Showing 1–10 of 10 results for author: Guerrini, E

A class of locally recoverable codes over finite chain rings

Authors: Giulia Cavicchioni, Eleonora Guerrini, Alessio Meneghetti

Abstract: Locally recoverable codes deal with the task of reconstructing a lost symbol by relying on a portion of the remaining coordinates smaller than an information set. We consider the case of codes over finite chain rings, generalizing known results and bounds for codes over fields. In particular, we propose a new family of locally recoverable codes by extending a construction proposed in 2014 by Tamo… ▽ More Locally recoverable codes deal with the task of reconstructing a lost symbol by relying on a portion of the remaining coordinates smaller than an information set. We consider the case of codes over finite chain rings, generalizing known results and bounds for codes over fields. In particular, we propose a new family of locally recoverable codes by extending a construction proposed in 2014 by Tamo and Barg, and we discuss its optimality. △ Less

Submitted 10 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

Enhancing simultaneous rational function recovery: adaptive error correction capability and new bounds for applications

Authors: Eleonora Guerrini, Romain Lebreton, Ilaria Zappatore

Abstract: In this work we present some results that allow to improve the decoding radius in solving polynomial linear systems with errors in the scenario where errors are additive and randomly distributed over a finite field. The decoding radius depends on some bounds on the solution that we want to recover, so their overestimation could significantly decrease our error correction capability. For this reaso… ▽ More In this work we present some results that allow to improve the decoding radius in solving polynomial linear systems with errors in the scenario where errors are additive and randomly distributed over a finite field. The decoding radius depends on some bounds on the solution that we want to recover, so their overestimation could significantly decrease our error correction capability. For this reason, we introduce an algorithm that can bridge this gap, introducing some ad hoc parameters that reduce the discrepancy between the estimate decoding radius and the effective error correction capability. △ Less

Submitted 3 March, 2020; originally announced March 2020.

On the Uniqueness of Simultaneous Rational Function Reconstruction

Authors: Eleonora Guerrini, Romain Lebreton, Ilaria Zappatore

Abstract: This paper focuses on the problem of reconstructing a vector of rational functions given some evaluations, or more generally given their remainders modulo different polynomials. The special case of rational functions sharing the same denominator, a.k.a.Simultaneous Rational Function Reconstruction (SRFR), has many applications from linear system solving to coding theory, provided that SRFR has a u… ▽ More This paper focuses on the problem of reconstructing a vector of rational functions given some evaluations, or more generally given their remainders modulo different polynomials. The special case of rational functions sharing the same denominator, a.k.a.Simultaneous Rational Function Reconstruction (SRFR), has many applications from linear system solving to coding theory, provided that SRFR has a unique solution. The number of unknowns in SRFR is smaller than for a general vector of rational function. This allows to reduce the number of evaluation points needed to guarantee the existence of a solution, but we may lose its uniqueness. In this work, we prove that uniqueness is guaranteed for a generic instance. △ Less

Submitted 20 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

Polynomial Linear System Solving with Errors by Simultaneous Polynomial Reconstruction of Interleaved Reed-Solomon Codes

Authors: E. Guerrini, R. Lebreton, I. Zappatore

Abstract: In this paper we present a new algorithm for Polynomial Linear System Solving (via evaluation/interpolation) with errors. In this scenario, errors can occur in the black box evaluation step. We improve the bound on the number of errors that we can correct, using techniques inspired by the decoding procedure of Interleaved Reed-Solomon Codes. In this paper we present a new algorithm for Polynomial Linear System Solving (via evaluation/interpolation) with errors. In this scenario, errors can occur in the black box evaluation step. We improve the bound on the number of errors that we can correct, using techniques inspired by the decoding procedure of Interleaved Reed-Solomon Codes. △ Less

Submitted 9 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

Comments: Extended and corrected version of the article "Polynomial Linear System Solving with Errors by Simultaneous Polynomial Reconstruction of Interleaved Reed-Solomon Codes", presented in the 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT 2019)

Journal ref: 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)

On optimal nonlinear systematic codes

Authors: Eleonora Guerrini, Alessio Meneghetti, Massimiliano Sala

Abstract: Most bounds on the size of codes hold for any code, whether linear or not. Notably, the Griesmer bound holds only in the linear case and so optimal linear codes are not necessarily optimal codes. In this paper we identify code parameters $(q,d,k)$, namely field size, minimum distance and dimension, for which the Griesmer bound holds also in the (systematic) nonlinear case. Moreover, we show that t… ▽ More Most bounds on the size of codes hold for any code, whether linear or not. Notably, the Griesmer bound holds only in the linear case and so optimal linear codes are not necessarily optimal codes. In this paper we identify code parameters $(q,d,k)$, namely field size, minimum distance and dimension, for which the Griesmer bound holds also in the (systematic) nonlinear case. Moreover, we show that the Griesmer bound does not necessarily hold for a systematic code by explicit construction of a family of optimal systematic binary codes. On the other hand, we are able to provide some versions of the Griesmer bound holding for all systematic codes. △ Less

Submitted 11 February, 2016; v1 submitted 10 June, 2015; originally announced June 2015.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1502.07379

Journal ref: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, Issue 99, 2016

