-
Why You Should Not Trust Interpretations in Machine Learning: Adversarial Attacks on Partial Dependence Plots
Authors:
Xi Xin,
Giles Hooker,
Fei Huang
Abstract:
The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) across industries has led to the widespread use of complex black-box models and interpretation tools for decision making. This paper proposes an adversarial framework to uncover the vulnerability of permutation-based interpretation methods for machine learning tasks, with a particular focus on partial dependence (PD) plots. This adversarial framework mo…
▽ More
The adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) across industries has led to the widespread use of complex black-box models and interpretation tools for decision making. This paper proposes an adversarial framework to uncover the vulnerability of permutation-based interpretation methods for machine learning tasks, with a particular focus on partial dependence (PD) plots. This adversarial framework modifies the original black box model to manipulate its predictions for instances in the extrapolation domain. As a result, it produces deceptive PD plots that can conceal discriminatory behaviors while preserving most of the original model's predictions. This framework can produce multiple fooled PD plots via a single model. By using real-world datasets including an auto insurance claims dataset and COMPAS (Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions) dataset, our results show that it is possible to intentionally hide the discriminatory behavior of a predictor and make the black-box model appear neutral through interpretation tools like PD plots while retaining almost all the predictions of the original black-box model. Managerial insights for regulators and practitioners are provided based on the findings.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2024; v1 submitted 29 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Longitudinal Counterfactuals: Constraints and Opportunities
Authors:
Alexander Asemota,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
Counterfactual explanations are a common approach to providing recourse to data subjects. However, current methodology can produce counterfactuals that cannot be achieved by the subject, making the use of counterfactuals for recourse difficult to justify in practice. Though there is agreement that plausibility is an important quality when using counterfactuals for algorithmic recourse, ground trut…
▽ More
Counterfactual explanations are a common approach to providing recourse to data subjects. However, current methodology can produce counterfactuals that cannot be achieved by the subject, making the use of counterfactuals for recourse difficult to justify in practice. Though there is agreement that plausibility is an important quality when using counterfactuals for algorithmic recourse, ground truth plausibility continues to be difficult to quantify. In this paper, we propose using longitudinal data to assess and improve plausibility in counterfactuals. In particular, we develop a metric that compares longitudinal differences to counterfactual differences, allowing us to evaluate how similar a counterfactual is to prior observed changes. Furthermore, we use this metric to generate plausible counterfactuals. Finally, we discuss some of the inherent difficulties of using counterfactuals for recourse.
△ Less
Submitted 29 February, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Provably Stable Feature Rankings with SHAP and LIME
Authors:
Jeremy Goldwasser,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
Feature attributions are ubiquitous tools for understanding the predictions of machine learning models. However, the calculation of popular methods for scoring input variables such as SHAP and LIME suffers from high instability due to random sampling. Leveraging ideas from multiple hypothesis testing, we devise attribution methods that ensure the most important features are ranked correctly with h…
▽ More
Feature attributions are ubiquitous tools for understanding the predictions of machine learning models. However, the calculation of popular methods for scoring input variables such as SHAP and LIME suffers from high instability due to random sampling. Leveraging ideas from multiple hypothesis testing, we devise attribution methods that ensure the most important features are ranked correctly with high probability. Given SHAP estimates from KernelSHAP or Shapley Sampling, we demonstrate how to retrospectively verify the number of stable rankings. Further, we introduce efficient sampling algorithms for SHAP and LIME that guarantee the $K$ highest-ranked features have the proper ordering. Finally, we show how to adapt these local feature attribution methods for the global importance setting.
△ Less
Submitted 2 June, 2024; v1 submitted 28 January, 2024;
originally announced January 2024.
