-
Quantum Speedup for Some Geometric 3SUM-Hard Problems and Beyond
Authors:
J. Mark Keil,
Fraser McLeod,
Debajyoti Mondal
Abstract:
The classical 3SUM conjecture states that the class of 3SUM-hard problems does not admit a truly subquadratic $O(n^{2-δ})$-time algorithm, where $δ>0$, in classical computing. The geometric 3SUM-hard problems have widely been studied in computational geometry and recently, these problems have been examined under the quantum computing model. For example, Ambainis and Larka [TQC'20] designed a quant…
▽ More
The classical 3SUM conjecture states that the class of 3SUM-hard problems does not admit a truly subquadratic $O(n^{2-δ})$-time algorithm, where $δ>0$, in classical computing. The geometric 3SUM-hard problems have widely been studied in computational geometry and recently, these problems have been examined under the quantum computing model. For example, Ambainis and Larka [TQC'20] designed a quantum algorithm that can solve many geometric 3SUM-hard problems in $O(n^{1+o(1)})$-time, whereas Buhrman [ITCS'22] investigated lower bounds under quantum 3SUM conjecture that claims there does not exist any sublinear $O(n^{1-δ})$-time quantum algorithm for the 3SUM problem. The main idea of Ambainis and Larka is to formulate a 3SUM-hard problem as a search problem, where one needs to find a point with a certain property over a set of regions determined by a line arrangement in the plane. The quantum speed-up then comes from the application of the well-known quantum search technique called Grover search over all regions.
This paper further generalizes the technique of Ambainis and Larka for some 3SUM-hard problems when a solution may not necessarily correspond to a single point or the search regions do not immediately correspond to the subdivision determined by a line arrangement. Given a set of $n$ points and a positive number $q$, we design $O(n^{1+o(1)})$-time quantum algorithms to determine whether there exists a triangle among these points with an area at most $q$ or a unit disk that contains at least $q$ points. We also give an $O(n^{1+o(1)})$-time quantum algorithm to determine whether a given set of intervals can be translated so that it becomes contained in another set of given intervals and discuss further generalizations.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
The Maximum Clique Problem in a Disk Graph Made Easy
Authors:
J. Mark Keil,
Debajyoti Mondal
Abstract:
A disk graph is an intersection graph of disks in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Determining the computational complexity of finding a maximum clique in a disk graph is a long-standing open problem. In 1990, Clark, Colbourn, and Johnson gave a polynomial-time algorithm for computing a maximum clique in a unit disk graph. However, finding a maximum clique when disks are of arbitrary size is widely believed to be…
▽ More
A disk graph is an intersection graph of disks in $\mathbb{R}^2$. Determining the computational complexity of finding a maximum clique in a disk graph is a long-standing open problem. In 1990, Clark, Colbourn, and Johnson gave a polynomial-time algorithm for computing a maximum clique in a unit disk graph. However, finding a maximum clique when disks are of arbitrary size is widely believed to be a challenging open problem. The problem is open even if we restrict the disks to have at most two different sizes of radii, or restrict the radii to be within $[1,1+\varepsilon]$ for some $ε>0$. In this paper, we provide a new perspective to examine adjacencies in a disk graph that helps obtain the following results.
- We design an $O(2^k n^{2k} poly(n))$-time algorithm to find a maximum clique in a $n$-vertex disk graph with $k$ different sizes of radii. This is polynomial for every fixed $k$, and thus settles the open question for the case when $k=2$.
- Given a set of $n$ unit disks, we show how to compute a maximum clique inside each possible axis-aligned rectangle determined by the disk centers in $O(n^5\log n)$-time. This is at least a factor of $n^{4/3}$ faster than applying the fastest known algorithm for finding a maximum clique in a unit disk graph for each rectangle independently.
