Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Kahl, K

Reducing Texture Bias of Deep Neural Networks via Edge Enhancing Diffusion

Authors: Edgar Heinert, Matthias Rottmann, Kira Maag, Karsten Kahl

Abstract: Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image processing tend to focus on localized texture patterns, commonly referred to as texture bias. While most of the previous works in the literature focus on the task of image classification, we go beyond this and study the texture bias of CNNs in semantic segmentation. In this work, we propose to train CNNs on pre-processed images with less texture to re… ▽ More Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for image processing tend to focus on localized texture patterns, commonly referred to as texture bias. While most of the previous works in the literature focus on the task of image classification, we go beyond this and study the texture bias of CNNs in semantic segmentation. In this work, we propose to train CNNs on pre-processed images with less texture to reduce the texture bias. Therein, the challenge is to suppress image texture while preserving shape information. To this end, we utilize edge enhancing diffusion (EED), an anisotropic image diffusion method initially introduced for image compression, to create texture reduced duplicates of existing datasets. Extensive numerical studies are performed with both CNNs and vision transformer models trained on original data and EED-processed data from the Cityscapes dataset and the CARLA driving simulator. We observe strong texture-dependence of CNNs and moderate texture-dependence of transformers. Training CNNs on EED-processed images enables the models to become completely ignorant with respect to texture, demonstrating resilience with respect to texture re-introduction to any degree. Additionally we analyze the performance reduction in depth on a level of connected components in the semantic segmentation and study the influence of EED pre-processing on domain generalization as well as adversarial robustness. △ Less

Submitted 14 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

ValUES: A Framework for Systematic Validation of Uncertainty Estimation in Semantic Segmentation

Authors: Kim-Celine Kahl, Carsten T. Lüth, Maximilian Zenk, Klaus Maier-Hein, Paul F. Jaeger

Abstract: Uncertainty estimation is an essential and heavily-studied component for the reliable application of semantic segmentation methods. While various studies exist claiming methodological advances on the one hand, and successful application on the other hand, the field is currently hampered by a gap between theory and practice leaving fundamental questions unanswered: Can data-related and model-relate… ▽ More Uncertainty estimation is an essential and heavily-studied component for the reliable application of semantic segmentation methods. While various studies exist claiming methodological advances on the one hand, and successful application on the other hand, the field is currently hampered by a gap between theory and practice leaving fundamental questions unanswered: Can data-related and model-related uncertainty really be separated in practice? Which components of an uncertainty method are essential for real-world performance? Which uncertainty method works well for which application? In this work, we link this research gap to a lack of systematic and comprehensive evaluation of uncertainty methods. Specifically, we identify three key pitfalls in current literature and present an evaluation framework that bridges the research gap by providing 1) a controlled environment for studying data ambiguities as well as distribution shifts, 2) systematic ablations of relevant method components, and 3) test-beds for the five predominant uncertainty applications: OoD-detection, active learning, failure detection, calibration, and ambiguity modeling. Empirical results on simulated as well as real-world data demonstrate how the proposed framework is able to answer the predominant questions in the field revealing for instance that 1) separation of uncertainty types works on simulated data but does not necessarily translate to real-world data, 2) aggregation of scores is a crucial but currently neglected component of uncertainty methods, 3) While ensembles are performing most robustly across the different downstream tasks and settings, test-time augmentation often constitutes a light-weight alternative. Code is at: https://github.com/IML-DKFZ/values △ Less

Submitted 3 May, 2024; v1 submitted 16 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: ICLR 2024 (oral)

Deep Active Learning with Noisy Oracle in Object Detection

Authors: Marius Schubert, Tobias Riedlinger, Karsten Kahl, Matthias Rottmann

Abstract: Obtaining annotations for complex computer vision tasks such as object detection is an expensive and time-intense endeavor involving a large number of human workers or expert opinions. Reducing the amount of annotations required while maintaining algorithm performance is, therefore, desirable for machine learning practitioners and has been successfully achieved by active learning algorithms. Howev… ▽ More Obtaining annotations for complex computer vision tasks such as object detection is an expensive and time-intense endeavor involving a large number of human workers or expert opinions. Reducing the amount of annotations required while maintaining algorithm performance is, therefore, desirable for machine learning practitioners and has been successfully achieved by active learning algorithms. However, it is not merely the amount of annotations which influences model performance but also the annotation quality. In practice, the oracles that are queried for new annotations frequently contain significant amounts of noise. Therefore, cleansing procedures are oftentimes necessary to review and correct given labels. This process is subject to the same budget as the initial annotation itself since it requires human workers or even domain experts. Here, we propose a composite active learning framework including a label review module for deep object detection. We show that utilizing part of the annotation budget to correct the noisy annotations partially in the active dataset leads to early improvements in model performance, especially when coupled with uncertainty-based query strategies. The precision of the label error proposals has a significant influence on the measured effect of the label review. In our experiments we achieve improvements of up to 4.5 mAP points of object detection performance by incorporating label reviews at equal annotation budget. △ Less