-
Stabilizing Estimates of Shapley Values with Control Variates
Authors:
Jeremy Goldwasser,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
Shapley values are among the most popular tools for explaining predictions of blackbox machine learning models. However, their high computational cost motivates the use of sampling approximations, inducing a considerable degree of uncertainty. To stabilize these model explanations, we propose ControlSHAP, an approach based on the Monte Carlo technique of control variates. Our methodology is applic…
▽ More
Shapley values are among the most popular tools for explaining predictions of blackbox machine learning models. However, their high computational cost motivates the use of sampling approximations, inducing a considerable degree of uncertainty. To stabilize these model explanations, we propose ControlSHAP, an approach based on the Monte Carlo technique of control variates. Our methodology is applicable to any machine learning model and requires virtually no extra computation or modeling effort. On several high-dimensional datasets, we find it can produce dramatic reductions in the Monte Carlo variability of Shapley estimates.
△ Less
Submitted 9 April, 2024; v1 submitted 11 October, 2023;
originally announced October 2023.
-
A Generic Approach for Reproducible Model Distillation
Authors:
Yunzhe Zhou,
Peiru Xu,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
Model distillation has been a popular method for producing interpretable machine learning. It uses an interpretable "student" model to mimic the predictions made by the black box "teacher" model. However, when the student model is sensitive to the variability of the data sets used for training even when kee** the teacher fixed, the corresponded interpretation is not reliable. Existing strategies…
▽ More
Model distillation has been a popular method for producing interpretable machine learning. It uses an interpretable "student" model to mimic the predictions made by the black box "teacher" model. However, when the student model is sensitive to the variability of the data sets used for training even when kee** the teacher fixed, the corresponded interpretation is not reliable. Existing strategies stabilize model distillation by checking whether a large enough corpus of pseudo-data is generated to reliably reproduce student models, but methods to do so have so far been developed for a specific student model. In this paper, we develop a generic approach for stable model distillation based on central limit theorem for the average loss. We start with a collection of candidate student models and search for candidates that reasonably agree with the teacher. Then we construct a multiple testing framework to select a corpus size such that the consistent student model would be selected under different pseudo samples. We demonstrate the application of our proposed approach on three commonly used intelligible models: decision trees, falling rule lists and symbolic regression. Finally, we conduct simulation experiments on Mammographic Mass and Breast Cancer datasets and illustrate the testing procedure throughout a theoretical analysis with Markov process. The code is publicly available at https://github.com/yunzhe-zhou/GenericDistillation.
△ Less
Submitted 27 April, 2023; v1 submitted 22 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
The Infinitesimal Jackknife and Combinations of Models
Authors:
Indrayudh Ghosal,
Yunzhe Zhou,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
The Infinitesimal Jackknife is a general method for estimating variances of parametric models, and more recently also for some ensemble methods. In this paper we extend the Infinitesimal Jackknife to estimate the covariance between any two models. This can be used to quantify uncertainty for combinations of models, or to construct test statistics for comparing different models or ensembles of mode…
▽ More
The Infinitesimal Jackknife is a general method for estimating variances of parametric models, and more recently also for some ensemble methods. In this paper we extend the Infinitesimal Jackknife to estimate the covariance between any two models. This can be used to quantify uncertainty for combinations of models, or to construct test statistics for comparing different models or ensembles of models fitted using the same training dataset. Specific examples in this paper use boosted combinations of models like random forests and M-estimators. We also investigate its application on neural networks and ensembles of XGBoost models. We illustrate the efficacy of variance estimates through extensive simulations and its application to the Bei**g Housing data, and demonstrate the theoretical consistency of the Infinitesimal Jackknife covariance estimate.
△ Less
Submitted 31 August, 2022;
originally announced September 2022.
