Showing 1–6 of 6 results for author: Heinisch, P

PAKT: Perspectivized Argumentation Knowledge Graph and Tool for Deliberation Analysis (with Supplementary Materials)

Authors: Moritz Plenz, Philipp Heinisch, Anette Frank, Philipp Cimiano

Abstract: Deliberative processes play a vital role in sha** opinions, decisions and policies in our society. In contrast to persuasive debates, deliberation aims to foster understanding of conflicting perspectives among interested parties. The exchange of arguments in deliberation serves to elucidate viewpoints, to raise awareness of conflicting interests, and to finally converge on a resolution. To bette… ▽ More Deliberative processes play a vital role in sha** opinions, decisions and policies in our society. In contrast to persuasive debates, deliberation aims to foster understanding of conflicting perspectives among interested parties. The exchange of arguments in deliberation serves to elucidate viewpoints, to raise awareness of conflicting interests, and to finally converge on a resolution. To better understand and analyze the underlying processes of deliberation, we propose PAKT, a Perspectivized Argumentation Knowledge Graph and Tool. The graph structures the argumentative space across diverse topics, where arguments i) are divided into premises and conclusions, ii) are annotated for stances, framings and their underlying values and iii) are connected to background knowledge. We show how to construct PAKT and conduct case studies on the obtained multifaceted argumentation graph. Our findings show the analytical potential offered by our framework, highlighting the capability to go beyond individual arguments and to reveal structural patterns in the way participants and stakeholders argue in a debate. The overarching goal of our work is to facilitate constructive discourse and informed decision making as a special form of argumentation. We offer public access to PAKT and its rich capabilities to support analytics, visualizaton, navigation and efficient search, for diverse forms of argumentation. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Comments: Accepted at the 1st International Conference on Robust Argumentation Machines (RATIO24); 18 pages and 13 pages supplementary materials

ACM Class: E.1; E.2; H.3; I.2; J.4

GrINd: Grid Interpolation Network for Scattered Observations

Authors: Andrzej Dulny, Paul Heinisch, Andreas Hotho, Anna Krause

Abstract: Predicting the evolution of spatiotemporal physical systems from sparse and scattered observational data poses a significant challenge in various scientific domains. Traditional methods rely on dense grid-structured data, limiting their applicability in scenarios with sparse observations. To address this challenge, we introduce GrINd (Grid Interpolation Network for Scattered Observations), a novel… ▽ More Predicting the evolution of spatiotemporal physical systems from sparse and scattered observational data poses a significant challenge in various scientific domains. Traditional methods rely on dense grid-structured data, limiting their applicability in scenarios with sparse observations. To address this challenge, we introduce GrINd (Grid Interpolation Network for Scattered Observations), a novel network architecture that leverages the high-performance of grid-based models by map** scattered observations onto a high-resolution grid using a Fourier Interpolation Layer. In the high-resolution space, a NeuralPDE-class model predicts the system's state at future timepoints using differentiable ODE solvers and fully convolutional neural networks parametrizing the system's dynamics. We empirically evaluate GrINd on the DynaBench benchmark dataset, comprising six different physical systems observed at scattered locations, demonstrating its state-of-the-art performance compared to existing models. GrINd offers a promising approach for forecasting physical systems from sparse, scattered observational data, extending the applicability of deep learning methods to real-world scenarios with limited data availability. △ Less

Submitted 28 March, 2024; originally announced March 2024.

Architectural Sweet Spots for Modeling Human Label Variation by the Example of Argument Quality: It's Best to Relate Perspectives!

Authors: Philipp Heinisch, Matthias Orlikowski, Julia Romberg, Philipp Cimiano

Abstract: Many annotation tasks in natural language processing are highly subjective in that there can be different valid and justified perspectives on what is a proper label for a given example. This also applies to the judgment of argument quality, where the assignment of a single ground truth is often questionable. At the same time, there are generally accepted concepts behind argumentation that form a c… ▽ More Many annotation tasks in natural language processing are highly subjective in that there can be different valid and justified perspectives on what is a proper label for a given example. This also applies to the judgment of argument quality, where the assignment of a single ground truth is often questionable. At the same time, there are generally accepted concepts behind argumentation that form a common ground. To best represent the interplay of individual and shared perspectives, we consider a continuum of approaches ranging from models that fully aggregate perspectives into a majority label to "share nothing"-architectures in which each annotator is considered in isolation from all other annotators. In between these extremes, inspired by models used in the field of recommender systems, we investigate the extent to which architectures that include layers to model the relations between different annotators are beneficial for predicting single-annotator labels. By means of two tasks of argument quality classification (argument concreteness and validity/novelty of conclusions), we show that recommender architectures increase the averaged annotator-individual F$_1$-scores up to $43\%$ over a majority label model. Our findings indicate that approaches to subjectivity can benefit from relating individual perspectives. △ Less

Submitted 6 November, 2023; originally announced November 2023.

