Showing 1–28 of 28 results for author: Guerrieri, G

The Benefits of Diligence

Authors: Victor Arrial, Giulio Guerrieri, Delia Kesner

Abstract: This paper studies the strength of embedding Call-by-Name ({\tt dCBN}) and Call-by-Value ({\tt dCBV}) into a unifying framework called the Bang Calculus ({\tt dBANG}). These embeddings enable establishing (static and dynamic) properties of {\tt dCBN} and {\tt dCBV} through their respective counterparts in {\tt dBANG}. While some specific static properties have been already successfully studied in… ▽ More This paper studies the strength of embedding Call-by-Name ({\tt dCBN}) and Call-by-Value ({\tt dCBV}) into a unifying framework called the Bang Calculus ({\tt dBANG}). These embeddings enable establishing (static and dynamic) properties of {\tt dCBN} and {\tt dCBV} through their respective counterparts in {\tt dBANG}. While some specific static properties have been already successfully studied in the literature, the dynamic ones are more challenging and have been left unexplored. We accomplish that by using a standard embedding for the (easy) {\tt dCBN} case, while a novel one must be introduced for the (difficult) {\tt dCBV} case. Moreover, a key point of our approach is the identification of {\tt dBANG} diligent reduction sequences, which eases the preservation of dynamic properties from {\tt dBANG} to {\tt dCBN}/{\tt dCBV}. We illustrate our methodology through two concrete applications: confluence/factorization for both {\tt dCBN} and {\tt dCBV} are respectively derived from confluence/factorization for {\tt dBANG}. △ Less

Submitted 19 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Meaningfulness and Genericity in a Subsuming Framework

Authors: Delia Kesner, Victor Arrial, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: This paper studies the notion of meaningfulness for a unifying framework called dBang-calculus, which subsumes both call-by-name (dCbN) and call-by-value (dCbV). We first characterize meaningfulness in dBang by means of typability and inhabitation in an associated non-idempotent intersection type system previously proposed in the literature. We validate the proposed notion of meaningfulness by sho… ▽ More This paper studies the notion of meaningfulness for a unifying framework called dBang-calculus, which subsumes both call-by-name (dCbN) and call-by-value (dCbV). We first characterize meaningfulness in dBang by means of typability and inhabitation in an associated non-idempotent intersection type system previously proposed in the literature. We validate the proposed notion of meaningfulness by showing two properties (1) consistency of the theory $\mathcal{H}$ equating meaningless terms and (2) genericity, stating that meaningless subterms have no bearing on the significance of meaningful terms. The theory $\mathcal{H}$ is also shown to have a unique consistent and maximal extension. Last but not least, we show that the notions of meaningfulness and genericity in the literature for dCbN and dCbV are subsumed by the respectively ones proposed here for the dBang-calculus. △ Less

Submitted 9 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Non-wellfounded parsimonious proofs and non-uniform complexity

Authors: Matteo Acclavio, Gianluca Curzi, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: In this paper we investigate the complexity-theoretical aspects of cyclic and non-wellfounded proofs in the context of parsimonious logic, a variant of linear logic where the exponential modality ! is interpreted as a constructor for streams over finite data. We present non-wellfounded parsimonious proof systems capturing the classes $\mathbf{FPTIME}$ and $\mathbf{FP}/\mathsf{poly}$. Soundness is… ▽ More In this paper we investigate the complexity-theoretical aspects of cyclic and non-wellfounded proofs in the context of parsimonious logic, a variant of linear logic where the exponential modality ! is interpreted as a constructor for streams over finite data. We present non-wellfounded parsimonious proof systems capturing the classes $\mathbf{FPTIME}$ and $\mathbf{FP}/\mathsf{poly}$. Soundness is established via a polynomial modulus of continuity for continuous cut-elimination. Completeness relies on an encoding of polynomial Turing machines with advice. As a byproduct of our proof methods, we establish a series of characterisation results for various finitary proof systems. △ Less

Submitted 4 April, 2024; originally announced April 2024.

