A deep learning system for differential diagnosis of skin diseases
Authors:
Yuan Liu,
Ayush Jain,
Clara Eng,
David H. Way,
Kang Lee,
Peggy Bui,
Kimberly Kanada,
Guilherme de Oliveira Marinho,
Jessica Gallegos,
Sara Gabriele,
Vishakha Gupta,
Nalini Singh,
Vivek Natarajan,
Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof,
Greg S. Corrado,
Lily H. Peng,
Dale R. Webster,
Dennis Ai,
Susan Huang,
Yun Liu,
R. Carter Dunn,
David Coz
Abstract:
Skin conditions affect an estimated 1.9 billion people worldwide. A shortage of dermatologists causes long wait times and leads patients to seek dermatologic care from general practitioners. However, the diagnostic accuracy of general practitioners has been reported to be only 0.24-0.70 (compared to 0.77-0.96 for dermatologists), resulting in referral errors, delays in care, and errors in diagnosi…
▽ More
Skin conditions affect an estimated 1.9 billion people worldwide. A shortage of dermatologists causes long wait times and leads patients to seek dermatologic care from general practitioners. However, the diagnostic accuracy of general practitioners has been reported to be only 0.24-0.70 (compared to 0.77-0.96 for dermatologists), resulting in referral errors, delays in care, and errors in diagnosis and treatment. In this paper, we developed a deep learning system (DLS) to provide a differential diagnosis of skin conditions for clinical cases (skin photographs and associated medical histories). The DLS distinguishes between 26 skin conditions that represent roughly 80% of the volume of skin conditions seen in primary care. The DLS was developed and validated using de-identified cases from a teledermatology practice serving 17 clinical sites via a temporal split: the first 14,021 cases for development and the last 3,756 cases for validation. On the validation set, where a panel of three board-certified dermatologists defined the reference standard for every case, the DLS achieved 0.71 and 0.93 top-1 and top-3 accuracies respectively. For a random subset of the validation set (n=963 cases), 18 clinicians reviewed the cases for comparison. On this subset, the DLS achieved a 0.67 top-1 accuracy, non-inferior to board-certified dermatologists (0.63, p<0.001), and higher than primary care physicians (PCPs, 0.45) and nurse practitioners (NPs, 0.41). The top-3 accuracy showed a similar trend: 0.90 DLS, 0.75 dermatologists, 0.60 PCPs, and 0.55 NPs. These results highlight the potential of the DLS to augment general practitioners to accurately diagnose skin conditions by suggesting differential diagnoses that may not have been considered. Future work will be needed to prospectively assess the clinical impact of using this tool in actual clinical workflows.
△ Less
Submitted 11 September, 2019;
originally announced September 2019.
Random Surfers on a Web Encyclopedia
Authors:
Florian Geigl,
Daniel Lamprecht,
Rainer Hofmann-Wellenhof,
Simon Walk,
Markus Strohmaier,
Denis Helic
Abstract:
The random surfer model is a frequently used model for simulating user navigation behavior on the Web. Various algorithms, such as PageRank, are based on the assumption that the model represents a good approximation of users browsing a website. However, the way users browse the Web has been drastically altered over the last decade due to the rise of search engines. Hence, new adaptations for the e…
▽ More
The random surfer model is a frequently used model for simulating user navigation behavior on the Web. Various algorithms, such as PageRank, are based on the assumption that the model represents a good approximation of users browsing a website. However, the way users browse the Web has been drastically altered over the last decade due to the rise of search engines. Hence, new adaptations for the established random surfer model might be required, which better capture and simulate this change in navigation behavior. In this article we compare the classical uniform random surfer to empirical navigation and page access data in a Web Encyclopedia. Our high level contributions are (i) a comparison of stationary distributions of different types of the random surfer to quantify the similarities and differences between those models as well as (ii) new insights into the impact of search engines on traditional user navigation. Our results suggest that the behavior of the random surfer is almost similar to those of users - as long as users do not use search engines. We also find that classical website navigation structures, such as navigation hierarchies or breadcrumbs, only exercise limited influence on user navigation anymore. Rather, a new kind of navigational tools (e.g., recommendation systems) might be needed to better reflect the changes in browsing behavior of existing users.
△ Less
Submitted 4 August, 2015; v1 submitted 16 July, 2015;
originally announced July 2015.
