-
Constrained Level Planarity is FPT with Respect to the Vertex Cover Number
Authors:
Boris Klemz,
Marie Diana Sieper
Abstract:
The problem Level Planarity asks for a crossing-free drawing of a graph in the plane such that vertices are placed at prescribed y-coordinates (called levels) and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. In the variant Constrained Level Planarity, each level y is equipped with a partial order <_y on its vertices and in the desired drawing the left-to-right order of vertices on level…
▽ More
The problem Level Planarity asks for a crossing-free drawing of a graph in the plane such that vertices are placed at prescribed y-coordinates (called levels) and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. In the variant Constrained Level Planarity, each level y is equipped with a partial order <_y on its vertices and in the desired drawing the left-to-right order of vertices on level y has to be a linear extension of <_y. Constrained Level Planarity is known to be a remarkably difficult problem: previous results by Klemz and Rote [ACM Trans. Alg. 2019] and by Brückner and Rutter [SODA 2017] imply that it remains NP-hard even when restricted to graphs whose tree-depth and feedback vertex set number are bounded by a constant and even when the instances are additionally required to be either proper, meaning that each edge spans two consecutive levels, or ordered, meaning that all given partial orders are total orders. In particular, these results rule out the existence of FPT-time (even XP-time) algorithms with respect to these and related graph parameters (unless P=NP). However, the parameterized complexity of Constrained Level Planarity with respect to the vertex cover number of the input graph remained open.
In this paper, we show that Constrained Level Planarity can be solved in FPT-time when parameterized by the vertex cover number. In view of the previous intractability statements, our result is best-possible in several regards: a speed-up to polynomial time or a generalization to the aforementioned smaller graph parameters is not possible, even if restricting to proper or ordered instances.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Constrained and Ordered Level Planarity Parameterized by the Number of Levels
Authors:
Václav Blažej,
Boris Klemz,
Felix Klesen,
Marie Diana Sieper,
Alexander Wolff,
Johannes Zink
Abstract:
The problem Level Planarity asks for a crossing-free drawing of a graph in the plane such that vertices are placed at prescribed y-coordinates (called levels) and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. In the variant Constrained Level Planarity (CLP), each level $y$ is equipped with a partial order $\prec_y$ on its vertices and in the desired drawing the left-to-right order of ver…
▽ More
The problem Level Planarity asks for a crossing-free drawing of a graph in the plane such that vertices are placed at prescribed y-coordinates (called levels) and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. In the variant Constrained Level Planarity (CLP), each level $y$ is equipped with a partial order $\prec_y$ on its vertices and in the desired drawing the left-to-right order of vertices on level $y$ has to be a linear extension of $\prec_y$. Ordered Level Planarity (OLP) corresponds to the special case of CLP where the given partial orders $\prec_y$ are total orders. Previous results by Brückner and Rutter [SODA 2017] and Klemz and Rote [ACM Trans. Alg. 2019] state that both CLP and OLP are NP-hard even in severely restricted cases. In particular, they remain NP-hard even when restricted to instances whose width (the maximum number of vertices that may share a common level) is at most two. In this paper, we focus on the other dimension: we study the parameterized complexity of CLP and OLP with respect to the height (the number of levels).
We show that OLP parameterized by the height is complete with respect to the complexity class XNLP, which was first studied by Elberfeld et al. [Algorithmica 2015] (under a different name) and recently made more prominent by Bodlaender et al. [FOCS 2021]. It contains all parameterized problems that can be solved nondeterministically in time $f(k) n^{O(1)}$ and space $f(k) \log n$ (where $f$ is a computable function, $n$ is the input size, and $k$ is the parameter). If a problem is XNLP-complete, it lies in XP, but is W[$t$]-hard for every $t$.
