A Static Analysis Platform for Investigating Security Trends in Repositories
Authors:
Tim Sonnekalb,
Christopher-Tobias Knaust,
Bernd Gruner,
Clemens-Alexander Brust,
Lynn von Kurnatowski,
Andreas Schreiber,
Thomas S. Heinze,
Patrick Mäder
Abstract:
Static analysis tools come in many forms andconfigurations, allowing them to handle various tasks in a (secure) development process: code style linting, bug/vulnerability detection, verification, etc., and adapt to the specific requirements of a software project, thus reducing the number of false positives.The wide range of configuration options poses a hurdle in their use for software developers,…
▽ More
Static analysis tools come in many forms andconfigurations, allowing them to handle various tasks in a (secure) development process: code style linting, bug/vulnerability detection, verification, etc., and adapt to the specific requirements of a software project, thus reducing the number of false positives.The wide range of configuration options poses a hurdle in their use for software developers, as the tools cannot be deployed out-of-the-box. However, static analysis tools only develop their full benefit if they are integrated into the software development workflow and used on regular. Vulnerability management should be integrated via version history to identify hotspots, for example. We present an analysis platform that integrates several static analysis tools that enable Git-based repositories to continuously monitor warnings across their version history. The framework is easily extensible with other tools and programming languages. We provide a visualization component in the form of a dashboard to display security trends and hotspots. Our tool can also be used to create a database of security alerts at a scale well-suited for machine learning applications such as bug or vulnerability detection.
△ Less
Submitted 4 April, 2023;
originally announced April 2023.
Cross-Domain Evaluation of a Deep Learning-Based Type Inference System
Authors:
Bernd Gruner,
Tim Sonnekalb,
Thomas S. Heinze,
Clemens-Alexander Brust
Abstract:
Optional type annotations allow for enriching dynamic programming languages with static ty** features like better Integrated Development Environment (IDE) support, more precise program analysis, and early detection and prevention of type-related runtime errors. Machine learning-based type inference promises interesting results for automating this task. However, the practical usage of such system…
▽ More
Optional type annotations allow for enriching dynamic programming languages with static ty** features like better Integrated Development Environment (IDE) support, more precise program analysis, and early detection and prevention of type-related runtime errors. Machine learning-based type inference promises interesting results for automating this task. However, the practical usage of such systems depends on their ability to generalize across different domains, as they are often applied outside their training domain. In this work, we investigate Type4Py as a representative of state-of-the-art deep learning-based type inference systems, by conducting extensive cross-domain experiments. Thereby, we address the following problems: class imbalances, out-of-vocabulary words, dataset shifts, and unknown classes. To perform such experiments, we use the datasets ManyTypes4Py and CrossDomainTypes4Py. The latter we introduce in this paper. Our dataset enables the evaluation of type inference systems in different domains of software projects and has over 1,000,000 type annotations mined on the platforms GitHub and Libraries. It consists of data from the two domains web development and scientific calculation. Through our experiments, we detect that the shifts in the dataset and the long-tailed distribution with many rare and unknown data types decrease the performance of the deep learning-based type inference system drastically. In this context, we test unsupervised domain adaptation methods and fine-tuning to overcome these issues. Moreover, we investigate the impact of out-of-vocabulary words.
△ Less
Submitted 28 July, 2023; v1 submitted 19 August, 2022;
originally announced August 2022.