Submitted 30 September, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

LMD: Light-weight Prediction Quality Estimation for Object Detection in Lidar Point Clouds

Authors: Tobias Riedlinger, Marius Schubert, Sarina Penquitt, Jan-Marcel Kezmann, Pascal Colling, Karsten Kahl, Lutz Roese-Koerner, Michael Arnold, Urs Zimmermann, Matthias Rottmann

Abstract: Object detection on Lidar point cloud data is a promising technology for autonomous driving and robotics which has seen a significant rise in performance and accuracy during recent years. Particularly uncertainty estimation is a crucial component for down-stream tasks and deep neural networks remain error-prone even for predictions with high confidence. Previously proposed methods for quantifying… ▽ More Object detection on Lidar point cloud data is a promising technology for autonomous driving and robotics which has seen a significant rise in performance and accuracy during recent years. Particularly uncertainty estimation is a crucial component for down-stream tasks and deep neural networks remain error-prone even for predictions with high confidence. Previously proposed methods for quantifying prediction uncertainty tend to alter the training scheme of the detector or rely on prediction sampling which results in vastly increased inference time. In order to address these two issues, we propose LidarMetaDetect (LMD), a light-weight post-processing scheme for prediction quality estimation. Our method can easily be added to any pre-trained Lidar object detector without altering anything about the base model and is purely based on post-processing, therefore, only leading to a negligible computational overhead. Our experiments show a significant increase of statistical reliability in separating true from false predictions. We propose and evaluate an additional application of our method leading to the detection of annotation errors. Explicit samples and a conservative count of annotation error proposals indicates the viability of our method for large-scale datasets like KITTI and nuScenes. On the widely-used nuScenes test dataset, 43 out of the top 100 proposals of our method indicate, in fact, erroneous annotations. △ Less

Submitted 15 June, 2023; v1 submitted 13 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Comments: 19 pages, 11 figures, 11 tables

Identifying Label Errors in Object Detection Datasets by Loss Inspection

Authors: Marius Schubert, Tobias Riedlinger, Karsten Kahl, Daniel Kröll, Sebastian Schoenen, Siniša Šegvić, Matthias Rottmann

Abstract: Labeling datasets for supervised object detection is a dull and time-consuming task. Errors can be easily introduced during annotation and overlooked during review, yielding inaccurate benchmarks and performance degradation of deep neural networks trained on noisy labels. In this work, we for the first time introduce a benchmark for label error detection methods on object detection datasets as wel… ▽ More Labeling datasets for supervised object detection is a dull and time-consuming task. Errors can be easily introduced during annotation and overlooked during review, yielding inaccurate benchmarks and performance degradation of deep neural networks trained on noisy labels. In this work, we for the first time introduce a benchmark for label error detection methods on object detection datasets as well as a label error detection method and a number of baselines. We simulate four different types of randomly introduced label errors on train and test sets of well-labeled object detection datasets. For our label error detection method we assume a two-stage object detector to be given and consider the sum of both stages' classification and regression losses. The losses are computed with respect to the predictions and the noisy labels including simulated label errors, aiming at detecting the latter. We compare our method to three baselines: a naive one without deep learning, the object detector's score and the entropy of the classification softmax distribution. We outperform all baselines and demonstrate that among the considered methods, ours is the only one that detects label errors of all four types efficiently. Furthermore, we detect real label errors a) on commonly used test datasets in object detection and b) on a proprietary dataset. In both cases we achieve low false positives rates, i.e., we detect label errors with a precision for a) of up to 71.5% and for b) with 97%. △ Less

Submitted 19 December, 2023; v1 submitted 13 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

Towards Rapid Prototy** and Comparability in Active Learning for Deep Object Detection

Authors: Tobias Riedlinger, Marius Schubert, Karsten Kahl, Hanno Gottschalk, Matthias Rottmann

Abstract: Active learning as a paradigm in deep learning is especially important in applications involving intricate perception tasks such as object detection where labels are difficult and expensive to acquire. Development of active learning methods in such fields is highly computationally expensive and time consuming which obstructs the progression of research and leads to a lack of comparability between… ▽ More Active learning as a paradigm in deep learning is especially important in applications involving intricate perception tasks such as object detection where labels are difficult and expensive to acquire. Development of active learning methods in such fields is highly computationally expensive and time consuming which obstructs the progression of research and leads to a lack of comparability between methods. In this work, we propose and investigate a sandbox setup for rapid development and transparent evaluation of active learning in deep object detection. Our experiments with commonly used configurations of datasets and detection architectures found in the literature show that results obtained in our sandbox environment are representative of results on standard configurations. The total compute time to obtain results and assess the learning behavior can thereby be reduced by factors of up to 14 when comparing with Pascal VOC and up to 32 when comparing with BDD100k. This allows for testing and evaluating data acquisition and labeling strategies in under half a day and contributes to the transparency and development speed in the field of active learning for object detection. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2022; originally announced December 2022.

