-
Improving Automatic Complexity Analysis of Integer Programs
Authors:
Jürgen Giesl,
Nils Lommen,
Marcel Hark,
Fabian Meyer
Abstract:
In earlier work, we developed an approach for automatic complexity analysis of integer programs, based on an alternating modular inference of upper runtime and size bounds for program parts. In this paper, we show how recent techniques to improve automated termination analysis of integer programs (like the generation of multiphase-linear ranking functions and control-flow refinement) can be integr…
▽ More
In earlier work, we developed an approach for automatic complexity analysis of integer programs, based on an alternating modular inference of upper runtime and size bounds for program parts. In this paper, we show how recent techniques to improve automated termination analysis of integer programs (like the generation of multiphase-linear ranking functions and control-flow refinement) can be integrated into our approach for the inference of runtime bounds. The power of the resulting approach is demonstrated by an extensive experimental evaluation with our new re-implementation of the corresponding tool KoAT.
△ Less
Submitted 1 June, 2022; v1 submitted 3 February, 2022;
originally announced February 2022.
-
Inferring Expected Runtimes of Probabilistic Integer Programs Using Expected Sizes
Authors:
Fabian Meyer,
Marcel Hark,
Jürgen Giesl
Abstract:
We present a novel modular approach to infer upper bounds on the expected runtime of probabilistic integer programs automatically. To this end, it computes bounds on the runtime of program parts and on the sizes of their variables in an alternating way. To evaluate its power, we implemented our approach in a new version of our open-source tool KoAT.
We present a novel modular approach to infer upper bounds on the expected runtime of probabilistic integer programs automatically. To this end, it computes bounds on the runtime of program parts and on the sizes of their variables in an alternating way. To evaluate its power, we implemented our approach in a new version of our open-source tool KoAT.
△ Less
Submitted 22 January, 2021; v1 submitted 13 October, 2020;
originally announced October 2020.
-
Termination of Triangular Polynomial Loops
Authors:
Marcel Hark,
Florian Frohn,
Jürgen Giesl
Abstract:
We consider the problem of proving termination for triangular weakly non-linear loops (twn-loops) over some ring $\mathcal{S}$ like $\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Q}$, or $\mathbb{R}$. The guard of such a loop is an arbitrary quantifier-free Boolean formula over (possibly non-linear) polynomial inequations, and the body is a single assignment of the form…
▽ More
We consider the problem of proving termination for triangular weakly non-linear loops (twn-loops) over some ring $\mathcal{S}$ like $\mathbb{Z}$, $\mathbb{Q}$, or $\mathbb{R}$. The guard of such a loop is an arbitrary quantifier-free Boolean formula over (possibly non-linear) polynomial inequations, and the body is a single assignment of the form $(x_1, \ldots, x_d) \longleftarrow (c_1 \cdot x_1 + p_1, \ldots, c_d \cdot x_d + p_d)$ where each $x_i$ is a variable, $c_i \in \mathcal{S}$, and each $p_i$ is a (possibly non-linear) polynomial over $\mathcal{S}$ and the variables $x_{i+1},\ldots,x_{d}$.
We show that the question of termination can be reduced to the existential fragment of the first-order theory of $\mathcal{S}$. For loops over $\mathbb{R}$, our reduction implies decidability of termination. For loops over $\mathbb{Z}$ and $\mathbb{Q}$, it proves semi-decidability of non-termination.
Furthermore, we present a transformation to convert certain non-twn-loops into twn-form. Then the original loop terminates iff the transformed loop terminates over a specific subset of $\mathbb{R}$, which can also be checked via our reduction. Moreover, we formalize a technique to linearize (the updates of) twn-loops in our setting and analyze its complexity. Based on these results, we prove complexity bounds for the termination problem of twn-loops as well as tight bounds for two important classes of loops which can always be transformed into twn-loops.
Finally, we show that there is an important class of linear loops where our decision procedure results in an efficient procedure for termination analysis, i.e., where the parameterized complexity of deciding termination is polynomial.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2024; v1 submitted 25 October, 2019;
originally announced October 2019.
-
Computing Expected Runtimes for Constant Probability Programs
Authors:
Jürgen Giesl,
Peter Giesl,
Marcel Hark
Abstract:
We introduce the class of constant probability (CP) programs and show that classical results from probability theory directly yield a simple decision procedure for (positive) almost sure termination of programs in this class. Moreover, asymptotically tight bounds on their expected runtime can always be computed easily. Based on this, we present an algorithm to infer the exact expected runtime of a…
▽ More
We introduce the class of constant probability (CP) programs and show that classical results from probability theory directly yield a simple decision procedure for (positive) almost sure termination of programs in this class. Moreover, asymptotically tight bounds on their expected runtime can always be computed easily. Based on this, we present an algorithm to infer the exact expected runtime of any CP program.
△ Less
Submitted 18 September, 2019; v1 submitted 23 May, 2019;
originally announced May 2019.
-
Aiming Low Is Harder -- Induction for Lower Bounds in Probabilistic Program Verification
Authors:
Marcel Hark,
Benjamin Lucien Kaminski,
Jürgen Giesl,
Joost-Pieter Katoen
Abstract:
We present a new inductive rule for verifying lower bounds on expected values of random variables after execution of probabilistic loops as well as on their expected runtimes. Our rule is simple in the sense that loop body semantics need to be applied only finitely often in order to verify that the candidates are indeed lower bounds. In particular, it is not necessary to find the limit of a sequen…
▽ More
We present a new inductive rule for verifying lower bounds on expected values of random variables after execution of probabilistic loops as well as on their expected runtimes. Our rule is simple in the sense that loop body semantics need to be applied only finitely often in order to verify that the candidates are indeed lower bounds. In particular, it is not necessary to find the limit of a sequence as in many previous rules.
△ Less
Submitted 11 August, 2021; v1 submitted 1 April, 2019;
originally announced April 2019.