Genericity Through Stratification

Authors: Victor Arrial, Giulio Guerrieri, Delia Kesner

Abstract: A fundamental issue in the $λ$-calculus is to find appropriate notions for meaningfulness. It is well-known that in the call-by-name $λ$-calculus (CbN) the meaningful terms can be identified with the solvable ones, and that this notion is not appropriate in the call-by-value $λ$-calculus (CbV). This paper validates the challenging claim that yet another notion, previously introduced in the literat… ▽ More A fundamental issue in the $λ$-calculus is to find appropriate notions for meaningfulness. It is well-known that in the call-by-name $λ$-calculus (CbN) the meaningful terms can be identified with the solvable ones, and that this notion is not appropriate in the call-by-value $λ$-calculus (CbV). This paper validates the challenging claim that yet another notion, previously introduced in the literature as potential valuability, appropriately represents meaningfulness in CbV. Akin to CbN, this claim is corroborated by proving two essential properties. The first one is genericity, stating that meaningless subterms have no bearing on evaluating normalizing terms. To prove this (which was an open problem), we use a novel approach based on stratified reduction, indifferently applicable to CbN and CbV, and in a quantitative way. The second property concerns consistency of the smallest congruence relation resulting from equating all meaningless terms. While the consistency result is not new, we provide the first direct operational proof of it. We also show that such a congruence has a unique consistent and maximal extension, which coincides with a well-known notion of observational equivalence. Our results thus supply the formal concepts and tools that validate the informal notion of meaningfulness underlying CbN and CbV. △ Less

Submitted 31 January, 2024; v1 submitted 22 January, 2024; originally announced January 2024.

ACM Class: F.3.2; F.4.1; D.3.1

Strong Call-by-Value and Multi Types

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri, Maico Leberle

Abstract: This paper provides foundations for strong (that is, possibly under abstraction) call-by-value evaluation for the lambda-calculus. Recently, Accattoli et al. proposed a form of call-by-value strong evaluation for the lambda-calculus, the external strategy, and proved it reasonable for time. Here, we study the external strategy using a semantical tool, namely Ehrhard's call-by-value multi types, a… ▽ More This paper provides foundations for strong (that is, possibly under abstraction) call-by-value evaluation for the lambda-calculus. Recently, Accattoli et al. proposed a form of call-by-value strong evaluation for the lambda-calculus, the external strategy, and proved it reasonable for time. Here, we study the external strategy using a semantical tool, namely Ehrhard's call-by-value multi types, a variant of intersection types. We show that the external strategy terminates exactly when a term is typable with so-called shrinking multi types, mimicking similar results for strong call-by-name. Additionally, the external strategy is normalizing in the untyped setting, that is, it reaches the normal form whenever it exists. We also consider the call-by-extended-value approach to strong evaluation shown reasonable for time by Biernacka et al. The two approaches turn out to not be equivalent: terms may be externally divergent but terminating for call-by-extended-value. △ Less

Submitted 21 September, 2023; originally announced September 2023.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2104.13979; text overlap with arXiv:2202.03079

ACM Class: F.3.2; D.3.1

Infinitary cut-elimination via finite approximations (extended version)

Authors: Matteo Acclavio, Gianluca Curzi, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: We investigate non-wellfounded proof systems based on parsimonious logic, a weaker variant of linear logic where the exponential modality ! is interpreted as a constructor for streams over finite data. Logical consistency is maintained at a global level by adapting a standard progressing criterion. We present an infinitary version of cut-elimination based on finite approximations, and we prove tha… ▽ More We investigate non-wellfounded proof systems based on parsimonious logic, a weaker variant of linear logic where the exponential modality ! is interpreted as a constructor for streams over finite data. Logical consistency is maintained at a global level by adapting a standard progressing criterion. We present an infinitary version of cut-elimination based on finite approximations, and we prove that, in presence of the progressing criterion, it returns well-defined non-wellfounded proofs at its limit. Furthermore, we show that cut-elimination preserves the progressive criterion and various regularity conditions internalizing degrees of proof-theoretical uniformity. Finally, we provide a denotational semantics for our systems based on the relational model. △ Less

Submitted 27 May, 2024; v1 submitted 15 August, 2023; originally announced August 2023.

