Showing 1–25 of 25 results for author: Kimmig, A

smProbLog: Stable Model Semantics in ProbLog for Probabilistic Argumentation

Authors: Pietro Totis, Angelika Kimmig, Luc De Raedt

Abstract: Argumentation problems are concerned with determining the acceptability of a set of arguments from their relational structure. When the available information is uncertain, probabilistic argumentation frameworks provide modelling tools to account for it. The first contribution of this paper is a novel interpretation of probabilistic argumentation frameworks as probabilistic logic programs. Probabil… ▽ More Argumentation problems are concerned with determining the acceptability of a set of arguments from their relational structure. When the available information is uncertain, probabilistic argumentation frameworks provide modelling tools to account for it. The first contribution of this paper is a novel interpretation of probabilistic argumentation frameworks as probabilistic logic programs. Probabilistic logic programs are logic programs in which some of the facts are annotated with probabilities. We show that the programs representing probabilistic argumentation frameworks do not satisfy a common assumption in probabilistic logic programming (PLP) semantics, which is, that probabilistic facts fully capture the uncertainty in the domain under investigation. The second contribution of this paper is then a novel PLP semantics for programs where a choice of probabilistic facts does not uniquely determine the truth assignment of the logical atoms. The third contribution of this paper is the implementation of a PLP system supporting this semantics: smProbLog. smProbLog is a novel PLP framework based on the probabilistic logic programming language ProbLog. smProbLog supports many inference and learning tasks typical of PLP, which, together with our first contribution, provide novel reasoning tools for probabilistic argumentation. We evaluate our approach with experiments analyzing the computational cost of the proposed algorithms and their application to a dataset of argumentation problems. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2023; v1 submitted 3 April, 2023; originally announced April 2023.

Comments: Under consideration in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)

MSC Class: 68-06; 68T30 ACM Class: D.1.6; D.3.1

Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in Discrete-Continuous Domains

Authors: Lennert De Smet, Pedro Zuidberg Dos Martires, Robin Manhaeve, Giuseppe Marra, Angelika Kimmig, Luc De Raedt

Abstract: Neural-symbolic AI (NeSy) allows neural networks to exploit symbolic background knowledge in the form of logic. It has been shown to aid learning in the limited data regime and to facilitate inference on out-of-distribution data. Probabilistic NeSy focuses on integrating neural networks with both logic and probability theory, which additionally allows learning under uncertainty. A major limitation… ▽ More Neural-symbolic AI (NeSy) allows neural networks to exploit symbolic background knowledge in the form of logic. It has been shown to aid learning in the limited data regime and to facilitate inference on out-of-distribution data. Probabilistic NeSy focuses on integrating neural networks with both logic and probability theory, which additionally allows learning under uncertainty. A major limitation of current probabilistic NeSy systems, such as DeepProbLog, is their restriction to finite probability distributions, i.e., discrete random variables. In contrast, deep probabilistic programming (DPP) excels in modelling and optimising continuous probability distributions. Hence, we introduce DeepSeaProbLog, a neural probabilistic logic programming language that incorporates DPP techniques into NeSy. Doing so results in the support of inference and learning of both discrete and continuous probability distributions under logical constraints. Our main contributions are 1) the semantics of DeepSeaProbLog and its corresponding inference algorithm, 2) a proven asymptotically unbiased learning algorithm, and 3) a series of experiments that illustrate the versatility of our approach. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2023; v1 submitted 8 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Comments: 27 pages, 9 figures

ACM Class: D.3.1; I.2.4; I.2.6

Declarative Probabilistic Logic Programming in Discrete-Continuous Domains

Authors: Pedro Zuidberg Dos Martires, Luc De Raedt, Angelika Kimmig

Abstract: Over the past three decades, the logic programming paradigm has been successfully expanded to support probabilistic modeling, inference and learning. The resulting paradigm of probabilistic logic programming (PLP) and its programming languages owes much of its success to a declarative semantics, the so-called distribution semantics. However, the distribution semantics is limited to discrete random… ▽ More Over the past three decades, the logic programming paradigm has been successfully expanded to support probabilistic modeling, inference and learning. The resulting paradigm of probabilistic logic programming (PLP) and its programming languages owes much of its success to a declarative semantics, the so-called distribution semantics. However, the distribution semantics is limited to discrete random variables only. While PLP has been extended in various ways for supporting hybrid, that is, mixed discrete and continuous random variables, we are still lacking a declarative semantics for hybrid PLP that not only generalizes the distribution semantics and the modeling language but also the standard inference algorithm that is based on knowledge compilation. We contribute the hybrid distribution semantics together with the hybrid PLP language DC-ProbLog and its inference engine infinitesimal algebraic likelihood weighting (IALW). These have the original distribution semantics, standard PLP languages such as ProbLog, and standard inference engines for PLP based on knowledge compilation as special cases. Thus, we generalize the state-of-the-art of PLP towards hybrid PLP in three different aspects: semantics, language and inference. Furthermore, IALW is the first inference algorithm for hybrid probabilistic programming based on knowledge compilation. △ Less

