-
Towards Safe Robot Use with Edged or Pointed Objects: A Surrogate Study Assembling a Human Hand Injury Protection Database
Authors:
Robin Jeanne Kirschner,
Carina M. Micheler,
Yangcan Zhou,
Sebastian Siegner,
Mazin Hamad,
Claudio Glowalla,
Jan Neumann,
Nader Rajaei,
Rainer Burgkart,
Sami Haddadin
Abstract:
The use of pointed or edged tools or objects is one of the most challenging aspects of today's application of physical human-robot interaction (pHRI). One reason for this is that the severity of harm caused by such edged or pointed impactors is less well studied than for blunt impactors. Consequently, the standards specify well-reasoned force and pressure thresholds for blunt impactors and advise…
▽ More
The use of pointed or edged tools or objects is one of the most challenging aspects of today's application of physical human-robot interaction (pHRI). One reason for this is that the severity of harm caused by such edged or pointed impactors is less well studied than for blunt impactors. Consequently, the standards specify well-reasoned force and pressure thresholds for blunt impactors and advise avoiding any edges and corners in contacts. Nevertheless, pointed or edged impactor geometries cannot be completely ruled out in real pHRI applications. For example, to allow edged or pointed tools such as screwdrivers near human operators, the knowledge of injury severity needs to be extended so that robot integrators can perform well-reasoned, time-efficient risk assessments. In this paper, we provide the initial datasets on injury prevention for the human hand based on drop tests with surrogates for the human hand, namely pig claws and chicken drumsticks. We then demonstrate the ease and efficiency of robot use using the dataset for contact on two examples. Finally, our experiments provide a set of injuries that may also be expected for human subjects under certain robot mass-velocity constellations in collisions. To extend this work, testing on human samples and a collaborative effort from research institutes worldwide is needed to create a comprehensive human injury avoidance database for any pHRI scenario and thus for safe pHRI applications including edged and pointed geometries.
△ Less
Submitted 5 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
A Concise Overview of Safety Aspects in Human-Robot Interaction
Authors:
Mazin Hamad,
Simone Nertinger,
Robin J. Kirschner,
Luis Figueredo,
Abdeldjallil Naceri,
Sami Haddadin
Abstract:
As of today, robots exhibit impressive agility but also pose potential hazards to humans using/collaborating with them. Consequently, safety is considered the most paramount factor in human-robot interaction (HRI). This paper presents a multi-layered safety architecture, integrating both physical and cognitive aspects for effective HRI. We outline critical requirements for physical safety layers a…
▽ More
As of today, robots exhibit impressive agility but also pose potential hazards to humans using/collaborating with them. Consequently, safety is considered the most paramount factor in human-robot interaction (HRI). This paper presents a multi-layered safety architecture, integrating both physical and cognitive aspects for effective HRI. We outline critical requirements for physical safety layers as service modules that can be arbitrarily queried. Further, we showcase an HRI scheme that addresses human factors and perceived safety as high-level constraints on a validated impact safety paradigm. The aim is to enable safety certification of human-friendly robots across various HRI scenarios.
△ Less
Submitted 18 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
ISO/TS 15066: How Different Interpretations Affect Risk Assessment
Authors:
Robin Jeanne Kirschner,
Nico Mansfeld,
Saeed Abdolshah,
Sami Haddadin
Abstract:
The current technical specification ISO/TS15066:2016(E) for safe human-robot interaction contains logically conflicting definitions for the contact between human and robot. This may result in different interpretations for the contact classification and thus no unique outcome can be expected, which may even cause a risk to the human. In previous work, we showed a first set of implications. This pap…
▽ More
The current technical specification ISO/TS15066:2016(E) for safe human-robot interaction contains logically conflicting definitions for the contact between human and robot. This may result in different interpretations for the contact classification and thus no unique outcome can be expected, which may even cause a risk to the human. In previous work, we showed a first set of implications. This paper addresses the possible interpretations of a collision scenario as a result of the varying interpretations for a risk assessment. With an experiment including four commercially available robot systems we demonstrate the procedure of the risk assessment following the different interpretations of the TS. The results indicate possible incorrect use of the technical specification, which we believe needs to be resolved in future revisions. For this, we suggest tools in form of a decision tree and constrained collision force maps, which enable a simple, unambiguous risk assessment for HRI.
△ Less
Submitted 5 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Expectable Motion Unit: Avoiding Hazards From Human Involuntary Motions in Human-Robot Interaction
Authors:
Robin Jeanne Kirschner,
Henning Mayer,
Lisa Burr,
Nico Mansfeld,
Saeed Abdolshah,
Sami Haddadin
Abstract:
In robotics, many control and planning schemes have been developed to ensure human physical safety in human-robot interaction. The human psychological state and the expectation towards the robot, however, are typically neglected. Even if the robot behaviour is regarded as biomechanically safe, humans may still react with a rapid involuntary motion (IM) caused by a startle or surprise. Such sudden,…
▽ More
In robotics, many control and planning schemes have been developed to ensure human physical safety in human-robot interaction. The human psychological state and the expectation towards the robot, however, are typically neglected. Even if the robot behaviour is regarded as biomechanically safe, humans may still react with a rapid involuntary motion (IM) caused by a startle or surprise. Such sudden, uncontrolled motions can jeopardize safety and should be prevented by any means. In this letter, we propose the Expectable Motion Unit (EMU), which ensures that a certain probability of IM occurrence is not exceeded in a typical HRI setting. Based on a model of IM occurrence generated through an experiment with 29 participants, we establish the map** between robot velocity, robot-human distance, and the relative frequency of IM occurrence. This map** is processed towards a real-time capable robot motion generator that limits the robot velocity during task execution if necessary. The EMU is combined in a holistic safety framework that integrates both the physical and psychological safety knowledge. A validation experiment showed that the EMU successfully avoids human IM in five out of six cases.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2024; v1 submitted 15 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
