-
Deep Learning-based Prediction of Breast Cancer Tumor and Immune Phenotypes from Histopathology
Authors:
Tiago Gonçalves,
Dagoberto Pulido-Arias,
Julian Willett,
Katharina V. Hoebel,
Mason Cleveland,
Syed Rakin Ahmed,
Elizabeth Gerstner,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer,
Jaime S. Cardoso,
Christopher P. Bridge,
Albert E. Kim
Abstract:
The interactions between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) dictate therapeutic efficacy of radiation and many systemic therapies in breast cancer. However, to date, there is not a widely available method to reproducibly measure tumor and immune phenotypes for each patient's tumor. Given this unmet clinical need, we applied multiple instance learning (MIL) algorithms to assess activi…
▽ More
The interactions between tumor cells and the tumor microenvironment (TME) dictate therapeutic efficacy of radiation and many systemic therapies in breast cancer. However, to date, there is not a widely available method to reproducibly measure tumor and immune phenotypes for each patient's tumor. Given this unmet clinical need, we applied multiple instance learning (MIL) algorithms to assess activity of ten biologically relevant pathways from the hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) slide of primary breast tumors. We employed different feature extraction approaches and state-of-the-art model architectures. Using binary classification, our models attained area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) scores above 0.70 for nearly all gene expression pathways and on some cases, exceeded 0.80. Attention maps suggest that our trained models recognize biologically relevant spatial patterns of cell sub-populations from H&E. These efforts represent a first step towards develo** computational H&E biomarkers that reflect facets of the TME and hold promise for augmenting precision oncology.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
A generalized framework to predict continuous scores from medical ordinal labels
Authors:
Katharina V. Hoebel,
Andreanne Lemay,
John Peter Campbell,
Susan Ostmo,
Michael F. Chiang,
Christopher P. Bridge,
Matthew D. Li,
Praveer Singh,
Aaron S. Coyner,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
Many variables of interest in clinical medicine, like disease severity, are recorded using discrete ordinal categories such as normal/mild/moderate/severe. These labels are used to train and evaluate disease severity prediction models. However, ordinal categories represent a simplification of an underlying continuous severity spectrum. Using continuous scores instead of ordinal categories is more…
▽ More
Many variables of interest in clinical medicine, like disease severity, are recorded using discrete ordinal categories such as normal/mild/moderate/severe. These labels are used to train and evaluate disease severity prediction models. However, ordinal categories represent a simplification of an underlying continuous severity spectrum. Using continuous scores instead of ordinal categories is more sensitive to detecting small changes in disease severity over time. Here, we present a generalized framework that accurately predicts continuously valued variables using only discrete ordinal labels during model development. We found that for three clinical prediction tasks, models that take the ordinal relationship of the training labels into account outperformed conventional multi-class classification models. Particularly the continuous scores generated by ordinal classification and regression models showed a significantly higher correlation with expert rankings of disease severity and lower mean squared errors compared to the multi-class classification models. Furthermore, the use of MC dropout significantly improved the ability of all evaluated deep learning approaches to predict continuously valued scores that truthfully reflect the underlying continuous target variable. We showed that accurate continuously valued predictions can be generated even if the model development only involves discrete ordinal labels. The novel framework has been validated on three different clinical prediction tasks and has proven to bridge the gap between discrete ordinal labels and the underlying continuously valued variables.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
-
Improving the repeatability of deep learning models with Monte Carlo dropout
Authors:
Andreanne Lemay,
Katharina Hoebel,
Christopher P. Bridge,
Brian Befano,
Silvia De Sanjosé,
Diden Egemen,
Ana Cecilia Rodriguez,
Mark Schiffman,
John Peter Campbell,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
The integration of artificial intelligence into clinical workflows requires reliable and robust models. Repeatability is a key attribute of model robustness. Repeatable models output predictions with low variation during independent tests carried out under similar conditions. During model development and evaluation, much attention is given to classification performance while model repeatability is…
▽ More
The integration of artificial intelligence into clinical workflows requires reliable and robust models. Repeatability is a key attribute of model robustness. Repeatable models output predictions with low variation during independent tests carried out under similar conditions. During model development and evaluation, much attention is given to classification performance while model repeatability is rarely assessed, leading to the development of models that are unusable in clinical practice. In this work, we evaluate the repeatability of four model types (binary classification, multi-class classification, ordinal classification, and regression) on images that were acquired from the same patient during the same visit. We study the performance of binary, multi-class, ordinal, and regression models on four medical image classification tasks from public and private datasets: knee osteoarthritis, cervical cancer screening, breast density estimation, and retinopathy of prematurity. Repeatability is measured and compared on ResNet and DenseNet architectures. Moreover, we assess the impact of sampling Monte Carlo dropout predictions at test time on classification performance and repeatability. Leveraging Monte Carlo predictions significantly increased repeatability for all tasks on the binary, multi-class, and ordinal models leading to an average reduction of the 95\% limits of agreement by 16% points and of the disagreement rate by 7% points. The classification accuracy improved in most settings along with the repeatability. Our results suggest that beyond about 20 Monte Carlo iterations, there is no further gain in repeatability. In addition to the higher test-retest agreement, Monte Carlo predictions were better calibrated which leads to output probabilities reflecting more accurately the true likelihood of being correctly classified.