Submitted 21 February, 2023; originally announced February 2023.

Efficient Knowledge Compilation Beyond Weighted Model Counting

Authors: Rafael Kiesel, Pietro Totis, Angelika Kimmig

Abstract: Quantitative extensions of logic programming often require the solution of so called second level inference tasks, i.e., problems that involve a third operation, such as maximization or normalization, on top of addition and multiplication, and thus go beyond the well-known weighted or algebraic model counting setting of probabilistic logic programming under the distribution semantics. We introduce… ▽ More Quantitative extensions of logic programming often require the solution of so called second level inference tasks, i.e., problems that involve a third operation, such as maximization or normalization, on top of addition and multiplication, and thus go beyond the well-known weighted or algebraic model counting setting of probabilistic logic programming under the distribution semantics. We introduce Second Level Algebraic Model Counting (2AMC) as a generic framework for these kinds of problems. As 2AMC is to (algebraic) model counting what forall-exists-SAT is to propositional satisfiability, it is notoriously hard to solve. First level techniques based on Knowledge Compilation (KC) have been adapted for specific 2AMC instances by imposing variable order constraints on the resulting circuit. However, those constraints can severely increase the circuit size and thus decrease the efficiency of such approaches. We show that we can exploit the logical structure of a 2AMC problem to omit parts of these constraints, thus limiting the negative effect. Furthermore, we introduce and implement a strategy to generate a sufficient set of constraints statically, with a priori guarantees for the performance of KC. Our empirical evaluation on several benchmarks and tasks confirms that our theoretical results can translate into more efficient solving in practice. Under consideration for acceptance in TPLP. △ Less

Submitted 16 May, 2022; originally announced May 2022.

Comments: Paper presented at the 38th International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2022), 16 pages

Using DeepProbLog to perform Complex Event Processing on an Audio Stream

Authors: Marc Roig Vilamala, Tianwei Xing, Harrison Taylor, Luis Garcia, Mani Srivastava, Lance Kaplan, Alun Preece, Angelika Kimmig, Federico Cerutti

Abstract: In this paper, we present an approach to Complex Event Processing (CEP) that is based on DeepProbLog. This approach has the following objectives: (i) allowing the use of subsymbolic data as an input, (ii) retaining the flexibility and modularity on the definitions of complex event rules, (iii) allowing the system to be trained in an end-to-end manner and (iv) being robust against noisily labelled… ▽ More In this paper, we present an approach to Complex Event Processing (CEP) that is based on DeepProbLog. This approach has the following objectives: (i) allowing the use of subsymbolic data as an input, (ii) retaining the flexibility and modularity on the definitions of complex event rules, (iii) allowing the system to be trained in an end-to-end manner and (iv) being robust against noisily labelled data. Our approach makes use of DeepProbLog to create a neuro-symbolic architecture that combines a neural network to process the subsymbolic data with a probabilistic logic layer to allow the user to define the rules for the complex events. We demonstrate that our approach is capable of detecting complex events from an audio stream. We also demonstrate that our approach is capable of training even with a dataset that has a moderate proportion of noisy data. △ Less

Submitted 15 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

Comments: 8 pages, 3 figures

SMProbLog: Stable Model Semantics in ProbLog and its Applications in Argumentation