Comments: Extended version of the paper "Infinitary cut-elimination via finite approximations" accepted at CSL2024

The Theory of Call-by-Value Solvability (long version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: The denotational semantics of the untyped lambda-calculus is a well developed field built around the concept of solvable terms, which are elegantly characterized in many different ways. In particular, unsolvable terms provide a consistent notion of meaningless term. The semantics of the untyped call-by-value lambda-calculus (CbV) is instead still in its infancy, because of some inherent difficulti… ▽ More The denotational semantics of the untyped lambda-calculus is a well developed field built around the concept of solvable terms, which are elegantly characterized in many different ways. In particular, unsolvable terms provide a consistent notion of meaningless term. The semantics of the untyped call-by-value lambda-calculus (CbV) is instead still in its infancy, because of some inherent difficulties but also because CbV solvable terms are less studied and understood than in call-by-name. On the one hand, we show that a carefully crafted presentation of CbV allows us to recover many of the properties that solvability has in call-by-name, in particular qualitative and quantitative characterizations via multi types. On the other hand, we stress that, in CbV, solvability plays a different role: identifying unsolvable terms as meaningless induces an inconsistent theory. △ Less

Submitted 18 July, 2022; originally announced July 2022.

Comments: Long version of a paper accepted at ICFP 2022. arXiv admin note: text overlap with arXiv:2202.03079

ACM Class: F.3.2; D.3.1; F.4.1

Strategies for Asymptotic Normalization

Authors: Claudia Faggian, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: We present a technique to study normalizing strategies when termination is asymptotic, that is, it appears as a limit, as opposite to reaching a normal form in a finite number of steps. Asymptotic termination occurs in several settings, such as effectful, and in particular probabilistic computation -- where the limits are distributions over the possible outputs -- or infinitary lambda-calculi -- w… ▽ More We present a technique to study normalizing strategies when termination is asymptotic, that is, it appears as a limit, as opposite to reaching a normal form in a finite number of steps. Asymptotic termination occurs in several settings, such as effectful, and in particular probabilistic computation -- where the limits are distributions over the possible outputs -- or infinitary lambda-calculi -- where the limits are infinitary normal forms such as Boehm trees. As a concrete application, we obtain a result which is of independent interest: a normalization theorem for Call-by-Value (and -- in a uniform way -- for Call-by-Name) probabilistic lambda-calculus. △ Less

Submitted 23 May, 2022; v1 submitted 19 April, 2022; originally announced April 2022.

Comments: FSCD 2022

Call-by-Value Solvability and Multi Types

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: This paper provides a characterization of call-by-value solvability using call-by-value multi types. Our work is based on Accattoli and Paolini's characterization of call-by-value solvable terms as those terminating with respect to the solving strategy of the value substitution calculus, a refinement of Plotkin's call-by-value $λ$-calculus. Here we show that the solving strategy terminates on a te… ▽ More This paper provides a characterization of call-by-value solvability using call-by-value multi types. Our work is based on Accattoli and Paolini's characterization of call-by-value solvable terms as those terminating with respect to the solving strategy of the value substitution calculus, a refinement of Plotkin's call-by-value $λ$-calculus. Here we show that the solving strategy terminates on a term $t$ if and only if $t$ is typable in a certain way in the multi type system induced by Ehrhard's call-by-value relational semantics. Moreover, we show how to extract from the type system exact bounds on the length of the solving evaluation and on the size of its normal form, adapting de Carvalho's technique for call-by-name. △ Less

Submitted 7 February, 2022; originally announced February 2022.

Comments: arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:2104.13979

A Deep Inference System for Differential Linear Logic

Authors: Matteo Acclavio, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: Differential linear logic (DiLL) provides a fine analysis of resource consumption in cut-elimination. We investigate the subsystem of DiLL without promotion in a deep inference formalism, where cuts are at an atomic level. In our system every provable formula admits a derivation in normal form, via a normalization procedure that commutes with the translation from sequent calculus to deep inferenc… ▽ More Differential linear logic (DiLL) provides a fine analysis of resource consumption in cut-elimination. We investigate the subsystem of DiLL without promotion in a deep inference formalism, where cuts are at an atomic level. In our system every provable formula admits a derivation in normal form, via a normalization procedure that commutes with the translation from sequent calculus to deep inference. △ Less

Submitted 30 December, 2021; originally announced December 2021.

