A resource-constrained stochastic scheduling algorithm for homeless street outreach and gleaning edible food
Authors:
Conor M. Artman,
Aditya Mate,
Ezinne Nwankwo,
Aliza Heching,
Tsuyoshi Idé,
Jiří Navrátil,
Karthikeyan Shanmugam,
Wei Sun,
Kush R. Varshney,
Lauri Goldkind,
Gidi Kroch,
Jaclyn Sawyer,
Ian Watson
Abstract:
We developed a common algorithmic solution addressing the problem of resource-constrained outreach encountered by social change organizations with different missions and operations: Breaking Ground -- an organization that helps individuals experiencing homelessness in New York transition to permanent housing and Leket -- the national food bank of Israel that rescues food from farms and elsewhere t…
▽ More
We developed a common algorithmic solution addressing the problem of resource-constrained outreach encountered by social change organizations with different missions and operations: Breaking Ground -- an organization that helps individuals experiencing homelessness in New York transition to permanent housing and Leket -- the national food bank of Israel that rescues food from farms and elsewhere to feed the hungry. Specifically, we developed an estimation and optimization approach for partially-observed episodic restless bandits under $k$-step transitions. The results show that our Thompson sampling with Markov chain recovery (via Stein variational gradient descent) algorithm significantly outperforms baselines for the problems of both organizations. We carried out this work in a prospective manner with the express goal of devising a flexible-enough but also useful-enough solution that can help overcome a lack of sustainable impact in data science for social good.
△ Less
Submitted 15 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
Retrospective End-User Walkthrough: A Method for Assessing How People Combine Multiple AI Models in Decision-Making Systems
Authors:
Vagner Figueredo de Santana,
Larissa Monteiro Da Fonseca Galeno,
Emilio Vital Brazil,
Aliza Heching,
Renato Cerqueira
Abstract:
Evaluating human-AI decision-making systems is an emerging challenge as new ways of combining multiple AI models towards a specific goal are proposed every day. As humans interact with AI in decision-making systems, multiple factors may be present in a task including trust, interpretability, and explainability, amongst others. In this context, this work proposes a retrospective method to support a…
▽ More
Evaluating human-AI decision-making systems is an emerging challenge as new ways of combining multiple AI models towards a specific goal are proposed every day. As humans interact with AI in decision-making systems, multiple factors may be present in a task including trust, interpretability, and explainability, amongst others. In this context, this work proposes a retrospective method to support a more holistic understanding of how people interact with and connect multiple AI models and combine multiple outputs in human-AI decision-making systems. The method consists of employing a retrospective end-user walkthrough with the objective of providing support to HCI practitioners so that they may gain an understanding of the higher order cognitive processes in place and the role that AI model outputs play in human-AI decision-making. The method was qualitatively assessed with 29 participants (four participants in a pilot phase; 25 participants in the main user study) interacting with a human-AI decision-making system in the context of financial decision-making. The system combines visual analytics, three AI models for revenue prediction, AI-supported analogues analysis, and hypothesis testing using external news and natural language processing to provide multiple means for comparing companies. Beyond results on tasks and usability problems, outcomes presented suggest that the method is promising in highlighting why AI models are ignored, used, or trusted, and how future interactions are planned. We suggest that HCI practitioners researching human-AI interaction can benefit by adding this step to user studies in a debriefing stage as a retrospective Thinking-Aloud protocol would be applied, but with emphasis on revisiting tasks and understanding why participants ignored or connected predictions while performing a task.
△ Less
Submitted 12 May, 2023;
originally announced May 2023.