In contrast to the fact that OLP parameterized by the height lies in XP, it turns out that CLP is NP-hard even when restricted to instances of height 4. We complement this result by showing that CLP can be solved in polynomial time for instances of height at most 3.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Deciding the Feasibility and Minimizing the Height of Tangles
Authors:
Oksana Firman,
Philipp Kindermann,
Boris Klemz,
Alexander Ravsky,
Alexander Wolff,
Johannes Zink
Abstract:
We study the following combinatorial problem. Given a set of $n$ y-monotone \emph{wires}, a \emph{tangle} determines the order of the wires on a number of horizontal \emph{layers} such that the orders of the wires on any two consecutive layers differ only in swaps of neighboring wires. Given a multiset~$L$ of \emph{swaps} (that is, unordered pairs of wires) and an initial order of the wires, a tan…
▽ More
We study the following combinatorial problem. Given a set of $n$ y-monotone \emph{wires}, a \emph{tangle} determines the order of the wires on a number of horizontal \emph{layers} such that the orders of the wires on any two consecutive layers differ only in swaps of neighboring wires. Given a multiset~$L$ of \emph{swaps} (that is, unordered pairs of wires) and an initial order of the wires, a tangle \emph{realizes}~$L$ if each pair of wires changes its order exactly as many times as specified by~$L$. \textsc{List-Feasibility} is the problem of finding a tangle that realizes a given list~$L$ if such a tangle exists. \textsc{Tangle-Height Minimization} is the problem of finding a tangle that realizes a given list and additionally uses the minimum number of layers. \textsc{List-Feasibility} (and therefore \textsc{Tangle-Height Minimization}) is NP-hard [Yamanaka, Horiyama, Uno, Wasa; CCCG 2018].
We prove that \textsc{List-Feasibility} remains NP-hard if every pair of wires swaps only a constant number of times. On the positive side, we present an algorithm for \textsc{Tangle-Height Minimization} that computes an optimal tangle for $n$ wires and a given list~$L$ of swaps in $O((2|L|/n^2+1)^{n^2/2} \cdot \varphi^n \cdot n)$ time, where $\varphi \approx 1.618$ is the golden ratio and $|L|$ is the total number of swaps in~$L$. From this algorithm, we derive a simpler and faster version to solve \textsc{List-Feasibility}. We also use the algorithm to show that \textsc{List-Feasibility} is in NP and fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the number of wires. For \emph{simple} lists, where every swap occurs at most once, we show how to solve \textsc{Tangle-Height Minimization} in $O(n!\varphi^n)$ time.
△ Less
Submitted 23 December, 2023;
originally announced December 2023.
-
Morphing Graph Drawings in the Presence of Point Obstacles
Authors:
Oksana Firman,
Tim Hegemann,
Boris Klemz,
Felix Klesen,
Marie Diana Sieper,
Alexander Wolff,
Johannes Zink
Abstract:
A crossing-free morph is a continuous deformation between two graph drawings that preserves straight-line pairwise noncrossing edges. Motivated by applications in 3D morphing problems, we initiate the study of morphing graph drawings in the plane in the presence of stationary point obstacles, which need to be avoided throughout the deformation. As our main result, we prove that it is NP-hard to de…
▽ More
A crossing-free morph is a continuous deformation between two graph drawings that preserves straight-line pairwise noncrossing edges. Motivated by applications in 3D morphing problems, we initiate the study of morphing graph drawings in the plane in the presence of stationary point obstacles, which need to be avoided throughout the deformation. As our main result, we prove that it is NP-hard to decide whether such an obstacle-avoiding 2D morph between two given drawings of the same graph exists. This is in sharp contrast to the classical case without obstacles, where there is an efficiently verifiable (necessary and sufficient) criterion for the existence of a morph.
