-
Why Unsupervised Deep Networks Generalize
Authors:
Anita de Mello Koch,
Ellen de Mello Koch,
Robert de Mello Koch
Abstract:
Promising resolutions of the generalization puzzle observe that the actual number of parameters in a deep network is much smaller than naive estimates suggest. The renormalization group is a compelling example of a problem which has very few parameters, despite the fact that naive estimates suggest otherwise. Our central hypothesis is that the mechanisms behind the renormalization group are also a…
▽ More
Promising resolutions of the generalization puzzle observe that the actual number of parameters in a deep network is much smaller than naive estimates suggest. The renormalization group is a compelling example of a problem which has very few parameters, despite the fact that naive estimates suggest otherwise. Our central hypothesis is that the mechanisms behind the renormalization group are also at work in deep learning, and that this leads to a resolution of the generalization puzzle. We show detailed quantitative evidence that proves the hypothesis for an RBM, by showing that the trained RBM is discarding high momentum modes. Specializing attention mainly to autoencoders, we give an algorithm to determine the network's parameters directly from the learning data set. The resulting autoencoder almost performs as well as one trained by deep learning, and it provides an excellent initial condition for training, reducing training times by a factor between 4 and 100 for the experiments we considered. Further, we are able to suggest a simple criterion to decide if a given problem can or can not be solved using a deep network.
△ Less
Submitted 7 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Short sighted deep learning
Authors:
Ellen de Melllo Koch,
Anita de Mello Koch,
Nicholas Kastanos,
Ling Cheng
Abstract:
A theory explaining how deep learning works is yet to be developed. Previous work suggests that deep learning performs a coarse graining, similar in spirit to the renormalization group (RG). This idea has been explored in the setting of a local (nearest neighbor interactions) Ising spin lattice. We extend the discussion to the setting of a long range spin lattice. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) s…
▽ More
A theory explaining how deep learning works is yet to be developed. Previous work suggests that deep learning performs a coarse graining, similar in spirit to the renormalization group (RG). This idea has been explored in the setting of a local (nearest neighbor interactions) Ising spin lattice. We extend the discussion to the setting of a long range spin lattice. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations determine both the critical temperature and scaling dimensions of the system. The model is used to train both a single RBM (restricted Boltzmann machine) network, as well as a stacked RBM network. Following earlier Ising model studies, the trained weights of a single layer RBM network define a flow of lattice models. In contrast to results for nearest neighbor Ising, the RBM flow for the long ranged model does not converge to the correct values for the spin and energy scaling dimension. Further, correlation functions between visible and hidden nodes exhibit key differences between the stacked RBM and RG flows. The stacked RBM flow appears to move towards low temperatures whereas the RG flow moves towards high temperature. This again differs from results obtained for nearest neighbor Ising.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
Is Deep Learning a Renormalization Group Flow?
Authors:
Ellen de Mello Koch,
Robert de Mello Koch,
Ling Cheng
Abstract:
Although there has been a rapid development of practical applications, theoretical explanations of deep learning are in their infancy. Deep learning performs a sophisticated coarse graining. Since coarse graining is a key ingredient of the renormalization group (RG), RG may provide a useful theoretical framework directly relevant to deep learning. In this study we pursue this possibility. A statis…
▽ More
Although there has been a rapid development of practical applications, theoretical explanations of deep learning are in their infancy. Deep learning performs a sophisticated coarse graining. Since coarse graining is a key ingredient of the renormalization group (RG), RG may provide a useful theoretical framework directly relevant to deep learning. In this study we pursue this possibility. A statistical mechanics model for a magnet, the Ising model, is used to train an unsupervised restricted Boltzmann machine (RBM). The patterns generated by the trained RBM are compared to the configurations generated through an RG treatment of the Ising model. Although we are motivated by the connection between deep learning and RG flow, in this study we focus mainly on comparing a single layer of a deep network to a single step in the RG flow. We argue that correlation functions between hidden and visible neurons are capable of diagnosing RG-like coarse graining. Numerical experiments show the presence of RG-like patterns in correlators computed using the trained RBMs. The observables we consider are also able to exhibit important differences between RG and deep learning.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2020; v1 submitted 12 June, 2019;
originally announced June 2019.
