Message in a Bottle -- An Update to the Golden Record
Authors:
Jonathan H. Jiang,
Anamaria Berea,
Heather Bowden,
Prithwis Das,
Kristen A. Fahy,
Joseph Ginsberg,
Robert Jew,
Xiaoming Jiang,
Arik Kershenbaum,
David Kip**,
Graham Lau,
Karen Lewis,
C. Isabel Nunez Lendo,
Philip E. Rosen,
Nick Searra,
Stuart F. Taylor,
John Traphagan
Abstract:
In this first part of our series, we delve into the foundational aspects of the "Message in a Bottle" (henceforth referred to as MIAB). This study stands as a continuation of the legacy set by the Voyager Golden Records launched aboard Voyager 1 and 2 in 1977, which aimed to communicate with intelligent species beyond our world. These Records continue to serve not only as a snapshot of Earth and h…
▽ More
In this first part of our series, we delve into the foundational aspects of the "Message in a Bottle" (henceforth referred to as MIAB). This study stands as a continuation of the legacy set by the Voyager Golden Records launched aboard Voyager 1 and 2 in 1977, which aimed to communicate with intelligent species beyond our world. These Records continue to serve not only as a snapshot of Earth and humanity but also carry forth our desire for establishing contact with advanced alien civilizations. Given the absence of mutually understood signs, symbols, and semiotic conventions, MIAB, like its predecessor, seeks to use scientific methods to design an innovative means of communication encapsulating the story of humanity. Our aim is to convey our collective knowledge, feelings, innovations, and aspirations in a manner that offers a universal, yet contextual understanding of human society, the evolution of life on Earth, and our hopes and concerns for the future. Through this time and space traveling capsule, we also strive to inspire and unify current and future generations to celebrate and safeguard our shared human experience.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2023; v1 submitted 27 May, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
Safe Reasoning Over Ontologies
Authors:
Genady Grabarnik,
Aaron Kershenbaum
Abstract:
As ontologies proliferate and automatic reasoners become more powerful, the problem of protecting sensitive information becomes more serious. In particular, as facts can be inferred from other facts, it becomes increasingly likely that information included in an ontology, while not itself deemed sensitive, may be able to be used to infer other sensitive information.
We first consider the probl…
▽ More
As ontologies proliferate and automatic reasoners become more powerful, the problem of protecting sensitive information becomes more serious. In particular, as facts can be inferred from other facts, it becomes increasingly likely that information included in an ontology, while not itself deemed sensitive, may be able to be used to infer other sensitive information.
We first consider the problem of testing an ontology for safeness defined as its not being able to be used to derive any sensitive facts using a given collection of inference rules. We then consider the problem of optimizing an ontology based on the criterion of making as much useful information as possible available without revealing any sensitive facts.
△ Less
Submitted 1 April, 2009;
originally announced April 2009.