- We give an $O(2^kn^{2rk} poly(n,r))$-time algorithm to find a maximum clique in a $n$-vertex ball graph with $k$ different sizes of radii where the ball centers lie on $r$ parallel planes. This is polynomial for every fixed $k$ and $r$, and thus contrasts the previously known NP-hardness result for finding a maximum clique in an arbitrary ball graph.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Finding a Maximum Clique in a Disk Graph
Authors:
Jared Espenant,
J. Mark Keil,
Debajyoti Mondal
Abstract:
A disk graph is an intersection graph of disks in the Euclidean plane, where the disks correspond to the vertices of the graph and a pair of vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding disks intersect. The problem of determining the time complexity of computing a maximum clique in a disk graph is a long-standing open question. The problem is known to be open even when the radii of all…
▽ More
A disk graph is an intersection graph of disks in the Euclidean plane, where the disks correspond to the vertices of the graph and a pair of vertices are adjacent if and only if their corresponding disks intersect. The problem of determining the time complexity of computing a maximum clique in a disk graph is a long-standing open question. The problem is known to be open even when the radii of all the disks are in the interval $[1,(1+\varepsilon)]$, where $\varepsilon>0$. However, the maximum clique problem is known to be APX-hard for the intersection graphs of many other convex objects such as intersection graphs of ellipses, triangles, and a combination of unit disks and axis-parallel rectangles. Furthermore, there exists an $O(n^3\log n)$-time algorithm to compute a maximum clique for unit disks. Here we obtain the following results.
- We give an algorithm to compute a maximum clique in a unit disk graph in $O(n^{2.5}\log n)$-time, which improves the previously best known running time of $O(n^3\log n)$ [Eppstein '09].
- We extend a widely used `co-2-subdivision approach' to prove that computing a maximum clique in a combination of unit disks and axis-parallel rectangles is NP-hard to approximate within $4448/4449 \approx 0.9997 $. The use of a `co-2-subdivision approach' was previously thought to be unlikely in this setting [Bonnet et al. '20]. Our result improves the previously known inapproximability factor of $7633010347/7633010348\approx 0.9999$.
- We show that the parameter minimum lens width of the disk arrangement may be used to make progress in the case when disk radii are in $[1,(1+\varepsilon)]$. For example, if the minimum lens width is at least $0.265$ and $ \varepsilon\le 0.0001$, which still allows for non-Helly triples in the arrangement, then one can find a maximum clique in polynomial time.
△ Less
Submitted 14 March, 2023;
originally announced March 2023.
-
Improved and Generalized Algorithms for Burning a Planar Point Set
Authors:
Prashant Gokhale,
J. Mark Keil,
Debajyoti Mondal
Abstract:
Given a set $P$ of points in the plane, a point burning process is a discrete time process to burn all the points of $P$ where fires must be initiated at the given points. Specifically, the point burning process starts with a single burnt point from $P$, and at each subsequent step, burns all the points in the plane that are within one unit distance from the currently burnt points, as well as one…
▽ More
Given a set $P$ of points in the plane, a point burning process is a discrete time process to burn all the points of $P$ where fires must be initiated at the given points. Specifically, the point burning process starts with a single burnt point from $P$, and at each subsequent step, burns all the points in the plane that are within one unit distance from the currently burnt points, as well as one other unburnt point of $P$ (if exists). The point burning number of $P$ is the smallest number of steps required to burn all the points of $P$. If we allow the fire to be initiated anywhere, then the burning process is called an anywhere burning process, and the corresponding burning number is called anywhere burning number. Computing the point and anywhere burning number is known to be NP-hard. In this paper we show that both these problems admit PTAS in one dimension. We then show that in two dimensions, point burning and anywhere burning are $(1.96296+\varepsilon)$ and $(1.92188+\varepsilon)$ approximable, respectively, for every $\varepsilon>0$, which improves the previously known $(2+\varepsilon)$ factor for these problems. We also observe that a known result on set cover problem can be leveraged to obtain a 2-approximation for burning the maximum number of points in a given number of steps. We show how the results generalize if we allow the points to have different fire spreading rates. Finally, we prove that even if the burning sources are given as input, finding a point burning sequence itself is NP-hard.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
Minimum Ply Covering of Points with Unit Squares
Authors:
Stephane Durocher,
J. Mark Keil,
Debajyoti Mondal
Abstract:
Given a set $P$ of points and a set $U$ of axis-parallel unit squares in the Euclidean plane, a minimum ply cover of $P$ with $U$ is a subset of $U$ that covers $P$ and minimizes the number of squares that share a common intersection, called the minimum ply cover number of $P$ with $U$. Biedl et al. [Comput. Geom., 94:101712, 2020] showed that determining the minimum ply cover number for a set of…
▽ More
Given a set $P$ of points and a set $U$ of axis-parallel unit squares in the Euclidean plane, a minimum ply cover of $P$ with $U$ is a subset of $U$ that covers $P$ and minimizes the number of squares that share a common intersection, called the minimum ply cover number of $P$ with $U$. Biedl et al. [Comput. Geom., 94:101712, 2020] showed that determining the minimum ply cover number for a set of points by a set of axis-parallel unit squares is NP-hard, and gave a polynomial-time 2-approximation algorithm for instances in which the minimum ply cover number is constant. The question of whether there exists a polynomial-time approximation algorithm remained open when the minimum ply cover number is $ω(1)$. We settle this open question and present a polynomial-time $(8+\varepsilon)$-approximation algorithm for the general problem, for every fixed $\varepsilon>0$.
