-
On the importance of AI research beyond disciplines
Authors:
Virginia Dignum,
Donal Casey,
Teresa Cerratto-Pargman,
Frank Dignum,
Valentina Fantasia,
Bodil Formark,
Björn Hammarfelt,
Gunnar Holmberg,
André Holzapfel,
Stefan Larsson,
Amanda Lagerkvist,
Nicolette Lakemond,
Helena Lindgren,
Fabian Lorig,
Ana Marusic,
Lina Rahm,
Yulia Razmetaeva,
Sverker Sikström,
Kıvanç Tatar,
Jason Tucker
Abstract:
As the impact of AI on various scientific fields is increasing, it is crucial to embrace interdisciplinary knowledge to understand the impact of technology on society. The goal is to foster a research environment beyond disciplines that values diversity and creates, critiques and develops new conceptual and theoretical frameworks. Even though research beyond disciplines is essential for understand…
▽ More
As the impact of AI on various scientific fields is increasing, it is crucial to embrace interdisciplinary knowledge to understand the impact of technology on society. The goal is to foster a research environment beyond disciplines that values diversity and creates, critiques and develops new conceptual and theoretical frameworks. Even though research beyond disciplines is essential for understanding complex societal issues and creating positive impact it is notoriously difficult to evaluate and is often not recognized by current academic career progression. The motivation for this paper is to engage in broad discussion across disciplines and identify guiding principles fir AI research beyond disciplines in a structured and inclusive way, revealing new perspectives and contributing to societal and human wellbeing and sustainability.
△ Less
Submitted 13 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
Indicators as judgment devices: Citizen bibliometrics in biomedicine and economics
Authors:
Bjorn Hammarfelt,
Alexander D. Rushforth
Abstract:
The number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic positions since the late 18th century. Today, the simple counting of publications has been supplemented with a whole range of bibliometric measures, which supposedly not only measures the volume of research but also its impact. In this study, we investigate how bibliometrics are used for evaluating the impact a…
▽ More
The number of publications has been a fundamental merit in the competition for academic positions since the late 18th century. Today, the simple counting of publications has been supplemented with a whole range of bibliometric measures, which supposedly not only measures the volume of research but also its impact. In this study, we investigate how bibliometrics are used for evaluating the impact and quality of publications in two specific settings: biomedicine and economics. Our study exposes the extent and type of metrics used in external evaluations of candidates for academic positions at Swedish universities. Moreover, we show how different bibliometric indicators, both explicitly and implicitly, are employed to value and rank candidates. Our findings contribute to a further understanding of bibliometric indicators as judgment devices that are employed in evaluating individuals and their published works within specific fields. We also show how expertise in using bibliometrics for evaluative purposes is negotiated at the interface between domain knowledge and skills in using indicators. In line with these results we propose that the use of metrics in this context is best described as a form of citizen bibliometrics - an underspecified term which we build upon in the paper.
△ Less
Submitted 12 October, 2016; v1 submitted 16 September, 2016;
originally announced September 2016.
-
The structure of the Arts & Humanities Citation Index: A map** on the basis of aggregated citations among 1,157 journals
Authors:
Loet Leydesdorff,
Björn Hammarfelt,
Alkim Almila Akdag Salah
Abstract:
Using the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) 2008, we apply map** techniques previously developed for map** journal structures in the Science and Social Science Citation Indices. Citation relations among the 110,718 records were aggregated at the level of 1,157 journals specific to the A&HCI, and the journal structures are questioned on whether a cognitive structure can be reconstructed…
▽ More
Using the Arts & Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) 2008, we apply map** techniques previously developed for map** journal structures in the Science and Social Science Citation Indices. Citation relations among the 110,718 records were aggregated at the level of 1,157 journals specific to the A&HCI, and the journal structures are questioned on whether a cognitive structure can be reconstructed and visualized. Both cosine-normalization (bottom up) and factor analysis (top down) suggest a division into approximately twelve subsets. The relations among these subsets are explored using various visualization techniques. However, we were not able to retrieve this structure using the ISI Subject Categories, including the 25 categories which are specific to the A&HCI. We discuss options for validation such as against the categories of the Humanities Indicators of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, the panel structure of the European Reference Index for the Humanities (ERIH), and compare our results with the curriculum organization of the Humanities Section of the College of Letters and Sciences of UCLA as an example of institutional organization.
△ Less
Submitted 20 July, 2011; v1 submitted 9 February, 2011;
originally announced February 2011.