-
S-LIME: Stabilized-LIME for Model Explanation
Authors:
Zhengze Zhou,
Giles Hooker,
Fei Wang
Abstract:
An increasing number of machine learning models have been deployed in domains with high stakes such as finance and healthcare. Despite their superior performances, many models are black boxes in nature which are hard to explain. There are growing efforts for researchers to develop methods to interpret these black-box models. Post hoc explanations based on perturbations, such as LIME, are widely us…
▽ More
An increasing number of machine learning models have been deployed in domains with high stakes such as finance and healthcare. Despite their superior performances, many models are black boxes in nature which are hard to explain. There are growing efforts for researchers to develop methods to interpret these black-box models. Post hoc explanations based on perturbations, such as LIME, are widely used approaches to interpret a machine learning model after it has been built. This class of methods has been shown to exhibit large instability, posing serious challenges to the effectiveness of the method itself and harming user trust. In this paper, we propose S-LIME, which utilizes a hypothesis testing framework based on central limit theorem for determining the number of perturbation points needed to guarantee stability of the resulting explanation. Experiments on both simulated and real world data sets are provided to demonstrate the effectiveness of our method.
△ Less
Submitted 15 June, 2021;
originally announced June 2021.
-
Bridging Breiman's Brook: From Algorithmic Modeling to Statistical Learning
Authors:
Lucas Mentch,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
In 2001, Leo Breiman wrote of a divide between "data modeling" and "algorithmic modeling" cultures. Twenty years later this division feels far more ephemeral, both in terms of assigning individuals to camps, and in terms of intellectual boundaries. We argue that this is largely due to the "data modelers" incorporating algorithmic methods into their toolbox, particularly driven by recent developmen…
▽ More
In 2001, Leo Breiman wrote of a divide between "data modeling" and "algorithmic modeling" cultures. Twenty years later this division feels far more ephemeral, both in terms of assigning individuals to camps, and in terms of intellectual boundaries. We argue that this is largely due to the "data modelers" incorporating algorithmic methods into their toolbox, particularly driven by recent developments in the statistical understanding of Breiman's own Random Forest methods. While this can be simplistically described as "Breiman won", these same developments also expose the limitations of the prediction-first philosophy that he espoused, making careful statistical analysis all the more important. This paper outlines these exciting recent developments in the random forest literature which, in our view, occurred as a result of a necessary blending of the two ways of thinking Breiman originally described. We also ask what areas statistics and statisticians might currently overlook.
△ Less
Submitted 22 February, 2021;
originally announced February 2021.
-
$V$-statistics and Variance Estimation
Authors:
Zhengze Zhou,
Lucas Mentch,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
This paper develops a general framework for analyzing asymptotics of $V$-statistics. Previous literature on limiting distribution mainly focuses on the cases when $n \to \infty$ with fixed kernel size $k$. Under some regularity conditions, we demonstrate asymptotic normality when $k$ grows with $n$ by utilizing existing results for $U$-statistics. The key in our approach lies in a mathematical red…
▽ More
This paper develops a general framework for analyzing asymptotics of $V$-statistics. Previous literature on limiting distribution mainly focuses on the cases when $n \to \infty$ with fixed kernel size $k$. Under some regularity conditions, we demonstrate asymptotic normality when $k$ grows with $n$ by utilizing existing results for $U$-statistics. The key in our approach lies in a mathematical reduction to $U$-statistics by designing an equivalent kernel for $V$-statistics. We also provide a unified treatment on variance estimation for both $U$- and $V$-statistics by observing connections to existing methods and proposing an empirically more accurate estimator. Ensemble methods such as random forests, where multiple base learners are trained and aggregated for prediction purposes, serve as a running example throughout the paper because they are a natural and flexible application of $V$-statistics.
△ Less
Submitted 6 May, 2020; v1 submitted 2 December, 2019;
originally announced December 2019.