Comments: In Proceedings Linearity&TLLA 2020, arXiv:2112.14305

ACM Class: F.4.1

Journal ref: EPTCS 353, 2021, pp. 26-49

Semantic Bounds and Strong Call-by-Value Normalization

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri, Maico Leberle

Abstract: This paper explores two topics at once: the use of denotational semantics to bound the evaluation length of functional programs, and the semantics of strong (that is, possibly under abstractions) call-by-value evaluation. About the first, we analyze de Carvalho's seminal use of relational semantics for bounding the evaluation length of lambda-terms, starting from the presentation of the semantic… ▽ More This paper explores two topics at once: the use of denotational semantics to bound the evaluation length of functional programs, and the semantics of strong (that is, possibly under abstractions) call-by-value evaluation. About the first, we analyze de Carvalho's seminal use of relational semantics for bounding the evaluation length of lambda-terms, starting from the presentation of the semantics as an intersection types system. We focus on the part of his work which is usually neglected in its many recent adaptations, despite being probably the conceptually deeper one: how to transfer the bounding power from the type system to the relational semantics itself. We dissect this result and re-understand it via the isolation of a simpler size representation property. About the second, we use relational semantics to develop a semantical study of strong call-by-value evaluation, which is both a delicate and neglected topic. We give a semantic characterization of terms normalizable with respect to strong evaluation, providing in particular the first result of adequacy with respect to strong call-by-value. Moreover, we extract bounds about strong evaluation from both the type systems and the relational semantics. Essentially, we use strong call-by-value to revisit de Carvalho's semantic bounds, and de Carvalho's technique to provide semantical foundations for strong call-by-value. △ Less

Submitted 3 July, 2023; v1 submitted 28 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

On reduction and normalization in the computational core

Authors: Claudia Faggian, Giulio Guerrieri, Ugo de'Liguoro, Riccardo Treglia

Abstract: We study the reduction in a lambda-calculus derived from Moggi's computational one, that we call the computational core. The reduction relation consists of rules obtained by orienting three monadic laws. Such laws, in particular associativity and identity, introduce intricacies in the operational analysis. We investigate the central notions of returning a value versus having a normal form, and add… ▽ More We study the reduction in a lambda-calculus derived from Moggi's computational one, that we call the computational core. The reduction relation consists of rules obtained by orienting three monadic laws. Such laws, in particular associativity and identity, introduce intricacies in the operational analysis. We investigate the central notions of returning a value versus having a normal form, and address the question of normalizing strategies. Our analysis relies on factorization results. △ Less

Submitted 29 November, 2022; v1 submitted 20 April, 2021; originally announced April 2021.

MSC Class: 68N18

Factorization in Call-by-Name and Call-by-Value Calculi via Linear Logic (long version)

Authors: Claudia Faggian, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: In each variant of the lambda-calculus, factorization and normalization are two key-properties that show how results are computed. Instead of proving factorization/normalization for the call-by-name (CbN) and call-by-value (CbV) variants separately, we prove them only once, for the bang calculus (an extension of the lambda-calculus inspired by linear logic and subsuming CbN and CbV), and then we t… ▽ More In each variant of the lambda-calculus, factorization and normalization are two key-properties that show how results are computed. Instead of proving factorization/normalization for the call-by-name (CbN) and call-by-value (CbV) variants separately, we prove them only once, for the bang calculus (an extension of the lambda-calculus inspired by linear logic and subsuming CbN and CbV), and then we transfer the result via translations, obtaining factorization/normalization for CbN and CbV. The approach is robust: it still holds when extending the calculi with operators and extra rules to model some additional computational features. △ Less

Submitted 20 January, 2021; originally announced January 2021.

MSC Class: 03B40; 68N18; 03B70

Gluing resource proof-structures: inhabitation and inverting the Taylor expansion

Authors: Giulio Guerrieri, Luc Pellissier, Lorenzo Tortora de Falco

Abstract: A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing (and deciding in the finite case) those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-stru… ▽ More A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing (and deciding in the finite case) those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-structures. We also prove semi-decidability of the type inhabitation problem for cut-free MELL proof-structures. △ Less

Submitted 21 April, 2022; v1 submitted 6 August, 2020; originally announced August 2020.

MSC Class: 03F52; 03B47; 03B70

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 18, Issue 2 (April 22, 2022) lmcs:6705

Factorize Factorization

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Claudia Faggian, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: Factorization -- a simple form of standardization -- is concerned with reduction strategies, i.e. how a result is computed. We present a new technique for proving factorization theorems for compound rewriting systems in a modular way, which is inspired by the Hindley-Rosen technique for confluence. Specifically, our technique is well adapted to deal with extensions of the call-by-name and call-by-… ▽ More Factorization -- a simple form of standardization -- is concerned with reduction strategies, i.e. how a result is computed. We present a new technique for proving factorization theorems for compound rewriting systems in a modular way, which is inspired by the Hindley-Rosen technique for confluence. Specifically, our technique is well adapted to deal with extensions of the call-by-name and call-by-value lambda-calculi. The technique is first developed abstractly. We isolate a sufficient condition (called linear swap) for lifting factorization from components to the compound system, and which is compatible with beta-reduction. We then closely analyze some common factorization schemas for the lambda-calculus. Concretely, we apply our technique to diverse extensions of the lambda-calculus, among which de' Liguoro and Piperno's non-deterministic lambda-calculus and -- for call-by-value -- Carraro and Guerrieri's shuffling calculus. For both calculi the literature contains factorization theorems. In both cases, we give a new proof which is neat, simpler than the original, and strikingly shorter. △ Less

Submitted 26 December, 2020; v1 submitted 4 May, 2020; originally announced May 2020.