Authors: Pietro Totis, Angelika Kimmig, Luc De Raedt

Abstract: We introduce SMProbLog, a generalization of the probabilistic logic programming language ProbLog. A ProbLog program defines a distribution over logic programs by specifying for each clause the probability that it belongs to a randomly sampled program, and these probabilities are mutually independent. The semantics of ProbLog is given by the success probability of a query, which corresponds to the… ▽ More We introduce SMProbLog, a generalization of the probabilistic logic programming language ProbLog. A ProbLog program defines a distribution over logic programs by specifying for each clause the probability that it belongs to a randomly sampled program, and these probabilities are mutually independent. The semantics of ProbLog is given by the success probability of a query, which corresponds to the probability that the query succeeds in a randomly sampled program. It is well-defined when each random sample uniquely determines the truth values of all logical atoms. Argumentation problems, however, represent an interesting practical application where this is not always the case. SMProbLog generalizes the semantics of ProbLog to the setting where multiple truth assignments are possible for a randomly sampled program, and implements the corresponding algorithms for both inference and learning tasks. We then show how this novel framework can be used to reason about probabilistic argumentation problems. Therefore, the key contribution of this paper are: a more general semantics for ProbLog programs, its implementation into a probabilistic programming framework for both inference and parameter learning, and a novel approach to probabilistic argumentation problems based on such framework. △ Less

Submitted 7 October, 2021; v1 submitted 5 October, 2021; originally announced October 2021.

ACM Class: D.1.6; D.3.1

Handling Epistemic and Aleatory Uncertainties in Probabilistic Circuits

Authors: Federico Cerutti, Lance M. Kaplan, Angelika Kimmig, Murat Sensoy

Abstract: When collaborating with an AI system, we need to assess when to trust its recommendations. If we mistakenly trust it in regions where it is likely to err, catastrophic failures may occur, hence the need for Bayesian approaches for probabilistic reasoning in order to determine the confidence (or epistemic uncertainty) in the probabilities in light of the training data. We propose an approach to ove… ▽ More When collaborating with an AI system, we need to assess when to trust its recommendations. If we mistakenly trust it in regions where it is likely to err, catastrophic failures may occur, hence the need for Bayesian approaches for probabilistic reasoning in order to determine the confidence (or epistemic uncertainty) in the probabilities in light of the training data. We propose an approach to overcome the independence assumption behind most of the approaches dealing with a large class of probabilistic reasoning that includes Bayesian networks as well as several instances of probabilistic logic. We provide an algorithm for Bayesian learning from sparse, albeit complete, observations, and for deriving inferences and their confidences kee** track of the dependencies between variables when they are manipulated within the unifying computational formalism provided by probabilistic circuits. Each leaf of such circuits is labelled with a beta-distributed random variable that provides us with an elegant framework for representing uncertain probabilities. We achieve better estimation of epistemic uncertainty than state-of-the-art approaches, including highly engineered ones, while being able to handle general circuits and with just a modest increase in the computational effort compared to using point probabilities. △ Less

Submitted 22 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: Under submission to MACH

Proceedings 36th International Conference on Logic Programming (Technical Communications)

Authors: Francesco Ricca, Alessandra Russo, Sergio Greco, Nicola Leone, Alexander Artikis, Gerhard Friedrich, Paul Fodor, Angelika Kimmig, Francesca Lisi, Marco Maratea, Alessandra Mileo, Fabrizio Riguzzi

Abstract: Since the first conference held in Marseille in 1982, ICLP has been the premier international event for presenting research in logic programming. Contributions are solicited in all areas of logic programming and related areas, including but not restricted to: - Foundations: Semantics, Formalisms, Answer-Set Programming, Non-monotonic Reasoning, Knowledge Representation. - Declarative Programm… ▽ More Since the first conference held in Marseille in 1982, ICLP has been the premier international event for presenting research in logic programming. Contributions are solicited in all areas of logic programming and related areas, including but not restricted to: - Foundations: Semantics, Formalisms, Answer-Set Programming, Non-monotonic Reasoning, Knowledge Representation. - Declarative Programming: Inference engines, Analysis, Type and mode inference, Partial evaluation, Abstract interpretation, Transformation, Validation, Verification, Debugging, Profiling, Testing, Logic-based domain-specific languages, constraint handling rules. - Related Paradigms and Synergies: Inductive and Co-inductive Logic Programming, Constraint Logic Programming, Interaction with SAT, SMT and CSP solvers, Logic programming techniques for type inference and theorem proving, Argumentation, Probabilistic Logic Programming, Relations to object-oriented and Functional programming, Description logics, Neural-Symbolic Machine Learning, Hybrid Deep Learning and Symbolic Reasoning. - Implementation: Concurrency and distribution, Objects, Coordination, Mobility, Virtual machines, Compilation, Higher Order, Type systems, Modules, Constraint handling rules, Meta-programming, Foreign interfaces, User interfaces. - Applications: Databases, Big Data, Data Integration and Federation, Software Engineering, Natural Language Processing, Web and Semantic Web, Agents, Artificial Intelligence, Bioinformatics, Education, Computational life sciences, Education, Cybersecurity, and Robotics. △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Journal ref: EPTCS 325, 2020

