Showing 1–28 of 28 results for author: Hannula, M

Conditional independence on semiring relations

Authors: Miika Hannula

Abstract: Conditional independence plays a foundational role in database theory, probability theory, information theory, and graphical models. In databases, conditional independence appears in database normalization and is known as the (embedded) multivalued dependency. Many properties of conditional independence are shared across various domains, and to some extent these commonalities can be studied throug… ▽ More Conditional independence plays a foundational role in database theory, probability theory, information theory, and graphical models. In databases, conditional independence appears in database normalization and is known as the (embedded) multivalued dependency. Many properties of conditional independence are shared across various domains, and to some extent these commonalities can be studied through a measure-theoretic approach. The present paper proposes an alternative approach via semiring relations, defined by extending database relations with tuple annotations from some commutative semiring. Integrating various interpretations of conditional independence in this context, we investigate how the choice of the underlying semiring impacts the corresponding axiomatic and decomposition properties. We specifically identify positivity and multiplicative cancellativity as the key semiring properties that enable extending results from the relational context to the broader semiring framework. Additionally, we explore the relationships between different conditional independence notions through model theory, and consider how methods to test logical consequence and validity generalize from database theory and information theory to semiring relations. △ Less

Submitted 18 December, 2023; v1 submitted 3 October, 2023; originally announced October 2023.

MSC Class: 03B70 ACM Class: H.2.0; H.1.1

Information inequality problem over set functions

Authors: Miika Hannula

Abstract: Information inequalities appear in many database applications such as query output size bounds, query containment, and implication between data dependencies. Recently Khamis et al. proposed to study the algorithmic aspects of information inequalities, including the information inequality problem: decide whether a linear inequality over entropies of random variables is valid. While the decidability… ▽ More Information inequalities appear in many database applications such as query output size bounds, query containment, and implication between data dependencies. Recently Khamis et al. proposed to study the algorithmic aspects of information inequalities, including the information inequality problem: decide whether a linear inequality over entropies of random variables is valid. While the decidability of this problem is a major open question, applications often involve only inequalities that adhere to specific syntactic forms linked to useful semantic invariance properties. This paper studies the information inequality problem in different syntactic and semantic scenarios that arise from database applications. Focusing on the boundary between tractability and intractability, we show that the information inequality problem is coNP-complete if restricted to normal polymatroids, and in polynomial time if relaxed to monotone functions. We also examine syntactic restrictions related to query output size bounds, and provide an alternative proof, through monotone functions, for the polynomial-time computability of the entropic bound over simple sets of degree constraints. △ Less

Submitted 21 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

MSC Class: 03B70 ACM Class: H.2.3; H.1.1

Logics with probabilistic team semantics and the Boolean negation

Authors: Miika Hannula, Minna Hirvonen, Juha Kontinen, Yasir Mahmood, Arne Meier, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: We study the expressivity and the complexity of various logics in probabilistic team semantics with the Boolean negation. In particular, we study the extension of probabilistic independence logic with the Boolean negation, and a recently introduced logic FOPT. We give a comprehensive picture of the relative expressivity of these logics together with the most studied logics in probabilistic team se… ▽ More We study the expressivity and the complexity of various logics in probabilistic team semantics with the Boolean negation. In particular, we study the extension of probabilistic independence logic with the Boolean negation, and a recently introduced logic FOPT. We give a comprehensive picture of the relative expressivity of these logics together with the most studied logics in probabilistic team semantics setting, as well as relating their expressivity to a numerical variant of second-order logic. In addition, we introduce novel entropy atoms and show that the extension of first-order logic by entropy atoms subsumes probabilistic independence logic. Finally, we obtain some results on the complexity of model checking, validity, and satisfiability of our logics. △ Less

Submitted 22 May, 2024; v1 submitted 1 June, 2023; originally announced June 2023.