-
Purifying Interaction Effects with the Functional ANOVA: An Efficient Algorithm for Recovering Identifiable Additive Models
Authors:
Benjamin Lengerich,
Sarah Tan,
Chun-Hao Chang,
Giles Hooker,
Rich Caruana
Abstract:
Models which estimate main effects of individual variables alongside interaction effects have an identifiability challenge: effects can be freely moved between main effects and interaction effects without changing the model prediction. This is a critical problem for interpretability because it permits "contradictory" models to represent the same function. To solve this problem, we propose pure int…
▽ More
Models which estimate main effects of individual variables alongside interaction effects have an identifiability challenge: effects can be freely moved between main effects and interaction effects without changing the model prediction. This is a critical problem for interpretability because it permits "contradictory" models to represent the same function. To solve this problem, we propose pure interaction effects: variance in the outcome which cannot be represented by any smaller subset of features. This definition has an equivalence with the Functional ANOVA decomposition. To compute this decomposition, we present a fast, exact algorithm that transforms any piecewise-constant function (such as a tree-based model) into a purified, canonical representation. We apply this algorithm to Generalized Additive Models with interactions trained on several datasets and show large disparity, including contradictions, between the effects before and after purification. These results underscore the need to specify data distributions and ensure identifiability before interpreting model parameters.
△ Less
Submitted 1 May, 2020; v1 submitted 12 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Unrestricted Permutation forces Extrapolation: Variable Importance Requires at least One More Model, or There Is No Free Variable Importance
Authors:
Giles Hooker,
Lucas Mentch,
Siyu Zhou
Abstract:
This paper reviews and advocates against the use of permute-and-predict (PaP) methods for interpreting black box functions. Methods such as the variable importance measures proposed for random forests, partial dependence plots, and individual conditional expectation plots remain popular because they are both model-agnostic and depend only on the pre-trained model output, making them computationall…
▽ More
This paper reviews and advocates against the use of permute-and-predict (PaP) methods for interpreting black box functions. Methods such as the variable importance measures proposed for random forests, partial dependence plots, and individual conditional expectation plots remain popular because they are both model-agnostic and depend only on the pre-trained model output, making them computationally efficient and widely available in software. However, numerous studies have found that these tools can produce diagnostics that are highly misleading, particularly when there is strong dependence among features. The purpose of our work here is to (i) review this growing body of literature, (ii) provide further demonstrations of these drawbacks along with a detailed explanation as to why they occur, and (iii) advocate for alternative measures that involve additional modeling. In particular, we describe how breaking dependencies between features in hold-out data places undue emphasis on sparse regions of the feature space by forcing the original model to extrapolate to regions where there is little to no data. We explore these effects across various model setups and find support for previous claims in the literature that PaP metrics can vastly over-emphasize correlated features in both variable importance measures and partial dependence plots. As an alternative, we discuss and recommend more direct approaches that involve measuring the change in model performance after muting the effects of the features under investigation.
△ Less
Submitted 7 October, 2021; v1 submitted 1 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Unbiased Measurement of Feature Importance in Tree-Based Methods
Authors:
Zhengze Zhou,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
We propose a modification that corrects for split-improvement variable importance measures in Random Forests and other tree-based methods. These methods have been shown to be biased towards increasing the importance of features with more potential splits. We show that by appropriately incorporating split-improvement as measured on out of sample data, this bias can be corrected yielding better summ…
▽ More
We propose a modification that corrects for split-improvement variable importance measures in Random Forests and other tree-based methods. These methods have been shown to be biased towards increasing the importance of features with more potential splits. We show that by appropriately incorporating split-improvement as measured on out of sample data, this bias can be corrected yielding better summaries and screening tools.
△ Less
Submitted 23 March, 2020; v1 submitted 12 March, 2019;
originally announced March 2019.