A Hybrid Neuro-Symbolic Approach for Complex Event Processing

Authors: Marc Roig Vilamala, Harrison Taylor, Tianwei Xing, Luis Garcia, Mani Srivastava, Lance Kaplan, Alun Preece, Angelika Kimmig, Federico Cerutti

Abstract: Training a model to detect patterns of interrelated events that form situations of interest can be a complex problem: such situations tend to be uncommon, and only sparse data is available. We propose a hybrid neuro-symbolic architecture based on Event Calculus that can perform Complex Event Processing (CEP). It leverages both a neural network to interpret inputs and logical rules that express the… ▽ More Training a model to detect patterns of interrelated events that form situations of interest can be a complex problem: such situations tend to be uncommon, and only sparse data is available. We propose a hybrid neuro-symbolic architecture based on Event Calculus that can perform Complex Event Processing (CEP). It leverages both a neural network to interpret inputs and logical rules that express the pattern of the complex event. Our approach is capable of training with much fewer labelled data than a pure neural network approach, and to learn to classify individual events even when training in an end-to-end manner. We demonstrate this comparing our approach against a pure neural network approach on a dataset based on Urban Sounds 8K. △ Less

Submitted 13 October, 2020; v1 submitted 7 September, 2020; originally announced September 2020.

Comments: Accepted as extended abstract at ICLP2020

The current state of automated negotiation theory: a literature review

Authors: Sam Vente, Angelika Kimmig, Alun Preece, Federico Cerutti

Abstract: Automated negotiation can be an efficient method for resolving conflict and redistributing resources in a coalition setting. Automated negotiation has already seen increased usage in fields such as e-commerce and power distribution in smart girds, and recent advancements in opponent modelling have proven to deliver better outcomes. However, significant barriers to more widespread adoption remain,… ▽ More Automated negotiation can be an efficient method for resolving conflict and redistributing resources in a coalition setting. Automated negotiation has already seen increased usage in fields such as e-commerce and power distribution in smart girds, and recent advancements in opponent modelling have proven to deliver better outcomes. However, significant barriers to more widespread adoption remain, such as lack of predictable outcome over time and user trust. Additionally, there have been many recent advancements in the field of reasoning about uncertainty, which could help alleviate both those problems. As there is no recent survey on these two fields, and specifically not on their possible intersection we aim to provide such a survey here. △ Less

Submitted 27 April, 2020; v1 submitted 30 March, 2020; originally announced April 2020.

Comments: pre-print. New version fixes mistake in title

Increasing negotiation performance at the edge of the network

Authors: Sam Vente, Angelika Kimmig, Alun Preece, Federico Cerutti

Abstract: Automated negotiation has been used in a variety of distributed settings, such as privacy in the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and power distribution in Smart Grids. The most common protocol under which these agents negotiate is the Alternating Offers Protocol (AOP). Under this protocol, agents cannot express any additional information to each other besides a counter offer. This can lead to unn… ▽ More Automated negotiation has been used in a variety of distributed settings, such as privacy in the Internet of Things (IoT) devices and power distribution in Smart Grids. The most common protocol under which these agents negotiate is the Alternating Offers Protocol (AOP). Under this protocol, agents cannot express any additional information to each other besides a counter offer. This can lead to unnecessarily long negotiations when, for example, negotiations are impossible, risking to waste bandwidth that is a precious resource at the edge of the network. While alternative protocols exist which alleviate this problem, these solutions are too complex for low power devices, such as IoT sensors operating at the edge of the network. To improve this bottleneck, we introduce an extension to AOP called Alternating Constrained Offers Protocol (ACOP), in which agents can also express constraints to each other. This allows agents to both search the possibility space more efficiently and recognise impossible situations sooner. We empirically show that agents using ACOP can significantly reduce the number of messages a negotiation takes, independently of the strategy agents choose. In particular, we show our method significantly reduces the number of messages when an agreement is not possible. Furthermore, when an agreement is possible it reaches this agreement sooner with no negative effect on the utility. △ Less

Submitted 30 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Comments: Accepted for presentation at The 7th International Conference on Agreement Technologies (AT 2020)