△ Less
Submitted 24 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
The Density Formula: One Lemma to Bound Them All
Authors:
Michael Kaufmann,
Boris Klemz,
Kristin Knorr,
Meghana M. Reddy,
Felix Schröder,
Torsten Ueckerdt
Abstract:
We introduce the Density Formula for (topological) drawings of graphs in the plane or on the sphere, which relates the number of edges, vertices, crossings, and sizes of cells in the drawing. We demonstrate its capability by providing several applications: we prove tight upper bounds on the edge density of various beyond-planar graph classes, including so-called $k$-planar graphs with $k=1,2$, fan…
▽ More
We introduce the Density Formula for (topological) drawings of graphs in the plane or on the sphere, which relates the number of edges, vertices, crossings, and sizes of cells in the drawing. We demonstrate its capability by providing several applications: we prove tight upper bounds on the edge density of various beyond-planar graph classes, including so-called $k$-planar graphs with $k=1,2$, fan-crossing / fan-planar graphs, $k$-bend RAC-graphs with $k=0,1,2$, and quasiplanar graphs. In some cases ($1$-bend and $2$-bend RAC-graphs and fan-crossing / fan-planar graphs), we thereby obtain the first tight upper bounds on the edge density of the respective graph classes. In other cases, we give new streamlined and significantly shorter proofs for bounds that were already known in the literature. Thanks to the Density Formula, all of our proofs are mostly elementary counting and mostly circumvent the typical intricate case analysis found in earlier proofs. Further, in some cases (simple and non-homotopic quasiplanar graphs), our alternative proofs using the Density Formula lead to the first tight lower bound examples.
△ Less
Submitted 4 January, 2024; v1 submitted 10 November, 2023;
originally announced November 2023.
-
Outside-Obstacle Representations with All Vertices on the Outer Face
Authors:
Oksana Firman,
Philipp Kindermann,
Jonathan Klawitter,
Boris Klemz,
Felix Klesen,
Alexander Wolff
Abstract:
An obstacle representation of a graph $G$ consists of a set of polygonal obstacles and a drawing of $G$ as a visibility graph with respect to the obstacles: vertices are mapped to points and edges to straight-line segments such that each edge avoids all obstacles whereas each non-edge intersects at least one obstacle. Obstacle representations have been investigated quite intensely over the last fe…
▽ More
An obstacle representation of a graph $G$ consists of a set of polygonal obstacles and a drawing of $G$ as a visibility graph with respect to the obstacles: vertices are mapped to points and edges to straight-line segments such that each edge avoids all obstacles whereas each non-edge intersects at least one obstacle. Obstacle representations have been investigated quite intensely over the last few years. Here we focus on outside-obstacle representations (OORs) that use only one obstacle in the outer face of the drawing. It is known that every outerplanar graph admits such a representation [Alpert, Koch, Laison; DCG 2010].
We strengthen this result by showing that every (partial) 2-tree has an OOR. We also consider restricted versions of OORs where the vertices of the graph lie on a convex polygon or a regular polygon. We characterize when the complement of a tree and when a complete graph minus a simple cycle admits a convex OOR. We construct regular OORs for all (partial) outerpaths, cactus graphs, and grids.
△ Less
Submitted 2 September, 2022; v1 submitted 25 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
The Segment Number: Algorithms and Universal Lower Bounds for Some Classes of Planar Graphs
Authors:
Ina Goeßmann,
Jonathan Klawitter,
Boris Klemz,
Felix Klesen,
Stephen Kobourov,
Myroslav Kryven,
Alexander Wolff,
Johannes Zink
Abstract:
The segment number of a planar graph $G$ is the smallest number of line segments needed for a planar straight-line drawing of $G$. Dujmović, Eppstein, Suderman, and Wood [CGTA'07] introduced this measure for the visual complexity of graphs. There are optimal algorithms for trees and worst-case optimal algorithms for outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. It is known that every cubic tric…
▽ More
The segment number of a planar graph $G$ is the smallest number of line segments needed for a planar straight-line drawing of $G$. Dujmović, Eppstein, Suderman, and Wood [CGTA'07] introduced this measure for the visual complexity of graphs. There are optimal algorithms for trees and worst-case optimal algorithms for outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. It is known that every cubic triconnected planar $n$-vertex graph (except $K_4$) has segment number $n/2+3$, which is the only known universal lower bound for a meaningful class of planar graphs.
