-
Upper Bounds for All and Max-gain Policy Iteration Algorithms on Deterministic MDPs
Authors:
Ritesh Goenka,
Eashan Gupta,
Sushil Khyalia,
Pratyush Agarwal,
Mulinti Shaik Wajid,
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan
Abstract:
Policy Iteration (PI) is a widely used family of algorithms to compute optimal policies for Markov Decision Problems (MDPs). We derive upper bounds on the running time of PI on Deterministic MDPs (DMDPs): the class of MDPs in which every state-action pair has a unique next state. Our results include a non-trivial upper bound that applies to the entire family of PI algorithms; another to all "max-g…
▽ More
Policy Iteration (PI) is a widely used family of algorithms to compute optimal policies for Markov Decision Problems (MDPs). We derive upper bounds on the running time of PI on Deterministic MDPs (DMDPs): the class of MDPs in which every state-action pair has a unique next state. Our results include a non-trivial upper bound that applies to the entire family of PI algorithms; another to all "max-gain" switching variants; and affirmation that a conjecture regarding Howard's PI on MDPs is true for DMDPs. Our analysis is based on certain graph-theoretic results, which may be of independent interest.
△ Less
Submitted 8 October, 2023; v1 submitted 28 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030: The One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence
Authors:
Peter Stone,
Rodney Brooks,
Erik Brynjolfsson,
Ryan Calo,
Oren Etzioni,
Greg Hager,
Julia Hirschberg,
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan,
Ece Kamar,
Sarit Kraus,
Kevin Leyton-Brown,
David Parkes,
William Press,
AnnaLee Saxenian,
Julie Shah,
Milind Tambe,
Astro Teller
Abstract:
In September 2016, Stanford's "One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence" project (AI100) issued the first report of its planned long-term periodic assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on society. It was written by a panel of 17 study authors, each of whom is deeply rooted in AI research, chaired by Peter Stone of the University of Texas at Austin. The report, entitled…
▽ More
In September 2016, Stanford's "One Hundred Year Study on Artificial Intelligence" project (AI100) issued the first report of its planned long-term periodic assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) and its impact on society. It was written by a panel of 17 study authors, each of whom is deeply rooted in AI research, chaired by Peter Stone of the University of Texas at Austin. The report, entitled "Artificial Intelligence and Life in 2030," examines eight domains of typical urban settings on which AI is likely to have impact over the coming years: transportation, home and service robots, healthcare, education, public safety and security, low-resource communities, employment and workplace, and entertainment. It aims to provide the general public with a scientifically and technologically accurate portrayal of the current state of AI and its potential and to help guide decisions in industry and governments, as well as to inform research and development in the field. The charge for this report was given to the panel by the AI100 Standing Committee, chaired by Barbara Grosz of Harvard University.
△ Less
Submitted 31 October, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
An Analysis of Frame-skip** in Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan,
Siddharth Aravindan,
Vishwajeet Bagdawat,
Varun Bhatt,
Harshith Goka,
Archit Gupta,
Kalpesh Krishna,
Vihari Piratla
Abstract:
In the practice of sequential decision making, agents are often designed to sense state at regular intervals of $d$ time steps, $d > 1$, ignoring state information in between sensing steps. While it is clear that this practice can reduce sensing and compute costs, recent results indicate a further benefit. On many Atari console games, reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms deliver substantially be…
▽ More
In the practice of sequential decision making, agents are often designed to sense state at regular intervals of $d$ time steps, $d > 1$, ignoring state information in between sensing steps. While it is clear that this practice can reduce sensing and compute costs, recent results indicate a further benefit. On many Atari console games, reinforcement learning (RL) algorithms deliver substantially better policies when run with $d > 1$ -- in fact with $d$ even as high as $180$. In this paper, we investigate the role of the parameter $d$ in RL; $d$ is called the "frame-skip" parameter, since states in the Atari domain are images. For evaluating a fixed policy, we observe that under standard conditions, frame-skip** does not affect asymptotic consistency. Depending on other parameters, it can possibly even benefit learning. To use $d > 1$ in the control setting, one must first specify which $d$-step open-loop action sequences can be executed in between sensing steps. We focus on "action-repetition", the common restriction of this choice to $d$-length sequences of the same action. We define a task-dependent quantity called the "price of inertia", in terms of which we upper-bound the loss incurred by action-repetition. We show that this loss may be offset by the gain brought to learning by a smaller task horizon. Our analysis is supported by experiments on different tasks and learning algorithms.
△ Less
Submitted 6 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
Lower Bounds for Policy Iteration on Multi-action MDPs
Authors:
Kumar Ashutosh,
Sarthak Consul,
Bhishma Dedhia,
Parthasarathi Khirwadkar,
Sahil Shah,
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan
Abstract:
Policy Iteration (PI) is a classical family of algorithms to compute an optimal policy for any given Markov Decision Problem (MDP). The basic idea in PI is to begin with some initial policy and to repeatedly update the policy to one from an improving set, until an optimal policy is reached. Different variants of PI result from the (switching) rule used for improvement. An important theoretical que…
▽ More
Policy Iteration (PI) is a classical family of algorithms to compute an optimal policy for any given Markov Decision Problem (MDP). The basic idea in PI is to begin with some initial policy and to repeatedly update the policy to one from an improving set, until an optimal policy is reached. Different variants of PI result from the (switching) rule used for improvement. An important theoretical question is how many iterations a specified PI variant will take to terminate as a function of the number of states $n$ and the number of actions $k$ in the input MDP. While there has been considerable progress towards upper-bounding this number, there are fewer results on lower bounds. In particular, existing lower bounds primarily focus on the special case of $k = 2$ actions. We devise lower bounds for $k \geq 3$. Our main result is that a particular variant of PI can take $Ω(k^{n/2})$ iterations to terminate. We also generalise existing constructions on $2$-action MDPs to scale lower bounds by a factor of $k$ for some common deterministic variants of PI, and by $\log(k)$ for corresponding randomised variants.