Beyond the Grounding Bottleneck: Datalog Techniques for Inference in Probabilistic Logic Programs (Technical Report)

Authors: Efthymia Tsamoura, Victor Gutierrez-Basulto, Angelika Kimmig

Abstract: State-of-the-art inference approaches in probabilistic logic programming typically start by computing the relevant ground program with respect to the queries of interest, and then use this program for probabilistic inference using knowledge compilation and weighted model counting. We propose an alternative approach that uses efficient Datalog techniques to integrate knowledge compilation with forw… ▽ More State-of-the-art inference approaches in probabilistic logic programming typically start by computing the relevant ground program with respect to the queries of interest, and then use this program for probabilistic inference using knowledge compilation and weighted model counting. We propose an alternative approach that uses efficient Datalog techniques to integrate knowledge compilation with forward reasoning with a non-ground program. This effectively eliminates the grounding bottleneck that so far has prohibited the application of probabilistic logic programming in query answering scenarios over knowledge graphs, while also providing fast approximations on classical benchmarks in the field. △ Less

Submitted 18 November, 2019; originally announced November 2019.

Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming in DeepProbLog

Authors: Robin Manhaeve, Sebastijan Dumančić, Angelika Kimmig, Thomas Demeester, Luc De Raedt

Abstract: We introduce DeepProbLog, a neural probabilistic logic programming language that incorporates deep learning by means of neural predicates. We show how existing inference and learning techniques of the underlying probabilistic logic programming language ProbLog can be adapted for the new language. We theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that DeepProbLog supports (i) both symbolic and subsym… ▽ More We introduce DeepProbLog, a neural probabilistic logic programming language that incorporates deep learning by means of neural predicates. We show how existing inference and learning techniques of the underlying probabilistic logic programming language ProbLog can be adapted for the new language. We theoretically and experimentally demonstrate that DeepProbLog supports (i) both symbolic and subsymbolic representations and inference, (ii) program induction, (iii) probabilistic (logic) programming, and (iv) (deep) learning from examples. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to propose a framework where general-purpose neural networks and expressive probabilistic-logical modeling and reasoning are integrated in a way that exploits the full expressiveness and strengths of both worlds and can be trained end-to-end based on examples. △ Less

Submitted 23 September, 2019; v1 submitted 18 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: Extended version of DeepProbLog: Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming (previously published at NeurIPS 2018). arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1805.10872

Probabilistic Logic Programming with Beta-Distributed Random Variables

Authors: Federico Cerutti, Lance Kaplan, Angelika Kimmig, Murat Sensoy

Abstract: We enable aProbLog---a probabilistic logical programming approach---to reason in presence of uncertain probabilities represented as Beta-distributed random variables. We achieve the same performance of state-of-the-art algorithms for highly specified and engineered domains, while simultaneously we maintain the flexibility offered by aProbLog in handling complex relational domains. Our motivation i… ▽ More We enable aProbLog---a probabilistic logical programming approach---to reason in presence of uncertain probabilities represented as Beta-distributed random variables. We achieve the same performance of state-of-the-art algorithms for highly specified and engineered domains, while simultaneously we maintain the flexibility offered by aProbLog in handling complex relational domains. Our motivation is that faithfully capturing the distribution of probabilities is necessary to compute an expected utility for effective decision making under uncertainty: unfortunately, these probability distributions can be highly uncertain due to sparse data. To understand and accurately manipulate such probability distributions we need a well-defined theoretical framework that is provided by the Beta distribution, which specifies a distribution of probabilities representing all the possible values of a probability when the exact value is unknown. △ Less

Submitted 15 November, 2018; v1 submitted 20 September, 2018; originally announced September 2018.

Comments: Accepted for presentation at AAAI 2019

DeepProbLog: Neural Probabilistic Logic Programming

Authors: Robin Manhaeve, Sebastijan Dumančić, Angelika Kimmig, Thomas Demeester, Luc De Raedt

Abstract: We introduce DeepProbLog, a probabilistic logic programming language that incorporates deep learning by means of neural predicates. We show how existing inference and learning techniques can be adapted for the new language. Our experiments demonstrate that DeepProbLog supports both symbolic and subsymbolic representations and inference, 1) program induction, 2) probabilistic (logic) programming, a… ▽ More We introduce DeepProbLog, a probabilistic logic programming language that incorporates deep learning by means of neural predicates. We show how existing inference and learning techniques can be adapted for the new language. Our experiments demonstrate that DeepProbLog supports both symbolic and subsymbolic representations and inference, 1) program induction, 2) probabilistic (logic) programming, and 3) (deep) learning from examples. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first to propose a framework where general-purpose neural networks and expressive probabilistic-logical modeling and reasoning are integrated in a way that exploits the full expressiveness and strengths of both worlds and can be trained end-to-end based on examples. △ Less

Submitted 12 December, 2018; v1 submitted 28 May, 2018; originally announced May 2018.