Comments: 29th EACSL Annual Conference on Computer Science Logic (CSL 2021)

Decomposing Probabilistic Lambda-calculi

Authors: Ugo Dal Lago, Giulio Guerrieri, Willem Heijltjes

Abstract: A notion of probabilistic lambda-calculus usually comes with a prescribed reduction strategy, typically call-by-name or call-by-value, as the calculus is non-confluent and these strategies yield different results. This is a break with one of the main advantages of lambda-calculus: confluence, which means results are independent from the choice of strategy. We present a probabilistic lambda-calculu… ▽ More A notion of probabilistic lambda-calculus usually comes with a prescribed reduction strategy, typically call-by-name or call-by-value, as the calculus is non-confluent and these strategies yield different results. This is a break with one of the main advantages of lambda-calculus: confluence, which means results are independent from the choice of strategy. We present a probabilistic lambda-calculus where the probabilistic operator is decomposed into two syntactic constructs: a generator, which represents a probabilistic event; and a consumer, which acts on the term depending on a given event. The resulting calculus, the Probabilistic Event Lambda-Calculus, is confluent, and interprets the call-by-name and call-by-value strategies through different interpretations of the probabilistic operator into our generator and consumer constructs. We present two notions of reduction, one via fine-grained local rewrite steps, and one by generation and consumption of probabilistic events. Simple types for the calculus are essentially standard, and they convey strong normalization. We demonstrate how we can encode call-by-name and call-by-value probabilistic evaluation. △ Less

Submitted 19 February, 2020; originally announced February 2020.

ACM Class: F.3.2; D.3.1

Glueability of resource proof-structures: inverting the Taylor expansion (long version)

Authors: Giulio Guerrieri, Luc Pellissier, Lorenzo Tortora de Falco

Abstract: A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-structures. A Multiplicative-Exponential Linear Logic (MELL) proof-structure can be expanded into a set of resource proof-structures: its Taylor expansion. We introduce a new criterion characterizing those sets of resource proof-structures that are part of the Taylor expansion of some MELL proof-structure, through a rewriting system acting both on resource and MELL proof-structures. △ Less

Submitted 17 October, 2019; originally announced October 2019.

ACM Class: F.4.1

Factorization and Normalization, Essentially

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Claudia Faggian, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: Lambda-calculi come with no fixed evaluation strategy. Different strategies may then be considered, and it is important that they satisfy some abstract rewriting property, such as factorization or normalization theorems. In this paper we provide simple proof techniques for these theorems. Our starting point is a revisitation of Takahashi's technique to prove factorization for head reduction. Our… ▽ More Lambda-calculi come with no fixed evaluation strategy. Different strategies may then be considered, and it is important that they satisfy some abstract rewriting property, such as factorization or normalization theorems. In this paper we provide simple proof techniques for these theorems. Our starting point is a revisitation of Takahashi's technique to prove factorization for head reduction. Our technique is both simpler and more powerful, as it works in cases where Takahishi's does not. We then pair factorization with two other abstract properties, defining \emph{essential systems}, and show that normalization follows. Concretely, we apply the technique to four case studies, two classic ones, head and the leftmost-outermost reductions, and two less classic ones, non-deterministic weak call-by-value and least-level reductions. △ Less

Submitted 27 November, 2019; v1 submitted 29 August, 2019; originally announced August 2019.

