-
Predicting Engagement with the Internet Research Agency's Facebook and Instagram Campaigns around the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Authors:
Dimitra Liotsiou,
Bharath Ganesh,
Philip N. Howard
Abstract:
The Russian Internet Research Agency's (IRA) online interference campaign in the 2016 U.S. presidential election represents a turning point in the trajectory of democratic elections in the digital age. What can we learn about how the IRA engages U.S. audiences, ahead of the 2020 U.S. presidential election? We provide the first in-depth analysis of the relationships between IRA content characterist…
▽ More
The Russian Internet Research Agency's (IRA) online interference campaign in the 2016 U.S. presidential election represents a turning point in the trajectory of democratic elections in the digital age. What can we learn about how the IRA engages U.S. audiences, ahead of the 2020 U.S. presidential election? We provide the first in-depth analysis of the relationships between IRA content characteristics and user engagement on Facebook and Instagram around the 2016 election. We find that content targeting right-wing and non-Black marginalised groups had the strongest positive association with engagement on both Facebook and Instagram, in contrast to findings from the IRA campaign on Twitter and to some previous commentary in the media. Higher engagement was associated with posting later in the 2015-2017 period and using less text on both platforms, using negative wording and not including links on Facebook, and using fewer hashtags on Instagram. The sub-audiences and sub-issues associated with most engagement differed across the platforms.
△ Less
Submitted 28 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Junk News & Information Sharing During the 2019 UK General Election
Authors:
Nahema Marchal,
Bence Kollanyi,
Lisa-Maria Neudert,
Hubert Au,
Philip N. Howard
Abstract:
Today, an estimated 75% of the British public access information about politics and public life online, and 40% do so via social media. With this context in mind, we investigate information sharing patterns over social media in the lead-up to the 2019 UK General Elections, and ask: (1) What type of political news and information were social media users sharing on Twitter ahead of the vote? (2) How…
▽ More
Today, an estimated 75% of the British public access information about politics and public life online, and 40% do so via social media. With this context in mind, we investigate information sharing patterns over social media in the lead-up to the 2019 UK General Elections, and ask: (1) What type of political news and information were social media users sharing on Twitter ahead of the vote? (2) How much of it is extremist, sensationalist, or conspiratorial junk news? (3) How much public engagement did these sites get on Facebook in the weeks leading and (4) What are the most common narratives and themes relayed by junk news outlets
△ Less
Submitted 27 February, 2020;
originally announced February 2020.
-
The Junk News Aggregator: Examining junk news posted on Facebook, starting with the 2018 US Midterm Elections
Authors:
Dimitra Liotsiou,
Bence Kollanyi,
Philip N. Howard
Abstract:
In recent years, the phenomenon of online misinformation and junk news circulating on social media has come to constitute an important and widespread problem affecting public life online across the globe, particularly around important political events such as elections. At the same time, there have been calls for more transparency around misinformation on social media platforms, as many of the mos…
▽ More
In recent years, the phenomenon of online misinformation and junk news circulating on social media has come to constitute an important and widespread problem affecting public life online across the globe, particularly around important political events such as elections. At the same time, there have been calls for more transparency around misinformation on social media platforms, as many of the most popular social media platforms function as "walled gardens," where it is impossible for researchers and the public to readily examine the scale and nature of misinformation activity as it unfolds on the platforms. In order to help address this, we present the Junk News Aggregator, a publicly available interactive web tool, which allows anyone to examine, in near real-time, all of the public content posted to Facebook by important junk news sources in the US. It allows the public to gain access to and examine the latest articles posted on Facebook (the most popular social media platform in the US and one where content is not readily accessible at scale from the open Web), as well as organise them by time, news publisher, and keywords of interest, and sort them based on all eight engagement metrics available on Facebook. Therefore, the Aggregator allows the public to gain insights on the volume, content, key themes, and types and volumes of engagement received by content posted by junk news publishers, in near real-time, hence opening up and offering transparency in these activities as they unfold, at scale across the top most popular junk news publishers. In this way, the Aggregator can help increase transparency around the nature, volume, and engagement with junk news on social media, and serve as a media literacy tool for the public.
△ Less
Submitted 17 April, 2019; v1 submitted 23 January, 2019;
originally announced January 2019.