Complexity of Neural Network Training and ETR: Extensions with Effectively Continuous Functions

Authors: Teemu Hankala, Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: We study the complexity of the problem of training neural networks defined via various activation functions. The training problem is known to be existsR-complete with respect to linear activation functions and the ReLU activation function. We consider the complexity of the problem with respect to the sigmoid activation function and other effectively continuous functions. We show that these trainin… ▽ More We study the complexity of the problem of training neural networks defined via various activation functions. The training problem is known to be existsR-complete with respect to linear activation functions and the ReLU activation function. We consider the complexity of the problem with respect to the sigmoid activation function and other effectively continuous functions. We show that these training problems are polynomial-time many-one bireducible to the existential theory of the reals extended with the corresponding activation functions. In particular, we establish that the sigmoid activation function leads to the existential theory of the reals with the exponential function. It is thus open, and equivalent with the decidability of the existential theory of the reals with the exponential function, whether training neural networks using the sigmoid activation function is algorithmically solvable. In contrast, we obtain that the training problem is undecidable if sinusoidal activation functions are considered. Finally, we obtain general upper bounds for the complexity of the training problem in the form of low levels of the arithmetical hierarchy. △ Less

Submitted 19 May, 2023; originally announced May 2023.

Comments: Revised version of a manuscript sent for review in April 2023

Unified Foundations of Team Semantics via Semirings

Authors: Timon Barlag, Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Nina Pardal, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: Semiring semantics for first-order logic provides a way to trace how facts represented by a model are used to deduce satisfaction of a formula. Team semantics is a framework for studying logics of dependence and independence in diverse contexts such as databases, quantum mechanics, and statistics by extending first-order logic with atoms that describe dependencies between variables. Combining thes… ▽ More Semiring semantics for first-order logic provides a way to trace how facts represented by a model are used to deduce satisfaction of a formula. Team semantics is a framework for studying logics of dependence and independence in diverse contexts such as databases, quantum mechanics, and statistics by extending first-order logic with atoms that describe dependencies between variables. Combining these two, we propose a unifying approach for analysing the concepts of dependence and independence via a novel semiring team semantics, which subsumes all the previously considered variants for first-order team semantics. In particular, we study the preservation of satisfaction of dependencies and formulae between different semirings. In addition we create links to reasoning tasks such as provenance, counting, and repairs. △ Less

Submitted 14 March, 2023; originally announced March 2023.

A Dichotomy in Consistent Query Answering for Primary Keys and Unary Foreign Keys

Authors: Miika Hannula, Jef Wijsen

Abstract: Since 2005, significant progress has been made in the problem of Consistent Query Answering (CQA) with respect to primary keys. In this problem, the input is a database instance that may violate one or more primary key constraints. A repair is defined as a maximal subinstance that satisfies all primary keys. Given a Boolean query q, the question then is whether q holds true in every repair. So f… ▽ More Since 2005, significant progress has been made in the problem of Consistent Query Answering (CQA) with respect to primary keys. In this problem, the input is a database instance that may violate one or more primary key constraints. A repair is defined as a maximal subinstance that satisfies all primary keys. Given a Boolean query q, the question then is whether q holds true in every repair. So far, theoretical research in this field has not addressed the combination of primary key and foreign key constraints, despite the importance of referential integrity in database systems. This paper addresses the problem of CQA with respect to both primary keys and foreign keys. In this setting, it is natural to adopt the notion of symmetric-difference repairs, because foreign keys can be repaired by inserting new tuples. We consider the case where foreign keys are unary, and queries are conjunctive queries without self-joins. In this setting, we characterize the boundary between those CQA problems that admit a consistent first-order rewriting, and those that do not. △ Less

Submitted 25 March, 2022; originally announced March 2022.

MSC Class: 68P15 ACM Class: H.2.4

On elementary logics for quantitative dependencies

Authors: Miika Hannula, Minna Hirvonen, Juha Kontinen

Abstract: We define and study logics in the framework of probabilistic team semantics and over metafinite structures. Our work is paralleled by the recent development of novel axiomatizable and tractable logics in team semantics that are closed under the Boolean negation. Our logics employ new probabilistic atoms that resemble so-called extended atoms from the team semantics literature. We also define count… ▽ More We define and study logics in the framework of probabilistic team semantics and over metafinite structures. Our work is paralleled by the recent development of novel axiomatizable and tractable logics in team semantics that are closed under the Boolean negation. Our logics employ new probabilistic atoms that resemble so-called extended atoms from the team semantics literature. We also define counterparts of our logics over metafinite structures and show that all of our logics can be translated into functional fixed point logic implying a polynomial time upper bound for data complexity with respect to BSS-computations. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

