Amazon SageMaker Clarify: Machine Learning Bias Detection and Explainability in the Cloud
Authors:
Michaela Hardt,
Xiaoguang Chen,
Xiaoyi Cheng,
Michele Donini,
Jason Gelman,
Satish Gollaprolu,
John He,
Pedro Larroy,
Xinyu Liu,
Nick McCarthy,
Ashish Rathi,
Scott Rees,
Ankit Siva,
ErhYuan Tsai,
Keerthan Vasist,
Pinar Yilmaz,
Muhammad Bilal Zafar,
Sanjiv Das,
Kevin Haas,
Tyler Hill,
Krishnaram Kenthapadi
Abstract:
Understanding the predictions made by machine learning (ML) models and their potential biases remains a challenging and labor-intensive task that depends on the application, the dataset, and the specific model. We present Amazon SageMaker Clarify, an explainability feature for Amazon SageMaker that launched in December 2020, providing insights into data and ML models by identifying biases and expl…
▽ More
Understanding the predictions made by machine learning (ML) models and their potential biases remains a challenging and labor-intensive task that depends on the application, the dataset, and the specific model. We present Amazon SageMaker Clarify, an explainability feature for Amazon SageMaker that launched in December 2020, providing insights into data and ML models by identifying biases and explaining predictions. It is deeply integrated into Amazon SageMaker, a fully managed service that enables data scientists and developers to build, train, and deploy ML models at any scale. Clarify supports bias detection and feature importance computation across the ML lifecycle, during data preparation, model evaluation, and post-deployment monitoring. We outline the desiderata derived from customer input, the modular architecture, and the methodology for bias and explanation computations. Further, we describe the technical challenges encountered and the tradeoffs we had to make. For illustration, we discuss two customer use cases. We present our deployment results including qualitative customer feedback and a quantitative evaluation. Finally, we summarize lessons learned, and discuss best practices for the successful adoption of fairness and explanation tools in practice.
△ Less
Submitted 7 September, 2021;
originally announced September 2021.
User Taglines: Alternative Presentations of Expertise and Interest in Social Media
Authors:
Hemant Purohit,
Alex Dow,
Omar Alonso,
Lei Duan,
Kevin Haas
Abstract:
Web applications are increasingly showing recommended users from social media along with some descriptions, an attempt to show relevancy - why they are being shown. For example, Twitter search for a topical keyword shows expert twitterers on the side for 'whom to follow'. Google+ and Facebook also recommend users to follow or add to friend circle. Popular Internet newspaper- The Huffington Post sh…
▽ More
Web applications are increasingly showing recommended users from social media along with some descriptions, an attempt to show relevancy - why they are being shown. For example, Twitter search for a topical keyword shows expert twitterers on the side for 'whom to follow'. Google+ and Facebook also recommend users to follow or add to friend circle. Popular Internet newspaper- The Huffington Post shows Twitter influencers/ experts on the side of an article for authoritative relevant tweets. The state of the art shows user profile bios as summary for Twitter experts, but it has issues with length constraint imposed by user interface (UI) design, missing bio and sometimes funny profile bio. Alternatively, applications can use human generated user summary, but it will not scale. Therefore, we study the problem of automatic generation of informative expertise summary or taglines for Twitter experts in space constraint imposed by UI design. We propose three methods for expertise summary generation- Occupation-Pattern based, Link-Triangulation based and User-Classification based, with use of knowledge-enhanced computing approaches. We also propose methods for final summary selection for users with multiple candidates of generated summaries. We evaluate the proposed approaches by user-study using a number of experiments. Our results show promising quality of 92.8% good summaries with majority agreement in the best case and 70% with majority agreement in the worst case. Our approaches also outperform the state of the art up to 88%. This study has implications in the area of expert profiling, user presentation and application design for engaging user experience.
△ Less
Submitted 9 December, 2012;
originally announced December 2012.
