-
Private Aggregate Queries to Untrusted Databases
Authors:
Syed Mahbub Hafiz,
Chitrabhanu Gupta,
Warren Wnuck,
Brijesh Vora,
Chen-Nee Chuah
Abstract:
Private information retrieval (PIR), a privacy-preserving cryptographic tool, solves a simplified version of this problem by hiding the database item that a client accesses. Most PIR protocols require the client to know the exact row index of the intended database item, which cannot support the complicated aggregation-based statistical query in a similar setting. Some works in the PIR space contai…
▽ More
Private information retrieval (PIR), a privacy-preserving cryptographic tool, solves a simplified version of this problem by hiding the database item that a client accesses. Most PIR protocols require the client to know the exact row index of the intended database item, which cannot support the complicated aggregation-based statistical query in a similar setting. Some works in the PIR space contain keyword searching and SQL-like queries, but most need multiple interactions between the PIR client and PIR servers. Some schemes support searching SQL-like expressive queries in a single round but fail to enable aggregate queries. These schemes are the main focus of this paper. To bridge the gap, we have built a general-purpose novel information-theoretic PIR (IT-PIR) framework that permits a user to fetch the aggregated result, hiding all sensitive sections of the complex query from the hosting PIR server in a single round of interaction. In other words, the server will not know which records contribute to the aggregation. We then evaluate the feasibility of our protocol for both benchmarking and real-world application settings. For instance, in a complex aggregate query to the Twitter microblogging database of 1 million tweets, our protocol takes 0.014 seconds for a PIR server to generate the result when the user is interested in one of 3K user handles. In contrast, for a much-simplified task, not an aggregate but a positional query, Goldberg's regular IT-PIR (Oakland 2007) takes 1.13 seconds. For all possible user handles, 300K, it takes equal time compared to the regular IT-PIR. This example shows that complicated aggregate queries through our framework do not incur additional overhead if not less, compared to the conventional query.
△ Less
Submitted 20 March, 2024;
originally announced March 2024.
-
Benchmarking Adversarial Robustness of Compressed Deep Learning Models
Authors:
Brijesh Vora,
Kartik Patwari,
Syed Mahbub Hafiz,
Zubair Shafiq,
Chen-Nee Chuah
Abstract:
The increasing size of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) poses a pressing need for model compression, particularly when employed on resource constrained devices. Concurrently, the susceptibility of DNNs to adversarial attacks presents another significant hurdle. Despite substantial research on both model compression and adversarial robustness, their joint examination remains underexplored. Our study bri…
▽ More
The increasing size of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) poses a pressing need for model compression, particularly when employed on resource constrained devices. Concurrently, the susceptibility of DNNs to adversarial attacks presents another significant hurdle. Despite substantial research on both model compression and adversarial robustness, their joint examination remains underexplored. Our study bridges this gap, seeking to understand the effect of adversarial inputs crafted for base models on their pruned versions. To examine this relationship, we have developed a comprehensive benchmark across diverse adversarial attacks and popular DNN models. We uniquely focus on models not previously exposed to adversarial training and apply pruning schemes optimized for accuracy and performance. Our findings reveal that while the benefits of pruning enhanced generalizability, compression, and faster inference times are preserved, adversarial robustness remains comparable to the base model. This suggests that model compression while offering its unique advantages, does not undermine adversarial robustness.
△ Less
Submitted 16 August, 2023;
originally announced August 2023.
-
Gimme That Model!: A Trusted ML Model Trading Protocol
Authors:
Laia Amorós,
Syed Mahbub Hafiz,
Keewoo Lee,
M. Caner Tol
Abstract:
We propose a HE-based protocol for trading ML models and describe possible improvements to the protocol to make the overall transaction more efficient and secure.
We propose a HE-based protocol for trading ML models and describe possible improvements to the protocol to make the overall transaction more efficient and secure.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2020; v1 submitted 1 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
