Two-sided Assortment Optimization: Adaptivity Gaps and Approximation Algorithms
Authors:
Omar El Housni,
Alfredo Torrico,
Ulysse Hennebelle
Abstract:
To address the challenge of choice congestion in matching markets, in this work, we introduce a two-sided assortment optimization framework under general choice preferences. The goal in this problem is to maximize the expected number of matches by deciding which assortments are displayed to the agents and the order in which they are shown. In this context, we identify several classes of policies t…
▽ More
To address the challenge of choice congestion in matching markets, in this work, we introduce a two-sided assortment optimization framework under general choice preferences. The goal in this problem is to maximize the expected number of matches by deciding which assortments are displayed to the agents and the order in which they are shown. In this context, we identify several classes of policies that platforms can use in their design. Our goals are: (1) to measure the value that one class of policies has over another one, and (2) to approximately solve the optimization problem itself for a given class. For (1), we define the adaptivity gap as the worst-case ratio between the optimal values of two different policy classes. First, we show that the gap between the class of policies that statically show assortments to one-side first and the class of policies that adaptively show assortments to one-side first is exactly $1-1/e$. Second, we show that the gap between the latter class of policies and the fully adaptive class of policies that show assortments to agents one by one is exactly $1/2$. We also note that the worst policies are those who simultaneously show assortments to all the agents, in fact, we show that their adaptivity gap even with respect to one-sided static policies can be arbitrarily small. For (2), we first show that there exists a polynomial time policy that achieves a $1/4$ approximation factor within the class of policies that adaptively show assortments to agents one by one. Finally, when agents' preferences are governed by multinomial-logit models, we show that a 0.082 approximation factor can be obtained within the class of policies that show assortments to all agents at once.
△ Less
Submitted 23 April, 2024; v1 submitted 13 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Runtime Analyses of Multi-Objective Evolutionary Algorithms in the Presence of Noise
Authors:
Matthieu Dinot,
Benjamin Doerr,
Ulysse Hennebelle,
Sebastian Will
Abstract:
In single-objective optimization, it is well known that evolutionary algorithms also without further adjustments can tolerate a certain amount of noise in the evaluation of the objective function. In contrast, this question is not at all understood for multi-objective optimization.
In this work, we conduct the first mathematical runtime analysis of a simple multi-objective evolutionary algorithm…
▽ More
In single-objective optimization, it is well known that evolutionary algorithms also without further adjustments can tolerate a certain amount of noise in the evaluation of the objective function. In contrast, this question is not at all understood for multi-objective optimization.
In this work, we conduct the first mathematical runtime analysis of a simple multi-objective evolutionary algorithm (MOEA) on a classic benchmark in the presence of noise in the objective functions. We prove that when bit-wise prior noise with rate $p \le α/n$, $α$ a suitable constant, is present, the \emph{simple evolutionary multi-objective optimizer} (SEMO) without any adjustments to cope with noise finds the Pareto front of the OneMinMax benchmark in time $O(n^2\log n)$, just as in the case without noise. Given that the problem here is to arrive at a population consisting of $n+1$ individuals witnessing the Pareto front, this is a surprisingly strong robustness to noise (comparably simple evolutionary algorithms cannot optimize the single-objective OneMax problem in polynomial time when $p = ω(\log(n)/n)$). Our proofs suggest that the strong robustness of the MOEA stems from its implicit diversity mechanism designed to enable it to compute a population covering the whole Pareto front.
Interestingly this result only holds when the objective value of a solution is determined only once and the algorithm from that point on works with this, possibly noisy, objective value. We prove that when all solutions are reevaluated in each iteration, then any noise rate $p = ω(\log(n)/n^2)$ leads to a super-polynomial runtime. This is very different from single-objective optimization, where it is generally preferred to reevaluate solutions whenever their fitness is important and where examples are known such that not reevaluating solutions can lead to catastrophic performance losses.
△ Less
Submitted 30 May, 2023; v1 submitted 17 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