An Algorithm for the Discovery of Independence from Data

Authors: Miika Hannula, Bor-Kuan Song, Sebastian Link

Abstract: For years, independence has been considered as an important concept in many disciplines. Nevertheless, we present the first research that investigates the discovery problem of independence in data. In its arguably simplest form, independence is a statement between two sets of columns expressing that for every two rows in a table there is also a row in the table that coincides with the first row on… ▽ More For years, independence has been considered as an important concept in many disciplines. Nevertheless, we present the first research that investigates the discovery problem of independence in data. In its arguably simplest form, independence is a statement between two sets of columns expressing that for every two rows in a table there is also a row in the table that coincides with the first row on the first set of columns and with the second row on the second set of columns. We show that the problem of deciding whether there is an independence statement that holds on a given table is not only NP-complete but $W[3]$-complete in its arguably most natural parameter, namely its arity. We establish the first algorithm to discover all independence statement that hold on a given table. We illustrate in experiments with benchmark data that our algorithm performs well within the limits established by our hardness results. In practice, it is often useful to determine the ratio with which independence statements hold on a given table. For that purpose, we show that our treatment of independence and the design of our algorithm enables us to extend our findings to approximate independence. In our final experiments, we provide some insight into the trade-off between run time and the approximation ratio. Naturally, the smaller the ratio, the more approximate independence statements hold, and the more time it takes to discover all of them. While this research establishes first insight into the computational properties of discovering independence from data, we hope to initiate research into more sophisticated notions of independence, including embedded multivalued dependencies, as well as their context-specific and probabilistic variants. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

MSC Class: 68P15 ACM Class: H.2.4

Controlling Entity Integrity with Key Sets

Authors: Miika Hannula, Xinyi Li, Sebastian Link

Abstract: Codd's rule of entity integrity stipulates that every table has a primary key. Hence, the attributes of the primary key carry unique and complete value combinations. In practice, data cannot always meet such requirements. Previous work proposed the superior notion of key sets for controlling entity integrity. We establish a linear-time algorithm for validating whether a given key set holds on a gi… ▽ More Codd's rule of entity integrity stipulates that every table has a primary key. Hence, the attributes of the primary key carry unique and complete value combinations. In practice, data cannot always meet such requirements. Previous work proposed the superior notion of key sets for controlling entity integrity. We establish a linear-time algorithm for validating whether a given key set holds on a given data set, and demonstrate its efficiency on real-world data. We establish a binary axiomatization for the associated implication problem, and prove its coNP-completeness. However, the implication of unary by arbitrary key sets has better properties. The fragment enjoys a unary axiomatization and is decidable in quadratic time. Hence, we can minimize overheads before validating key sets. While perfect models do not always exist in general, we show how to compute them for any instance of our fragment. This provides computational support towards the acquisition of key sets. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

MSC Class: 68P15 ACM Class: H.2.4

On the Interaction of Functional and Inclusion Dependencies with Independence Atoms

Authors: Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Sebastian Link

Abstract: Infamously, the finite and unrestricted implication problems for the classes of i) functional and inclusion dependencies together, and ii) embedded multivalued dependencies alone are each undecidable. Famously, the restriction of i) to functional and unary inclusion dependencies in combination with the restriction of ii) to multivalued dependencies yield implication problems that are still differe… ▽ More Infamously, the finite and unrestricted implication problems for the classes of i) functional and inclusion dependencies together, and ii) embedded multivalued dependencies alone are each undecidable. Famously, the restriction of i) to functional and unary inclusion dependencies in combination with the restriction of ii) to multivalued dependencies yield implication problems that are still different in the finite and unrestricted case, but each are finitely axiomatizable and decidable in low-degree polynomial time. An important embedded tractable fragment of embedded multivalued dependencies are independence atoms that stipulate independence between two attribute sets. We establish a series of results for implication problems over subclasses of the combined class of functional and inclusion dependencies as well as independence atoms. One of our main results is that both finite and unrestricted implication problems for the combined class of independence atoms, unary functional and unary inclusion dependencies are axiomatizable and decidable in low-degree polynomial time. △ Less

Submitted 7 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

MSC Class: 68P15 ACM Class: H.2.4

Tractability frontiers in probabilistic team semantics and existential second-order logic over the reals

Authors: Miika Hannula, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: Probabilistic team semantics is a framework for logical analysis of probabilistic dependencies. Our focus is on the axiomatizability, complexity, and expressivity of probabilistic inclusion logic and its extensions. We identify a natural fragment of existential second-order logic with additive real arithmetic that captures exactly the expressivity of probabilistic inclusion logic. We furthermore r… ▽ More Probabilistic team semantics is a framework for logical analysis of probabilistic dependencies. Our focus is on the axiomatizability, complexity, and expressivity of probabilistic inclusion logic and its extensions. We identify a natural fragment of existential second-order logic with additive real arithmetic that captures exactly the expressivity of probabilistic inclusion logic. We furthermore relate these formalisms to linear programming, and doing so obtain PTIME data complexity for the logics. Moreover, on finite structures, we show that the full existential second-order logic with additive real arithmetic can only express NP properties. Lastly, we present a sound and complete axiomatization for probabilistic inclusion logic at the atomic level. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2021; v1 submitted 23 December, 2020; originally announced December 2020.