△ Less
Submitted 16 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Regret Minimisation in Multi-Armed Bandits Using Bounded Arm Memory
Authors:
Arghya Roy Chaudhuri,
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose a constant word (RAM model) algorithm for regret minimisation for both finite and infinite Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) instances. Most of the existing regret minimisation algorithms need to remember the statistics of all the arms they encounter. This may become a problem for the cases where the number of available words of memory is limited. Designing an efficient…
▽ More
In this paper, we propose a constant word (RAM model) algorithm for regret minimisation for both finite and infinite Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandit (MAB) instances. Most of the existing regret minimisation algorithms need to remember the statistics of all the arms they encounter. This may become a problem for the cases where the number of available words of memory is limited. Designing an efficient regret minimisation algorithm that uses a constant number of words has long been interesting to the community. Some early attempts consider the number of arms to be infinite, and require the reward distribution of the arms to belong to some particular family. Recently, for finitely many-armed bandits an explore-then-commit based algorithm~\citep{Liau+PSY:2018} seems to escape such assumption. However, due to the underlying PAC-based elimination their method incurs a high regret. We present a conceptually simple, and efficient algorithm that needs to remember statistics of at most $M$ arms, and for any $K$-armed finite bandit instance it enjoys a $O(KM +K^{1.5}\sqrt{T\log (T/MK)}/M)$ upper-bound on regret. We extend it to achieve sub-linear \textit{quantile-regret}~\citep{RoyChaudhuri+K:2018} and empirically verify the efficiency of our algorithm via experiments.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
PAC Identification of Many Good Arms in Stochastic Multi-Armed Bandits
Authors:
Arghya Roy Chaudhuri,
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan
Abstract:
We consider the problem of identifying any $k$ out of the best $m$ arms in an $n$-armed stochastic multi-armed bandit. Framed in the PAC setting, this particular problem generalises both the problem of `best subset selection' and that of selecting `one out of the best m' arms [arcsk 2017]. In applications such as crowd-sourcing and drug-designing, identifying a single good solution is often not su…
▽ More
We consider the problem of identifying any $k$ out of the best $m$ arms in an $n$-armed stochastic multi-armed bandit. Framed in the PAC setting, this particular problem generalises both the problem of `best subset selection' and that of selecting `one out of the best m' arms [arcsk 2017]. In applications such as crowd-sourcing and drug-designing, identifying a single good solution is often not sufficient. Moreover, finding the best subset might be hard due to the presence of many indistinguishably close solutions. Our generalisation of identifying exactly $k$ arms out of the best $m$, where $1 \leq k \leq m$, serves as a more effective alternative. We present a lower bound on the worst-case sample complexity for general $k$, and a fully sequential PAC algorithm, \GLUCB, which is more sample-efficient on easy instances. Also, extending our analysis to infinite-armed bandits, we present a PAC algorithm that is independent of $n$, which identifies an arm from the best $ρ$ fraction of arms using at most an additive poly-log number of samples than compared to the lower bound, thereby improving over [arcsk 2017] and [Aziz+AKA:2018]. The problem of identifying $k > 1$ distinct arms from the best $ρ$ fraction is not always well-defined; for a special class of this problem, we present lower and upper bounds. Finally, through a reduction, we establish a relation between upper bounds for the `one out of the best $ρ$' problem for infinite instances and the `one out of the best $m$' problem for finite instances. We conjecture that it is more efficient to solve `small' finite instances using the latter formulation, rather than going through the former.
△ Less
Submitted 24 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
RLWS: A Reinforcement Learning based GPU Warp Scheduler
Authors:
Jayvant Anantpur,
Nagendra Gulur Dwarakanath,
Shivaram Kalyanakrishnan,
Shalabh Bhatnagar,
R. Govindarajan
Abstract:
The Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs) of a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) execute instructions from a group of consecutive threads, called warps. At each cycle, an SM schedules a warp from a group of active warps and can context switch among the active warps to hide various stalls. Hence the performance of warp scheduler is critical to the performance of GPU. Several heuristic warp scheduling algori…
▽ More
The Streaming Multiprocessors (SMs) of a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) execute instructions from a group of consecutive threads, called warps. At each cycle, an SM schedules a warp from a group of active warps and can context switch among the active warps to hide various stalls. Hence the performance of warp scheduler is critical to the performance of GPU. Several heuristic warp scheduling algorithms have been proposed which work well only for the situations they are designed for. GPU workloads are becoming very diverse in nature and hence one heuristic may not work for all cases. To work well over a diverse range of workloads, which might exhibit hitherto unseen characteristics, a warp scheduling algorithm must be able to adapt on-line.
We propose a Reinforcement Learning based Warp Scheduler (RLWS) which learns to schedule warps based on the current state of the core and the long-term benefits of scheduling actions, adapting not only to different types of workloads, but also to different execution phases in each workload. As the design space involving the state variables and the parameters (such as learning and exploration rates, reward and penalty values) used by RLWS is large, we use Genetic Algorithm to identify the useful subset of state variables and parameter values. We evaluated the proposed RLWS using the GPGPU-SIM simulator on a large number of workloads from the Rodinia, Parboil, CUDA-SDK and GPGPU-SIM benchmark suites and compared with other state-of-the-art warp scheduling methods. Our RL based implementation achieved either the best or very close to the best performance in 80\% of kernels with an average speedup of 1.06x over the Loose Round Robin strategy and 1.07x over the Two-Level strategy.
△ Less
Submitted 17 November, 2017;
originally announced December 2017.