Crumbling Abstract Machines

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Andrea Condoluci, Giulio Guerrieri, Claudio Sacerdoti Coen

Abstract: Extending the lambda-calculus with a construct for sharing, such as let expressions, enables a special representation of terms: iterated applications are decomposed by introducing sharing points in between any two of them, reducing to the case where applications have only values as immediate subterms. This work studies how such a crumbled representation of terms impacts on the design and the eff… ▽ More Extending the lambda-calculus with a construct for sharing, such as let expressions, enables a special representation of terms: iterated applications are decomposed by introducing sharing points in between any two of them, reducing to the case where applications have only values as immediate subterms. This work studies how such a crumbled representation of terms impacts on the design and the efficiency of abstract machines for call-by-value evaluation. About the design, it removes the need for data structures encoding the evaluation context, such as the applicative stack and the dump, that get encoded in the environment. About efficiency, we show that there is no slowdown, clarifying in particular a point raised by Kennedy, about the potential inefficiency of such a representation. Moreover, we prove that everything smoothly scales up to the delicate case of open terms, needed to implement proof assistants. Along the way, we also point out that continuation-passing style transformations--that may be alternatives to our representation--do not scale up to the open case. △ Less

Submitted 13 July, 2019; originally announced July 2019.

MSC Class: 03B70; 68N18; 03B40

Towards a Semantic Measure of the Execution Time in Call-by-Value lambda-Calculus

Authors: Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: We investigate the possibility of a semantic account of the execution time (i.e. the number of beta-steps leading to the normal form, if any) for the shuffling calculus, an extension of Plotkin's call-by-value lambda-calculus. For this purpose, we use a linear logic based denotational model that can be seen as a non-idempotent intersection type system: relational semantics. Our investigation is in… ▽ More We investigate the possibility of a semantic account of the execution time (i.e. the number of beta-steps leading to the normal form, if any) for the shuffling calculus, an extension of Plotkin's call-by-value lambda-calculus. For this purpose, we use a linear logic based denotational model that can be seen as a non-idempotent intersection type system: relational semantics. Our investigation is inspired by similar ones for linear logic proof-nets and untyped call-by-name lambda-calculus. We first prove a qualitative result: a (possibly open) term is normalizable for weak reduction (which does not reduce under abstractions) if and only if its interpretation is not empty. We then show that the size of type derivations can be used to measure the execution time. Finally, we show that, differently from the case of linear logic and call-by-name lambda-calculus, the quantitative information enclosed in type derivations does not lift to types (i.e. to the interpretation of terms). To get a truly semantic measure of execution time in a call-by-value setting, we conjecture that a refinement of its syntax and operational semantics is needed. △ Less

Submitted 22 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: In Proceedings DCM 2018 and ITRS 2018 , arXiv:1904.09561. arXiv admin note: substantial text overlap with arXiv:1812.10799

Journal ref: EPTCS 293, 2019, pp. 57-72

The Bang Calculus and the Two Girard's Translations

Authors: Giulio Guerrieri, Giulio Manzonetto

Abstract: We study the two Girard's translations of intuitionistic implication into linear logic by exploiting the bang calculus, a paradigmatic functional language with an explicit box-operator that allows both call-by-name and call-by-value lambda-calculi to be encoded in. We investigate how the bang calculus subsumes both call-by-name and call-by-value lambda-calculi from a syntactic and a semantic viewp… ▽ More We study the two Girard's translations of intuitionistic implication into linear logic by exploiting the bang calculus, a paradigmatic functional language with an explicit box-operator that allows both call-by-name and call-by-value lambda-calculi to be encoded in. We investigate how the bang calculus subsumes both call-by-name and call-by-value lambda-calculi from a syntactic and a semantic viewpoint. △ Less

Submitted 15 April, 2019; originally announced April 2019.

Comments: In Proceedings Linearity-TLLA 2018, arXiv:1904.06159

Journal ref: EPTCS 292, 2019, pp. 15-30

Types by Need (Extended Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri, Maico Leberle

Abstract: A cornerstone of the theory of lambda-calculus is that intersection types characterise termination properties. They are a flexible tool that can be adapted to various notions of termination, and that also induces adequate denotational models. Since the seminal work of de Carvalho in 2007, it is known that multi types (i.e. non-idempotent intersection types) refine intersection types with quantit… ▽ More A cornerstone of the theory of lambda-calculus is that intersection types characterise termination properties. They are a flexible tool that can be adapted to various notions of termination, and that also induces adequate denotational models. Since the seminal work of de Carvalho in 2007, it is known that multi types (i.e. non-idempotent intersection types) refine intersection types with quantitative information and a strong connection to linear logic. Typically, type derivations provide bounds for evaluation lengths, and minimal type derivations provide exact bounds. De Carvalho studied call-by-name evaluation, and Kesner used his system to show the termination equivalence of call-by-need and call-by-name. De Carvalho's system, however, cannot provide exact bounds on call-by-need evaluation lengths. In this paper we develop a new multi type system for call-by-need. Our system produces exact bounds and induces a denotational model of call-by-need, providing the first tight quantitative semantics of call-by-need. △ Less

Submitted 15 February, 2019; originally announced February 2019.

