Improving User Mental Models of XAI Systems with Inclusive Design Approaches
Authors:
Md Montaser Hamid,
Fatima Moussaoui,
Jimena Noa Guevara,
Andrew Anderson,
Margaret Burnett
Abstract:
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) systems aim to improve users' understanding of AI but rarely consider the inclusivity aspects of XAI. Without inclusive approaches, improving explanations might not work well for everyone. This study investigates leveraging users' diverse problem-solving styles as an inclusive strategy to fix an XAI prototype, with the ultimate goal of improving users' men…
▽ More
Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) systems aim to improve users' understanding of AI but rarely consider the inclusivity aspects of XAI. Without inclusive approaches, improving explanations might not work well for everyone. This study investigates leveraging users' diverse problem-solving styles as an inclusive strategy to fix an XAI prototype, with the ultimate goal of improving users' mental models of AI. We ran a between-subject study with 69 participants. Our results show that the inclusivity fixes increased participants' engagement with explanations and produced significantly improved mental models. Analyzing differences in mental model scores further highlighted specific inclusivity fixes that contributed to the significant improvement in the mental model.
△ Less
Submitted 19 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
Measuring User Experience Inclusivity in Human-AI Interaction via Five User Problem-Solving Styles
Authors:
Andrew Anderson,
Jimena Noa Guevara,
Fatima Moussaoui,
Tianyi Li,
Mihaela Vorvoreanu,
Margaret Burnett
Abstract:
Motivations: Recent research has emerged on generally how to improve AI product user experiences, but relatively little is known about an AI product's inclusivity. For example, what kinds of users does it support well, and who does it leave out? And what changes in the product would make it more inclusive?
Objectives: Our overall objective is to help fill this gap, investigating what kinds of di…
▽ More
Motivations: Recent research has emerged on generally how to improve AI product user experiences, but relatively little is known about an AI product's inclusivity. For example, what kinds of users does it support well, and who does it leave out? And what changes in the product would make it more inclusive?
Objectives: Our overall objective is to help fill this gap, investigating what kinds of diverse users an AI product leaves out, and how to act upon that knowledge. To bring actionability to our findings, we focus on users' diversity of problem-solving attributes. Thus, our specific objectives were: (1) to reveal whether participants with diverse problem-solving styles were left behind in a set of AI products; and (2) to relate participants' problem-solving diversity to their demographic diversity, specifically, gender and age.
Methods: We performed 18 experiments, discarding two that failed manipulation checks. Each experiment was a 2x2 factorial experiment with online participants. Each experiment compared two AI products: one deliberately violating an HAI guideline and the other applying the guideline. For our first objective, we analyzed how much each AI product gained/lost inclusivity compared to its counterpart, where inclusivity was supportiveness to participants with particular problem-solving styles. For our second objective, we analyzed how participants' problem-solving styles aligned with their demographics, namely their genders and ages.
Results & Implications: Participants' diverse problem-solving styles revealed six types of inclusivity results: (1) the AI products that followed an HAI guideline were almost always more inclusive across diversity of problem-solving styles than the products that did not follow that guideline-but the "who" that got most of the inclusivity varied widely by guideline and by problem-solving style...
△ Less
Submitted 16 February, 2024; v1 submitted 1 August, 2021;
originally announced August 2021.
