Collaborative Robotic Biopsy with Trajectory Guidance and Needle Tip Force Feedback
Authors:
Robin Mieling,
Maximilian Neidhardt,
Sarah Latus,
Carolin Stapper,
Stefan Gerlach,
Inga Kniep,
Axel Heinemann,
Benjamin Ondruschka,
Alexander Schlaefer
Abstract:
The diagnostic value of biopsies is highly dependent on the placement of needles. Robotic trajectory guidance has been shown to improve needle positioning, but feedback for real-time navigation is limited. Haptic display of needle tip forces can provide rich feedback for needle navigation by enabling localization of tissue structures along the insertion path. We present a collaborative robotic bio…
▽ More
The diagnostic value of biopsies is highly dependent on the placement of needles. Robotic trajectory guidance has been shown to improve needle positioning, but feedback for real-time navigation is limited. Haptic display of needle tip forces can provide rich feedback for needle navigation by enabling localization of tissue structures along the insertion path. We present a collaborative robotic biopsy system that combines trajectory guidance with kinesthetic feedback to assist the physician in needle placement. The robot aligns the needle while the insertion is performed in collaboration with a medical expert who controls the needle position on site. We present a needle design that senses forces at the needle tip based on optical coherence tomography and machine learning for real-time data processing. Our robotic setup allows operators to sense deep tissue interfaces independent of frictional forces to improve needle placement relative to a desired target structure. We first evaluate needle tip force sensing in ex-vivo tissue in a phantom study. We characterize the tip forces during insertions with constant velocity and demonstrate the ability to detect tissue interfaces in a collaborative user study. Participants are able to detect 91% of ex-vivo tissue interfaces based on needle tip force feedback alone. Finally, we demonstrate that even smaller, deep target structures can be accurately sampled by performing post-mortem in situ biopsies of the pancreas.
△ Less
Submitted 12 July, 2023; v1 submitted 12 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
Robotic Tissue Sampling for Safe Post-mortem Biopsy in Infectious Corpses
Authors:
Maximilian Neidhardt,
Stefan Gerlach,
Robin Mieling,
Max-Heinrich Laves,
Thorben Weiß,
Martin Gromniak,
Antonia Fitzek,
Dustin Möbius,
Inga Kniep,
Alexandra Ron,
Julia Schädler,
Axel Heinemann,
Klaus Püschel,
Benjamin Ondruschka,
Alexander Schlaefer
Abstract:
In pathology and legal medicine, the histopathological and microbiological analysis of tissue samples from infected deceased is a valuable information for develo** treatment strategies during a pandemic such as COVID-19. However, a conventional autopsy carries the risk of disease transmission and may be rejected by relatives. We propose minimally invasive biopsy with robot assistance under CT gu…
▽ More
In pathology and legal medicine, the histopathological and microbiological analysis of tissue samples from infected deceased is a valuable information for develo** treatment strategies during a pandemic such as COVID-19. However, a conventional autopsy carries the risk of disease transmission and may be rejected by relatives. We propose minimally invasive biopsy with robot assistance under CT guidance to minimize the risk of disease transmission during tissue sampling and to improve accuracy. A flexible robotic system for biopsy sampling is presented, which is applied to human corpses placed inside protective body bags. An automatic planning and decision system estimates optimal insertion point. Heat maps projected onto the segmented skin visualize the distance and angle of insertions and estimate the minimum cost of a puncture while avoiding bone collisions. Further, we test multiple insertion paths concerning feasibility and collisions. A custom end effector is designed for inserting needles and extracting tissue samples under robotic guidance. Our robotic post-mortem biopsy (RPMB) system is evaluated in a study during the COVID-19 pandemic on 20 corpses and 10 tissue targets, 5 of them being infected with SARS-CoV-2. The mean planning time including robot path planning is (5.72+-1.67) s. Mean needle placement accuracy is (7.19+-4.22) mm.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2022;
originally announced January 2022.