△ Less
Submitted 15 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
QU-BraTS: MICCAI BraTS 2020 Challenge on Quantifying Uncertainty in Brain Tumor Segmentation - Analysis of Ranking Scores and Benchmarking Results
Authors:
Raghav Mehta,
Angelos Filos,
Ujjwal Baid,
Chiharu Sako,
Richard McKinley,
Michael Rebsamen,
Katrin Datwyler,
Raphael Meier,
Piotr Radojewski,
Gowtham Krishnan Murugesan,
Sahil Nalawade,
Chandan Ganesh,
Ben Wagner,
Fang F. Yu,
Baowei Fei,
Ananth J. Madhuranthakam,
Joseph A. Maldjian,
Laura Daza,
Catalina Gomez,
Pablo Arbelaez,
Chengliang Dai,
Shuo Wang,
Hadrien Reynaud,
Yuan-han Mo,
Elsa Angelini
, et al. (67 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying…
▽ More
Deep learning (DL) models have provided state-of-the-art performance in various medical imaging benchmarking challenges, including the Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) challenges. However, the task of focal pathology multi-compartment segmentation (e.g., tumor and lesion sub-regions) is particularly challenging, and potential errors hinder translating DL models into clinical workflows. Quantifying the reliability of DL model predictions in the form of uncertainties could enable clinical review of the most uncertain regions, thereby building trust and paving the way toward clinical translation. Several uncertainty estimation methods have recently been introduced for DL medical image segmentation tasks. Develo** scores to evaluate and compare the performance of uncertainty measures will assist the end-user in making more informed decisions. In this study, we explore and evaluate a score developed during the BraTS 2019 and BraTS 2020 task on uncertainty quantification (QU-BraTS) and designed to assess and rank uncertainty estimates for brain tumor multi-compartment segmentation. This score (1) rewards uncertainty estimates that produce high confidence in correct assertions and those that assign low confidence levels at incorrect assertions, and (2) penalizes uncertainty measures that lead to a higher percentage of under-confident correct assertions. We further benchmark the segmentation uncertainties generated by 14 independent participating teams of QU-BraTS 2020, all of which also participated in the main BraTS segmentation task. Overall, our findings confirm the importance and complementary value that uncertainty estimates provide to segmentation algorithms, highlighting the need for uncertainty quantification in medical image analyses. Finally, in favor of transparency and reproducibility, our evaluation code is made publicly available at: https://github.com/RagMeh11/QU-BraTS.
△ Less
Submitted 23 August, 2022; v1 submitted 19 December, 2021;
originally announced December 2021.
-
Monte Carlo dropout increases model repeatability
Authors:
Andreanne Lemay,
Katharina Hoebel,
Christopher P. Bridge,
Didem Egemen,
Ana Cecilia Rodriguez,
Mark Schiffman,
John Peter Campbell,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
The integration of artificial intelligence into clinical workflows requires reliable and robust models. Among the main features of robustness is repeatability. Much attention is given to classification performance without assessing the model repeatability, leading to the development of models that turn out to be unusable in practice. In this work, we evaluate the repeatability of four model types…
▽ More
The integration of artificial intelligence into clinical workflows requires reliable and robust models. Among the main features of robustness is repeatability. Much attention is given to classification performance without assessing the model repeatability, leading to the development of models that turn out to be unusable in practice. In this work, we evaluate the repeatability of four model types on images from the same patient that were acquired during the same visit. We study the performance of binary, multi-class, ordinal, and regression models on three medical image analysis tasks: cervical cancer screening, breast density estimation, and retinopathy of prematurity classification. Moreover, we assess the impact of sampling Monte Carlo dropout predictions at test time on classification performance and repeatability. Leveraging Monte Carlo predictions significantly increased repeatability for all tasks on the binary, multi-class, and ordinal models leading to an average reduction of the 95% limits of agreement by 17% points.
