family of connected subgraphs of $G$ such that for every two subgraphs $H_1$ and $H_2$ in the bramble either $V(H_1) \cap V(H_2) \neq \emptyset$ or there is an edge of $G$ with one endpoint in $V(H_1)$ and the second endpoint in $V(H_2)$. The order of the bramble is the minimum size of a vertex set that intersects all elements of a bramble.
Brambles are objects dual to treewidth: As shown by Seymour and Thomas, the maximum order of a bramble in an undirected graph $G$ equals one plus the treewidth of $G$. However, as shown by Grohe and Marx, brambles of high order may necessarily be of exponential size: In a constant-degree $n$-vertex expander a bramble of order $Ω(n^{1/2+δ})$ requires size exponential in $Ω(n^{2δ})$ for any fixed $δ\in (0,\frac{1}{2}]$. On the other hand, the combination of results of Grohe and Marx and Chekuri and Chuzhoy shows that a graph of treewidth $k$ admits a bramble of order $\widetildeΩ(k^{1/2})$ and size $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(k^{3/2})$. ($\widetildeΩ$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}$ hide polylogarithmic factors and divisors, respectively.)
In this note, we first sharpen the second bound by proving that every graph $G$ of treewidth at least $k$ contains a bramble of order $\widetildeΩ(k^{1/2})$ and congestion $2$, i.e., every vertex of $G$ is contained in at most two elements of the bramble (thus the bramble is of size linear in its order). Second, we provide a tight upper bound for the lower bound of Grohe and Marx: For every $δ\in (0,\frac{1}{2}]$, every graph $G$ of treewidth at least $k$ contains a bramble of order $\widetildeΩ(k^{1/2+δ})$ and size $2^{\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}(k^{2δ})}$.
△ Less
Submitted 30 March, 2022; v1 submitted 5 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Randomized contractions meet lean decompositions
Authors:
Marek Cygan,
Paweł Komosa,
Daniel Lokshtanov,
Michał Pilipczuk,
Marcin Pilipczuk,
Saket Saurabh,
Magnus Wahlström
Abstract:
We show an algorithm that, given an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and a parameter $k$, in time $2^{O(k \log k)} n^{O(1)}$ finds a tree decomposition of $G$ with the following properties:
* every adhesion of the tree decomposition is of size at most $k$, and
* every bag of the tree decomposition is $(i,i)$-unbreakable in $G$ for every $1 \leq i \leq k$.
Here, a set $X \subseteq V(G)$ is $(a,b)$-unbrea…
▽ More
We show an algorithm that, given an $n$-vertex graph $G$ and a parameter $k$, in time $2^{O(k \log k)} n^{O(1)}$ finds a tree decomposition of $G$ with the following properties:
* every adhesion of the tree decomposition is of size at most $k$, and
* every bag of the tree decomposition is $(i,i)$-unbreakable in $G$ for every $1 \leq i \leq k$.
Here, a set $X \subseteq V(G)$ is $(a,b)$-unbreakable in $G$ if for every separation $(A,B)$ of order at most $b$ in $G$, we have $|A \cap X| \leq a$ or $|B \cap X| \leq a$. The resulting tree decomposition has arguably best possible adhesion size boundsand unbreakability guarantees. Furthermore, the parametric factor in the running time bound is significantly smaller than in previous similar constructions. These improvements allow us to present parameterized algorithms for Minimum Bisection, Steiner Cut, and Steiner Multicut with improved parameteric factor in the running time bound.
The main technical insight is to adapt the notion of lean decompositions of Thomas and the subsequent construction algorithm of Bellenbaum and Diestel to the parameterized setting.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2020; v1 submitted 16 October, 2018;
originally announced October 2018.
-
Hardness of approximation for H-free edge modification problems
Authors:
Ivan Bliznets,
Marek Cygan,
Pawel Komosa,
Michal Pilipczuk
Abstract:
The $H$-Free Edge Deletion problem asks, for a given graph $G$ and an integer $k$, whether it is possible to delete at most $k$ edges from $G$ to make it $H$-free, that is, not containing $H$ as an induced subgraph. The $H$-Free Edge Completion problem is defined similarly, but we add edges instead of deleting them. The study of these two problem families has recently been the subject of intensive…
▽ More
The $H$-Free Edge Deletion problem asks, for a given graph $G$ and an integer $k$, whether it is possible to delete at most $k$ edges from $G$ to make it $H$-free, that is, not containing $H$ as an induced subgraph. The $H$-Free Edge Completion problem is defined similarly, but we add edges instead of deleting them. The study of these two problem families has recently been the subject of intensive studies from the point of view of parameterized complexity and kernelization. In particular, it was shown that the problems do not admit polynomial kernels (under plausible complexity assumptions) for almost all graphs $H$, with several important exceptions occurring when the class of $H$-free graphs exhibits some structural properties.
