Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Hunter, L E

It Is Not About What You Say, It Is About How You Say It: A Surprisingly Simple Approach for Improving Reading Comprehension

Authors: Sagi Shaier, Lawrence E Hunter, Katharina von der Wense

Abstract: Natural language processing has seen rapid progress over the past decade. Due to the speed of developments, some practices get established without proper evaluation. Considering one such case and focusing on reading comprehension, we ask our first research question: 1) How does the order of inputs -- i.e., question and context -- affect model performance? Additionally, given recent advancements in… ▽ More Natural language processing has seen rapid progress over the past decade. Due to the speed of developments, some practices get established without proper evaluation. Considering one such case and focusing on reading comprehension, we ask our first research question: 1) How does the order of inputs -- i.e., question and context -- affect model performance? Additionally, given recent advancements in input emphasis, we ask a second research question: 2) Does emphasizing either the question, the context, or both enhance performance? Experimenting with 9 large language models across 3 datasets, we find that presenting the context before the question improves model performance, with an accuracy increase of up to $31\%$. Furthermore, emphasizing the context yields superior results compared to question emphasis, and in general, emphasizing parts of the input is particularly effective for addressing questions that models lack the parametric knowledge to answer. Experimenting with both prompt-based and attention-based emphasis methods, we additionally find that the best method is surprisingly simple: it only requires concatenating a few tokens to the input and results in an accuracy improvement of up to $36\%$, allowing smaller models to outperform their significantly larger counterparts. △ Less

Submitted 24 June, 2024; originally announced June 2024.

Comments: Accepted to ACL Findings

Comparing Template-based and Template-free Language Model Probing

Authors: Sagi Shaier, Kevin Bennett, Lawrence E Hunter, Katharina von der Wense

Abstract: The differences between cloze-task language model (LM) probing with 1) expert-made templates and 2) naturally-occurring text have often been overlooked. Here, we evaluate 16 different LMs on 10 probing English datasets -- 4 template-based and 6 template-free -- in general and biomedical domains to answer the following research questions: (RQ1) Do model rankings differ between the two approaches? (… ▽ More The differences between cloze-task language model (LM) probing with 1) expert-made templates and 2) naturally-occurring text have often been overlooked. Here, we evaluate 16 different LMs on 10 probing English datasets -- 4 template-based and 6 template-free -- in general and biomedical domains to answer the following research questions: (RQ1) Do model rankings differ between the two approaches? (RQ2) Do models' absolute scores differ between the two approaches? (RQ3) Do the answers to RQ1 and RQ2 differ between general and domain-specific models? Our findings are: 1) Template-free and template-based approaches often rank models differently, except for the top domain-specific models. 2) Scores decrease by up to 42% Acc@1 when comparing parallel template-free and template-based prompts. 3) Perplexity is negatively correlated with accuracy in the template-free approach, but, counter-intuitively, they are positively correlated for template-based probing. 4) Models tend to predict the same answers frequently across prompts for template-based probing, which is less common when employing template-free techniques. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: Accepted to EACL 2024

Desiderata for the Context Use of Question Answering Systems

Authors: Sagi Shaier, Lawrence E Hunter, Katharina von der Wense

Abstract: Prior work has uncovered a set of common problems in state-of-the-art context-based question answering (QA) systems: a lack of attention to the context when the latter conflicts with a model's parametric knowledge, little robustness to noise, and a lack of consistency with their answers. However, most prior work focus on one or two of those problems in isolation, which makes it difficult to see tr… ▽ More Prior work has uncovered a set of common problems in state-of-the-art context-based question answering (QA) systems: a lack of attention to the context when the latter conflicts with a model's parametric knowledge, little robustness to noise, and a lack of consistency with their answers. However, most prior work focus on one or two of those problems in isolation, which makes it difficult to see trends across them. We aim to close this gap, by first outlining a set of -- previously discussed as well as novel -- desiderata for QA models. We then survey relevant analysis and methods papers to provide an overview of the state of the field. The second part of our work presents experiments where we evaluate 15 QA systems on 5 datasets according to all desiderata at once. We find many novel trends, including (1) systems that are less susceptible to noise are not necessarily more consistent with their answers when given irrelevant context; (2) most systems that are more susceptible to noise are more likely to correctly answer according to a context that conflicts with their parametric knowledge; and (3) the combination of conflicting knowledge and noise can reduce system performance by up to 96%. As such, our desiderata help increase our understanding of how these models work and reveal potential avenues for improvements. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Comments: Accepted to EACL 2024

Who Are All The Stochastic Parrots Imitating? They Should Tell Us!