△ Less
Submitted 12 November, 2021;
originally announced November 2021.
-
Fair Conformal Predictors for Applications in Medical Imaging
Authors:
Charles Lu,
Andreanne Lemay,
Ken Chang,
Katharina Hoebel,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
Deep learning has the potential to automate many clinically useful tasks in medical imaging. However translation of deep learning into clinical practice has been hindered by issues such as lack of the transparency and interpretability in these "black box" algorithms compared to traditional statistical methods. Specifically, many clinical deep learning models lack rigorous and robust techniques for…
▽ More
Deep learning has the potential to automate many clinically useful tasks in medical imaging. However translation of deep learning into clinical practice has been hindered by issues such as lack of the transparency and interpretability in these "black box" algorithms compared to traditional statistical methods. Specifically, many clinical deep learning models lack rigorous and robust techniques for conveying certainty (or lack thereof) in their predictions -- ultimately limiting their appeal for extensive use in medical decision-making. Furthermore, numerous demonstrations of algorithmic bias have increased hesitancy towards deployment of deep learning for clinical applications. To this end, we explore how conformal predictions can complement existing deep learning approaches by providing an intuitive way of expressing uncertainty while facilitating greater transparency to clinical users. In this paper, we conduct field interviews with radiologists to assess possible use-cases for conformal predictors. Using insights gathered from these interviews, we devise two clinical use-cases and empirically evaluate several methods of conformal predictions on a dermatology photography dataset for skin lesion classification. We show how to modify conformal predictions to be more adaptive to subgroup differences in patient skin tones through equalized coverage. Finally, we compare conformal prediction against measures of epistemic uncertainty.
△ Less
Submitted 3 May, 2022; v1 submitted 9 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
-
Evaluating subgroup disparity using epistemic uncertainty in mammography
Authors:
Charles Lu,
Andreanne Lemay,
Katharina Hoebel,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
As machine learning (ML) continue to be integrated into healthcare systems that affect clinical decision making, new strategies will need to be incorporated in order to effectively detect and evaluate subgroup disparities to ensure accountability and generalizability in clinical workflows. In this paper, we explore how epistemic uncertainty can be used to evaluate disparity in patient demographics…
▽ More
As machine learning (ML) continue to be integrated into healthcare systems that affect clinical decision making, new strategies will need to be incorporated in order to effectively detect and evaluate subgroup disparities to ensure accountability and generalizability in clinical workflows. In this paper, we explore how epistemic uncertainty can be used to evaluate disparity in patient demographics (race) and data acquisition (scanner) subgroups for breast density assessment on a dataset of 108,190 mammograms collected from 33 clinical sites. Our results show that even if aggregate performance is comparable, the choice of uncertainty quantification metric can significantly the subgroup level. We hope this analysis can promote further work on how uncertainty can be leveraged to increase transparency of machine learning applications for clinical deployment.
△ Less
Submitted 15 July, 2021; v1 submitted 6 July, 2021;
originally announced July 2021.
-
Addressing catastrophic forgetting for medical domain expansion
Authors:
Sharut Gupta,
Praveer Singh,
Ken Chang,
Liangqiong Qu,
Mehak Aggarwal,
Nishanth Arun,
Ashwin Vaswani,
Shruti Raghavan,
Vibha Agarwal,
Mishka Gidwani,
Katharina Hoebel,
Jay Patel,
Charles Lu,
Christopher P. Bridge,
Daniel L. Rubin,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
Model brittleness is a key concern when deploying deep learning models in real-world medical settings. A model that has high performance at one institution may suffer a significant decline in performance when tested at other institutions. While pooling datasets from multiple institutions and retraining may provide a straightforward solution, it is often infeasible and may compromise patient privac…
▽ More
Model brittleness is a key concern when deploying deep learning models in real-world medical settings. A model that has high performance at one institution may suffer a significant decline in performance when tested at other institutions. While pooling datasets from multiple institutions and retraining may provide a straightforward solution, it is often infeasible and may compromise patient privacy. An alternative approach is to fine-tune the model on subsequent institutions after training on the original institution. Notably, this approach degrades model performance at the original institution, a phenomenon known as catastrophic forgetting. In this paper, we develop an approach to address catastrophic forget-ting based on elastic weight consolidation combined with modulation of batch normalization statistics under two scenarios: first, for expanding the domain from one imaging system's data to another imaging system's, and second, for expanding the domain from a large multi-institutional dataset to another single institution dataset. We show that our approach outperforms several other state-of-the-art approaches and provide theoretical justification for the efficacy of batch normalization modulation. The results of this study are generally applicable to the deployment of any clinical deep learning model which requires domain expansion.