-
Approximation Trees: Statistical Stability in Model Distillation
Authors:
Yichen Zhou,
Zhengze Zhou,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
This paper examines the stability of learned explanations for black-box predictions via model distillation with decision trees. One approach to intelligibility in machine learning is to use an understandable `student' model to mimic the output of an accurate `teacher'. Here, we consider the use of regression trees as a student model, in which nodes of the tree can be used as `explanations' for par…
▽ More
This paper examines the stability of learned explanations for black-box predictions via model distillation with decision trees. One approach to intelligibility in machine learning is to use an understandable `student' model to mimic the output of an accurate `teacher'. Here, we consider the use of regression trees as a student model, in which nodes of the tree can be used as `explanations' for particular predictions, and the whole structure of the tree can be used as a global representation of the resulting function. However, individual trees are sensitive to the particular data sets used to train them, and an interpretation of a student model may be suspect if small changes in the training data have a large effect on it. In this context, access to outcomes from a teacher helps to stabilize the greedy splitting strategy by generating a much larger corpus of training examples than was originally available. We develop tests to ensure that enough examples are generated at each split so that the same splitting rule would be chosen with high probability were the tree to be re trained. Further, we develop a stop** rule to indicate how deep the tree should be built based on recent results on the variability of Random Forests when these are used as the teacher. We provide concrete examples of these procedures on the CAD-MDD and COMPAS data sets.
△ Less
Submitted 22 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
-
Boosting Random Forests to Reduce Bias; One-Step Boosted Forest and its Variance Estimate
Authors:
Indrayudh Ghosal,
Giles Hooker
Abstract:
In this paper we propose using the principle of boosting to reduce the bias of a random forest prediction in the regression setting. From the original random forest fit we extract the residuals and then fit another random forest to these residuals. We call the sum of these two random forests a \textit{one-step boosted forest}. We show with simulated and real data that the one-step boosted forest h…
▽ More
In this paper we propose using the principle of boosting to reduce the bias of a random forest prediction in the regression setting. From the original random forest fit we extract the residuals and then fit another random forest to these residuals. We call the sum of these two random forests a \textit{one-step boosted forest}. We show with simulated and real data that the one-step boosted forest has a reduced bias compared to the original random forest. The paper also provides a variance estimate of the one-step boosted forest by an extension of the infinitesimal Jackknife estimator. Using this variance estimate we can construct prediction intervals for the boosted forest and we show that they have good coverage probabilities. Combining the bias reduction and the variance estimate we show that the one-step boosted forest has a significant reduction in predictive mean squared error and thus an improvement in predictive performance. When applied on datasets from the UCI database, one-step boosted forest performs better than random forest and gradient boosting machine algorithms. Theoretically we can also extend such a boosting process to more than one step and the same principles outlined in this paper can be used to find variance estimates for such predictors. Such boosting will reduce bias even further but it risks over-fitting and also increases the computational burden.
△ Less
Submitted 22 April, 2020; v1 submitted 21 March, 2018;
originally announced March 2018.
-
Considerations When Learning Additive Explanations for Black-Box Models
Authors:
Sarah Tan,
Giles Hooker,
Paul Koch,
Albert Gordo,
Rich Caruana
Abstract:
Many methods to explain black-box models, whether local or global, are additive. In this paper, we study global additive explanations for non-additive models, focusing on four explanation methods: partial dependence, Shapley explanations adapted to a global setting, distilled additive explanations, and gradient-based explanations. We show that different explanation methods characterize non-additiv…
▽ More
Many methods to explain black-box models, whether local or global, are additive. In this paper, we study global additive explanations for non-additive models, focusing on four explanation methods: partial dependence, Shapley explanations adapted to a global setting, distilled additive explanations, and gradient-based explanations. We show that different explanation methods characterize non-additive components in a black-box model's prediction function in different ways. We use the concepts of main and total effects to anchor additive explanations, and quantitatively evaluate additive and non-additive explanations. Even though distilled explanations are generally the most accurate additive explanations, non-additive explanations such as tree explanations that explicitly model non-additive components tend to be even more accurate. Despite this, our user study showed that machine learning practitioners were better able to leverage additive explanations for various tasks. These considerations should be taken into account when considering which explanation to trust and use to explain black-box models.
△ Less
Submitted 31 July, 2023; v1 submitted 25 January, 2018;
originally announced January 2018.