MSC Class: 03B40; 68N18; 68N15; 03B47

Towards a Semantic Measure of the Execution Time in Call-by-Value lambda-Calculus (Long Version)

Authors: Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: We investigate the possibility of a semantic account of the execution time (i.e. the number of β_v-steps leading to the normal form, if any) for the shuffling calculus, an extension of Plotkin's call-by-value λ-calculus. For this purpose, we use a linear logic based denotational model that can be seen as a non-idempotent intersection type system: relational semantics. Our investigation is inspired… ▽ More We investigate the possibility of a semantic account of the execution time (i.e. the number of β_v-steps leading to the normal form, if any) for the shuffling calculus, an extension of Plotkin's call-by-value λ-calculus. For this purpose, we use a linear logic based denotational model that can be seen as a non-idempotent intersection type system: relational semantics. Our investigation is inspired by similar ones for linear logic proof-nets and untyped call-by-name λ-calculus. We first prove a qualitative result: a (possibly open) term is normalizable for weak reduction (which does not reduce under abstractions) if and only if its interpretation is not empty. We then show that the size of type derivations can be used to measure the execution time. Finally, we show that, differently from the case of linear logic and call-by-name λ-calculus, the quantitative information enclosed in type derivations does not lift to types (i.e. to the interpretation of terms). To get a truly semantic measure of execution time in a call-by-value setting, we conjecture that a refinement of its syntax and operational semantics is needed. △ Less

Submitted 27 December, 2018; originally announced December 2018.

MSC Class: 03B47; 03B70; 03B40; 68N18; 03B15

Types of Fireballs (Extended Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: The good properties of Plotkin's call-by-value lambda-calculus crucially rely on the restriction to weak evaluation and closed terms. Open call-by-value is the more general setting where evaluation is weak but terms may be open. Such an extension is delicate, and the literature contains a number of proposals. Recently, Accattoli and Guerrieri provided detailed operational and implementative studie… ▽ More The good properties of Plotkin's call-by-value lambda-calculus crucially rely on the restriction to weak evaluation and closed terms. Open call-by-value is the more general setting where evaluation is weak but terms may be open. Such an extension is delicate, and the literature contains a number of proposals. Recently, Accattoli and Guerrieri provided detailed operational and implementative studies of these proposals, showing that they are equivalent from the point of view of termination, and also at the level of time cost models. This paper explores the denotational semantics of open call-by-value, adapting de Carvalho's analysis of call-by-name via multi types (aka non-idempotent intersection types). Our type system characterises normalisation and thus provides an adequate relational semantics. Moreover, type derivations carry quantitative information about the cost of evaluation: their size bounds the number of evaluation steps and the size of the normal form, and we also characterise derivations giving exact bounds. The study crucially relies on a new, refined presentation of the fireball calculus, the simplest proposal for open call-by-value, that is more apt to denotational investigations. △ Less

Submitted 29 October, 2018; v1 submitted 30 August, 2018; originally announced August 2018.

MSC Class: 03B47; 03B70; 03B40; 68N18; 03B15;

Implementing Open Call-by-Value (Extended Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: The theory of the call-by-value lambda-calculus relies on weak evaluation and closed terms, that are natural hypotheses in the study of programming languages. To model proof assistants, however, strong evaluation and open terms are required. Open call-by-value is the intermediate setting of weak evaluation with open terms, on top of which Grégoire and Leroy designed the abstract machine of Coq. Th… ▽ More The theory of the call-by-value lambda-calculus relies on weak evaluation and closed terms, that are natural hypotheses in the study of programming languages. To model proof assistants, however, strong evaluation and open terms are required. Open call-by-value is the intermediate setting of weak evaluation with open terms, on top of which Grégoire and Leroy designed the abstract machine of Coq. This paper provides a theory of abstract machines for open call-by-value. The literature contains machines that are either simple but inefficient, as they have an exponential overhead, or efficient but heavy, as they rely on a labelling of environments and a technical optimization. We introduce a machine that is simple and efficient: it does not use labels and it implements open call-by-value within a bilinear overhead. Moreover, we provide a new fine understanding of how different optimizations impact on the complexity of the overhead. △ Less

Submitted 1 February, 2017; v1 submitted 27 January, 2017; originally announced January 2017.