We show that every triconnected planar 4-regular graph can be drawn using at most $n+3$ segments. This bound is tight up to an additive constant, improves a previous upper bound of $7n/4+2$ implied by a more general result of Dujmović et al., and supplements the result for cubic graphs. We also give a simple optimal algorithm for cactus graphs, generalizing the above-mentioned result for trees. We prove the first linear universal lower bounds for outerpaths, maximal outerplanar graphs, 2-trees, and planar 3-trees. This shows that the existing algorithms for these graph classes are constant-factor approximations. For maximal outerpaths, our bound is best possible and can be generalized to circular arcs.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2022; v1 submitted 23 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Simplifying Non-Simple Fan-Planar Drawings
Authors:
Boris Klemz,
Kristin Knorr,
Meghana M. Reddy,
Felix Schröder
Abstract:
A drawing of a graph is fan-planar if the edges intersecting a common edge $a$ share a vertex $A$ on the same side of $a$. More precisely, orienting $e$ arbitrarily and the other edges towards $A$ results in a consistent orientation of the crossings. So far, fan-planar drawings have only been considered in the context of simple drawings, where any two edges share at most one point, including endpo…
▽ More
A drawing of a graph is fan-planar if the edges intersecting a common edge $a$ share a vertex $A$ on the same side of $a$. More precisely, orienting $e$ arbitrarily and the other edges towards $A$ results in a consistent orientation of the crossings. So far, fan-planar drawings have only been considered in the context of simple drawings, where any two edges share at most one point, including endpoints. We show that every non-simple fan-planar drawing can be redrawn as a simple fan-planar drawing of the same graph while not introducing additional crossings. Combined with previous results on fan-planar drawings, this yields that $n$-vertex-graphs having such a drawing can have at most $6.5n$ edges and that the recognition of such graphs is NP-hard. We thereby answer an open problem posed by Kaufmann and Ueckerdt in 2014.
△ Less
Submitted 30 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Adjacency Graphs of Polyhedral Surfaces
Authors:
Elena Arseneva,
Linda Kleist,
Boris Klemz,
Maarten Löffler,
André Schulz,
Birgit Vogtenhuber,
Alexander Wolff
Abstract:
We study whether a given graph can be realized as an adjacency graph of the polygonal cells of a polyhedral surface in $\mathbb{R}^3$. We show that every graph is realizable as a polyhedral surface with arbitrary polygonal cells, and that this is not true if we require the cells to be convex. In particular, if the given graph contains $K_5$, $K_{5,81}$, or any nonplanar $3$-tree as a subgraph, no…
▽ More
We study whether a given graph can be realized as an adjacency graph of the polygonal cells of a polyhedral surface in $\mathbb{R}^3$. We show that every graph is realizable as a polyhedral surface with arbitrary polygonal cells, and that this is not true if we require the cells to be convex. In particular, if the given graph contains $K_5$, $K_{5,81}$, or any nonplanar $3$-tree as a subgraph, no such realization exists. On the other hand, all planar graphs, $K_{4,4}$, and $K_{3,5}$ can be realized with convex cells. The same holds for any subdivision of any graph where each edge is subdivided at least once, and, by a result from McMullen et al. (1983), for any hypercube.
Our results have implications on the maximum density of graphs describing polyhedral surfaces with convex cells: The realizability of hypercubes shows that the maximum number of edges over all realizable $n$-vertex graphs is in $Ω(n \log n)$. From the non-realizability of $K_{5,81}$, we obtain that any realizable $n$-vertex graph has $O(n^{9/5})$ edges. As such, these graphs can be considerably denser than planar graphs, but not arbitrarily dense.