Comments: Accepted for spotlight at NeurIPS 2018

Domain Recursion for Lifted Inference with Existential Quantifiers

Authors: Seyed Mehran Kazemi, Angelika Kimmig, Guy Van den Broeck, David Poole

Abstract: In recent work, we proved that the domain recursion inference rule makes domain-lifted inference possible on several relational probability models (RPMs) for which the best known time complexity used to be exponential. We also identified two classes of RPMs for which inference becomes domain lifted when using domain recursion. These two classes subsume the largest lifted classes that were previous… ▽ More In recent work, we proved that the domain recursion inference rule makes domain-lifted inference possible on several relational probability models (RPMs) for which the best known time complexity used to be exponential. We also identified two classes of RPMs for which inference becomes domain lifted when using domain recursion. These two classes subsume the largest lifted classes that were previously known. In this paper, we show that domain recursion can also be applied to models with existential quantifiers. Currently, all lifted inference algorithms assume that existential quantifiers have been removed in pre-processing by Skolemization. We show that besides introducing potentially inconvenient negative weights, Skolemization may increase the time complexity of inference. We give two example models where domain recursion can replace Skolemization, avoids the need for dealing with negative numbers, and reduces the time complexity of inference. These two examples may be interesting from three theoretical aspects: 1- they provide a better and deeper understanding of domain recursion and, in general, (lifted) inference, 2- they may serve as evidence that there are larger classes of models for which domain recursion can satisfyingly replace Skolemization, and 3- they may serve as evidence that better Skolemization techniques exist. △ Less

Submitted 27 July, 2017; v1 submitted 24 July, 2017; originally announced July 2017.

Comments: 7 pages, 1 figure, Accepted at Statistical Relational AI (StarAI) Workshop 2017

A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Map**: Appendix

Authors: Angelika Kimmig, Alex Memory, Renee J. Miller, Lise Getoor

Abstract: In this appendix we provide additional supplementary material to "A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Map**." We include an additional extended example, supplementary experiment details, and proof for the complexity result stated in the main paper. In this appendix we provide additional supplementary material to "A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Map**." We include an additional extended example, supplementary experiment details, and proof for the complexity result stated in the main paper. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2017; originally announced February 2017.

Comments: This is the appendix to the paper "A Collective, Probabilistic Approach to Schema Map**" accepted to ICDE 2017

New Liftable Classes for First-Order Probabilistic Inference

Authors: Seyed Mehran Kazemi, Angelika Kimmig, Guy Van den Broeck, David Poole

Abstract: Statistical relational models provide compact encodings of probabilistic dependencies in relational domains, but result in highly intractable graphical models. The goal of lifted inference is to carry out probabilistic inference without needing to reason about each individual separately, by instead treating exchangeable, undistinguished objects as a whole. In this paper, we study the domain recurs… ▽ More Statistical relational models provide compact encodings of probabilistic dependencies in relational domains, but result in highly intractable graphical models. The goal of lifted inference is to carry out probabilistic inference without needing to reason about each individual separately, by instead treating exchangeable, undistinguished objects as a whole. In this paper, we study the domain recursion inference rule, which, despite its central role in early theoretical results on domain-lifted inference, has later been believed redundant. We show that this rule is more powerful than expected, and in fact significantly extends the range of models for which lifted inference runs in time polynomial in the number of individuals in the domain. This includes an open problem called S4, the symmetric transitivity model, and a first-order logic encoding of the birthday paradox. We further identify new classes S2FO2 and S2RU of domain-liftable theories, which respectively subsume FO2 and recursively unary theories, the largest classes of domain-liftable theories known so far, and show that using domain recursion can achieve exponential speedup even in theories that cannot fully be lifted with the existing set of inference rules. △ Less

Submitted 26 October, 2016; originally announced October 2016.