On the Griesmer bound for nonlinear codes

Authors: Emanuele Bellini, Eleonora Guerrini, Alessio Meneghetti, Massimiliano Sala

Abstract: Most bounds on the size of codes hold for any code, whether linear or nonlinear. Notably, the Griesmer bound, holds only in the linear case. In this paper we characterize a family of systematic nonlinear codes for which the Griesmer bound holds. Moreover, we show that the Griesmer bound does not necessarily hold for a systematic code by showing explicit counterexamples. On the other hand, we are a… ▽ More Most bounds on the size of codes hold for any code, whether linear or nonlinear. Notably, the Griesmer bound, holds only in the linear case. In this paper we characterize a family of systematic nonlinear codes for which the Griesmer bound holds. Moreover, we show that the Griesmer bound does not necessarily hold for a systematic code by showing explicit counterexamples. On the other hand, we are also able to provide (weaker) versions of the Griesmer bound holding for all systematic codes. △ Less

Submitted 18 January, 2015; originally announced February 2015.

Some bounds on the size of codes

Authors: Emanuele Bellini, Eleonora Guerrini, Massimiliano Sala

Abstract: We present some upper bounds on the size of non-linear codes and their restriction to systematic codes and linear codes. These bounds are independent of other known theoretical bounds, e.g. the Griesmer bound, the Johnson bound or the Plotkin bound, and one of these is actually an improvement of a bound by Litsyn and Laihonen. Our experiments show that in some cases (the majority of cases for some… ▽ More We present some upper bounds on the size of non-linear codes and their restriction to systematic codes and linear codes. These bounds are independent of other known theoretical bounds, e.g. the Griesmer bound, the Johnson bound or the Plotkin bound, and one of these is actually an improvement of a bound by Litsyn and Laihonen. Our experiments show that in some cases (the majority of cases for some q) our bounds provide the best value, compared to all other theoretical bounds. △ Less

Submitted 27 December, 2012; v1 submitted 26 June, 2012; originally announced June 2012.

Comments: This paper had two old titles: "A bound on the size of linear codes and systematic codes", "A bound on the size of linear codes" (arXiv:0902.1634)

Journal ref: IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 2014, vol. 60, p. 1475-1480

Extremal graphs for the identifying code problem

Authors: Florent Foucaud, Eleonora Guerrini, Matjaz Kovse, Reza Naserasr, Aline Parreau, Petru Valicov

Abstract: An identifying code of a graph G is a dominating set C such that every vertex x of G is distinguished from all other vertices by the set of vertices in C that are at distance at most 1 from x. The problem of finding an identifying code of minimum possible size turned out to be a challenging problem. It was proved by N. Bertrand that if a graph on n vertices with at least one edge admits an identif… ▽ More An identifying code of a graph G is a dominating set C such that every vertex x of G is distinguished from all other vertices by the set of vertices in C that are at distance at most 1 from x. The problem of finding an identifying code of minimum possible size turned out to be a challenging problem. It was proved by N. Bertrand that if a graph on n vertices with at least one edge admits an identifying code, then a minimum identifying code has size at most n-1. Some classes of graphs whose smallest identifying code is of size n-1 were already known, and few conjectures were formulated to classify all these graphs. In this paper, disproving these conjectures, we classify all finite graphs for which all but one of the vertices are needed to form an identifying code. We also classify all infinite graphs needing the whole set of vertices in any identifying code. New upper bounds in terms of the number of vertices and the maximum degree of a graph are also provided. △ Less

Submitted 24 February, 2011; v1 submitted 29 April, 2010; originally announced April 2010.

Journal ref: European Journal of Combinatorics 32, 4 (2011) 628-638

Computing the distance distribution of systematic non-linear codes

Authors: Eleonora Guerrini, Emmanuela Orsini, Massimiliano Sala

Abstract: The most important families of non-linear codes are systematic. A brute-force check is the only known method to compute their weight distribution and distance distribution. On the other hand, it outputs also all closest word pairs in the code. In the black-box complexity model, the check is optimal among closest-pair algorithms. In this paper we provide a Groebner basis technique to compute the… ▽ More The most important families of non-linear codes are systematic. A brute-force check is the only known method to compute their weight distribution and distance distribution. On the other hand, it outputs also all closest word pairs in the code. In the black-box complexity model, the check is optimal among closest-pair algorithms. In this paper we provide a Groebner basis technique to compute the weight/distance distribution of any systematic non-linear code. Also our technique outputs all closest pairs. Unlike the check, our method can be extended to work on code families. △ Less

Submitted 9 September, 2009; originally announced September 2009.

Journal ref: Journal of Algebra and its Applications, 2010, vol. 9, p. 241-256

A bound on the size of linear codes

Authors: Eleonora Guerrini, Massimiliano Sala

Abstract: We present a bound on the size of linear codes. This bound is independent of other known bounds, e.g. the Griesmer bound. We present a bound on the size of linear codes. This bound is independent of other known bounds, e.g. the Griesmer bound. △ Less

Submitted 27 June, 2012; v1 submitted 10 February, 2009; originally announced February 2009.

Comments: A new version of this article is now available

MSC Class: 11T71;