Showing 1–9 of 9 results for author: Hayes, C F

Utility-Based Reinforcement Learning: Unifying Single-objective and Multi-objective Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Peter Vamplew, Cameron Foale, Conor F. Hayes, Patrick Mannion, Enda Howley, Richard Dazeley, Scott Johnson, Johan Källström, Gabriel Ramos, Roxana Rădulescu, Willem Röpke, Diederik M. Roijers

Abstract: Research in multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) has introduced the utility-based paradigm, which makes use of both environmental rewards and a function that defines the utility derived by the user from those rewards. In this paper we extend this paradigm to the context of single-objective reinforcement learning (RL), and outline multiple potential benefits including the ability to perfor… ▽ More Research in multi-objective reinforcement learning (MORL) has introduced the utility-based paradigm, which makes use of both environmental rewards and a function that defines the utility derived by the user from those rewards. In this paper we extend this paradigm to the context of single-objective reinforcement learning (RL), and outline multiple potential benefits including the ability to perform multi-policy learning across tasks relating to uncertain objectives, risk-aware RL, discounting, and safe RL. We also examine the algorithmic implications of adopting a utility-based approach. △ Less

Submitted 4 February, 2024; originally announced February 2024.

Comments: Accepted for the Blue Sky Track at AAMAS'24

Distributional Multi-Objective Decision Making

Authors: Willem Röpke, Conor F. Hayes, Patrick Mannion, Enda Howley, Ann Nowé, Diederik M. Roijers

Abstract: For effective decision support in scenarios with conflicting objectives, sets of potentially optimal solutions can be presented to the decision maker. We explore both what policies these sets should contain and how such sets can be computed efficiently. With this in mind, we take a distributional approach and introduce a novel dominance criterion relating return distributions of policies directly.… ▽ More For effective decision support in scenarios with conflicting objectives, sets of potentially optimal solutions can be presented to the decision maker. We explore both what policies these sets should contain and how such sets can be computed efficiently. With this in mind, we take a distributional approach and introduce a novel dominance criterion relating return distributions of policies directly. Based on this criterion, we present the distributional undominated set and show that it contains optimal policies otherwise ignored by the Pareto front. In addition, we propose the convex distributional undominated set and prove that it comprises all policies that maximise expected utility for multivariate risk-averse decision makers. We propose a novel algorithm to learn the distributional undominated set and further contribute pruning operators to reduce the set to the convex distributional undominated set. Through experiments, we demonstrate the feasibility and effectiveness of these methods, making this a valuable new approach for decision support in real-world problems. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2023; v1 submitted 9 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: Accepted at IJCAI 2023

Monte Carlo Tree Search Algorithms for Risk-Aware and Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning

Authors: Conor F. Hayes, Mathieu Reymond, Diederik M. Roijers, Enda Howley, Patrick Mannion

Abstract: In many risk-aware and multi-objective reinforcement learning settings, the utility of the user is derived from a single execution of a policy. In these settings, making decisions based on the average future returns is not suitable. For example, in a medical setting a patient may only have one opportunity to treat their illness. Making decisions using just the expected future returns -- known in r… ▽ More In many risk-aware and multi-objective reinforcement learning settings, the utility of the user is derived from a single execution of a policy. In these settings, making decisions based on the average future returns is not suitable. For example, in a medical setting a patient may only have one opportunity to treat their illness. Making decisions using just the expected future returns -- known in reinforcement learning as the value -- cannot account for the potential range of adverse or positive outcomes a decision may have. Therefore, we should use the distribution over expected future returns differently to represent the critical information that the agent requires at decision time by taking both the future and accrued returns into consideration. In this paper, we propose two novel Monte Carlo tree search algorithms. Firstly, we present a Monte Carlo tree search algorithm that can compute policies for nonlinear utility functions (NLU-MCTS) by optimising the utility of the different possible returns attainable from individual policy executions, resulting in good policies for both risk-aware and multi-objective settings. Secondly, we propose a distributional Monte Carlo tree search algorithm (DMCTS) which extends NLU-MCTS. DMCTS computes an approximate posterior distribution over the utility of the returns, and utilises Thompson sampling during planning to compute policies in risk-aware and multi-objective settings. Both algorithms outperform the state-of-the-art in multi-objective reinforcement learning for the expected utility of the returns. △ Less

Submitted 6 December, 2022; v1 submitted 23 November, 2022; originally announced November 2022.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2102.00966

Multi-Objective Coordination Graphs for the Expected Scalarised Returns with Generative Flow Models

Authors: Conor F. Hayes, Timothy Verstraeten, Diederik M. Roijers, Enda Howley, Patrick Mannion