Authors: Sagi Shaier, Lawrence E. Hunter, Katharina von der Wense

Abstract: Both standalone language models (LMs) as well as LMs within downstream-task systems have been shown to generate statements which are factually untrue. This problem is especially severe for low-resource languages, where training data is scarce and of worse quality than for high-resource languages. In this opinion piece, we argue that LMs in their current state will never be fully trustworthy in cri… ▽ More Both standalone language models (LMs) as well as LMs within downstream-task systems have been shown to generate statements which are factually untrue. This problem is especially severe for low-resource languages, where training data is scarce and of worse quality than for high-resource languages. In this opinion piece, we argue that LMs in their current state will never be fully trustworthy in critical settings and suggest a possible novel strategy to handle this issue: by building LMs such that can cite their sources - i.e., point a user to the parts of their training data that back up their outputs. We first discuss which current NLP tasks would or would not benefit from such models. We then highlight the expected benefits such models would bring, e.g., quick verifiability of statements. We end by outlining the individual tasks that would need to be solved on the way to develo** LMs with the ability to cite. We hope to start a discussion about the field's current approach to building LMs, especially for low-resource languages, and the role of the training data in explaining model generations. △ Less

Submitted 16 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

Comments: Accepted to IJCNLP-AACL 2023

An Open-Source Knowledge Graph Ecosystem for the Life Sciences

Authors: Tiffany J. Callahan, Ignacio J. Tripodi, Adrianne L. Stefanski, Luca Cappelletti, Sanya B. Taneja, Jordan M. Wyrwa, Elena Casiraghi, Nicolas A. Matentzoglu, Justin Reese, Jonathan C. Silverstein, Charles Tapley Hoyt, Richard D. Boyce, Scott A. Malec, Deepak R. Unni, Marcin P. Joachimiak, Peter N. Robinson, Christopher J. Mungall, Emanuele Cavalleri, Tommaso Fontana, Giorgio Valentini, Marco Mesiti, Lucas A. Gillenwater, Brook Santangelo, Nicole A. Vasilevsky, Robert Hoehndorf , et al. (7 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Translational research requires data at multiple scales of biological organization. Advancements in sequencing and multi-omics technologies have increased the availability of these data, but researchers face significant integration challenges. Knowledge graphs (KGs) are used to model complex phenomena, and methods exist to construct them automatically. However, tackling complex biomedical integrat… ▽ More Translational research requires data at multiple scales of biological organization. Advancements in sequencing and multi-omics technologies have increased the availability of these data, but researchers face significant integration challenges. Knowledge graphs (KGs) are used to model complex phenomena, and methods exist to construct them automatically. However, tackling complex biomedical integration problems requires flexibility in the way knowledge is modeled. Moreover, existing KG construction methods provide robust tooling at the cost of fixed or limited choices among knowledge representation models. PheKnowLator (Phenotype Knowledge Translator) is a semantic ecosystem for automating the FAIR (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) construction of ontologically grounded KGs with fully customizable knowledge representation. The ecosystem includes KG construction resources (e.g., data preparation APIs), analysis tools (e.g., SPARQL endpoints and abstraction algorithms), and benchmarks (e.g., prebuilt KGs and embeddings). We evaluated the ecosystem by systematically comparing it to existing open-source KG construction methods and by analyzing its computational performance when used to construct 12 large-scale KGs. With flexible knowledge representation, PheKnowLator enables fully customizable KGs without compromising performance or usability. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2024; v1 submitted 11 July, 2023; originally announced July 2023.

Ontologizing Health Systems Data at Scale: Making Translational Discovery a Reality

Authors: Tiffany J. Callahan, Adrianne L. Stefanski, Jordan M. Wyrwa, Chenjie Zeng, Anna Ostropolets, Juan M. Banda, William A. Baumgartner Jr., Richard D. Boyce, Elena Casiraghi, Ben D. Coleman, Janine H. Collins, Sara J. Deakyne-Davies, James A. Feinstein, Melissa A. Haendel, Asiyah Y. Lin, Blake Martin, Nicolas A. Matentzoglu, Daniella Meeker, Justin Reese, Jessica Sinclair, Sanya B. Taneja, Katy E. Trinkley, Nicole A. Vasilevsky, Andrew Williams, Xingman A. Zhang , et al. (7 additional authors not shown)

Abstract: Background: Common data models solve many challenges of standardizing electronic health record (EHR) data, but are unable to semantically integrate all the resources needed for deep phenoty**. Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry ontologies provide computable representations of biological knowledge and enable the integration of heterogeneous data. However, map** EHR data to OB… ▽ More Background: Common data models solve many challenges of standardizing electronic health record (EHR) data, but are unable to semantically integrate all the resources needed for deep phenoty**. Open Biological and Biomedical Ontology (OBO) Foundry ontologies provide computable representations of biological knowledge and enable the integration of heterogeneous data. However, map** EHR data to OBO ontologies requires significant manual curation and domain expertise. Objective: We introduce OMOP2OBO, an algorithm for map** Observational Medical Outcomes Partnership (OMOP) vocabularies to OBO ontologies. Results: Using OMOP2OBO, we produced map**s for 92,367 conditions, 8611 drug ingredients, and 10,673 measurement results, which covered 68-99% of concepts used in clinical practice when examined across 24 hospitals. When used to phenotype rare disease patients, the map**s helped systematically identify undiagnosed patients who might benefit from genetic testing. Conclusions: By aligning OMOP vocabularies to OBO ontologies our algorithm presents new opportunities to advance EHR-based deep phenoty**. △ Less

Submitted 30 January, 2023; v1 submitted 10 September, 2022; originally announced September 2022.