△ Less
Submitted 24 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
The unreasonable effectiveness of Batch-Norm statistics in addressing catastrophic forgetting across medical institutions
Authors:
Sharut Gupta,
Praveer Singh,
Ken Chang,
Mehak Aggarwal,
Nishanth Arun,
Liangqiong Qu,
Katharina Hoebel,
Jay Patel,
Mishka Gidwani,
Ashwin Vaswani,
Daniel L Rubin,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
Model brittleness is a primary concern when deploying deep learning models in medical settings owing to inter-institution variations, like patient demographics and intra-institution variation, such as multiple scanner types. While simply training on the combined datasets is fraught with data privacy limitations, fine-tuning the model on subsequent institutions after training it on the original ins…
▽ More
Model brittleness is a primary concern when deploying deep learning models in medical settings owing to inter-institution variations, like patient demographics and intra-institution variation, such as multiple scanner types. While simply training on the combined datasets is fraught with data privacy limitations, fine-tuning the model on subsequent institutions after training it on the original institution results in a decrease in performance on the original dataset, a phenomenon called catastrophic forgetting. In this paper, we investigate trade-off between model refinement and retention of previously learned knowledge and subsequently address catastrophic forgetting for the assessment of mammographic breast density. More specifically, we propose a simple yet effective approach, adapting Elastic weight consolidation (EWC) using the global batch normalization (BN) statistics of the original dataset. The results of this study provide guidance for the deployment of clinical deep learning models where continuous learning is needed for domain expansion.
△ Less
Submitted 16 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Towards Trainable Saliency Maps in Medical Imaging
Authors:
Mehak Aggarwal,
Nishanth Arun,
Sharut Gupta,
Ashwin Vaswani,
Bryan Chen,
Matthew Li,
Ken Chang,
Jay Patel,
Katherine Hoebel,
Mishka Gidwani,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer,
Praveer Singh
Abstract:
While success of Deep Learning (DL) in automated diagnosis can be transformative to the medicinal practice especially for people with little or no access to doctors, its widespread acceptability is severely limited by inherent black-box decision making and unsafe failure modes. While saliency methods attempt to tackle this problem in non-medical contexts, their apriori explanations do not transfer…
▽ More
While success of Deep Learning (DL) in automated diagnosis can be transformative to the medicinal practice especially for people with little or no access to doctors, its widespread acceptability is severely limited by inherent black-box decision making and unsafe failure modes. While saliency methods attempt to tackle this problem in non-medical contexts, their apriori explanations do not transfer well to medical usecases. With this study we validate a model design element agnostic to both architecture complexity and model task, and show how introducing this element gives an inherently self-explanatory model. We compare our results with state of the art non-trainable saliency maps on RSNA Pneumonia Dataset and demonstrate a much higher localization efficacy using our adopted technique. We also compare, with a fully supervised baseline and provide a reasonable alternative to it's high data labelling overhead. We further investigate the validity of our claims through qualitative evaluation from an expert reader.
△ Less
Submitted 15 November, 2020;
originally announced November 2020.