△ Less
Submitted 12 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
-
Burning Number for the Points in the Plane
Authors:
J. Mark Keil,
Debajyoti Mondal,
Ehsan Moradi
Abstract:
The burning process on a graph $G$ starts with a single burnt vertex, and at each subsequent step, burns the neighbors of the currently burnt vertices, as well as one other unburnt vertex. The burning number of $G$ is the smallest number of steps required to burn all the vertices of the graph. In this paper, we examine the problem of computing the burning number in a geometric setting. The input i…
▽ More
The burning process on a graph $G$ starts with a single burnt vertex, and at each subsequent step, burns the neighbors of the currently burnt vertices, as well as one other unburnt vertex. The burning number of $G$ is the smallest number of steps required to burn all the vertices of the graph. In this paper, we examine the problem of computing the burning number in a geometric setting. The input is a set of points $P$ in the Euclidean plane. The burning process starts with a single burnt point, and at each subsequent step, burns all the points that are within a distance of one unit from the currently burnt points and one other unburnt point. The burning number of $P$ is the smallest number of steps required to burn all the points of $P$. We call this variant \emph{point burning}. We consider another variant called \emph{anywhere burning}, where we are allowed to burn any point of the plane. We show that point burning and anywhere burning problems are both NP-complete, but $(2+\varepsilon)$ approximable for every $\varepsilon>0$. Moreover, if we put a restriction on the number of burning sources that can be used, then the anywhere burning problem becomes NP-hard to approximate within a factor of $\frac{2}{\sqrt{3}}-\varepsilon$.
△ Less
Submitted 26 September, 2022; v1 submitted 9 May, 2022;
originally announced May 2022.
-
Bottleneck Convex Subsets: Finding $k$ Large Convex Sets in a Point Set
Authors:
Stephane Durocher,
J. Mark Keil,
Saeed Mehrabi,
Debajyoti Mondal
Abstract:
Chvátal and Klincsek (1980) gave an $O(n^3)$-time algorithm for the problem of finding a maximum-cardinality convex subset of an arbitrary given set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane. This paper examines a generalization of the problem, the Bottleneck Convex Subsets problem: given a set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane and a positive integer $k$, select $k$ pairwise disjoint convex subsets of $P$ such…
▽ More
Chvátal and Klincsek (1980) gave an $O(n^3)$-time algorithm for the problem of finding a maximum-cardinality convex subset of an arbitrary given set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane. This paper examines a generalization of the problem, the Bottleneck Convex Subsets problem: given a set $P$ of $n$ points in the plane and a positive integer $k$, select $k$ pairwise disjoint convex subsets of $P$ such that the cardinality of the smallest subset is maximized. Equivalently, a solution maximizes the cardinality of $k$ mutually disjoint convex subsets of $P$ of equal cardinality. We show the problem is NP-hard when $k$ is an arbitrary input parameter, we give an algorithm that solves the problem exactly, with running time polynomial in $n$ when $k$ is fixed, and we give a fixed-parameter tractable algorithm parameterized in terms of the number of points strictly interior to the convex hull.
△ Less
Submitted 27 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
-
Finding a Maximum Clique in a Grounded 1-Bend String Graph
Authors:
J. Mark Keil,
Debajyoti Mondal,
Ehsan Moradi,
Yakov Nekrich
Abstract:
A grounded 1-bend string graph is an intersection graph of a set of polygonal lines, each with one bend, such that the lines lie above a common horizontal line $\ell$ and have exactly one endpoint on $\ell$. We show that the problem of finding a maximum clique in a grounded 1-bend string graph is APX-hard, even for strictly $y$-monotone strings. For general 1-bend strings, the problem remains APX-…
▽ More
A grounded 1-bend string graph is an intersection graph of a set of polygonal lines, each with one bend, such that the lines lie above a common horizontal line $\ell$ and have exactly one endpoint on $\ell$. We show that the problem of finding a maximum clique in a grounded 1-bend string graph is APX-hard, even for strictly $y$-monotone strings. For general 1-bend strings, the problem remains APX-hard even if we restrict the position of the bends and end-points to lie on at most three parallel horizontal lines. We give fast algorithms to compute a maximum clique for different subclasses of grounded segment graphs, which are formed by restricting the strings to various forms of $L$-shapes.