ACM Class: D.3.1; F.3.1; F.3.2; F.4.1; F.1.1

Standardization and Conservativity of a Refined Call-by-Value lambda-Calculus

Authors: Giulio Guerrieri, Luca Paolini, Simona Ronchi Della Rocca

Abstract: We study an extension of Plotkin's call-by-value lambda-calculus via two commutation rules (sigma-reductions). These commutation rules are sufficient to remove harmful call-by-value normal forms from the calculus, so that it enjoys elegant characterizations of many semantic properties. We prove that this extended calculus is a conservative refinement of Plotkin's one. In particular, the notions of… ▽ More We study an extension of Plotkin's call-by-value lambda-calculus via two commutation rules (sigma-reductions). These commutation rules are sufficient to remove harmful call-by-value normal forms from the calculus, so that it enjoys elegant characterizations of many semantic properties. We prove that this extended calculus is a conservative refinement of Plotkin's one. In particular, the notions of solvability and potential valuability for this calculus coincide with those for Plotkin's call-by-value lambda-calculus. The proof rests on a standardization theorem proved by generalizing Takahashi's approach of parallel reductions to our set of reduction rules. The standardization is weak (i.e. redexes are not fully sequentialized) because of overlap** interferences between reductions. △ Less

Submitted 21 December, 2017; v1 submitted 22 November, 2016; originally announced November 2016.

Comments: 27 pages

MSC Class: 03B40; 68N18 ACM Class: F.3.2; D.3.1; F.4.1

Journal ref: Logical Methods in Computer Science, Volume 13, Issue 4 (December 22, 2017) lmcs:4162

Open Call-by-Value (Extended Version)

Authors: Beniamino Accattoli, Giulio Guerrieri

Abstract: The elegant theory of the call-by-value lambda-calculus relies on weak evaluation and closed terms, that are natural hypotheses in the study of programming languages. To model proof assistants, however, strong evaluation and open terms are required, and it is well known that the operational semantics of call-by-value becomes problematic in this case. Here we study the intermediate setting -- that… ▽ More The elegant theory of the call-by-value lambda-calculus relies on weak evaluation and closed terms, that are natural hypotheses in the study of programming languages. To model proof assistants, however, strong evaluation and open terms are required, and it is well known that the operational semantics of call-by-value becomes problematic in this case. Here we study the intermediate setting -- that we call Open Call-by-Value -- of weak evaluation with open terms, on top of which Grégoire and Leroy designed the abstract machine of Coq. Various calculi for Open Call-by-Value already exist, each one with its pros and cons. This paper presents a detailed comparative study of the operational semantics of four of them, coming from different areas such as the study of abstract machines, denotational semantics, linear logic proof nets, and sequent calculus. We show that these calculi are all equivalent from a termination point of view, justifying the slogan Open Call-by-Value. △ Less

Submitted 19 September, 2016; v1 submitted 1 September, 2016; originally announced September 2016.

ACM Class: F.4.1; D.3.1; F.3.2

Relational type-checking for MELL proof-structures. Part 1: Multiplicatives

Authors: Giulio Guerrieri, Luc Pellissier, Lorenzo Tortora de Falco

Abstract: Relational semantics for linear logic is a form of non-idempotent intersection type system, from which several informations on the execution of a proof-structure can be recovered. An element of the relational interpretation of a proof-structure R with conclusion $Γ$ acts thus as a type (refining $Γ$) having R as an inhabitant. We are interested in the following type-checking question: given a proo… ▽ More Relational semantics for linear logic is a form of non-idempotent intersection type system, from which several informations on the execution of a proof-structure can be recovered. An element of the relational interpretation of a proof-structure R with conclusion $Γ$ acts thus as a type (refining $Γ$) having R as an inhabitant. We are interested in the following type-checking question: given a proof-structure R, a list of formulae $Γ$, and a point x in the relational interpretation of $Γ$, is x in the interpretation of R? This question is decidable. We present here an algorithm that decides it in time linear in the size of R, if R is a proof-structure in the multiplicative fragment of linear logic. This algorithm can be extended to larger fragments of multiplicative-exponential linear logic containing $λ$-calculus. △ Less

Submitted 1 June, 2016; originally announced June 2016.