-
MinePlanner: A Benchmark for Long-Horizon Planning in Large Minecraft Worlds
Authors:
William Hill,
Ireton Liu,
Anita De Mello Koch,
Damion Harvey,
Nishanth Kumar,
George Konidaris,
Steven James
Abstract:
We propose a new benchmark for planning tasks based on the Minecraft game. Our benchmark contains 45 tasks overall, but also provides support for creating both propositional and numeric instances of new Minecraft tasks automatically. We benchmark numeric and propositional planning systems on these tasks, with results demonstrating that state-of-the-art planners are currently incapable of dealing w…
▽ More
We propose a new benchmark for planning tasks based on the Minecraft game. Our benchmark contains 45 tasks overall, but also provides support for creating both propositional and numeric instances of new Minecraft tasks automatically. We benchmark numeric and propositional planning systems on these tasks, with results demonstrating that state-of-the-art planners are currently incapable of dealing with many of the challenges advanced by our new benchmark, such as scaling to instances with thousands of objects. Based on these results, we identify areas of improvement for future planners. Our framework is made available at https://github.com/IretonLiu/mine-pddl/.
△ Less
Submitted 28 April, 2024; v1 submitted 20 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Why Unsupervised Deep Networks Generalize
Authors:
Anita de Mello Koch,
Ellen de Mello Koch,
Robert de Mello Koch
Abstract:
Promising resolutions of the generalization puzzle observe that the actual number of parameters in a deep network is much smaller than naive estimates suggest. The renormalization group is a compelling example of a problem which has very few parameters, despite the fact that naive estimates suggest otherwise. Our central hypothesis is that the mechanisms behind the renormalization group are also a…
▽ More
Promising resolutions of the generalization puzzle observe that the actual number of parameters in a deep network is much smaller than naive estimates suggest. The renormalization group is a compelling example of a problem which has very few parameters, despite the fact that naive estimates suggest otherwise. Our central hypothesis is that the mechanisms behind the renormalization group are also at work in deep learning, and that this leads to a resolution of the generalization puzzle. We show detailed quantitative evidence that proves the hypothesis for an RBM, by showing that the trained RBM is discarding high momentum modes. Specializing attention mainly to autoencoders, we give an algorithm to determine the network's parameters directly from the learning data set. The resulting autoencoder almost performs as well as one trained by deep learning, and it provides an excellent initial condition for training, reducing training times by a factor between 4 and 100 for the experiments we considered. Further, we are able to suggest a simple criterion to decide if a given problem can or can not be solved using a deep network.
△ Less
Submitted 7 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
-
Short sighted deep learning
Authors:
Ellen de Melllo Koch,
Anita de Mello Koch,
Nicholas Kastanos,
Ling Cheng
Abstract:
A theory explaining how deep learning works is yet to be developed. Previous work suggests that deep learning performs a coarse graining, similar in spirit to the renormalization group (RG). This idea has been explored in the setting of a local (nearest neighbor interactions) Ising spin lattice. We extend the discussion to the setting of a long range spin lattice. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) s…
▽ More
A theory explaining how deep learning works is yet to be developed. Previous work suggests that deep learning performs a coarse graining, similar in spirit to the renormalization group (RG). This idea has been explored in the setting of a local (nearest neighbor interactions) Ising spin lattice. We extend the discussion to the setting of a long range spin lattice. Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) simulations determine both the critical temperature and scaling dimensions of the system. The model is used to train both a single RBM (restricted Boltzmann machine) network, as well as a stacked RBM network. Following earlier Ising model studies, the trained weights of a single layer RBM network define a flow of lattice models. In contrast to results for nearest neighbor Ising, the RBM flow for the long ranged model does not converge to the correct values for the spin and energy scaling dimension. Further, correlation functions between visible and hidden nodes exhibit key differences between the stacked RBM and RG flows. The stacked RBM flow appears to move towards low temperatures whereas the RG flow moves towards high temperature. This again differs from results obtained for nearest neighbor Ising.
△ Less
Submitted 7 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
