MERA: A Comprehensive LLM Evaluation in Russian
Authors:
Alena Fenogenova,
Artem Chervyakov,
Nikita Martynov,
Anastasia Kozlova,
Maria Tikhonova,
Albina Akhmetgareeva,
Anton Emelyanov,
Denis Shevelev,
Pavel Lebedev,
Leonid Sinev,
Ulyana Isaeva,
Katerina Kolomeytseva,
Daniil Moskovskiy,
Elizaveta Goncharova,
Nikita Savushkin,
Polina Mikhailova,
Denis Dimitrov,
Alexander Panchenko,
Sergei Markov
Abstract:
Over the past few years, one of the most notable advancements in AI research has been in foundation models (FMs), headlined by the rise of language models (LMs). As the models' size increases, LMs demonstrate enhancements in measurable aspects and the development of new qualitative features. However, despite researchers' attention and the rapid growth in LM application, the capabilities, limitatio…
▽ More
Over the past few years, one of the most notable advancements in AI research has been in foundation models (FMs), headlined by the rise of language models (LMs). As the models' size increases, LMs demonstrate enhancements in measurable aspects and the development of new qualitative features. However, despite researchers' attention and the rapid growth in LM application, the capabilities, limitations, and associated risks still need to be better understood. To address these issues, we introduce an open Multimodal Evaluation of Russian-language Architectures (MERA), a new instruction benchmark for evaluating foundation models oriented towards the Russian language. The benchmark encompasses 21 evaluation tasks for generative models in 11 skill domains and is designed as a black-box test to ensure the exclusion of data leakage. The paper introduces a methodology to evaluate FMs and LMs in zero- and few-shot fixed instruction settings that can be extended to other modalities. We propose an evaluation methodology, an open-source code base for the MERA assessment, and a leaderboard with a submission system. We evaluate open LMs as baselines and find that they are still far behind the human level. We publicly release MERA to guide forthcoming research, anticipate groundbreaking model features, standardize the evaluation procedure, and address potential societal drawbacks.
△ Less
Submitted 12 January, 2024; v1 submitted 9 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