△ Less
Submitted 15 May, 2023; v1 submitted 17 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
The Complexity of Finding Tangles
Authors:
Oksana Firman,
Philipp Kindermann,
Boris Klemz,
Alexander Ravsky,
Alexander Wolff,
Johannes Zink
Abstract:
We study the following combinatorial problem. Given a set of $n$ y-monotone curves, which we call wires, a tangle determines the order of the wires on a number of horizontal layers such that any two consecutive layers differ only in swaps of neighboring wires. Given a multiset $L$ of swaps (that is, unordered pairs of wires) and an initial order of the wires, a tangle realizes $L$ if each pair of…
▽ More
We study the following combinatorial problem. Given a set of $n$ y-monotone curves, which we call wires, a tangle determines the order of the wires on a number of horizontal layers such that any two consecutive layers differ only in swaps of neighboring wires. Given a multiset $L$ of swaps (that is, unordered pairs of wires) and an initial order of the wires, a tangle realizes $L$ if each pair of wires changes its order exactly as many times as specified by $L$. Deciding whether a given multiset of swaps admits a realizing tangle is known to be NP-hard [Yamanaka et al., CCCG 2018]. We prove that this problem remains NP-hard if every pair of wires swaps only a constant number of times. On the positive side, we improve the runtime of a previous exponential-time algorithm. We also show that the problem is in NP and fixed-parameter tractable with respect to the number of wires.
△ Less
Submitted 29 December, 2023; v1 submitted 27 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
On the edge-vertex ratio of maximal thrackles
Authors:
Oswin Aichholzer,
Linda Kleist,
Boris Klemz,
Felix Schröder,
Birgit Vogtenhuber
Abstract:
A drawing of a graph in the plane is a thrackle if every pair of edges intersects exactly once, either at a common vertex or at a proper crossing. Conway's conjecture states that a thrackle has at most as many edges as vertices. In this paper, we investigate the edge-vertex ratio of maximal thrackles, that is, thrackles in which no edge between already existing vertices can be inserted such that t…
▽ More
A drawing of a graph in the plane is a thrackle if every pair of edges intersects exactly once, either at a common vertex or at a proper crossing. Conway's conjecture states that a thrackle has at most as many edges as vertices. In this paper, we investigate the edge-vertex ratio of maximal thrackles, that is, thrackles in which no edge between already existing vertices can be inserted such that the resulting drawing remains a thrackle. For maximal geometric and topological thrackles, we show that the edge-vertex ratio can be arbitrarily small. When forbidding isolated vertices, the edge-vertex ratio of maximal geometric thrackles can be arbitrarily close to the natural lower bound of 1/2. For maximal topological thrackles without isolated vertices, we present an infinite family with an edge-vertex ratio of 5/6.
△ Less
Submitted 17 September, 2019; v1 submitted 23 August, 2019;
originally announced August 2019.
-
The Partition Spanning Forest Problem
Authors:
Philipp Kindermann,
Boris Klemz,
Ignaz Rutter,
Patrick Schnider,
André Schulz
Abstract:
Given a set of colored points in the plane, we ask if there exists a crossing-free straight-line drawing of a spanning forest, such that every tree in the forest contains exactly the points of one color class. We show that the problem is NP-complete, even if every color class contains at most five points, but it is solvable in $O(n^2)$ time when each color class contains at most three points. If w…
▽ More
Given a set of colored points in the plane, we ask if there exists a crossing-free straight-line drawing of a spanning forest, such that every tree in the forest contains exactly the points of one color class. We show that the problem is NP-complete, even if every color class contains at most five points, but it is solvable in $O(n^2)$ time when each color class contains at most three points. If we require that the spanning forest is a linear forest, then the problem becomes NP-complete even if every color class contains at most four points.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2018;
originally announced September 2018.
