-
Augmenting Automated Game Testing with Deep Reinforcement Learning
Authors:
Joakim Bergdahl,
Camilo Gordillo,
Konrad Tollmar,
Linus Gisslén
Abstract:
General game testing relies on the use of human play testers, play test scripting, and prior knowledge of areas of interest to produce relevant test data. Using deep reinforcement learning (DRL), we introduce a self-learning mechanism to the game testing framework. With DRL, the framework is capable of exploring and/or exploiting the game mechanics based on a user-defined, reinforcing reward signa…
▽ More
General game testing relies on the use of human play testers, play test scripting, and prior knowledge of areas of interest to produce relevant test data. Using deep reinforcement learning (DRL), we introduce a self-learning mechanism to the game testing framework. With DRL, the framework is capable of exploring and/or exploiting the game mechanics based on a user-defined, reinforcing reward signal. As a result, test coverage is increased and unintended game play mechanics, exploits and bugs are discovered in a multitude of game types. In this paper, we show that DRL can be used to increase test coverage, find exploits, test map difficulty, and to detect common problems that arise in the testing of first-person shooter (FPS) games.
△ Less
Submitted 29 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Improving Playtesting Coverage via Curiosity Driven Reinforcement Learning Agents
Authors:
Camilo Gordillo,
Joakim Bergdahl,
Konrad Tollmar,
Linus Gisslén
Abstract:
As modern games continue growing both in size and complexity, it has become more challenging to ensure that all the relevant content is tested and that any potential issue is properly identified and fixed. Attempting to maximize testing coverage using only human participants, however, results in a tedious and hard to orchestrate process which normally slows down the development cycle. Complementin…
▽ More
As modern games continue growing both in size and complexity, it has become more challenging to ensure that all the relevant content is tested and that any potential issue is properly identified and fixed. Attempting to maximize testing coverage using only human participants, however, results in a tedious and hard to orchestrate process which normally slows down the development cycle. Complementing playtesting via autonomous agents has shown great promise accelerating and simplifying this process. This paper addresses the problem of automatically exploring and testing a given scenario using reinforcement learning agents trained to maximize game state coverage. Each of these agents is rewarded based on the novelty of its actions, thus encouraging a curious and exploratory behaviour on a complex 3D scenario where previously proposed exploration techniques perform poorly. The curious agents are able to learn the complex navigation mechanics required to reach the different areas around the map, thus providing the necessary data to identify potential issues. Moreover, the paper also explores different visualization strategies and evaluates how to make better use of the collected data to drive design decisions and to recognize possible problems and oversights.
△ Less
Submitted 23 June, 2021; v1 submitted 25 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
-
Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Procedural Content Generation
Authors:
Linus Gisslén,
Andy Eakins,
Camilo Gordillo,
Joakim Bergdahl,
Konrad Tollmar
Abstract:
We present a new approach ARLPCG: Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Procedural Content Generation, which procedurally generates and tests previously unseen environments with an auxiliary input as a control variable. Training RL agents over novel environments is a notoriously difficult task. One popular approach is to procedurally generate different environments to increase the generalizabilit…
▽ More
We present a new approach ARLPCG: Adversarial Reinforcement Learning for Procedural Content Generation, which procedurally generates and tests previously unseen environments with an auxiliary input as a control variable. Training RL agents over novel environments is a notoriously difficult task. One popular approach is to procedurally generate different environments to increase the generalizability of the trained agents. ARLPCG instead deploys an adversarial model with one PCG RL agent (called Generator) and one solving RL agent (called Solver). The Generator receives a reward signal based on the Solver's performance, which encourages the environment design to be challenging but not impossible. To further drive diversity and control of the environment generation, we propose using auxiliary inputs for the Generator. The benefit is two-fold: Firstly, the Solver achieves better generalization through the Generator's generated challenges. Secondly, the trained Generator can be used as a creator of novel environments that, together with the Solver, can be shown to be solvable. We create two types of 3D environments to validate our model, representing two popular game genres: a third-person platformer and a racing game. In these cases, we shows that ARLPCG has a significantly better solve ratio, and that the auxiliary inputs renders the levels creation controllable to a certain degree. For a video compilation of the results please visit https://youtu.be/z7q2PtVsT0I.
△ Less
Submitted 10 June, 2021; v1 submitted 8 March, 2021;
originally announced March 2021.