-
Federated Learning for Breast Density Classification: A Real-World Implementation
Authors:
Holger R. Roth,
Ken Chang,
Praveer Singh,
Nir Neumark,
Wenqi Li,
Vikash Gupta,
Sharut Gupta,
Liangqiong Qu,
Alvin Ihsani,
Bernardo C. Bizzo,
Yuhong Wen,
Varun Buch,
Meesam Shah,
Felipe Kitamura,
Matheus Mendonça,
Vitor Lavor,
Ahmed Harouni,
Colin Compas,
Jesse Tetreault,
Prerna Dogra,
Yan Cheng,
Selnur Erdal,
Richard White,
Behrooz Hashemian,
Thomas Schultz
, et al. (18 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
Building robust deep learning-based models requires large quantities of diverse training data. In this study, we investigate the use of federated learning (FL) to build medical imaging classification models in a real-world collaborative setting. Seven clinical institutions from across the world joined this FL effort to train a model for breast density classification based on Breast Imaging, Report…
▽ More
Building robust deep learning-based models requires large quantities of diverse training data. In this study, we investigate the use of federated learning (FL) to build medical imaging classification models in a real-world collaborative setting. Seven clinical institutions from across the world joined this FL effort to train a model for breast density classification based on Breast Imaging, Reporting & Data System (BI-RADS). We show that despite substantial differences among the datasets from all sites (mammography system, class distribution, and data set size) and without centralizing data, we can successfully train AI models in federation. The results show that models trained using FL perform 6.3% on average better than their counterparts trained on an institute's local data alone. Furthermore, we show a 45.8% relative improvement in the models' generalizability when evaluated on the other participating sites' testing data.
△ Less
Submitted 20 October, 2020; v1 submitted 3 September, 2020;
originally announced September 2020.
-
Assessing the (Un)Trustworthiness of Saliency Maps for Localizing Abnormalities in Medical Imaging
Authors:
Nishanth Arun,
Nathan Gaw,
Praveer Singh,
Ken Chang,
Mehak Aggarwal,
Bryan Chen,
Katharina Hoebel,
Sharut Gupta,
Jay Patel,
Mishka Gidwani,
Julius Adebayo,
Matthew D. Li,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
Saliency maps have become a widely used method to make deep learning models more interpretable by providing post-hoc explanations of classifiers through identification of the most pertinent areas of the input medical image. They are increasingly being used in medical imaging to provide clinically plausible explanations for the decisions the neural network makes. However, the utility and robustness…
▽ More
Saliency maps have become a widely used method to make deep learning models more interpretable by providing post-hoc explanations of classifiers through identification of the most pertinent areas of the input medical image. They are increasingly being used in medical imaging to provide clinically plausible explanations for the decisions the neural network makes. However, the utility and robustness of these visualization maps has not yet been rigorously examined in the context of medical imaging. We posit that trustworthiness in this context requires 1) localization utility, 2) sensitivity to model weight randomization, 3) repeatability, and 4) reproducibility. Using the localization information available in two large public radiology datasets, we quantify the performance of eight commonly used saliency map approaches for the above criteria using area under the precision-recall curves (AUPRC) and structural similarity index (SSIM), comparing their performance to various baseline measures. Using our framework to quantify the trustworthiness of saliency maps, we show that all eight saliency map techniques fail at least one of the criteria and are, in most cases, less trustworthy when compared to the baselines. We suggest that their usage in the high-risk domain of medical imaging warrants additional scrutiny and recommend that detection or segmentation models be used if localization is the desired output of the network. Additionally, to promote reproducibility of our findings, we provide the code we used for all tests performed in this work at this link: https://github.com/QTIM-Lab/Assessing-Saliency-Maps.
△ Less
Submitted 14 July, 2021; v1 submitted 6 August, 2020;
originally announced August 2020.
-
Assessing the validity of saliency maps for abnormality localization in medical imaging
Authors:
Nishanth Thumbavanam Arun,
Nathan Gaw,
Praveer Singh,
Ken Chang,
Katharina Viktoria Hoebel,
Jay Patel,
Mishka Gidwani,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
Saliency maps have become a widely used method to assess which areas of the input image are most pertinent to the prediction of a trained neural network. However, in the context of medical imaging, there is no study to our knowledge that has examined the efficacy of these techniques and quantified them using overlap with ground truth bounding boxes. In this work, we explored the credibility of the…
▽ More
Saliency maps have become a widely used method to assess which areas of the input image are most pertinent to the prediction of a trained neural network. However, in the context of medical imaging, there is no study to our knowledge that has examined the efficacy of these techniques and quantified them using overlap with ground truth bounding boxes. In this work, we explored the credibility of the various existing saliency map methods on the RSNA Pneumonia dataset. We found that GradCAM was the most sensitive to model parameter and label randomization, and was highly agnostic to model architecture.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2020;
originally announced June 2020.
