-
Exploring the Transferability of a Foundation Model for Fundus Images: Application to Hypertensive Retinopathy
Authors:
Julio Silva-Rodriguez,
Jihed Chelbi,
Waziha Kabir,
Hadi Chakor,
Jose Dolz,
Ismail Ben Ayed,
Riadh Kobbi
Abstract:
Using deep learning models pre-trained on Imagenet is the traditional solution for medical image classification to deal with data scarcity. Nevertheless, relevant literature supports that this strategy may offer limited gains due to the high dissimilarity between domains. Currently, the paradigm of adapting domain-specialized foundation models is proving to be a promising alternative. However, how…
▽ More
Using deep learning models pre-trained on Imagenet is the traditional solution for medical image classification to deal with data scarcity. Nevertheless, relevant literature supports that this strategy may offer limited gains due to the high dissimilarity between domains. Currently, the paradigm of adapting domain-specialized foundation models is proving to be a promising alternative. However, how to perform such knowledge transfer, and the benefits and limitations it presents, are under study. The CGI-HRDC challenge for Hypertensive Retinopathy diagnosis on fundus images introduces an appealing opportunity to evaluate the transferability of a recently released vision-language foundation model of the retina, FLAIR. In this work, we explore the potential of using FLAIR features as starting point for fundus image classification, and we compare its performance with regard to Imagenet initialization on two popular transfer learning methods: Linear Probing (LP) and Fine-Tuning (FP). Our empirical observations suggest that, in any case, the use of the traditional strategy provides performance gains. In contrast, direct transferability from FLAIR model allows gains of 2.5%. When fine-tuning the whole network, the performance gap increases up to 4%. In this case, we show that avoiding feature deterioration via LP initialization of the classifier allows the best re-use of the rich pre-trained features. Although direct transferability using LP still offers limited performance, we believe that foundation models such as FLAIR will drive the evolution of deep-learning-based fundus image analysis.
△ Less
Submitted 27 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
A Foundation LAnguage-Image model of the Retina (FLAIR): Encoding expert knowledge in text supervision
Authors:
Julio Silva-Rodriguez,
Hadi Chakor,
Riadh Kobbi,
Jose Dolz,
Ismail Ben Ayed
Abstract:
Foundation vision-language models are currently transforming computer vision, and are on the rise in medical imaging fueled by their very promising generalization capabilities. However, the initial attempts to transfer this new paradigm to medical imaging have shown less impressive performances than those observed in other domains, due to the significant domain shift and the complex, expert domain…
▽ More
Foundation vision-language models are currently transforming computer vision, and are on the rise in medical imaging fueled by their very promising generalization capabilities. However, the initial attempts to transfer this new paradigm to medical imaging have shown less impressive performances than those observed in other domains, due to the significant domain shift and the complex, expert domain knowledge inherent to medical-imaging tasks. Motivated by the need for domain-expert foundation models, we present FLAIR, a pre-trained vision-language model for universal retinal fundus image understanding. To this end, we compiled 37 open-access, mostly categorical fundus imaging datasets from various sources, with up to 97 different target conditions and 284,660 images. We integrate the expert's domain knowledge in the form of descriptive textual prompts, during both pre-training and zero-shot inference, enhancing the less-informative categorical supervision of the data. Such a textual expert's knowledge, which we compiled from the relevant clinical literature and community standards, describes the fine-grained features of the pathologies as well as the hierarchies and dependencies between them. We report comprehensive evaluations, which illustrate the benefit of integrating expert knowledge and the strong generalization capabilities of FLAIR under difficult scenarios with domain shifts or unseen categories. When adapted with a lightweight linear probe, FLAIR outperforms fully-trained, dataset-focused models, more so in the few-shot regimes. Interestingly, FLAIR outperforms by a large margin more generalist, larger-scale image-language models, which emphasizes the potential of embedding experts' domain knowledge and the limitations of generalist models in medical imaging.
