Showing 1–2 of 2 results for author: Itsykson, D
-
Tree-like resolution complexity of two planar problems
Authors:
Dmitry Itsykson,
Anna Malova,
Vsevolod Oparin,
Dmitry Sokolov
Abstract:
We consider two CSP problems: the first CSP encodes 2D Sperner's lemma for the standard triangulation of the right triangle on $n^2$ small triangles; the second CSP encodes the fact that it is impossible to match cells of $n \times n$ square to arrows (two horizontal, two vertical and four diagonal) such that arrows in two cells with a common edge differ by at most $45^\circ$, and all arrows on th…
▽ More
We consider two CSP problems: the first CSP encodes 2D Sperner's lemma for the standard triangulation of the right triangle on $n^2$ small triangles; the second CSP encodes the fact that it is impossible to match cells of $n \times n$ square to arrows (two horizontal, two vertical and four diagonal) such that arrows in two cells with a common edge differ by at most $45^\circ$, and all arrows on the boundary of the square do not look outside (this fact is a corollary of the Brower's fixed point theorem). We prove that the tree-like resolution complexities of these CSPs are $2^{Θ(n)}$. For Sperner's lemma our result implies $Ω(n)$ lower bound on the number of request to colors of vertices that is enough to make in order to find a trichromatic triangle; this lower bound was originally proved by Crescenzi and Silvestri.
CSP based on Sperner's lemma is related with the $\rm PPAD$-complete problem. We show that CSP corresponding to arrows is also related with a $\rm PPAD$-complete problem.
△ Less
Submitted 2 December, 2014;
originally announced December 2014.
-
On optimal heuristic randomized semidecision procedures, with application to proof complexity
Authors:
Edward A. Hirsch,
Dmitry Itsykson
Abstract:
The existence of a (p-)optimal propositional proof system is a major open question in (proof) complexity; many people conjecture that such systems do not exist. Krajicek and Pudlak (1989) show that this question is equivalent to the existence of an algorithm that is optimal on all propositional tautologies. Monroe (2009) recently gave a conjecture implying that such algorithm does not exist.
W…
▽ More
The existence of a (p-)optimal propositional proof system is a major open question in (proof) complexity; many people conjecture that such systems do not exist. Krajicek and Pudlak (1989) show that this question is equivalent to the existence of an algorithm that is optimal on all propositional tautologies. Monroe (2009) recently gave a conjecture implying that such algorithm does not exist.
We show that in the presence of errors such optimal algorithms do exist. The concept is motivated by the notion of heuristic algorithms. Namely, we allow the algorithm to claim a small number of false "theorems" (according to any samplable distribution on non-tautologies) and err with bounded probability on other inputs.
Our result can also be viewed as the existence of an optimal proof system in a class of proof systems obtained by generalizing automatizable proof systems.
△ Less
Submitted 3 February, 2010; v1 submitted 19 August, 2009;
originally announced August 2009.