-
Give me (un)certainty -- An exploration of parameters that affect segmentation uncertainty
Authors:
Katharina Hoebel,
Ken Chang,
Jay Patel,
Praveer Singh,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
Segmentation tasks in medical imaging are inherently ambiguous: the boundary of a target structure is oftentimes unclear due to image quality and biological factors. As such, predicted segmentations from deep learning algorithms are inherently ambiguous. Additionally, "ground truth" segmentations performed by human annotators are in fact weak labels that further increase the uncertainty of outputs…
▽ More
Segmentation tasks in medical imaging are inherently ambiguous: the boundary of a target structure is oftentimes unclear due to image quality and biological factors. As such, predicted segmentations from deep learning algorithms are inherently ambiguous. Additionally, "ground truth" segmentations performed by human annotators are in fact weak labels that further increase the uncertainty of outputs of supervised models developed on these manual labels. To date, most deep learning segmentation studies utilize predicted segmentations without uncertainty quantification. In contrast, we explore the use of Monte Carlo dropout U-Nets for the segmentation with additional quantification of segmentation uncertainty. We assess the utility of three measures of uncertainty (Coefficient of Variation, Mean Pairwise Dice, and Mean Voxelwise Uncertainty) for the segmentation of a less ambiguous target structure (liver) and a more ambiguous one (liver tumors). Furthermore, we assess how the utility of these measures changes with different patch sizes and cost functions. Our results suggest that models trained using larger patches and the weighted categorical cross-entropy as cost function allow the extraction of more meaningful uncertainty measures compared to smaller patches and soft dice loss. Among the three uncertainty measures Mean Pairwise Dice shows the strongest correlation with segmentation quality. Our study serves as a proof-of-concept of how uncertainty measures can be used to assess the quality of a predicted segmentation, potentially serving to flag low quality segmentations from a given model for further human review.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2019;
originally announced November 2019.
-
Deep feature transfer between localization and segmentation tasks
Authors:
Szu-Yeu Hu,
Andrew Beers,
Ken Chang,
Kathi Höbel,
J. Peter Campbell,
Deniz Erdogumus,
Stratis Ioannidis,
Jennifer Dy,
Michael F. Chiang,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer,
James M. Brown
Abstract:
In this paper, we propose a new pre-training scheme for U-net based image segmentation. We first train the encoding arm as a localization network to predict the center of the target, before extending it into a U-net architecture for segmentation. We apply our proposed method to the problem of segmenting the optic disc from fundus photographs. Our work shows that the features learned by encoding ar…
▽ More
In this paper, we propose a new pre-training scheme for U-net based image segmentation. We first train the encoding arm as a localization network to predict the center of the target, before extending it into a U-net architecture for segmentation. We apply our proposed method to the problem of segmenting the optic disc from fundus photographs. Our work shows that the features learned by encoding arm can be transferred to the segmentation network to reduce the annotation burden. We propose that an approach could have broad utility for medical image segmentation, and alleviate the burden of delineating complex structures by pre-training on annotations that are much easier to acquire.
△ Less
Submitted 10 November, 2018; v1 submitted 6 November, 2018;
originally announced November 2018.
-
DeepNeuro: an open-source deep learning toolbox for neuroimaging
Authors:
Andrew Beers,
James Brown,
Ken Chang,
Katharina Hoebel,
Elizabeth Gerstner,
Bruce Rosen,
Jayashree Kalpathy-Cramer
Abstract:
Translating neural networks from theory to clinical practice has unique challenges, specifically in the field of neuroimaging. In this paper, we present DeepNeuro, a deep learning framework that is best-suited to putting deep learning algorithms for neuroimaging in practical usage with a minimum of friction. We show how this framework can be used to both design and train neural network architectur…
▽ More
Translating neural networks from theory to clinical practice has unique challenges, specifically in the field of neuroimaging. In this paper, we present DeepNeuro, a deep learning framework that is best-suited to putting deep learning algorithms for neuroimaging in practical usage with a minimum of friction. We show how this framework can be used to both design and train neural network architectures, as well as modify state-of-the-art architectures in a flexible and intuitive way. We display the pre- and postprocessing functions common in the medical imaging community that DeepNeuro offers to ensure consistent performance of networks across variable users, institutions, and scanners. And we show how pipelines created in DeepNeuro can be concisely packaged into shareable Docker containers and command-line interfaces using DeepNeuro's pipeline resources.
△ Less
Submitted 14 August, 2018;
originally announced August 2018.