-
Studying Politically Vulnerable Communities Online: Ethical Dilemmas, Questions, and Solutions
Authors:
Robert Gorwa,
Philip N. Howard
Abstract:
This short article introduces the concept of political vulnerability for social media researchers. How are traditional notions of harm challenged by research subjects in politically vulnerable communities? Through a selection of case studies, we explore some of the trade-offs, challenges, and questions raised by research that seeks be robust and transparent while also preserving anonymity and priv…
▽ More
This short article introduces the concept of political vulnerability for social media researchers. How are traditional notions of harm challenged by research subjects in politically vulnerable communities? Through a selection of case studies, we explore some of the trade-offs, challenges, and questions raised by research that seeks be robust and transparent while also preserving anonymity and privacy, especially in high-stakes, politically fraught contexts.
△ Less
Submitted 3 June, 2018;
originally announced June 2018.
-
Polarization, Partisanship and Junk News Consumption over Social Media in the US
Authors:
Vidya Narayanan,
Vlad Barash,
John Kelly,
Bence Kollanyi,
Lisa-Maria Neudert,
Philip N. Howard
Abstract:
What kinds of social media users read junk news? We examine the distribution of the most significant sources of junk news in the three months before President Donald Trump first State of the Union Address. Drawing on a list of sources that consistently publish political news and information that is extremist, sensationalist, conspiratorial, masked commentary, fake news and other forms of junk news…
▽ More
What kinds of social media users read junk news? We examine the distribution of the most significant sources of junk news in the three months before President Donald Trump first State of the Union Address. Drawing on a list of sources that consistently publish political news and information that is extremist, sensationalist, conspiratorial, masked commentary, fake news and other forms of junk news, we find that the distribution of such content is unevenly spread across the ideological spectrum. We demonstrate that (1) on Twitter, a network of Trump supporters shares the widest range of known junk news sources and circulates more junk news than all the other groups put together; (2) on Facebook, extreme hard right pages, distinct from Republican pages, share the widest range of known junk news sources and circulate more junk news than all the other audiences put together; (3) on average, the audiences for junk news on Twitter share a wider range of known junk news sources than audiences on Facebook public pages.
△ Less
Submitted 4 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Social Media, News and Political Information during the US Election: Was Polarizing Content Concentrated in Swing States?
Authors:
Philip N. Howard,
Bence Kollanyi,
Samantha Bradshaw,
Lisa-Maria Neudert
Abstract:
US voters shared large volumes of polarizing political news and information in the form of links to content from Russian, WikiLeaks and junk news sources. Was this low quality political information distributed evenly around the country, or concentrated in swing states and particular parts of the country? In this data memo we apply a tested dictionary of sources about political news and information…
▽ More
US voters shared large volumes of polarizing political news and information in the form of links to content from Russian, WikiLeaks and junk news sources. Was this low quality political information distributed evenly around the country, or concentrated in swing states and particular parts of the country? In this data memo we apply a tested dictionary of sources about political news and information being shared over Twitter over a ten day period around the 2016 Presidential Election. Using self-reported location information, we place a third of users by state and create a simple index for the distribution of polarizing content around the country. We find that (1) nationally, Twitter users got more misinformation, polarizing and conspiratorial content than professionally produced news. (2) Users in some states, however, shared more polarizing political news and information than users in other states. (3) Average levels of misinformation were higher in swing states than in uncontested states, even when weighted for the relative size of the user population in each state. We conclude with some observations about the impact of strategically disseminated polarizing information on public life.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Junk News on Military Affairs and National Security: Social Media Disinformation Campaigns Against US Military Personnel and Veterans
Authors:
John D. Gallacher,
Vlad Barash,
Philip N. Howard,
John Kelly
Abstract:
Social media provides political news and information for both active duty military personnel and veterans. We analyze the subgroups of Twitter and Facebook users who spend time consuming junk news from websites that target US military personnel and veterans with conspiracy theories, misinformation, and other forms of junk news about military affairs and national security issues. (1) Over Twitter w…
▽ More
Social media provides political news and information for both active duty military personnel and veterans. We analyze the subgroups of Twitter and Facebook users who spend time consuming junk news from websites that target US military personnel and veterans with conspiracy theories, misinformation, and other forms of junk news about military affairs and national security issues. (1) Over Twitter we find that there are significant and persistent interactions between current and former military personnel and a broad network of extremist, Russia-focused, and international conspiracy subgroups. (2) Over Facebook, we find significant and persistent interactions between public pages for military and veterans and subgroups dedicated to political conspiracy, and both sides of the political spectrum. (3) Over Facebook, the users who are most interested in conspiracy theories and the political right seem to be distributing the most junk news, whereas users who are either in the military or are veterans are among the most sophisticated news consumers, and share very little junk news through the network.