Comments: Accepted at NIPS-2016. 22 pages, 1 figure

Lazy Explanation-Based Approximation for Probabilistic Logic Programming

Authors: Joris Renkens, Angelika Kimmig, Luc De Raedt

Abstract: We introduce a lazy approach to the explanation-based approximation of probabilistic logic programs. It uses only the most significant part of the program when searching for explanations. The result is a fast and anytime approximate inference algorithm which returns hard lower and upper bounds on the exact probability. We experimentally show that this method outperforms state-of-the-art approximat… ▽ More We introduce a lazy approach to the explanation-based approximation of probabilistic logic programs. It uses only the most significant part of the program when searching for explanations. The result is a fast and anytime approximate inference algorithm which returns hard lower and upper bounds on the exact probability. We experimentally show that this method outperforms state-of-the-art approximate inference. △ Less

Submitted 10 July, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

Probabilistic Programming Concepts

Authors: Luc De Raedt, Angelika Kimmig

Abstract: A multitude of different probabilistic programming languages exists today, all extending a traditional programming language with primitives to support modeling of complex, structured probability distributions. Each of these languages employs its own probabilistic primitives, and comes with a particular syntax, semantics and inference procedure. This makes it hard to understand the underlying progr… ▽ More A multitude of different probabilistic programming languages exists today, all extending a traditional programming language with primitives to support modeling of complex, structured probability distributions. Each of these languages employs its own probabilistic primitives, and comes with a particular syntax, semantics and inference procedure. This makes it hard to understand the underlying programming concepts and appreciate the differences between the different languages. To obtain a better understanding of probabilistic programming, we identify a number of core programming concepts underlying the primitives used by various probabilistic languages, discuss the execution mechanisms that they require and use these to position state-of-the-art probabilistic languages and their implementation. While doing so, we focus on probabilistic extensions of logic programming languages such as Prolog, which have been developed since more than 20 years. △ Less

Submitted 16 December, 2013; originally announced December 2013.

Subgraph Pattern Matching over Uncertain Graphs with Identity Linkage Uncertainty

Authors: Walaa Eldin Moustafa, Angelika Kimmig, Amol Deshpande, Lise Getoor

Abstract: There is a growing need for methods which can capture uncertainties and answer queries over graph-structured data. Two common types of uncertainty are uncertainty over the attribute values of nodes and uncertainty over the existence of edges. In this paper, we combine those with identity uncertainty. Identity uncertainty represents uncertainty over the map** from objects mentioned in the data, o… ▽ More There is a growing need for methods which can capture uncertainties and answer queries over graph-structured data. Two common types of uncertainty are uncertainty over the attribute values of nodes and uncertainty over the existence of edges. In this paper, we combine those with identity uncertainty. Identity uncertainty represents uncertainty over the map** from objects mentioned in the data, or references, to the underlying real-world entities. We propose the notion of a probabilistic entity graph (PEG), a probabilistic graph model that defines a distribution over possible graphs at the entity level. The model takes into account node attribute uncertainty, edge existence uncertainty, and identity uncertainty, and thus enables us to systematically reason about all three types of uncertainties in a uniform manner. We introduce a general framework for constructing a PEG given uncertain data at the reference level and develop highly efficient algorithms to answer subgraph pattern matching queries in this setting. Our algorithms are based on two novel ideas: context-aware path indexing and reduction by join-candidates, which drastically reduce the query search space. A comprehensive experimental evaluation shows that our approach outperforms baseline implementations by orders of magnitude. △ Less

Submitted 30 May, 2013; originally announced May 2013.

Algebraic Model Counting

Authors: Angelika Kimmig, Guy Van den Broeck, Luc De Raedt

Abstract: Weighted model counting (WMC) is a well-known inference task on knowledge bases, used for probabilistic inference in graphical models. We introduce algebraic model counting (AMC), a generalization of WMC to a semiring structure. We show that AMC generalizes many well-known tasks in a variety of domains such as probabilistic inference, soft constraints and network and database analysis. Furthermore… ▽ More Weighted model counting (WMC) is a well-known inference task on knowledge bases, used for probabilistic inference in graphical models. We introduce algebraic model counting (AMC), a generalization of WMC to a semiring structure. We show that AMC generalizes many well-known tasks in a variety of domains such as probabilistic inference, soft constraints and network and database analysis. Furthermore, we investigate AMC from a knowledge compilation perspective and show that all AMC tasks can be evaluated using sd-DNNF circuits. We identify further characteristics of AMC instances that allow for the use of even more succinct circuits. △ Less

Submitted 19 November, 2012; originally announced November 2012.