-
Convexity-Increasing Morphs of Planar Graphs
Authors:
Linda Kleist,
Boris Klemz,
Anna Lubiw,
Lena Schlipf,
Frank Staals,
Darren Strash
Abstract:
We study the problem of convexifying drawings of planar graphs. Given any planar straight-line drawing of an internally 3-connected graph, we show how to morph the drawing to one with strictly convex faces while maintaining planarity at all times. Our morph is convexity-increasing, meaning that once an angle is convex, it remains convex. We give an efficient algorithm that constructs such a morph…
▽ More
We study the problem of convexifying drawings of planar graphs. Given any planar straight-line drawing of an internally 3-connected graph, we show how to morph the drawing to one with strictly convex faces while maintaining planarity at all times. Our morph is convexity-increasing, meaning that once an angle is convex, it remains convex. We give an efficient algorithm that constructs such a morph as a composition of a linear number of steps where each step either moves vertices along horizontal lines or moves vertices along vertical lines. Moreover, we show that a linear number of steps is worst-case optimal.
To obtain our result, we use a well-known technique by Hong and Nagamochi for finding redrawings with convex faces while preserving y-coordinates. Using a variant of Tutte's graph drawing algorithm, we obtain a new proof of Hong and Nagamochi's result which comes with a better running time. This is of independent interest, as Hong and Nagamochi's technique serves as a building block in existing morphing algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 28 January, 2019; v1 submitted 19 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Linear-Time Algorithms for Maximum-Weight Induced Matchings and Minimum Chain Covers in Convex Bipartite Graphs
Authors:
Boris Klemz,
Günter Rote
Abstract:
A bipartite graph $G=(U,V,E)$ is convex if the vertices in $V$ can be linearly ordered such that for each vertex $u\in U$, the neighbors of $u$ are consecutive in the ordering of $V$. An induced matching $H$ of $G$ is a matching such that no edge of $E$ connects endpoints of two different edges of $H$. We show that in a convex bipartite graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ weighted edges, an induced ma…
▽ More
A bipartite graph $G=(U,V,E)$ is convex if the vertices in $V$ can be linearly ordered such that for each vertex $u\in U$, the neighbors of $u$ are consecutive in the ordering of $V$. An induced matching $H$ of $G$ is a matching such that no edge of $E$ connects endpoints of two different edges of $H$. We show that in a convex bipartite graph with $n$ vertices and $m$ weighted edges, an induced matching of maximum total weight can be computed in $O(n+m)$ time. An unweighted convex bipartite graph has a representation of size $O(n)$ that records for each vertex $u\in U$ the first and last neighbor in the ordering of $V$. Given such a compact representation, we compute an induced matching of maximum cardinality in $O(n)$ time.
In convex bipartite graphs, maximum-cardinality induced matchings are dual to minimum chain covers. A chain cover is a covering of the edge set by chain subgraphs, that is, subgraphs that do not contain induced matchings of more than one edge. Given a compact representation, we compute a representation of a minimum chain cover in $O(n)$ time. If no compact representation is given, the cover can be computed in $O(n+m)$ time.
All of our algorithms achieve optimal running time for the respective problem and model. Previous algorithms considered only the unweighted case, and the best algorithm for computing a maximum-cardinality induced matching or a minimum chain cover in a convex bipartite graph had a running time of $O(n^2)$.
△ Less
Submitted 13 November, 2017;
originally announced November 2017.
-
Ordered Level Planarity, Geodesic Planarity and Bi-Monotonicity
Authors:
Boris Klemz,
Günter Rote
Abstract:
We introduce and study the problem Ordered Level Planarity which asks for a planar drawing of a graph such that vertices are placed at prescribed positions in the plane and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. This can be interpreted as a variant of Level Planarity in which the vertices on each level appear in a prescribed total order. We establish a complexity dichotomy with re…
▽ More
We introduce and study the problem Ordered Level Planarity which asks for a planar drawing of a graph such that vertices are placed at prescribed positions in the plane and such that every edge is realized as a y-monotone curve. This can be interpreted as a variant of Level Planarity in which the vertices on each level appear in a prescribed total order. We establish a complexity dichotomy with respect to both the maximum degree and the level-width, that is, the maximum number of vertices that share a level. Our study of Ordered Level Planarity is motivated by connections to several other graph drawing problems.
