-
Design optimization of advanced tow-steered composites with manufacturing constraints
Authors:
Chuan Luo,
Federico Ferrari,
James K. Guest
Abstract:
Tow steering technologies, such as Automated fiber placement, enable the fabrication of composite laminates with curvilinear fiber, tow, or tape paths. Designers may therefore tailor tow orientations locally according to the expected local stress state within a structure, such that strong and stiff orientations of the tow are (for example) optimized to provide maximal mechanical benefit. Tow path…
▽ More
Tow steering technologies, such as Automated fiber placement, enable the fabrication of composite laminates with curvilinear fiber, tow, or tape paths. Designers may therefore tailor tow orientations locally according to the expected local stress state within a structure, such that strong and stiff orientations of the tow are (for example) optimized to provide maximal mechanical benefit. Tow path optimization can be an effective tool in automating this design process, yet has a tendency to create complex designs that may be challenging to manufacture. In the context of tow steering, these complexities can manifest in defects such as tow wrinkling, gaps, overlaps. In this work, we implement manufacturing constraints within the tow path optimization formulation to restrict the minimum tow turning radius and the maximum density of gaps between and overlaps of tows. This is achieved by bounding the local value of the curl and divergence of the vector field associated with the tow orientations. The resulting local constraints are effectively enforced in the optimization framework through the Augmented Lagrangian method. The resulting optimization methodology is demonstrated by designing 2D and 3D structures with optimized tow orientation paths that maximize stiffness (minimize compliance) considering various levels of manufacturing restrictions. The optimized tow paths are shown to be structurally efficient and to respect imposed manufacturing constraints. As expected, the more geometrical complexity that can be achieved by the feedstock tow and placement technology, the higher the stiffness of the resulting optimized design.
△ Less
Submitted 25 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
-
Topology Optimization with linearized buckling criteria in 250 lines of Matlab
Authors:
Federico Ferrari,
Ole Sigmund,
James K. Guest
Abstract:
We present a 250 line Matlab code for topology optimization for linearized buckling criteria. The code is conceived to handle stiffness, volume and Buckling Load Factors (BLFs) either as the objective function or as constraints. We use the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser aggregation function in order to reduce multiple objectives (viz. constraints) to a single, differentiable one. Then, the problem is s…
▽ More
We present a 250 line Matlab code for topology optimization for linearized buckling criteria. The code is conceived to handle stiffness, volume and Buckling Load Factors (BLFs) either as the objective function or as constraints. We use the Kreisselmeier-Steinhauser aggregation function in order to reduce multiple objectives (viz. constraints) to a single, differentiable one. Then, the problem is sequentially approximated by using MMA-like expansions and an OC-like scheme is tailored to update the variables. The inspection of the stress stiffness matrix leads to a vectorized implementation for its efficient construction and for the sensitivity analysis of the BLFs. This, coupled with the efficiency improvements already presented by Ferrari and Sigmund 2020, cuts all the computational bottlenecks associated with setting up the buckling analysis and allows buckling topology optimization problems of an interesting size to be solved on a laptop. The efficiency and flexibility of the code is demonstrated over a few structural design examples and some ideas are given for possible extensions.
△ Less
Submitted 8 January, 2021;
originally announced January 2021.
-
Revisiting element removal for density-based structural topology optimization with reintroduction by Heaviside projection
Authors:
Reza Behrou,
Reza Lotfi,
Josephine Voigt Carstensen,
Federico Ferrari,
James K. Guest
Abstract:
We present a strategy grounded in the element removal idea of Bruns and Tortorelli [1] and aimed at reducing computational cost and circumventing potential numerical instabilities of density-based topology optimization. The design variables and the relative densities are both represented on a fixed, uniform finite element grid, and linked through filtering and Heaviside projection. The regions in…
▽ More
We present a strategy grounded in the element removal idea of Bruns and Tortorelli [1] and aimed at reducing computational cost and circumventing potential numerical instabilities of density-based topology optimization. The design variables and the relative densities are both represented on a fixed, uniform finite element grid, and linked through filtering and Heaviside projection. The regions in the analysis domain where the relative density is below a specified threshold are removed from the forward analysis and replaced by fictitious nodal boundary conditions. This brings a progressive cut of the computational cost as the optimization proceeds and helps to mitigate numerical instabilities associated with low-density regions. Removed regions can be readily reintroduced since all the design variables remain active and are modeled in the formal sensitivity analysis. A key feature of the proposed approach is that the Heaviside functions promote material reintroduction along the structural boundaries by amplifying the magnitude of the sensitivities inside the filter reach. Several 2D and 3D structural topology optimization examples are presented, including linear and nonlinear compliance minimization, the design of a force inverter, and frequency and buckling load maximization. The approach is shown to be effective at producing optimized designs equivalent or nearly equivalent to those obtained without the element removal, while providing remarkable computational savings.
△ Less
Submitted 4 December, 2020;
originally announced December 2020.
