CardsVR: A Two-Person VR Experience with Passive Haptic Feedback from a Deck of Playing Cards
Authors:
Andrew Huard,
Mengyu Chen,
Misha Sra
Abstract:
Presence in virtual reality (VR) is meaningful for remotely connecting with others and facilitating social interactions despite great distance while providing a sense of "being there." This work presents CardsVR, a two-person VR experience that allows remote participants to play a game of cards together. An entire deck of tracked cards are used to recreate the sense of playing cards in-person. Pri…
▽ More
Presence in virtual reality (VR) is meaningful for remotely connecting with others and facilitating social interactions despite great distance while providing a sense of "being there." This work presents CardsVR, a two-person VR experience that allows remote participants to play a game of cards together. An entire deck of tracked cards are used to recreate the sense of playing cards in-person. Prior work in VR commonly provides passive haptic feedback either through a single object or through static objects in the environment. CardsVR is novel in providing passive haptic feedback through multiple cards that are individually tracked and represented in the virtual environment. Participants interact with the physical cards by picking them up, holding them, playing them, or moving them on the physical table. Our participant study (N=23) shows that passive haptic feedback provides significant improvement in three standard measures of presence: Possibility to Act, Realism, and Haptics.
△ Less
Submitted 30 October, 2022;
originally announced October 2022.
QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results
Authors:
Raghav Mehta,
Angelos Filos,
Ujjwal Baid,
Chiharu Sako,
Richard McKinley,
Michael Rebsamen,
Katrin Datwyler,
Raphael Meier,
Piotr Radojewski,
Gowtham Krishnan Murugesan,
Sahil Nalawade,
Chandan Ganesh,
Ben Wagner,
Fang F. Yu,
Baowei Fei,
Ananth J. Madhuranthakam,
Joseph A. Maldjian,
Laura Daza,
Catalina Gomez,
Pablo Arbelaez,
Chengliang Dai,
Shuo Wang,
Hadrien Reynaud,
Yuan-han Mo,
Elsa Angelini
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying…
▽ More
Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Develo** scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at: https://github.com/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2022; v1 submitted 19 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
