Exploring the limits of Concurrency in ML Training on Google TPUs
Authors:
Sameer Kumar,
James Bradbury,
Cliff Young,
Yu Emma Wang,
Anselm Levskaya,
Blake Hechtman,
Dehao Chen,
HyoukJoong Lee,
Mehmet Deveci,
Naveen Kumar,
Pankaj Kanwar,
Shibo Wang,
Skye Wanderman-Milne,
Steve Lacy,
Tao Wang,
Tayo Oguntebi,
Yazhou Zu,
Yuanzhong Xu,
Andy Swing
Abstract:
Recent results in language understanding using neural networks have required training hardware of unprecedentedscale, with thousands of chips cooperating on a single training run. This paper presents techniques to scaleML models on the Google TPU Multipod, a mesh with 4096 TPU-v3 chips. We discuss model parallelism toovercome scaling limitations from the fixed batch size in data parallelism, commu…
▽ More
Recent results in language understanding using neural networks have required training hardware of unprecedentedscale, with thousands of chips cooperating on a single training run. This paper presents techniques to scaleML models on the Google TPU Multipod, a mesh with 4096 TPU-v3 chips. We discuss model parallelism toovercome scaling limitations from the fixed batch size in data parallelism, communication/collective optimizations,distributed evaluation of training metrics, and host input processing scaling optimizations. These techniques aredemonstrated in both the TensorFlow and JAX programming frameworks. We also present performance resultsfrom the recent Google submission to the MLPerf-v0.7 benchmark contest, achieving record training times from16 to 28 seconds in four MLPerf models on the Google TPU-v3 Multipod machine.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2021; v1 submitted 6 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
MLPerf Inference Benchmark
Authors:
Vijay Janapa Reddi,
Christine Cheng,
David Kanter,
Peter Mattson,
Guenther Schmuelling,
Carole-Jean Wu,
Brian Anderson,
Maximilien Breughe,
Mark Charlebois,
William Chou,
Ramesh Chukka,
Cody Coleman,
Sam Davis,
Pan Deng,
Greg Diamos,
Jared Duke,
Dave Fick,
J. Scott Gardner,
Itay Hubara,
Sachin Idgunji,
Thomas B. Jablin,
Jeff Jiao,
Tom St. John,
Pankaj Kanwar,
David Lee
, et al. (22 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Machine-learning (ML) hardware and software system demand is burgeoning. Driven by ML applications, the number of different ML inference systems has exploded. Over 100 organizations are building ML inference chips, and the systems that incorporate existing models span at least three orders of magnitude in power consumption and five orders of magnitude in performance; they range from embedded devic…
▽ More
Machine-learning (ML) hardware and software system demand is burgeoning. Driven by ML applications, the number of different ML inference systems has exploded. Over 100 organizations are building ML inference chips, and the systems that incorporate existing models span at least three orders of magnitude in power consumption and five orders of magnitude in performance; they range from embedded devices to data-center solutions. Fueling the hardware are a dozen or more software frameworks and libraries. The myriad combinations of ML hardware and ML software make assessing ML-system performance in an architecture-neutral, representative, and reproducible manner challenging. There is a clear need for industry-wide standard ML benchmarking and evaluation criteria. MLPerf Inference answers that call. In this paper, we present our benchmarking method for evaluating ML inference systems. Driven by more than 30 organizations as well as more than 200 ML engineers and practitioners, MLPerf prescribes a set of rules and best practices to ensure comparability across systems with wildly differing architectures. The first call for submissions garnered more than 600 reproducible inference-performance measurements from 14 organizations, representing over 30 systems that showcase a wide range of capabilities. The submissions attest to the benchmark's flexibility and adaptability.
△ Less
Submitted 9 May, 2020; v1 submitted 6 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