△ Less
Submitted 10 February, 2018;
originally announced February 2018.
-
Redes sociales, participación ciudadana y la hipótesis del slacktivismo: lecciones del caso de "El Bronco" / Social Media, Civic Engagement, and the Slacktivism Hypothesis: Lessons from Mexico's "El Bronco"
Authors:
Philip N. Howard,
Saiph Savage,
Claudia Flores-Saviaga,
Carlos Toxtli,
Andres Monroy-Hernández
Abstract:
El uso de las redes sociales tiene consecuencias positivas o negativas en la participación ciudadana? La gran parte de los intentos por responder a esta pregunta incluyen datos de la opinión pública de los Estados Unidos, por lo que nosotros ofrecemos un estudio sobre un caso significativo de México, donde un candidato independiente utilizó las redes sociales para comunicarse con el público y rehu…
▽ More
El uso de las redes sociales tiene consecuencias positivas o negativas en la participación ciudadana? La gran parte de los intentos por responder a esta pregunta incluyen datos de la opinión pública de los Estados Unidos, por lo que nosotros ofrecemos un estudio sobre un caso significativo de México, donde un candidato independiente utilizó las redes sociales para comunicarse con el público y rehuyó de los medios de comunicación tradicionales. Dicho candidato, conocido como "El Bronco", ganó la carrera por la gubernatura del estado al derrotar a los candidatos de los partidos tradicionales. Además, generó una participación ciudadana que se ha mantenido más allá del día de las elecciones. En nuestra investigación analizamos más de 750 mil mensajes, comentarios y respuestas durante más de tres años de interacciones en la página pública de Facebook de "El Bronco". Examinamos y demostramos que las redes sociales pueden utilizarse para dar cabida a una gran cantidad de interacciones ciudadanas sobre la vida pública más allá de un acontecimiento político.
Does social media use have a positive or negative impact on civic engagement? The "slacktivism hypothesis" holds that if citizens use social media for political conversation, those conversations will be fleeting and vapid. Most attempts to answer this question involve public opinion data from the United States, so we offer an examination of an important case from Mexico, where an independent candidate used social media to communicate with the public and eschewed traditional media outlets. He won the race for state governor, defeating candidates from traditional parties and triggering sustained public engagement beyond election day. In our investigation, we analyze over 750,000 posts, comments, and replies over three years of conversations on the Facebook page of "El Bronco".
△ Less
Submitted 9 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Bots, #StrongerIn, and #Brexit: Computational Propaganda during the UK-EU Referendum
Authors:
Philip N. Howard,
Bence Kollanyi
Abstract:
Bots are social media accounts that automate interaction with other users, and they are active on the StrongerIn-Brexit conversation happening over Twitter. These automated scripts generate content through these platforms and then interact with people. Political bots are automated accounts that are particularly active on public policy issues, elections, and political crises. In this preliminary st…
▽ More
Bots are social media accounts that automate interaction with other users, and they are active on the StrongerIn-Brexit conversation happening over Twitter. These automated scripts generate content through these platforms and then interact with people. Political bots are automated accounts that are particularly active on public policy issues, elections, and political crises. In this preliminary study on the use of political bots during the UK referendum on EU membership, we analyze the tweeting patterns for both human users and bots. We find that political bots have a small but strategic role in the referendum conversations: (1) the family of hashtags associated with the argument for leaving the EU dominates, (2) different perspectives on the issue utilize different levels of automation, and (3) less than 1 percent of sampled accounts generate almost a third of all the messages.
△ Less
Submitted 20 June, 2016;
originally announced June 2016.