On the Complexity of Horn and Krom Fragments of Second-Order Boolean Logic

Authors: Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Martin Lück, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: Second-order Boolean logic is a generalization of QBF, whose constant alternation fragments are known to be complete for the levels of the exponential time hierarchy. We consider two types of restriction of this logic: 1) restrictions to term constructions, 2) restrictions to the form of the Boolean matrix. Of the first sort, we consider two kinds of restrictions: firstly, disallowing nested use o… ▽ More Second-order Boolean logic is a generalization of QBF, whose constant alternation fragments are known to be complete for the levels of the exponential time hierarchy. We consider two types of restriction of this logic: 1) restrictions to term constructions, 2) restrictions to the form of the Boolean matrix. Of the first sort, we consider two kinds of restrictions: firstly, disallowing nested use of proper function variables, and secondly stipulating that each function variable must appear with a fixed sequence of arguments. Of the second sort, we consider Horn, Krom, and core fragments of the Boolean matrix. We classify the complexity of logics obtained by combining these two types of restrictions. We show that, in most cases, logics with k alternating blocks of function quantifiers are complete for the kth or (k-1)th level of the exponential time hierarchy. Furthermore, we establish NL-completeness for the Krom and core fragments, when k=1 and both restrictions of the first sort are in effect. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2020; originally announced July 2020.

Descriptive complexity of real computation and probabilistic independence logic

Authors: Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Jan Van den Bussche, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: We introduce a novel variant of BSS machines called Separate Branching BSS machines (S-BSS in short) and develop a Fagin-type logical characterisation for languages decidable in non-deterministic polynomial time by S-BSS machines. We show that NP on S-BSS machines is strictly included in NP on BSS machines and that every NP language on S-BSS machines is a countable union of closed sets in the usua… ▽ More We introduce a novel variant of BSS machines called Separate Branching BSS machines (S-BSS in short) and develop a Fagin-type logical characterisation for languages decidable in non-deterministic polynomial time by S-BSS machines. We show that NP on S-BSS machines is strictly included in NP on BSS machines and that every NP language on S-BSS machines is a countable union of closed sets in the usual topology of R^n. Moreover, we establish that on Boolean inputs NP on S-BSS machines without real constants characterises a natural fragment of the complexity class existsR (a class of problems polynomial time reducible to the true existential theory of the reals) and hence lies between NP and PSPACE. Finally we apply our results to determine the data complexity of probabilistic independence logic. △ Less

Submitted 7 July, 2020; v1 submitted 1 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

Journal ref: Proceedings of the 35th Annual ACM/IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science (LICS), 2020. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 550-563

Complexity Thresholds in Inclusion Logic

Authors: Miika Hannula, Lauri Hella

Abstract: Logics with team semantics provide alternative means for logical characterization of complexity classes. Both dependence and independence logic are known to capture non-deterministic polynomial time, and the frontiers of tractability in these logics are relatively well understood. Inclusion logic is similar to these team-based logical formalisms with the exception that it corresponds to determinis… ▽ More Logics with team semantics provide alternative means for logical characterization of complexity classes. Both dependence and independence logic are known to capture non-deterministic polynomial time, and the frontiers of tractability in these logics are relatively well understood. Inclusion logic is similar to these team-based logical formalisms with the exception that it corresponds to deterministic polynomial time in ordered models. In this article we examine connections between syntactical fragments of inclusion logic and different complexity classes in terms of two computational problems: maximal subteam membership and the model checking problem for a fixed inclusion logic formula. We show that very simple quantifier-free formulae with one or two inclusion atoms generate instances of these problems that are complete for (non-deterministic) logarithmic space and polynomial time. Furthermore, we present a fragment of inclusion logic that captures non-deterministic logarithmic space in ordered models. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2019; originally announced March 2019.