△ Less
Submitted 12 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
The Problem with XSD Binary Floating Point Datatypes in RDF
Authors:
Jan Martin Keil,
Merle Gänßinger
Abstract:
The XSD binary floating point datatypes are regularly used for precise numeric values in RDF. However, the use of these datatypes for knowledge representation can systematically impair the quality of data and, compared to the XSD decimal datatype, increases the probability of data processing producing false results. We argue why in most cases the XSD decimal datatype is better suited to represent…
▽ More
The XSD binary floating point datatypes are regularly used for precise numeric values in RDF. However, the use of these datatypes for knowledge representation can systematically impair the quality of data and, compared to the XSD decimal datatype, increases the probability of data processing producing false results. We argue why in most cases the XSD decimal datatype is better suited to represent numeric values in RDF. A survey of the actual usage of datatypes on the relevant subset of the December 2020 Web Data Commons dataset, containing 19453060341 literals from real web data, substantiates the practical relevancy of the described problem: 29 %-68 % of binary floating point values are distorted due to the datatype.
△ Less
Submitted 7 June, 2022; v1 submitted 13 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Computing Maximum Independent Set on Outerstring Graphs and Their Relatives
Authors:
Prosenjit Bose,
Paz Carmi,
J. Mark Keil,
Anil Maheshwari,
Saeed Mehrabi,
Debajyoti Mondal,
Michiel Smid
Abstract:
A graph $G$ with $n$ vertices is called an outerstring graph if it has an intersection representation of a set of $n$ curves inside a disk such that one endpoint of every curve is attached to the boundary of the disk. Given an outerstring graph representation, the Maximum Independent Set (MIS) problem of the underlying graph can be computed in $O(s^3)$ time, where $s$ is the number of segments in…
▽ More
A graph $G$ with $n$ vertices is called an outerstring graph if it has an intersection representation of a set of $n$ curves inside a disk such that one endpoint of every curve is attached to the boundary of the disk. Given an outerstring graph representation, the Maximum Independent Set (MIS) problem of the underlying graph can be computed in $O(s^3)$ time, where $s$ is the number of segments in the representation (Keil et al., Comput. Geom., 60:19--25, 2017). If the strings are of constant size (e.g., line segments, L-shapes, etc.), then the algorithm takes $O(n^3)$ time.
In this paper, we examine the fine-grained complexity of the MIS problem on some well-known outerstring representations. We show that solving the MIS problem on grounded segment and grounded square-L representations is at least as hard as solving MIS on circle graph representations. Note that no $O(n^{2-δ})$-time algorithm, $δ>0$, is known for the MIS problem on circle graphs. For the grounded string representations where the strings are $y$-monotone simple polygonal paths of constant length with segments at integral coordinates, we solve MIS in $O(n^2)$ time and show this to be the best possible under the strong exponential time hypothesis (SETH). For the intersection graph of $n$ L-shapes in the plane, we give a $(4\cdot \log OPT)$-approximation algorithm for MIS (where $OPT$ denotes the size of an optimal solution), improving the previously best-known $(4\cdot \log n)$-approximation algorithm of Biedl and Derka (WADS 2017).
△ Less
Submitted 1 August, 2021; v1 submitted 17 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Polygon Simplification by Minimizing Convex Corners
Authors:
Yeganeh Bahoo,
Stephane Durocher,
J. Mark Keil,
Debajyoti Mondal,
Saeed Mehrabi,
Sahar Mehrpour
Abstract:
Let $P$ be a polygon with $r>0$ reflex vertices and possibly with holes and islands. A subsuming polygon of $P$ is a polygon $P'$ such that $P \subseteq P'$, each connected component $R$ of $P$ is a subset of a distinct connected component $R'$ of $P'$, and the reflex corners of $R$ coincide with those of $R'$. A subsuming chain of $P'$ is a minimal path on the boundary of $P'$ whose two end edges…
▽ More
Let $P$ be a polygon with $r>0$ reflex vertices and possibly with holes and islands. A subsuming polygon of $P$ is a polygon $P'$ such that $P \subseteq P'$, each connected component $R$ of $P$ is a subset of a distinct connected component $R'$ of $P'$, and the reflex corners of $R$ coincide with those of $R'$. A subsuming chain of $P'$ is a minimal path on the boundary of $P'$ whose two end edges coincide with two edges of $P$. Aichholzer et al. proved that every polygon $P$ has a subsuming polygon with $O(r)$ vertices, and posed an open problem to determine the computational complexity of computing subsuming polygons with the minimum number of convex vertices.