Comments: 17 pages, 12 figures, 9 tables

MGiaD: Multigrid in all dimensions. Efficiency and robustness by coarsening in resolution and channel dimensions

Authors: Antonia van Betteray, Matthias Rottmann, Karsten Kahl

Abstract: Current state-of-the-art deep neural networks for image classification are made up of 10 - 100 million learnable weights and are therefore inherently prone to overfitting. The complexity of the weight count can be seen as a function of the number of channels, the spatial extent of the input and the number of layers of the network. Due to the use of convolutional layers the scaling of weight comple… ▽ More Current state-of-the-art deep neural networks for image classification are made up of 10 - 100 million learnable weights and are therefore inherently prone to overfitting. The complexity of the weight count can be seen as a function of the number of channels, the spatial extent of the input and the number of layers of the network. Due to the use of convolutional layers the scaling of weight complexity is usually linear with regards to the resolution dimensions, but remains quadratic with respect to the number of channels. Active research in recent years in terms of using multigrid inspired ideas in deep neural networks have shown that on one hand a significant number of weights can be saved by appropriate weight sharing and on the other that a hierarchical structure in the channel dimension can improve the weight complexity to linear. In this work, we combine these multigrid ideas to introduce a joint framework of multigrid inspired architectures, that exploit multigrid structures in all relevant dimensions to achieve linear weight complexity scaling and drastically reduced weight counts. Our experiments show that this structured reduction in weight count is able to reduce overfitting and thus shows improved performance over state-of-the-art ResNet architectures on typical image classification benchmarks at lower network complexity. △ Less

Submitted 10 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

MetaDetect: Uncertainty Quantification and Prediction Quality Estimates for Object Detection

Authors: Marius Schubert, Karsten Kahl, Matthias Rottmann

Abstract: In object detection with deep neural networks, the box-wise objectness score tends to be overconfident, sometimes even indicating high confidence in presence of inaccurate predictions. Hence, the reliability of the prediction and therefore reliable uncertainties are of highest interest. In this work, we present a post processing method that for any given neural network provides predictive uncertai… ▽ More In object detection with deep neural networks, the box-wise objectness score tends to be overconfident, sometimes even indicating high confidence in presence of inaccurate predictions. Hence, the reliability of the prediction and therefore reliable uncertainties are of highest interest. In this work, we present a post processing method that for any given neural network provides predictive uncertainty estimates and quality estimates. These estimates are learned by a post processing model that receives as input a hand-crafted set of transparent metrics in form of a structured dataset. Therefrom, we learn two tasks for predicted bounding boxes. We discriminate between true positives ($\mathit{IoU}\geq0.5$) and false positives ($\mathit{IoU} < 0.5$) which we term meta classification, and we predict $\mathit{IoU}$ values directly which we term meta regression. The probabilities of the meta classification model aim at learning the probabilities of success and failure and therefore provide a modelled predictive uncertainty estimate. On the other hand, meta regression gives rise to a quality estimate. In numerical experiments, we use the publicly available YOLOv3 network and the Faster-RCNN network and evaluate meta classification and regression performance on the Kitti, Pascal VOC and COCO datasets. We demonstrate that our metrics are indeed well correlated with the $\mathit{IoU}$. For meta classification we obtain classification accuracies of up to 98.92% and AUROCs of up to 99.93%. For meta regression we obtain an $R^2$ value of up to 91.78%. These results yield significant improvements compared to other network's objectness score and other baseline approaches. Therefore, we obtain more reliable uncertainty and quality estimates which is particularly interesting in the absence of ground truth. △ Less

Submitted 6 October, 2020; v1 submitted 4 October, 2020; originally announced October 2020.

Comments: 11 pages, 5 figures, 5 tables

Deep Bayesian Active Semi-Supervised Learning

Authors: Matthias Rottmann, Karsten Kahl, Hanno Gottschalk

Abstract: In many applications the process of generating label information is expensive and time consuming. We present a new method that combines active and semi-supervised deep learning to achieve high generalization performance from a deep convolutional neural network with as few known labels as possible. In a setting where a small amount of labeled data as well as a large amount of unlabeled data is avai… ▽ More In many applications the process of generating label information is expensive and time consuming. We present a new method that combines active and semi-supervised deep learning to achieve high generalization performance from a deep convolutional neural network with as few known labels as possible. In a setting where a small amount of labeled data as well as a large amount of unlabeled data is available, our method first learns the labeled data set. This initialization is followed by an expectation maximization algorithm, where further training reduces classification entropy on the unlabeled data by targeting a low entropy fit which is consistent with the labeled data. In addition the algorithm asks at a specified frequency an oracle for labels of data with entropy above a certain entropy quantile. Using this active learning component we obtain an agile labeling process that achieves high accuracy, but requires only a small amount of known labels. For the MNIST dataset we report an error rate of 2.06% using only 300 labels and 1.06% for 1000 labels. These results are obtained without employing any special network architecture or data augmentation. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

MSC Class: 68T10; 62H30; 62H35