ACM Class: F.4.1

Facets of Distribution Identities in Probabilistic Team Semantics

Authors: Miika Hannula, Åsa Hirvonen, Juha Kontinen, Vadim Kulikov, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: We study probabilistic team semantics which is a semantical framework allowing the study of logical and probabilistic dependencies simultaneously. We examine and classify the expressive power of logical formalisms arising by different probabilistic atoms such as conditional independence and different variants of marginal distribution equivalences. We also relate the framework to the first-order th… ▽ More We study probabilistic team semantics which is a semantical framework allowing the study of logical and probabilistic dependencies simultaneously. We examine and classify the expressive power of logical formalisms arising by different probabilistic atoms such as conditional independence and different variants of marginal distribution equivalences. We also relate the framework to the first-order theory of the reals and apply our methods to the open question on the complexity of the implication problem of conditional independence. △ Less

Submitted 25 February, 2019; v1 submitted 14 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

Probabilistic team semantics

Authors: Arnaud Durand, Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Arne Meier, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: Team semantics is a semantical framework for the study of dependence and independence concepts ubiquitous in many areas such as databases and statistics. In recent works team semantics has been generalised to accommodate also multisets and probabilistic dependencies. In this article we study a variant of probabilistic team semantics and relate this framework to a Tarskian two-sorted logic. We also… ▽ More Team semantics is a semantical framework for the study of dependence and independence concepts ubiquitous in many areas such as databases and statistics. In recent works team semantics has been generalised to accommodate also multisets and probabilistic dependencies. In this article we study a variant of probabilistic team semantics and relate this framework to a Tarskian two-sorted logic. We also show that very simple quantifier-free formulae of our logic give rise to NP-hard model checking problems. △ Less

Submitted 6 March, 2018; originally announced March 2018.

Polyteam Semantics

Authors: Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: Team semantics is the mathematical framework of modern logics of dependence and independence in which formulae are interpreted by sets of assignments (teams) instead of single assignments as in first-order logic. In order to deepen the fruitful interplay between team semantics and database dependency theory, we define "Polyteam Semantics" in which formulae are evaluated over a family of teams. We… ▽ More Team semantics is the mathematical framework of modern logics of dependence and independence in which formulae are interpreted by sets of assignments (teams) instead of single assignments as in first-order logic. In order to deepen the fruitful interplay between team semantics and database dependency theory, we define "Polyteam Semantics" in which formulae are evaluated over a family of teams. We begin by defining a novel polyteam variant of dependence atoms and give a finite axiomatisation for the associated implication problem. We relate polyteam semantics to team semantics and investigate in which cases logics over the former can be simulated by logics over the latter. We also characterise the expressive power of poly-dependence logic by properties of polyteams that are downwards closed and definable in existential second-order logic (ESO). The analogous result is shown to hold for poly-independence logic and all ESO-definable properties. We also relate poly-inclusion logic to greatest fixed point logic. △ Less

Submitted 26 March, 2020; v1 submitted 7 April, 2017; originally announced April 2017.

On Quantified Propositional Logics and the Exponential Time Hierarchy

Authors: Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Martin Lück, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: We study quantified propositional logics from the complexity theoretic point of view. First we introduce alternating dependency quantified boolean formulae (ADQBF) which generalize both quantified and dependency quantified boolean formulae. We show that the truth evaluation for ADQBF is AEXPTIME(poly)-complete. We also identify fragments for which the problem is complete for the levels of the expo… ▽ More We study quantified propositional logics from the complexity theoretic point of view. First we introduce alternating dependency quantified boolean formulae (ADQBF) which generalize both quantified and dependency quantified boolean formulae. We show that the truth evaluation for ADQBF is AEXPTIME(poly)-complete. We also identify fragments for which the problem is complete for the levels of the exponential hierarchy. Second we study propositional team-based logics. We show that DQBF formulae correspond naturally to quantified propositional dependence logic and present a general NEXPTIME upper bound for quantified propositional logic with a large class of generalized dependence atoms. Moreover we show AEXPTIME(poly)-completeness for extensions of propositional team logic with generalized dependence atoms. △ Less