△ Less
Submitted 15 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
GAMMA Challenge:Glaucoma grAding from Multi-Modality imAges
Authors:
Junde Wu,
Huihui Fang,
Fei Li,
Huazhu Fu,
Fengbin Lin,
Jiongcheng Li,
Lexing Huang,
Qinji Yu,
Sifan Song,
Xinxing Xu,
Yanyu Xu,
Wensai Wang,
Lingxiao Wang,
Shuai Lu,
Huiqi Li,
Shihua Huang,
Zhichao Lu,
Chubin Ou,
Xifei Wei,
Bingyuan Liu,
Riadh Kobbi,
Xiaoying Tang,
Li Lin,
Qiang Zhou,
Qiang Hu
, et al. (4 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Color fundus photography and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) are the two most cost-effective tools for glaucoma screening. Both two modalities of images have prominent biomarkers to indicate glaucoma suspected. Clinically, it is often recommended to take both of the screenings for a more accurate and reliable diagnosis. However, although numerous algorithms are proposed based on fundus images o…
▽ More
Color fundus photography and Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) are the two most cost-effective tools for glaucoma screening. Both two modalities of images have prominent biomarkers to indicate glaucoma suspected. Clinically, it is often recommended to take both of the screenings for a more accurate and reliable diagnosis. However, although numerous algorithms are proposed based on fundus images or OCT volumes in computer-aided diagnosis, there are still few methods leveraging both of the modalities for the glaucoma assessment. Inspired by the success of Retinal Fundus Glaucoma Challenge (REFUGE) we held previously, we set up the Glaucoma grAding from Multi-Modality imAges (GAMMA) Challenge to encourage the development of fundus \& OCT-based glaucoma grading. The primary task of the challenge is to grade glaucoma from both the 2D fundus images and 3D OCT scanning volumes. As part of GAMMA, we have publicly released a glaucoma annotated dataset with both 2D fundus color photography and 3D OCT volumes, which is the first multi-modality dataset for glaucoma grading. In addition, an evaluation framework is also established to evaluate the performance of the submitted methods. During the challenge, 1272 results were submitted, and finally, top-10 teams were selected to the final stage. We analysis their results and summarize their methods in the paper. Since all these teams submitted their source code in the challenge, a detailed ablation study is also conducted to verify the effectiveness of the particular modules proposed. We find many of the proposed techniques are practical for the clinical diagnosis of glaucoma. As the first in-depth study of fundus \& OCT multi-modality glaucoma grading, we believe the GAMMA Challenge will be an essential starting point for future research.
△ Less
Submitted 26 December, 2022; v1 submitted 14 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Do We Really Need Dice? The Hidden Region-Size Biases of Segmentation Losses
Authors:
Bingyuan Liu,
Jose Dolz,
Adrian Galdran,
Riadh Kobbi,
Ismail Ben Ayed
Abstract:
Most segmentation losses are arguably variants of the Cross-Entropy (CE) or Dice losses. On the surface, these two categories of losses seem unrelated, and there is no clear consensus as to which category is a better choice, with varying performances for each across different benchmarks and applications. Furthermore, it is widely argued within the medical-imaging community that Dice and CE are com…
▽ More
Most segmentation losses are arguably variants of the Cross-Entropy (CE) or Dice losses. On the surface, these two categories of losses seem unrelated, and there is no clear consensus as to which category is a better choice, with varying performances for each across different benchmarks and applications. Furthermore, it is widely argued within the medical-imaging community that Dice and CE are complementary, which has motivated the use of compound CE-Dice losses. In this work, we provide a theoretical analysis, which shows that CE and Dice share a much deeper connection than previously thought. First, we show that, from a constrained-optimization perspective, they both decompose into two components, i.e., a similar ground-truth matching term, which pushes the predicted foreground regions towards the ground-truth, and a region-size penalty term imposing different biases on the size of the predicted regions. Then, we provide bound relationships and an information-theoretic analysis, which uncover hidden region-size biases: Dice has an intrinsic bias towards specific extremely imbalanced solutions, whereas CE implicitly encourages the ground-truth region proportions. Our theoretical results explain the wide experimental evidence in the medical-imaging literature, whereby Dice losses bring improvements for imbalanced segmentation. Based on our theoretical analysis, we propose a principled and simple solution, which enables to control explicitly the region-size bias. The proposed method integrates CE with explicit terms based on L1 or the KL divergence, which encourage segmenting region proportions to match target class proportions, thereby mitigating class imbalance but without losing generality. Comprehensive experiments and ablation studies over different losses and applications validate our theoretical analysis, as well as the effectiveness of explicit and simple region-size terms.
△ Less
Submitted 19 November, 2023; v1 submitted 18 April, 2021;
originally announced April 2021.