Comments: Supplementary Material is included at the end of the manuscript

ACM Class: J.3

Knowledge-Driven Mechanistic Enrichment of the Preeclampsia Ignorome

Authors: Tiffany J. Callahan, Adrianne L. Stefanski, **-Dong Kim, William A. Baumgartner Jr., Jordan M. Wyrwa, Lawrence E. Hunter

Abstract: Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Currently, the only definitive treatment of preeclampsia is delivery of the placenta, which is central to the pathogenesis of the disease. Transcriptional profiling of human placenta from pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia has been extensively performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The decisio… ▽ More Preeclampsia is a leading cause of maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Currently, the only definitive treatment of preeclampsia is delivery of the placenta, which is central to the pathogenesis of the disease. Transcriptional profiling of human placenta from pregnancies complicated by preeclampsia has been extensively performed to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs). The decisions to investigate DEGs experimentally are biased by many factors, causing many DEGs to remain uninvestigated. A set of DEGs which are associated with a disease experimentally, but which have no known association to the disease in the literature are known as the ignorome. Preeclampsia has an extensive body of scientific literature, a large pool of DEG data, and only one definitive treatment. Tools facilitating knowledge-based analyses, which are capable of combining disparate data from many sources in order to suggest underlying mechanisms of action, may be a valuable resource to support discovery and improve our understanding of this disease. In this work we demonstrate how a biomedical knowledge graph (KG) can be used to identify novel preeclampsia molecular mechanisms. Existing open source biomedical resources and publicly available high-throughput transcriptional profiling data were used to identify and annotate the function of currently uninvestigated preeclampsia-associated DEGs. Experimentally investigated genes associated with preeclampsia were identified from PubMed abstracts using text-mining methodologies. The relative complement of the text-mined- and meta-analysis-derived lists were identified as the uninvestigated preeclampsia-associated DEGs (n=445), i.e., the preeclampsia ignorome. Using the KG to investigate relevant DEGs revealed 53 novel clinically relevant and biologically actionable mechanistic associations. △ Less

Submitted 2 October, 2022; v1 submitted 27 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Preprint of an article submitted for consideration in Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing ©2022 copyright World Scientific Publishing Company https://psb.stanford.edu/

Hypernetwork Science: From Multidimensional Networks to Computational Topology

Authors: Cliff A. Joslyn, Sinan Aksoy, Tiffany J. Callahan, Lawrence E. Hunter, Brett Jefferson, Brenda Praggastis, Emilie A. H. Purvine, Ignacio J. Tripodi

Abstract: As data structures and mathematical objects used for complex systems modeling, hypergraphs sit nicely poised between on the one hand the world of network models, and on the other that of higher-order mathematical abstractions from algebra, lattice theory, and topology. They are able to represent complex systems interactions more faithfully than graphs and networks, while also being some of the sim… ▽ More As data structures and mathematical objects used for complex systems modeling, hypergraphs sit nicely poised between on the one hand the world of network models, and on the other that of higher-order mathematical abstractions from algebra, lattice theory, and topology. They are able to represent complex systems interactions more faithfully than graphs and networks, while also being some of the simplest classes of systems representing topological structures as collections of multidimensional objects connected in a particular pattern. In this paper we discuss the role of (undirected) hypergraphs in the science of complex networks, and provide a mathematical overview of the core concepts needed for hypernetwork modeling, including duality and the relationship to bicolored graphs, quantitative adjacency and incidence, the nature of walks in hypergraphs, and available topological relationships and properties. We close with a brief discussion of two example applications: biomedical databases for disease analysis, and domain-name system (DNS) analysis of cyber data. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Report number: PNNL-SA-152208 MSC Class: 05C65; ACM Class: G.2.2

Knowledge-based Biomedical Data Science 2019

Authors: Tiffany J. Callahan, Harrison Pielke-Lombardo, Ignacio J. Tripodi, Lawrence E. Hunter

Abstract: Knowledge-based biomedical data science (KBDS) involves the design and implementation of computer systems that act as if they knew about biomedicine. Such systems depend on formally represented knowledge in computer systems, often in the form of knowledge graphs. Here we survey the progress in the last year in systems that use formally represented knowledge to address data science problems in both… ▽ More Knowledge-based biomedical data science (KBDS) involves the design and implementation of computer systems that act as if they knew about biomedicine. Such systems depend on formally represented knowledge in computer systems, often in the form of knowledge graphs. Here we survey the progress in the last year in systems that use formally represented knowledge to address data science problems in both clinical and biological domains, as well as on approaches for creating knowledge graphs. Major themes include the relationships between knowledge graphs and machine learning, the use of natural language processing, and the expansion of knowledge-based approaches to novel domains, such as Chinese Traditional Medicine and biodiversity. △ Less

Submitted 8 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

Comments: Manuscript 43 pages with 3 tables; Supplemental material 43 pages with 3 tables

ACM Class: I.2.0; I.2.1; I.2.4; I.2.7; I.2.m; I.5.0; I.7.0; J.3

Journal ref: Annual Review of Biomedical Data Science. 2020 Jul 20;3:23-41