Submitted 13 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

Comments: In Proceedings GandALF 2016, arXiv:1609.03648

ACM Class: F.1.3; F.4.1

Journal ref: EPTCS 226, 2016, pp. 198-212

Validity and Entailment in Modal and Propositional Dependence Logics

Authors: Miika Hannula

Abstract: The computational properties of modal and propositional dependence logics have been extensively studied over the past few years, starting from a result by Sevenster showing NEXPTIME-completeness of the satisfiability problem for modal dependence logic. Thus far, however, the validity and entailment properties of these logics have remained mostly unaddressed. This paper provides a comprehensive cla… ▽ More The computational properties of modal and propositional dependence logics have been extensively studied over the past few years, starting from a result by Sevenster showing NEXPTIME-completeness of the satisfiability problem for modal dependence logic. Thus far, however, the validity and entailment properties of these logics have remained mostly unaddressed. This paper provides a comprehensive classification of the complexity of validity and entailment in various modal and propositional dependence logics. The logics examined are obtained by extending the standard modal and propositional logics with notions of dependence, independence, and inclusion in the team semantics context. In particular, we address the question of the complexity of validity in modal dependence logic. By showing that it is NEXPTIME-complete we refute an earlier conjecture proposing a higher complexity for the problem. △ Less

Submitted 25 April, 2019; v1 submitted 12 August, 2016; originally announced August 2016.

ACM Class: F.4.1

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 15, Issue 2 (April 26, 2019) lmcs:4215

Approximation and Dependence via Multiteam Semantics

Authors: Arnaud Durand, Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Arne Meier, Jonni Virtema

Abstract: We define a variant of team semantics called multiteam semantics based on multisets and study the properties of various logics in this framework. In particular, we define natural probabilistic versions of inclusion and independence atoms and certain approximation operators motivated by approximate dependence atoms of Väänänen. We define a variant of team semantics called multiteam semantics based on multisets and study the properties of various logics in this framework. In particular, we define natural probabilistic versions of inclusion and independence atoms and certain approximation operators motivated by approximate dependence atoms of Väänänen. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2015; v1 submitted 30 October, 2015; originally announced October 2015.

Comments: Accepted paper for FoIKS conference, long version

Reasoning about embedded dependencies using inclusion dependencies

Authors: Miika Hannula

Abstract: The implication problem for the class of embedded dependencies is undecidable. However, this does not imply lackness of a proof procedure as exemplified by the chase algorithm. In this paper we present a complete axiomatization of embedded dependencies that is based on the chase and uses inclusion dependencies and implicit existential quantification in the intermediate steps of deductions. The implication problem for the class of embedded dependencies is undecidable. However, this does not imply lackness of a proof procedure as exemplified by the chase algorithm. In this paper we present a complete axiomatization of embedded dependencies that is based on the chase and uses inclusion dependencies and implicit existential quantification in the intermediate steps of deductions. △ Less

Submitted 2 July, 2015; originally announced July 2015.

MSC Class: 03B60; 03B70 ACM Class: F.4.1; H.2.4

Complexity of Propositional Logics in Team Semantics

Authors: Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Jonni Virtema, Heribert Vollmer

Abstract: We classify the computational complexity of the satisfiability, validity and model-checking problems for propositional independence, inclusion, and team logic. Our main result shows that the satisfiability and validity problems for propositional team logic are complete for alternating exponential-time with polynomially many alternations. We classify the computational complexity of the satisfiability, validity and model-checking problems for propositional independence, inclusion, and team logic. Our main result shows that the satisfiability and validity problems for propositional team logic are complete for alternating exponential-time with polynomially many alternations. △ Less

Submitted 5 January, 2017; v1 submitted 23 April, 2015; originally announced April 2015.

Comments: 15 pages + 1 page appendix, the main result is generalised and the title updated to reflect this

On Independence Atoms and Keys

Authors: Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen, Sebastian Link

Abstract: Uniqueness and independence are two fundamental properties of data. Their enforcement in database systems can lead to higher quality data, faster data service response time, better data-driven decision making and knowledge discovery from data. The applications can be effectively unlocked by providing efficient solutions to the underlying implication problems of keys and independence atoms. Indeed,… ▽ More Uniqueness and independence are two fundamental properties of data. Their enforcement in database systems can lead to higher quality data, faster data service response time, better data-driven decision making and knowledge discovery from data. The applications can be effectively unlocked by providing efficient solutions to the underlying implication problems of keys and independence atoms. Indeed, for the sole class of keys and the sole class of independence atoms the associated finite and general implication problems coincide and enjoy simple axiomatizations. However, the situation changes drastically when keys and independence atoms are combined. We show that the finite and the general implication problems are already different for keys and unary independence atoms. Furthermore, we establish a finite axiomatization for the general implication problem, and show that the finite implication problem does not enjoy a k-ary axiomatization for any k. △ Less

Submitted 17 April, 2014; originally announced April 2014.

