The FAIR Funder pilot programme to make it easy for funders to require and for grantees to produce FAIR Data
Authors:
P. Wittenburg,
H. Pergl Sustkova,
A. Montesanti,
S. M. Bloemers,
S. H. de Waard,
M. A. Musen,
J. B. Graybeal,
K. M. Hettne,
A. Jacobsen,
R. Pergl,
R. W. W. Hooft,
C. Staiger,
C. W. G. van Gelder,
S. L. Knijnenburg,
A. C. van Arkel,
B. Meerman,
M. D. Wilkinson,
S-A Sansone,
P. Rocca-Serra,
P. McQuilton,
A. N. Gonzalez-Beltran,
G. J. C. Aben,
P. Henning,
S. Alencar,
C. Ribeiro
, et al. (35 additional authors not shown)
Abstract:
There is a growing acknowledgement in the scientific community of the importance of making experimental data machine findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). Recognizing that high quality metadata are essential to make datasets FAIR, members of the GO FAIR Initiative and the Research Data Alliance (RDA) have initiated a series of workshops to encourage the creation of Metadata for…
▽ More
There is a growing acknowledgement in the scientific community of the importance of making experimental data machine findable, accessible, interoperable, and reusable (FAIR). Recognizing that high quality metadata are essential to make datasets FAIR, members of the GO FAIR Initiative and the Research Data Alliance (RDA) have initiated a series of workshops to encourage the creation of Metadata for Machines (M4M), enabling any self-identified stakeholder to define and promote the reuse of standardized, comprehensive machine-actionable metadata. The funders of scientific research recognize that they have an important role to play in ensuring that experimental results are FAIR, and that high quality metadata and careful planning for FAIR data stewardship are central to these goals. We describe the outcome of a recent M4M workshop that has led to a pilot programme involving two national science funders, the Health Research Board of Ireland (HRB) and the Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMW). These funding organizations will explore new technologies to define at the time that a request for proposals is issued the minimal set of machine-actionable metadata that they would like investigators to use to annotate their datasets, to enable investigators to create such metadata to help make their data FAIR, and to develop data-stewardship plans that ensure that experimental data will be managed appropriately abiding by the FAIR principles. The FAIR Funders design envisions a data-management workflow having seven essential stages, where solution providers are openly invited to participate. The initial pilot programme will launch using existing computer-based tools of those who attended the M4M Workshop.
△ Less
Submitted 6 March, 2019; v1 submitted 26 February, 2019;
originally announced February 2019.
Structuring research methods and data with the Research Object model: genomics workflows as a case study
Authors:
Kristina M. Hettne,
Harish Dharuri,
Jun Zhao,
Katherine Wolstencroft,
Khalid Belhajjame,
Stian Soiland-Reyes,
Eleni Mina,
Mark Thompson,
Don Cruickshank,
Lourdes Verdes-Montenegro,
Julian Garrido,
David de Roure,
Oscar Corcho,
Graham Klyne,
Reinout van Schouwen,
Peter A. C. 't Hoen,
Sean Bechhofer,
Carole Goble,
Marco Roos
Abstract:
One of the main challenges for biomedical research lies in the computer-assisted integrative study of large and increasingly complex combinations of data in order to understand molecular mechanisms. The preservation of the materials and methods of such computational experiments with clear annotations is essential for understanding an experiment, and this is increasingly recognized in the bioinform…
▽ More
One of the main challenges for biomedical research lies in the computer-assisted integrative study of large and increasingly complex combinations of data in order to understand molecular mechanisms. The preservation of the materials and methods of such computational experiments with clear annotations is essential for understanding an experiment, and this is increasingly recognized in the bioinformatics community. Our assumption is that offering means of digital, structured aggregation and annotation of the objects of an experiment will provide necessary meta-data for a scientist to understand and recreate the results of an experiment. To support this we explored a model for the semantic description of a workflow-centric Research Object (RO), where an RO is defined as a resource that aggregates other resources, e.g., datasets, software, spreadsheets, text, etc. We applied this model to a case study where we analysed human metabolite variation by workflows.
△ Less
Submitted 19 September, 2014; v1 submitted 12 November, 2013;
originally announced November 2013.