Comments: Accepted at EMNLP 2023 main conference. First two authors contributed equally

TaylorPDENet: Learning PDEs from non-grid Data

Authors: Paul Heinisch, Andrzej Dulny, Anna Krause, Andreas Hotho

Abstract: Modeling data obtained from dynamical systems has gained attention in recent years as a challenging task for machine learning models. Previous approaches assume the measurements to be distributed on a grid. However, for real-world applications like weather prediction, the observations are taken from arbitrary locations within the spatial domain. In this paper, we propose TaylorPDENet - a novel mac… ▽ More Modeling data obtained from dynamical systems has gained attention in recent years as a challenging task for machine learning models. Previous approaches assume the measurements to be distributed on a grid. However, for real-world applications like weather prediction, the observations are taken from arbitrary locations within the spatial domain. In this paper, we propose TaylorPDENet - a novel machine learning method that is designed to overcome this challenge. Our algorithm uses the multidimensional Taylor expansion of a dynamical system at each observation point to estimate the spatial derivatives to perform predictions. TaylorPDENet is able to accomplish two objectives simultaneously: accurately forecast the evolution of a complex dynamical system and explicitly reconstruct the underlying differential equation describing the system. We evaluate our model on a variety of advection-diffusion equations with different parameters and show that it performs similarly to equivalent approaches on grid-structured data while being able to process unstructured data as well. △ Less

Submitted 26 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Similarity-weighted Construction of Contextualized Commonsense Knowledge Graphs for Knowledge-intense Argumentation Tasks

Authors: Moritz Plenz, Juri Opitz, Philipp Heinisch, Philipp Cimiano, Anette Frank

Abstract: Arguments often do not make explicit how a conclusion follows from its premises. To compensate for this lack, we enrich arguments with structured background knowledge to support knowledge-intense argumentation tasks. We present a new unsupervised method for constructing Contextualized Commonsense Knowledge Graphs (CCKGs) that selects contextually relevant knowledge from large knowledge graphs (KGs… ▽ More Arguments often do not make explicit how a conclusion follows from its premises. To compensate for this lack, we enrich arguments with structured background knowledge to support knowledge-intense argumentation tasks. We present a new unsupervised method for constructing Contextualized Commonsense Knowledge Graphs (CCKGs) that selects contextually relevant knowledge from large knowledge graphs (KGs) efficiently and at high quality. Our work goes beyond context-insensitive knowledge extraction heuristics by computing semantic similarity between KG triplets and textual arguments. Using these triplet similarities as weights, we extract contextualized knowledge paths that connect a conclusion to its premise, while maximizing similarity to the argument. We combine multiple paths into a CCKG that we optionally prune to reduce noise and raise precision. Intrinsic evaluation of the quality of our graphs shows that our method is effective for (re)constructing human explanation graphs. Manual evaluations in a large-scale knowledge selection setup confirm high recall and precision of implicit CSK in the CCKGs. Finally, we demonstrate the effectiveness of CCKGs in a knowledge-insensitive argument quality rating task, outperforming strong baselines and rivaling a GPT-3 based system. △ Less

Submitted 15 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: Accepted at ACL 2023

Towards Green Computing: A Survey of Performance and Energy Efficiency of Different Platforms using OpenCL

Authors: Philip Heinisch, Katharina Ostaszewski, Hendrik Ranocha

Abstract: When considering different hardware platforms, not just the time-to-solution can be of importance but also the energy necessary to reach it. This is not only the case with battery powered and mobile devices but also with high-performance parallel cluster systems due to financial and practical limits on power consumption and cooling. Recent developments in hard- and software have given programmers… ▽ More When considering different hardware platforms, not just the time-to-solution can be of importance but also the energy necessary to reach it. This is not only the case with battery powered and mobile devices but also with high-performance parallel cluster systems due to financial and practical limits on power consumption and cooling. Recent developments in hard- and software have given programmers the ability to run the same code on a range of different devices giving rise to the concept of heterogeneous computing. Many of these devices are optimized for certain types of applications. To showcase the differences and give a basic outlook on the applicability of different architectures for specific problems, the cross-platform OpenCL framework was used to compare both time- and energy-to-solution. A large set of devices ranging from ARM processors to server CPUs and consumer and enterprise level GPUs has been used with different benchmarking testcases taken from applied research applications. While the results show the overall advantages of GPUs in terms of both runtime and energy efficiency compared to CPUs, ARM devices show potential for certain applications in massively parallel systems. This study also highlights how OpenCL enables the use of the same codebase on many different systems and hardware platforms without specific code adaptations. △ Less

Submitted 8 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.