-
Democratisation of Usable Machine Learning in Computer Vision
Authors:
Raymond Bond,
Ansgar Koene,
Alan Dix,
Jennifer Boger,
Maurice D. Mulvenna,
Mykola Galushka,
Bethany Waterhouse Bradley,
Fiona Browne,
Hui Wang,
Alexander Wong
Abstract:
Many industries are now investing heavily in data science and automation to replace manual tasks and/or to help with decision making, especially in the realm of leveraging computer vision to automate many monitoring, inspection, and surveillance tasks. This has resulted in the emergence of the 'data scientist' who is conversant in statistical thinking, machine learning (ML), computer vision, and c…
▽ More
Many industries are now investing heavily in data science and automation to replace manual tasks and/or to help with decision making, especially in the realm of leveraging computer vision to automate many monitoring, inspection, and surveillance tasks. This has resulted in the emergence of the 'data scientist' who is conversant in statistical thinking, machine learning (ML), computer vision, and computer programming. However, as ML becomes more accessible to the general public and more aspects of ML become automated, applications leveraging computer vision are increasingly being created by non-experts with less opportunity for regulatory oversight. This points to the overall need for more educated responsibility for these lay-users of usable ML tools in order to mitigate potentially unethical ramifications. In this paper, we undertake a SWOT analysis to study the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats of building usable ML tools for mass adoption for important areas leveraging ML such as computer vision. The paper proposes a set of data science literacy criteria for educating and supporting lay-users in the responsible development and deployment of ML applications.
△ Less
Submitted 18 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
-
Assessing the impact of machine intelligence on human behaviour: an interdisciplinary endeavour
Authors:
Emilia Gómez,
Carlos Castillo,
Vicky Charisi,
Verónica Dahl,
Gustavo Deco,
Blagoj Delipetrev,
Nicole Dewandre,
Miguel Ángel González-Ballester,
Fabien Gouyon,
José Hernández-Orallo,
Perfecto Herrera,
Anders Jonsson,
Ansgar Koene,
Martha Larson,
Ramón López de Mántaras,
Bertin Martens,
Marius Miron,
Rubén Moreno-Bote,
Nuria Oliver,
Antonio Puertas Gallardo,
Heike Schweitzer,
Nuria Sebastian,
Xavier Serra,
Joan Serrà,
Songül Tolan
, et al. (1 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
This document contains the outcome of the first Human behaviour and machine intelligence (HUMAINT) workshop that took place 5-6 March 2018 in Barcelona, Spain. The workshop was organized in the context of a new research programme at the Centre for Advanced Studies, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, which focuses on studying the potential impact of artificial intelligence on human b…
▽ More
This document contains the outcome of the first Human behaviour and machine intelligence (HUMAINT) workshop that took place 5-6 March 2018 in Barcelona, Spain. The workshop was organized in the context of a new research programme at the Centre for Advanced Studies, Joint Research Centre of the European Commission, which focuses on studying the potential impact of artificial intelligence on human behaviour. The workshop gathered an interdisciplinary group of experts to establish the state of the art research in the field and a list of future research challenges to be addressed on the topic of human and machine intelligence, algorithm's potential impact on human cognitive capabilities and decision making, and evaluation and regulation needs. The document is made of short position statements and identification of challenges provided by each expert, and incorporates the result of the discussions carried out during the workshop. In the conclusion section, we provide a list of emerging research topics and strategies to be addressed in the near future.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
The Fallacy of Favoring Gradual Replacement Mind Uploading Over Scan-and-Copy
Authors:
Keith B. Wiley,
Randal A. Koene
Abstract:
Mind uploading speculation and debate often concludes that a procedure described as gradual in-place replacement preserves personal identity while a procedure described as destructive scan-and-copy produces some other identity in the target substrate such that personal identity is lost along with the biological brain. This paper demonstrates a chain of reasoning that establishes metaphysical equiv…
▽ More
Mind uploading speculation and debate often concludes that a procedure described as gradual in-place replacement preserves personal identity while a procedure described as destructive scan-and-copy produces some other identity in the target substrate such that personal identity is lost along with the biological brain. This paper demonstrates a chain of reasoning that establishes metaphysical equivalence between these two methods in terms of preserving personal identity.
△ Less
Submitted 17 December, 2018; v1 submitted 23 April, 2015;
originally announced April 2015.
