Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI
Authors:
Francisco Eiras,
Aleksandar Petrov,
Bertie Vidgen,
Christian Schroeder,
Fabio Pizzati,
Katherine Elkins,
Supratik Mukhopadhyay,
Adel Bibi,
Aaron Purewal,
Csaba Botos,
Fabro Steibel,
Fazel Keshtkar,
Fazl Barez,
Genevieve Smith,
Gianluca Guadagni,
Jon Chun,
Jordi Cabot,
Joseph Imperial,
Juan Arturo Nolazco,
Lori Landay,
Matthew Jackson,
Phillip H. S. Torr,
Trevor Darrell,
Yong Lee,
Jakob Foerster
Abstract:
Applications of Generative AI (Gen AI) are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about the potential risks of the technology, and resulted in calls for tighter regulation, in particular from some of the major tech companies who are leading in AI development. This reg…
▽ More
Applications of Generative AI (Gen AI) are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about the potential risks of the technology, and resulted in calls for tighter regulation, in particular from some of the major tech companies who are leading in AI development. This regulation is likely to put at risk the budding field of open-source generative AI. Using a three-stage framework for Gen AI development (near, mid and long-term), we analyze the risks and opportunities of open-source generative AI models with similar capabilities to the ones currently available (near to mid-term) and with greater capabilities (long-term). We argue that, overall, the benefits of open-source Gen AI outweigh its risks. As such, we encourage the open sourcing of models, training and evaluation data, and provide a set of recommendations and best practices for managing risks associated with open-source generative AI.
△ Less
Submitted 29 May, 2024; v1 submitted 14 May, 2024;
originally announced May 2024.
Near to Mid-term Risks and Opportunities of Open-Source Generative AI
Authors:
Francisco Eiras,
Aleksandar Petrov,
Bertie Vidgen,
Christian Schroeder de Witt,
Fabio Pizzati,
Katherine Elkins,
Supratik Mukhopadhyay,
Adel Bibi,
Botos Csaba,
Fabro Steibel,
Fazl Barez,
Genevieve Smith,
Gianluca Guadagni,
Jon Chun,
Jordi Cabot,
Joseph Marvin Imperial,
Juan A. Nolazco-Flores,
Lori Landay,
Matthew Jackson,
Paul Röttger,
Philip H. S. Torr,
Trevor Darrell,
Yong Suk Lee,
Jakob Foerster
Abstract:
In the next few years, applications of Generative AI are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about potential risks and resulted in calls for tighter regulation, in particular from some of the major tech companies who are leading in AI development. This regulation i…
▽ More
In the next few years, applications of Generative AI are expected to revolutionize a number of different areas, ranging from science & medicine to education. The potential for these seismic changes has triggered a lively debate about potential risks and resulted in calls for tighter regulation, in particular from some of the major tech companies who are leading in AI development. This regulation is likely to put at risk the budding field of open-source Generative AI. We argue for the responsible open sourcing of generative AI models in the near and medium term. To set the stage, we first introduce an AI openness taxonomy system and apply it to 40 current large language models. We then outline differential benefits and risks of open versus closed source AI and present potential risk mitigation, ranging from best practices to calls for technical and scientific contributions. We hope that this report will add a much needed missing voice to the current public discourse on near to mid-term AI safety and other societal impact.
△ Less
Submitted 24 May, 2024; v1 submitted 25 April, 2024;
originally announced April 2024.