Abstract: Many real-world problems contain multiple objectives and agents, where a trade-off exists between objectives. Key to solving such problems is to exploit sparse dependency structures that exist between agents. For example, in wind farm control a trade-off exists between maximising power and minimising stress on the systems components. Dependencies between turbines arise due to the wake effect. We m… ▽ More Many real-world problems contain multiple objectives and agents, where a trade-off exists between objectives. Key to solving such problems is to exploit sparse dependency structures that exist between agents. For example, in wind farm control a trade-off exists between maximising power and minimising stress on the systems components. Dependencies between turbines arise due to the wake effect. We model such sparse dependencies between agents as a multi-objective coordination graph (MO-CoG). In multi-objective reinforcement learning a utility function is typically used to model a users preferences over objectives, which may be unknown a priori. In such settings a set of optimal policies must be computed. Which policies are optimal depends on which optimality criterion applies. If the utility function of a user is derived from multiple executions of a policy, the scalarised expected returns (SER) must be optimised. If the utility of a user is derived from a single execution of a policy, the expected scalarised returns (ESR) criterion must be optimised. For example, wind farms are subjected to constraints and regulations that must be adhered to at all times, therefore the ESR criterion must be optimised. For MO-CoGs, the state-of-the-art algorithms can only compute a set of optimal policies for the SER criterion, leaving the ESR criterion understudied. To compute a set of optimal polices under the ESR criterion, also known as the ESR set, distributions over the returns must be maintained. Therefore, to compute a set of optimal policies under the ESR criterion for MO-CoGs, we present a novel distributional multi-objective variable elimination (DMOVE) algorithm. We evaluate DMOVE in realistic wind farm simulations. Given the returns in real-world wind farm settings are continuous, we utilise a model known as real-NVP to learn the continuous return distributions to calculate the ESR set. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Exploring the Pareto front of multi-objective COVID-19 mitigation policies using reinforcement learning

Authors: Mathieu Reymond, Conor F. Hayes, Lander Willem, Roxana Rădulescu, Steven Abrams, Diederik M. Roijers, Enda Howley, Patrick Mannion, Niel Hens, Ann Nowé, Pieter Libin

Abstract: Infectious disease outbreaks can have a disruptive impact on public health and societal processes. As decision making in the context of epidemic mitigation is hard, reinforcement learning provides a methodology to automatically learn prevention strategies in combination with complex epidemic models. Current research focuses on optimizing policies w.r.t. a single objective, such as the pathogen's a… ▽ More Infectious disease outbreaks can have a disruptive impact on public health and societal processes. As decision making in the context of epidemic mitigation is hard, reinforcement learning provides a methodology to automatically learn prevention strategies in combination with complex epidemic models. Current research focuses on optimizing policies w.r.t. a single objective, such as the pathogen's attack rate. However, as the mitigation of epidemics involves distinct, and possibly conflicting criteria (i.a., prevalence, mortality, morbidity, cost), a multi-objective approach is warranted to learn balanced policies. To lift this decision-making process to real-world epidemic models, we apply deep multi-objective reinforcement learning and build upon a state-of-the-art algorithm, Pareto Conditioned Networks (PCN), to learn a set of solutions that approximates the Pareto front of the decision problem. We consider the first wave of the Belgian COVID-19 epidemic, which was mitigated by a lockdown, and study different deconfinement strategies, aiming to minimize both COVID-19 cases (i.e., infections and hospitalizations) and the societal burden that is induced by the applied mitigation measures. We contribute a multi-objective Markov decision process that encapsulates the stochastic compartment model that was used to inform policy makers during the COVID-19 epidemic. As these social mitigation measures are implemented in a continuous action space that modulates the contact matrix of the age-structured epidemic model, we extend PCN to this setting. We evaluate the solution returned by PCN, and observe that it correctly learns to reduce the social burden whenever the hospitalization rates are sufficiently low. In this work, we thus show that multi-objective reinforcement learning is attainable in complex epidemiological models and provides essential insights to balance complex mitigation policies. △ Less

Submitted 11 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Scalar reward is not enough: A response to Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton (2021)

Authors: Peter Vamplew, Benjamin J. Smith, Johan Kallstrom, Gabriel Ramos, Roxana Radulescu, Diederik M. Roijers, Conor F. Hayes, Fredrik Heintz, Patrick Mannion, Pieter J. K. Libin, Richard Dazeley, Cameron Foale

Abstract: The recent paper `"Reward is Enough" by Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton posits that the concept of reward maximisation is sufficient to underpin all intelligence, both natural and artificial. We contest the underlying assumption of Silver et al. that such reward can be scalar-valued. In this paper we explain why scalar rewards are insufficient to account for some aspects of both biological and co… ▽ More The recent paper `"Reward is Enough" by Silver, Singh, Precup and Sutton posits that the concept of reward maximisation is sufficient to underpin all intelligence, both natural and artificial. We contest the underlying assumption of Silver et al. that such reward can be scalar-valued. In this paper we explain why scalar rewards are insufficient to account for some aspects of both biological and computational intelligence, and argue in favour of explicitly multi-objective models of reward maximisation. Furthermore, we contend that even if scalar reward functions can trigger intelligent behaviour in specific cases, it is still undesirable to use this approach for the development of artificial general intelligence due to unacceptable risks of unsafe or unethical behaviour. △ Less