Geodesic Planarity asks for a planar drawing of a graph such that vertices are placed at prescribed positions in the plane and such that every edge is realized as a polygonal path composed of line segments with two adjacent directions from a given set $S$ of directions symmetric with respect to the origin. Our results on Ordered Level Planarity imply $NP$-hardness for any $S$ with $|S|\ge 4$ even if the given graph is a matching. Katz, Krug, Rutter and Wolff claimed that for matchings Manhattan Geodesic Planarity, the case where $S$ contains precisely the horizontal and vertical directions, can be solved in polynomial time [GD'09]. Our results imply that this is incorrect unless $P=NP$. Our reduction extends to settle the complexity of the Bi-Monotonicity problem, which was proposed by Fulek, Pelsmajer, Schaefer and Štefankovič.
Ordered Level Planarity turns out to be a special case of T-Level Planarity, Clustered Level Planarity and Constrained Level Planarity. Thus, our results strengthen previous hardness results. In particular, our reduction to Clustered Level Planarity generates instances with only two non-trivial clusters. This answers a question posed by Angelini, Da Lozzo, Di Battista, Frati and Roselli.
△ Less
Submitted 24 August, 2017;
originally announced August 2017.
-
Strongly Monotone Drawings of Planar Graphs
Authors:
Stefan Felsner,
Alexander Igamberdiev,
Philipp Kindermann,
Boris Klemz,
Tamara Mchedlidze,
Manfred Scheucher
Abstract:
A straight-line drawing of a graph is a monotone drawing if for each pair of vertices there is a path which is monotonically increasing in some direction, and it is called a strongly monotone drawing if the direction of monotonicity is given by the direction of the line segment connecting the two vertices.
We present algorithms to compute crossing-free strongly monotone drawings for some classes…
▽ More
A straight-line drawing of a graph is a monotone drawing if for each pair of vertices there is a path which is monotonically increasing in some direction, and it is called a strongly monotone drawing if the direction of monotonicity is given by the direction of the line segment connecting the two vertices.
We present algorithms to compute crossing-free strongly monotone drawings for some classes of planar graphs; namely, 3-connected planar graphs, outerplanar graphs, and 2-trees. The drawings of 3-connected planar graphs are based on primal-dual circle packings. Our drawings of outerplanar graphs are based on a new algorithm that constructs strongly monotone drawings of trees which are also convex. For irreducible trees, these drawings are strictly convex.
△ Less
Submitted 7 January, 2016;
originally announced January 2016.
-
Recognizing Weighted Disk Contact Graphs
Authors:
Boris Klemz,
Martin Nöllenburg,
Roman Prutkin
Abstract:
Disk contact representations realize graphs by map** vertices bijectively to interior-disjoint disks in the plane such that two disks touch each other if and only if the corresponding vertices are adjacent in the graph. Deciding whether a vertex-weighted planar graph can be realized such that the disks' radii coincide with the vertex weights is known to be NP-hard. In this work, we reduce the ga…
▽ More
Disk contact representations realize graphs by map** vertices bijectively to interior-disjoint disks in the plane such that two disks touch each other if and only if the corresponding vertices are adjacent in the graph. Deciding whether a vertex-weighted planar graph can be realized such that the disks' radii coincide with the vertex weights is known to be NP-hard. In this work, we reduce the gap between hardness and tractability by analyzing the problem for special graph classes. We show that it remains NP-hard for outerplanar graphs with unit weights and for stars with arbitrary weights, strengthening the previous hardness results. On the positive side, we present constructive linear-time recognition algorithms for caterpillars with unit weights and for embedded stars with arbitrary weights.
△ Less
Submitted 2 September, 2015;
originally announced September 2015.