In this work we complement the parameterized study of edge modification problems to $H$-free graphs by considering their approximability. We prove that whenever $H$ is $3$-connected and has at least two non-edges, then both $H$-Free Edge Deletion and $H$-Free Edge Completion are very hard to approximate: they do not admit $\mathrm{poly}(\mathsf{OPT})$-approximation in polynomial time, unless $\mathrm{P}=\mathrm{NP}$, or even in time subexponential in $\mathsf{OPT}$, unless the Exponential Time Hypothesis fails. The assumption of the existence of two non-edges appears to be important: we show that whenever $H$ is a complete graph without one edge, then $H$-Free Edge Deletion is tightly connected to the Min Horn problem, whose approximability is still open. Finally, in an attempt to extend our hardness results beyond $3$-connected graphs, we consider the cases of $H$ being a path or a cycle, and we achieve an almost complete dichotomy there.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2018; v1 submitted 8 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
-
Lower bounds for the parameterized complexity of Minimum Fill-in and other completion problems
Authors:
Ivan Bliznets,
Marek Cygan,
Pawel Komosa,
Lukas Mach,
Michal Pilipczuk
Abstract:
In this work, we focus on several completion problems for subclasses of chordal graphs: Minimum Fill-In, Interval Completion, Proper Interval Completion, Threshold Completion, and Trivially Perfect Completion. In these problems, the task is to add at most k edges to a given graph in order to obtain a chordal, interval, proper interval, threshold, or trivially perfect graph, respectively. We prove…
▽ More
In this work, we focus on several completion problems for subclasses of chordal graphs: Minimum Fill-In, Interval Completion, Proper Interval Completion, Threshold Completion, and Trivially Perfect Completion. In these problems, the task is to add at most k edges to a given graph in order to obtain a chordal, interval, proper interval, threshold, or trivially perfect graph, respectively. We prove the following lower bounds for all these problems, as well as for the related Chain Completion problem: Assuming the Exponential Time Hypothesis, none of these problems can be solved in time 2^O(n^(1/2) / log^c n) or 2^O(k^(1/4) / log^c k) n^O(1), for some integer c. Assuming the non-existence of a subexponential-time approximation scheme for Min Bisection on d-regular graphs, for some constant d, none of these problems can be solved in time 2^o(n) or 2^o(sqrt(k)) n^O(1).
For all the aforementioned completion problems, apart from Proper Interval Completion, FPT algorithms with running time of the form 2^O(sqrt(k) log k) n^O(1) are known. Thus, the second result proves that a significant improvement of any of these algorithms would lead to a surprising breakthrough in the design of approximation algorithms for Min Bisection.
To prove our results, we use a reduction methodology based on combining the classic approach of starting with a sparse instance of 3-Sat, prepared using the Sparsification Lemma, with the existence of almost linear-size Probabilistically Checkable Proofs (PCPs). Apart from our main results, we also obtain lower bounds excluding the existence of subexponential algorithms for the Optimum Linear Arrangement problem, as well as improved, yet still not tight, lower bounds for Feedback Arc Set in Tournaments.
△ Less
Submitted 15 October, 2015; v1 submitted 21 August, 2015;
originally announced August 2015.
-
Kernelization lower bound for Permutation Pattern Matching
Authors:
Ivan Bliznets,
Marek Cygan,
Pawel Komosa,
Lukas Mach
Abstract:
A permutation $π$ contains a permutation $σ$ as a pattern if it contains a subsequence of length $|σ|$ whose elements are in the same relative order as in the permutation $σ$. This notion plays a major role in enumerative combinatorics. We prove that the problem does not have a polynomial kernel (under the widely believed complexity assumption $\mbox{NP} \not\subseteq \mbox{co-NP}/\mbox{poly}$) by…
▽ More
A permutation $π$ contains a permutation $σ$ as a pattern if it contains a subsequence of length $|σ|$ whose elements are in the same relative order as in the permutation $σ$. This notion plays a major role in enumerative combinatorics. We prove that the problem does not have a polynomial kernel (under the widely believed complexity assumption $\mbox{NP} \not\subseteq \mbox{co-NP}/\mbox{poly}$) by introducing a new polynomial reduction from the clique problem to permutation pattern matching.
△ Less
Submitted 11 January, 2015; v1 submitted 4 June, 2014;
originally announced June 2014.