Submitted 24 November, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Expected Scalarised Returns Dominance: A New Solution Concept for Multi-Objective Decision Making

Authors: Conor F. Hayes, Timothy Verstraeten, Diederik M. Roijers, Enda Howley, Patrick Mannion

Abstract: In many real-world scenarios, the utility of a user is derived from the single execution of a policy. In this case, to apply multi-objective reinforcement learning, the expected utility of the returns must be optimised. Various scenarios exist where a user's preferences over objectives (also known as the utility function) are unknown or difficult to specify. In such scenarios, a set of optimal pol… ▽ More In many real-world scenarios, the utility of a user is derived from the single execution of a policy. In this case, to apply multi-objective reinforcement learning, the expected utility of the returns must be optimised. Various scenarios exist where a user's preferences over objectives (also known as the utility function) are unknown or difficult to specify. In such scenarios, a set of optimal policies must be learned. However, settings where the expected utility must be maximised have been largely overlooked by the multi-objective reinforcement learning community and, as a consequence, a set of optimal solutions has yet to be defined. In this paper we address this challenge by proposing first-order stochastic dominance as a criterion to build solution sets to maximise expected utility. We also propose a new dominance criterion, known as expected scalarised returns (ESR) dominance, that extends first-order stochastic dominance to allow a set of optimal policies to be learned in practice. We then define a new solution concept called the ESR set, which is a set of policies that are ESR dominant. Finally, we define a new multi-objective distributional tabular reinforcement learning (MOT-DRL) algorithm to learn the ESR set in a multi-objective multi-armed bandit setting. △ Less

Submitted 1 July, 2022; v1 submitted 2 June, 2021; originally announced June 2021.

A Practical Guide to Multi-Objective Reinforcement Learning and Planning

Authors: Conor F. Hayes, Roxana Rădulescu, Eugenio Bargiacchi, Johan Källström, Matthew Macfarlane, Mathieu Reymond, Timothy Verstraeten, Luisa M. Zintgraf, Richard Dazeley, Fredrik Heintz, Enda Howley, Athirai A. Irissappane, Patrick Mannion, Ann Nowé, Gabriel Ramos, Marcello Restelli, Peter Vamplew, Diederik M. Roijers

Abstract: Real-world decision-making tasks are generally complex, requiring trade-offs between multiple, often conflicting, objectives. Despite this, the majority of research in reinforcement learning and decision-theoretic planning either assumes only a single objective, or that multiple objectives can be adequately handled via a simple linear combination. Such approaches may oversimplify the underlying pr… ▽ More Real-world decision-making tasks are generally complex, requiring trade-offs between multiple, often conflicting, objectives. Despite this, the majority of research in reinforcement learning and decision-theoretic planning either assumes only a single objective, or that multiple objectives can be adequately handled via a simple linear combination. Such approaches may oversimplify the underlying problem and hence produce suboptimal results. This paper serves as a guide to the application of multi-objective methods to difficult problems, and is aimed at researchers who are already familiar with single-objective reinforcement learning and planning methods who wish to adopt a multi-objective perspective on their research, as well as practitioners who encounter multi-objective decision problems in practice. It identifies the factors that may influence the nature of the desired solution, and illustrates by example how these influence the design of multi-objective decision-making systems for complex problems. △ Less

Submitted 17 March, 2021; originally announced March 2021.

Journal ref: Auton Agent Multi-Agent Syst 36, 26 (2022)

Risk Aware and Multi-Objective Decision Making with Distributional Monte Carlo Tree Search

Authors: Conor F. Hayes, Mathieu Reymond, Diederik M. Roijers, Enda Howley, Patrick Mannion

Abstract: In many risk-aware and multi-objective reinforcement learning settings, the utility of the user is derived from the single execution of a policy. In these settings, making decisions based on the average future returns is not suitable. For example, in a medical setting a patient may only have one opportunity to treat their illness. When making a decision, just the expected return -- known in reinfo… ▽ More In many risk-aware and multi-objective reinforcement learning settings, the utility of the user is derived from the single execution of a policy. In these settings, making decisions based on the average future returns is not suitable. For example, in a medical setting a patient may only have one opportunity to treat their illness. When making a decision, just the expected return -- known in reinforcement learning as the value -- cannot account for the potential range of adverse or positive outcomes a decision may have. Our key insight is that we should use the distribution over expected future returns differently to represent the critical information that the agent requires at decision time. In this paper, we propose Distributional Monte Carlo Tree Search, an algorithm that learns a posterior distribution over the utility of the different possible returns attainable from individual policy executions, resulting in good policies for both risk-aware and multi-objective settings. Moreover, our algorithm outperforms the state-of-the-art in multi-objective reinforcement learning for the expected utility of the returns. △ Less

Submitted 2 February, 2021; v1 submitted 1 February, 2021; originally announced February 2021.

Comments: 8 pages, 4 figures