The Magic of Logical Inference in Probabilistic Programming

Authors: Bernd Gutmann, Ingo Thon, Angelika Kimmig, Maurice Bruynooghe, Luc De Raedt

Abstract: Today, many different probabilistic programming languages exist and even more inference mechanisms for these languages. Still, most logic programming based languages use backward reasoning based on SLD resolution for inference. While these methods are typically computationally efficient, they often can neither handle infinite and/or continuous distributions, nor evidence. To overcome these limitat… ▽ More Today, many different probabilistic programming languages exist and even more inference mechanisms for these languages. Still, most logic programming based languages use backward reasoning based on SLD resolution for inference. While these methods are typically computationally efficient, they often can neither handle infinite and/or continuous distributions, nor evidence. To overcome these limitations, we introduce distributional clauses, a variation and extension of Sato's distribution semantics. We also contribute a novel approximate inference method that integrates forward reasoning with importance sampling, a well-known technique for probabilistic inference. To achieve efficiency, we integrate two logic programming techniques to direct forward sampling. Magic sets are used to focus on relevant parts of the program, while the integration of backward reasoning allows one to identify and avoid regions of the sample space that are inconsistent with the evidence. △ Less

Submitted 26 July, 2011; originally announced July 2011.

Comments: 17 pages, 2 figures, International Conference on Logic Programming (ICLP 2011)

ACM Class: D.1.6

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, Volume 11, Special Issue 4-5, July 2011, pp 663-680. Cambridge University Press 2011

DNF Sampling for ProbLog Inference

Authors: Dimitar Sht. Shterionov, Angelika Kimmig, Theofrastos Mantadelis, Gerda Janssens

Abstract: Inference in probabilistic logic languages such as ProbLog, an extension of Prolog with probabilistic facts, is often based on a reduction to a propositional formula in DNF. Calculating the probability of such a formula involves the disjoint-sum-problem, which is computationally hard. In this work we introduce a new approximation method for ProbLog inference which exploits the DNF to focus samplin… ▽ More Inference in probabilistic logic languages such as ProbLog, an extension of Prolog with probabilistic facts, is often based on a reduction to a propositional formula in DNF. Calculating the probability of such a formula involves the disjoint-sum-problem, which is computationally hard. In this work we introduce a new approximation method for ProbLog inference which exploits the DNF to focus sampling. While this DNF sampling technique has been applied to a variety of tasks before, to the best of our knowledge it has not been used for inference in probabilistic logic systems. The paper also presents an experimental comparison with another sampling based inference method previously introduced for ProbLog. △ Less

Submitted 21 September, 2010; v1 submitted 20 September, 2010; originally announced September 2010.

Comments: Online proceedings of the Joint Workshop on Implementation of Constraint Logic Programming Systems and Logic-based Methods in Programming Environments (CICLOPS-WLPE 2010), Edinburgh, Scotland, U.K., July 15, 2010

Journal ref: Proceedings of CICLOPS-WLPE 2010

On the Implementation of the Probabilistic Logic Programming Language ProbLog

Authors: Angelika Kimmig, Bart Demoen, Luc De Raedt, Vítor Santos Costa, Ricardo Rocha

Abstract: The past few years have seen a surge of interest in the field of probabilistic logic learning and statistical relational learning. In this endeavor, many probabilistic logics have been developed. ProbLog is a recent probabilistic extension of Prolog motivated by the mining of large biological networks. In ProbLog, facts can be labeled with probabilities. These facts are treated as mutually indepen… ▽ More The past few years have seen a surge of interest in the field of probabilistic logic learning and statistical relational learning. In this endeavor, many probabilistic logics have been developed. ProbLog is a recent probabilistic extension of Prolog motivated by the mining of large biological networks. In ProbLog, facts can be labeled with probabilities. These facts are treated as mutually independent random variables that indicate whether these facts belong to a randomly sampled program. Different kinds of queries can be posed to ProbLog programs. We introduce algorithms that allow the efficient execution of these queries, discuss their implementation on top of the YAP-Prolog system, and evaluate their performance in the context of large networks of biological entities. △ Less

Submitted 23 June, 2010; originally announced June 2010.

Comments: 28 pages; To appear in Theory and Practice of Logic Programming (TPLP)

Journal ref: Theory and Practice of Logic Programming, 11, 235-262, 2011