-
Substitutability, equilibrium transport, and matching models
Authors:
Alfred Galichon,
Antoine Jacquet
Abstract:
This chapter explores the role of substitutability in economic models, particularly in the context of optimal transport and matching models. In equilibrium models with substitutability, market-clearing prices can often be recovered using coordinate update methods such as Jacobi's algorithm. We provide a detailed mathematical analysis of models with substitutability through the lens of Z- and M-fun…
▽ More
This chapter explores the role of substitutability in economic models, particularly in the context of optimal transport and matching models. In equilibrium models with substitutability, market-clearing prices can often be recovered using coordinate update methods such as Jacobi's algorithm. We provide a detailed mathematical analysis of models with substitutability through the lens of Z- and M-functions, in particular regarding their role in ensuring the convergence of Jacobi's algorithm. The chapter proceeds by studying matching models using substitutability, first focusing on models with (imperfectly) transferable utility, and then on models with non-transferable utility. In both cases, the text reviews theoretical implications as well as computational approaches (Sinkhorn, Gale--Shapley), and highlights a practical economic application.
△ Less
Submitted 13 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
-
Learning to Solve Job Shop Scheduling under Uncertainty
Authors:
Guillaume Infantes,
Stéphanie Roussel,
Pierre Pereira,
Antoine Jacquet,
Emmanuel Benazera
Abstract:
Job-Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) is a combinatorial optimization problem where tasks need to be scheduled on machines in order to minimize criteria such as makespan or delay. To address more realistic scenarios, we associate a probability distribution with the duration of each task. Our objective is to generate a robust schedule, i.e. that minimizes the average makespan. This paper introduces a…
▽ More
Job-Shop Scheduling Problem (JSSP) is a combinatorial optimization problem where tasks need to be scheduled on machines in order to minimize criteria such as makespan or delay. To address more realistic scenarios, we associate a probability distribution with the duration of each task. Our objective is to generate a robust schedule, i.e. that minimizes the average makespan. This paper introduces a new approach that leverages Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) techniques to search for robust solutions, emphasizing JSSPs with uncertain durations. Key contributions of this research include: (1) advancements in DRL applications to JSSPs, enhancing generalization and scalability, (2) a novel method for addressing JSSPs with uncertain durations. The Wheatley approach, which integrates Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) and DRL, is made publicly available for further research and applications.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue: A Collection of Best Practices for AI Governance and Engineering
Authors:
Qinghua Lu,
Liming Zhu,
Xiwei Xu,
Jon Whittle,
Didar Zowghi,
Aurelie Jacquet
Abstract:
Responsible AI is widely considered as one of the greatest scientific challenges of our time and is key to increase the adoption of AI. Recently, a number of AI ethics principles frameworks have been published. However, without further guidance on best practices, practitioners are left with nothing much beyond truisms. Also, significant efforts have been placed at algorithm-level rather than syste…
▽ More
Responsible AI is widely considered as one of the greatest scientific challenges of our time and is key to increase the adoption of AI. Recently, a number of AI ethics principles frameworks have been published. However, without further guidance on best practices, practitioners are left with nothing much beyond truisms. Also, significant efforts have been placed at algorithm-level rather than system-level, mainly focusing on a subset of mathematics-amenable ethical principles, such as fairness. Nevertheless, ethical issues can arise at any step of the development lifecycle, cutting across many AI and non-AI components of systems beyond AI algorithms and models. To operationalize responsible AI from a system perspective, in this paper, we present a Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue based on the results of a Multivocal Literature Review (MLR). Rather than staying at the principle or algorithm level, we focus on patterns that AI system stakeholders can undertake in practice to ensure that the developed AI systems are responsible throughout the entire governance and engineering lifecycle. The Responsible AI Pattern Catalogue classifies the patterns into three groups: multi-level governance patterns, trustworthy process patterns, and responsible-AI-by-design product patterns. These patterns provide systematic and actionable guidance for stakeholders to implement responsible AI.
△ Less
Submitted 27 September, 2023; v1 submitted 11 September, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
A Trust Framework for Government Use of Artificial Intelligence and Automated Decision Making
Authors:
Pia Andrews,
Tim de Sousa,
Bruce Haefele,
Matt Beard,
Marcus Wigan,
Abhinav Palia,
Kathy Reid,
Saket Narayan,
Morgan Dumitru,
Alex Morrison,
Geoff Mason,
Aurelie Jacquet
Abstract:
This paper identifies the current challenges of the mechanisation, digitisation and automation of public sector systems and processes, and proposes a modern and practical framework to ensure and assure ethical and high veracity Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Automated Decision Making (ADM) systems in public institutions. This framework is designed for the specific context of the public sector, in…
▽ More
This paper identifies the current challenges of the mechanisation, digitisation and automation of public sector systems and processes, and proposes a modern and practical framework to ensure and assure ethical and high veracity Artificial Intelligence (AI) or Automated Decision Making (ADM) systems in public institutions. This framework is designed for the specific context of the public sector, in the jurisdictional and constitutional context of Australia, but is extendable to other jurisdictions and private sectors. The goals of the framework are to: 1) earn public trust and grow public confidence in government systems; 2) to ensure the unique responsibilities and accountabilities (including to the public) of public institutions under Administrative Law are met effectively; and 3) to assure a positive human, societal and ethical impact from the adoption of such systems. The framework could be extended to assure positive environmental or other impacts, but this paper focuses on human/societal outcomes and public trust. This paper is meant to complement principles-based frameworks like Australia's Artificial Intelligence Ethics Framework and the EU Assessment List for Trustworthy AI. In many countries, COVID created a bubble of improved trust, a bubble which has arguably already popped, and in an era of unprecedented mistrust of public institutions (but even in times of high trust) it is not enough that a service is faster, or more cost-effective. This paper proposes recommendations for government systems (technology platforms, operations, culture, governance, engagement, etc.) that would help to improve public confidence and trust in public institutions, policies and services, whilst meeting the special obligations and responsibilities of the public sector.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
