-
Examining Ownership Models in Software Teams: A Systematic Literature Review and a Replication Study
Authors:
Umme Ayman Koana,
Quang Hy Le,
Shadikur Rahman,
Chris Carlson,
Francis Chew,
Maleknaz Nayebi
Abstract:
Effective ownership of software artifacts, particularly code, is crucial for accountability, knowledge sharing, and code quality enhancement. Researchers have proposed models linking ownership of software artifacts with developer performance and code quality. Our study aims to systematically examine various ownership models and provide a structured literature overview. Conducting a systematic lite…
▽ More
Effective ownership of software artifacts, particularly code, is crucial for accountability, knowledge sharing, and code quality enhancement. Researchers have proposed models linking ownership of software artifacts with developer performance and code quality. Our study aims to systematically examine various ownership models and provide a structured literature overview. Conducting a systematic literature review, we identified 79 relevant papers published between 2005 and 2022. We developed a taxonomy of ownership artifacts based on type, owners, and degree of ownership, along with compiling modeling variables and analytics types used in each study. Additionally, we assessed the replication status of each study. As a result, we identified nine distinct software artifacts whose ownership has been discussed in the literature, with "Code" being the most frequently analyzed artifact. We found that only three papers (3.79%) provided code and data, whereas nine papers (11.4%) provided only data. Using our systematic literature review results, we replicated experiments on nine priority projects at \texttt{Brightsquid}. The company aimed to compare its code quality against ownership factors in other teams, so we conducted a replication study using their data. Unlike prior studies, we found no strong correlation between minor contributors and bug numbers. Surprisingly, we found no strong link between the total number of developers modifying a file and bug counts, contrasting previous findings. However, we observed a significant correlation between major contributors and bug counts, diverging from earlier research.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Ownership in the Hands of Accountability at Brightsquid -- A Case Study and a Developer Survey
Authors:
Umme Ayman Koana,
Francis Chew,
Chris Carlson,
Maleknaz Nayebi
Abstract:
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of digital health solutions. This has presented significant challenges for software development teams to swiftly adjust to the market need and demand. To address these challenges, product management teams have had to adapt their approach to software development, resha** their processes to meet the demands of the pandemic. Brighsquid implemented…
▽ More
The COVID-19 pandemic has accelerated the adoption of digital health solutions. This has presented significant challenges for software development teams to swiftly adjust to the market need and demand. To address these challenges, product management teams have had to adapt their approach to software development, resha** their processes to meet the demands of the pandemic. Brighsquid implemented a new task assignment process aimed at enhancing developer accountability toward the customer. To assess the impact of this change on code ownership, we conducted a code change analysis. Additionally, we surveyed 67 developers to investigate the relationship between accountability and ownership more broadly. The findings of our case study indicate that the revised assignment model not only increased the perceived sense of accountability within the production team but also improved code resilience against ownership changes. Moreover, the survey results revealed that a majority of the participating developers (67.5%) associated perceived accountability with artifact ownership.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Example Driven Code Review Explanation
Authors:
Shadikur Rahman,
Umme Ayman Koana,
Maleknaz Nayebi
Abstract:
Background: Code reviewing is an essential part of software development to ensure software quality. However, the abundance of review tasks and the intensity of the workload for reviewers negatively impact the quality of the reviews. The short review text is often unactionable, which needs further interaction between the reviewer and the developer. The problem becomes more critical in dynamic teams…
▽ More
Background: Code reviewing is an essential part of software development to ensure software quality. However, the abundance of review tasks and the intensity of the workload for reviewers negatively impact the quality of the reviews. The short review text is often unactionable, which needs further interaction between the reviewer and the developer. The problem becomes more critical in dynamic teams and in the case of new team members who are less familiar with their reviewers and perspectives. Aims: We are proposing the Example Driven Review Explanation (EDRE) method to facilitate the code review process by adding additional explanations through examples. EDRE recommends similar code reviews as examples to further explain a review and help a developer to understand the received reviews with less communication overhead. Method: Through an empirical study in an industrial setting and by analyzing 3,722 code reviews across three open-source projects, we compared five methods of data retrieval, text classification, and text recommendation. Results: EDRE using TF-IDF word embedding along with an SVM classifier can provide practical examples for each code review with 92% F-score and 90% Accuracy. Conclusions: The example-based explanation is an established method for assisting experts in explaining decisions. EDRE was developed based on the same philosophy and can accurately provide a set of context-specific examples to facilitate the code review process in software teams.
△ Less
Submitted 23 July, 2022;
originally announced July 2022.