-
Distill-and-Compare: Auditing Black-Box Models Using Transparent Model Distillation
Authors:
Sarah Tan,
Rich Caruana,
Giles Hooker,
Yin Lou
Abstract:
Black-box risk scoring models permeate our lives, yet are typically proprietary or opaque. We propose Distill-and-Compare, a model distillation and comparison approach to audit such models. To gain insight into black-box models, we treat them as teachers, training transparent student models to mimic the risk scores assigned by black-box models. We compare the student model trained with distillatio…
▽ More
Black-box risk scoring models permeate our lives, yet are typically proprietary or opaque. We propose Distill-and-Compare, a model distillation and comparison approach to audit such models. To gain insight into black-box models, we treat them as teachers, training transparent student models to mimic the risk scores assigned by black-box models. We compare the student model trained with distillation to a second un-distilled transparent model trained on ground-truth outcomes, and use differences between the two models to gain insight into the black-box model. Our approach can be applied in a realistic setting, without probing the black-box model API. We demonstrate the approach on four public data sets: COMPAS, Stop-and-Frisk, Chicago Police, and Lending Club. We also propose a statistical test to determine if a data set is missing key features used to train the black-box model. Our test finds that the ProPublica data is likely missing key feature(s) used in COMPAS.
△ Less
Submitted 11 October, 2018; v1 submitted 17 October, 2017;
originally announced October 2017.
-
Machine Learning and the Future of Realism
Authors:
Giles Hooker,
Cliff Hooker
Abstract:
The preceding three decades have seen the emergence, rise, and proliferation of machine learning (ML). From half-recognised beginnings in perceptrons, neural nets, and decision trees, algorithms that extract correlations (that is, patterns) from a set of data points have broken free from their origin in computational cognition to embrace all forms of problem solving, from voice recognition to medi…
▽ More
The preceding three decades have seen the emergence, rise, and proliferation of machine learning (ML). From half-recognised beginnings in perceptrons, neural nets, and decision trees, algorithms that extract correlations (that is, patterns) from a set of data points have broken free from their origin in computational cognition to embrace all forms of problem solving, from voice recognition to medical diagnosis to automated scientific research and driverless cars, and it is now widely opined that the real industrial revolution lies less in mobile phone and similar than in the maturation and universal application of ML. Among the consequences just might be the triumph of anti-realism over realism.
△ Less
Submitted 15 April, 2017;
originally announced April 2017.
-
Tree Space Prototypes: Another Look at Making Tree Ensembles Interpretable
Authors:
Sarah Tan,
Matvey Soloviev,
Giles Hooker,
Martin T. Wells
Abstract:
Ensembles of decision trees perform well on many problems, but are not interpretable. In contrast to existing approaches in interpretability that focus on explaining relationships between features and predictions, we propose an alternative approach to interpret tree ensemble classifiers by surfacing representative points for each class -- prototypes. We introduce a new distance for Gradient Booste…
▽ More
Ensembles of decision trees perform well on many problems, but are not interpretable. In contrast to existing approaches in interpretability that focus on explaining relationships between features and predictions, we propose an alternative approach to interpret tree ensemble classifiers by surfacing representative points for each class -- prototypes. We introduce a new distance for Gradient Boosted Tree models, and propose new, adaptive prototype selection methods with theoretical guarantees, with the flexibility to choose a different number of prototypes in each class. We demonstrate our methods on random forests and gradient boosted trees, showing that the prototypes can perform as well as or even better than the original tree ensemble when used as a nearest-prototype classifier. In a user study, humans were better at predicting the output of a tree ensemble classifier when using prototypes than when using Shapley values, a popular feature attribution method. Hence, prototypes present a viable alternative to feature-based explanations for tree ensembles.
△ Less
Submitted 25 August, 2020; v1 submitted 21 November, 2016;
originally announced November 2016.
