-
Random Abstract Cell Complexes
Authors:
Josef Hoppe,
Michael T. Schaub
Abstract:
We define a model for random (abstract) cell complexes (CCs), similiar to the well-known Erdős-Rényi model for graphs and its extensions for simplicial complexes. To build a random cell complex, we first draw from an Erdős-Rényi graph, and consecutively augment the graph with cells for each dimension with a specified probability. As the number of possible cells increases combinatorially -- e.g., 2…
▽ More
We define a model for random (abstract) cell complexes (CCs), similiar to the well-known Erdős-Rényi model for graphs and its extensions for simplicial complexes. To build a random cell complex, we first draw from an Erdős-Rényi graph, and consecutively augment the graph with cells for each dimension with a specified probability. As the number of possible cells increases combinatorially -- e.g., 2-cells can be represented as cycles, or permutations -- we derive an approximate sampling algorithm for this model limited to two-dimensional abstract cell complexes. Since there is a large variance in the number of simple cycles on graphs drawn from the same configuration of ER, we also provide an efficient method to approximate that number, which is of independent interest. Moreover, it enables us to specify the expected number of 2-cells of each boundary length we want to sample. We provide some initial analysis into the properties of random CCs drawn from this model. We further showcase practical applications for our random CCs as null models, and in the context of (random) liftings of graphs to cell complexes. Both the sampling and cycle count estimation algorithms are available in the package `py-raccoon` on the Python Packaging Index.
△ Less
Submitted 4 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
TopoX: A Suite of Python Packages for Machine Learning on Topological Domains
Authors:
Mustafa Hajij,
Mathilde Papillon,
Florian Frantzen,
Jens Agerberg,
Ibrahem AlJabea,
Ruben Ballester,
Claudio Battiloro,
Guillermo Bernárdez,
Tolga Birdal,
Aiden Brent,
Peter Chin,
Sergio Escalera,
Simone Fiorellino,
Odin Hoff Gardaa,
Gurusankar Gopalakrishnan,
Devendra Govil,
Josef Hoppe,
Maneel Reddy Karri,
Jude Khouja,
Manuel Lecha,
Neal Livesay,
Jan Meißner,
Soham Mukherjee,
Alexander Nikitin,
Theodore Papamarkou
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
We introduce TopoX, a Python software suite that provides reliable and user-friendly building blocks for computing and machine learning on topological domains that extend graphs: hypergraphs, simplicial, cellular, path and combinatorial complexes. TopoX consists of three packages: TopoNetX facilitates constructing and computing on these domains, including working with nodes, edges and higher-order…
▽ More
We introduce TopoX, a Python software suite that provides reliable and user-friendly building blocks for computing and machine learning on topological domains that extend graphs: hypergraphs, simplicial, cellular, path and combinatorial complexes. TopoX consists of three packages: TopoNetX facilitates constructing and computing on these domains, including working with nodes, edges and higher-order cells; TopoEmbedX provides methods to embed topological domains into vector spaces, akin to popular graph-based embedding algorithms such as node2vec; TopoModelx is built on top of PyTorch and offers a comprehensive toolbox of higher-order message passing functions for neural networks on topological domains. The extensively documented and unit-tested source code of TopoX is available under MIT license at https://pyt-team.github.io/.
△ Less
Submitted 17 February, 2024; v1 submitted 4 February, 2024;
originally announced February 2024.
-
Representing Edge Flows on Graphs via Sparse Cell Complexes
Authors:
Josef Hoppe,
Michael T. Schaub
Abstract:
Obtaining sparse, interpretable representations of observable data is crucial in many machine learning and signal processing tasks. For data representing flows along the edges of a graph, an intuitively interpretable way to obtain such representations is to lift the graph structure to a simplicial complex: The eigenvectors of the associated Hodge-Laplacian, respectively the incidence matrices of t…
▽ More
Obtaining sparse, interpretable representations of observable data is crucial in many machine learning and signal processing tasks. For data representing flows along the edges of a graph, an intuitively interpretable way to obtain such representations is to lift the graph structure to a simplicial complex: The eigenvectors of the associated Hodge-Laplacian, respectively the incidence matrices of the corresponding simplicial complex then induce a Hodge decomposition, which can be used to represent the observed data in terms of gradient, curl, and harmonic flows. In this paper, we generalize this approach to cellular complexes and introduce the flow representation learning problem, i.e., the problem of augmenting the observed graph by a set of cells, such that the eigenvectors of the associated Hodge Laplacian provide a sparse, interpretable representation of the observed edge flows on the graph. We show that this problem is NP-hard and introduce an efficient approximation algorithm for its solution. Experiments on real-world and synthetic data demonstrate that our algorithm outperforms state-of-the-art methods with respect to approximation error, while being computationally efficient.
△ Less
Submitted 2 November, 2023; v1 submitted 4 September, 2023;
originally announced September 2023.
-
Are fast labeling methods reliable? A case study of computer-aided expert annotations on microscopy slides
Authors:
Christian Marzahl,
Christof A. Bertram,
Marc Aubreville,
Anne Petrick,
Kristina Weiler,
Agnes C. Gläsel,
Marco Fragoso,
Sophie Merz,
Florian Bartenschlager,
Judith Hoppe,
Alina Langenhagen,
Anne Jasensky,
Jörn Voigt,
Robert Klopfleisch,
Andreas Maier
Abstract:
Deep-learning-based pipelines have shown the potential to revolutionalize microscopy image diagnostics by providing visual augmentations to a trained pathology expert. However, to match human performance, the methods rely on the availability of vast amounts of high-quality labeled data, which poses a significant challenge. To circumvent this, augmented labeling methods, also known as expert-algori…
▽ More
Deep-learning-based pipelines have shown the potential to revolutionalize microscopy image diagnostics by providing visual augmentations to a trained pathology expert. However, to match human performance, the methods rely on the availability of vast amounts of high-quality labeled data, which poses a significant challenge. To circumvent this, augmented labeling methods, also known as expert-algorithm-collaboration, have recently become popular. However, potential biases introduced by this operation mode and their effects for training neuronal networks are not entirely understood. This work aims to shed light on some of the effects by providing a case study for three pathologically relevant diagnostic settings. Ten trained pathology experts performed a labeling tasks first without and later with computer-generated augmentation. To investigate different biasing effects, we intentionally introduced errors to the augmentation. Furthermore, we developed a novel loss function which incorporates the experts' annotation consensus in the training of a deep learning classifier. In total, the pathology experts annotated 26,015 cells on 1,200 images in this novel annotation study. Backed by this extensive data set, we found that the consensus of multiple experts and the deep learning classifier accuracy, was significantly increased in the computer-aided setting, versus the unaided annotation. However, a significant percentage of the deliberately introduced false labels was not identified by the experts. Additionally, we showed that our loss function profited from multiple experts and outperformed conventional loss functions. At the same time, systematic errors did not lead to a deterioration of the trained classifier accuracy. Furthermore, a classifier trained with annotations from a single expert with computer-aided support can outperform the combined annotations from up to nine experts.
△ Less
Submitted 13 April, 2020;
originally announced April 2020.