MSC Class: 68P15

Hierarchies in inclusion logic with lax semantics

Authors: Miika Hannula

Abstract: We study the expressive power of fragments of inclusion logic under the so-called lax team semantics. The fragments are defined either by restricting the number of universal quantifiers or the arity of inclusion atoms in formulae. In case of universal quantifiers, the corresponding hierarchy collapses at the first level. Arity hierarchy is shown to be strict by relating the question to the study o… ▽ More We study the expressive power of fragments of inclusion logic under the so-called lax team semantics. The fragments are defined either by restricting the number of universal quantifiers or the arity of inclusion atoms in formulae. In case of universal quantifiers, the corresponding hierarchy collapses at the first level. Arity hierarchy is shown to be strict by relating the question to the study of arity hierarchies in fixed point logics. △ Less

Submitted 14 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

MSC Class: 03C80 ACM Class: F.4.1

Hierarchies in independence and inclusion logic with strict semantics

Authors: Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen

Abstract: We study the expressive power of fragments of inclusion and independence logic defined by restricting the number k of universal quantifiers in formulas. Assuming the so-called strict semantics for these logics, we relate these fragments of inclusion and independence logic to sublogics ESO_f(k\forall) of existential second-order logic, which in turn are known to capture the complexity classes NTIME… ▽ More We study the expressive power of fragments of inclusion and independence logic defined by restricting the number k of universal quantifiers in formulas. Assuming the so-called strict semantics for these logics, we relate these fragments of inclusion and independence logic to sublogics ESO_f(k\forall) of existential second-order logic, which in turn are known to capture the complexity classes NTIME_{RAM}(n^k). △ Less

Submitted 14 January, 2014; originally announced January 2014.

MSC Class: 03C80 ACM Class: F.4.1

A finite axiomatization of conditional independence and inclusion dependencies

Authors: Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen

Abstract: We present a complete finite axiomatization of the unrestricted implication problem for inclusion and conditional independence atoms in the context of dependence logic. For databases, our result implies a finite axiomatization of the unrestricted implication problem for inclusion, functional, and embedded multivalued dependencies in the unirelational case. We present a complete finite axiomatization of the unrestricted implication problem for inclusion and conditional independence atoms in the context of dependence logic. For databases, our result implies a finite axiomatization of the unrestricted implication problem for inclusion, functional, and embedded multivalued dependencies in the unirelational case. △ Less

Submitted 20 September, 2013; v1 submitted 19 September, 2013; originally announced September 2013.

MSC Class: 03C80 ACM Class: F.4.1

Hierarchies in independence logic

Authors: Pietro Galliani, Miika Hannula, Juha Kontinen

Abstract: We study the expressive power of fragments of inclusion and independence logic defined either by restricting the number of universal quantifiers or the arity of inclusion and independence atoms in formulas. Assuming the so-called lax semantics for these logics, we relate these fragments of inclusion and independence logic to familiar sublogics of existential second-order logic. We also show that,… ▽ More We study the expressive power of fragments of inclusion and independence logic defined either by restricting the number of universal quantifiers or the arity of inclusion and independence atoms in formulas. Assuming the so-called lax semantics for these logics, we relate these fragments of inclusion and independence logic to familiar sublogics of existential second-order logic. We also show that, with respect to the stronger strict semantics, inclusion logic is equivalent to existential second-order logic. △ Less

Submitted 16 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

MSC Class: 03C80 ACM Class: F.4.1

Axiomatizing first-order consequences in independence logic

Authors: Miika Hannula

Abstract: Independence logic cannot be effectively axiomatized. However, first-order consequences of independence logic sentences can be axiomatized. In this article we give an explicit axiomatization and prove that it is complete in this sense. The proof is a generalization of the similar result for dependence logic. Independence logic cannot be effectively axiomatized. However, first-order consequences of independence logic sentences can be axiomatized. In this article we give an explicit axiomatization and prove that it is complete in this sense. The proof is a generalization of the similar result for dependence logic. △ Less

Submitted 13 October, 2015; v1 submitted 15 April, 2013; originally announced April 2013.

Comments: arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:1208.0176 by other authors

MSC Class: 03C80 ACM Class: F.4.1