We prove that the problem of computing an optimal subsuming polygon is NP-complete, but the complexity remains open for simple polygons (i.e., polygons without holes). Our NP-hardness result holds even when the subsuming chains are restricted to have constant length and lie on the arrangement of lines determined by the edges of the input polygon. We show that this restriction makes the problem polynomial-time solvable for simple polygons.
△ Less
Submitted 13 December, 2018;
originally announced December 2018.
-
Boundary Labeling for Rectangular Diagrams
Authors:
Prosenjit Bose,
Paz Carmi,
J. Mark Keil,
Saeed Mehrabi,
Debajyoti Mondal
Abstract:
Given a set of $n$ points (sites) inside a rectangle $R$ and $n$ points (label locations or ports) on its boundary, a boundary labeling problem seeks ways of connecting every site to a distinct port while achieving different labeling aesthetics. We examine the scenario when the connecting lines (leaders) are drawn as axis-aligned polylines with few bends, every leader lies strictly inside $R$, no…
▽ More
Given a set of $n$ points (sites) inside a rectangle $R$ and $n$ points (label locations or ports) on its boundary, a boundary labeling problem seeks ways of connecting every site to a distinct port while achieving different labeling aesthetics. We examine the scenario when the connecting lines (leaders) are drawn as axis-aligned polylines with few bends, every leader lies strictly inside $R$, no two leaders cross, and the sum of the lengths of all the leaders is minimized. In a $k$-sided boundary labeling problem, where $1\le k\le 4$, the label locations are located on the $k$ consecutive sides of $R$.
In this paper, we develop an $O(n^3\log n)$-time algorithm for 2-sided boundary labeling, where the leaders are restricted to have one bend. This improves the previously best known $O(n^8\log n)$-time algorithm of Kindermann et al. (Algorithmica, 76(1):225-258, 2016). We show the problem is polynomial-time solvable in more general settings such as when the ports are located on more than two sides of $R$, in the presence of obstacles, and even when the objective is to minimize the total number of bends. Our results improve the previous algorithms on boundary labeling with obstacles, as well as provide the first polynomial-time algorithms for minimizing the total leader length and number of bends for 3- and 4-sided boundary labeling. These results settle a number of open questions on the boundary labeling problems (Wolff, Handbook of Graph Drawing, Chapter 23, Table 23.1, 2014).
△ Less
Submitted 28 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Swap** Colored Tokens on Graphs
Authors:
Katsuhisa Yamanaka,
Takashi Horiyama,
J. Mark Keil,
David Kirkpatrick,
Yota Otachi,
Toshiki Saitoh,
Ryuhei Uehara,
Yushi Uno
Abstract:
We investigate the computational complexity of the following problem. We are given a graph in which each vertex has an initial and a target color. Each pair of adjacent vertices can swap their current colors. Our goal is to perform the minimum number of swaps so that the current and target colors agree at each vertex. When the colors are chosen from {1,2,...,c}, we call this problem c-Colored Toke…
▽ More
We investigate the computational complexity of the following problem. We are given a graph in which each vertex has an initial and a target color. Each pair of adjacent vertices can swap their current colors. Our goal is to perform the minimum number of swaps so that the current and target colors agree at each vertex. When the colors are chosen from {1,2,...,c}, we call this problem c-Colored Token Swap** since the current color of a vertex can be seen as a colored token placed on the vertex. We show that c-Colored Token Swap** is NP-complete for c = 3 even if input graphs are restricted to connected planar bipartite graphs of maximum degree 3. We then show that 2-Colored Token Swap** can be solved in polynomial time for general graphs and in linear time for trees. Besides, we show that, the problem for complete graphs is fixed-parameter tractable when parameterized by the number of colors, while it is known to be NP-complete when the number of colors is unbounded.
△ Less
Submitted 19 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
