-
Dancing in the Shadows: Harnessing Ambiguity for Fairer Classifiers
Authors:
Ainhize Barrainkua,
Paula Gordaliza,
Jose A. Lozano,
Novi Quadrianto
Abstract:
This paper introduces a novel approach to bolster algorithmic fairness in scenarios where sensitive information is only partially known. In particular, we propose to leverage instances with uncertain identity with regards to the sensitive attribute to train a conventional machine learning classifier. The enhanced fairness observed in the final predictions of this classifier highlights the promisin…
▽ More
This paper introduces a novel approach to bolster algorithmic fairness in scenarios where sensitive information is only partially known. In particular, we propose to leverage instances with uncertain identity with regards to the sensitive attribute to train a conventional machine learning classifier. The enhanced fairness observed in the final predictions of this classifier highlights the promising potential of prioritizing ambiguity (i.e., non-normativity) as a means to improve fairness guarantees in real-world classification tasks.
△ Less
Submitted 27 June, 2024;
originally announced June 2024.
-
A study on group fairness in healthcare outcomes for nursing home residents during the COVID-19 pandemic in the Basque Country
Authors:
Hristo Inouzhe,
Irantzu Barrio,
Paula Gordaliza,
María Xosé Rodríguez-Álvarez,
Itxaso Bengoechea,
José María Quintana
Abstract:
We explore the effect of nursing home status on healthcare outcomes such as hospitalisation, mortality and in-hospital mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some claim that in specific Autonomous Communities (geopolitical divisions) in Spain, elderly people in nursing homes had restrictions on access to hospitals and treatments, which raised a public outcry about the fairness of such measures. I…
▽ More
We explore the effect of nursing home status on healthcare outcomes such as hospitalisation, mortality and in-hospital mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic. Some claim that in specific Autonomous Communities (geopolitical divisions) in Spain, elderly people in nursing homes had restrictions on access to hospitals and treatments, which raised a public outcry about the fairness of such measures. In this work, the case of the Basque Country is studied under a rigorous statistical approach and a physician's perspective. As fairness/unfairness is hard to model mathematically and has strong real-world implications, this work concentrates on the following simplification: establishing if the nursing home status had a direct effect on healthcare outcomes once accounted for other meaningful patients' information such as age, health status and period of the pandemic, among others. The methods followed here are a combination of established techniques as well as new proposals from the fields of causality and fair learning. The current analysis suggests that as a group, people in nursing homes were significantly less likely to be hospitalised, and considerably more likely to die, even in hospitals, compared to their non-residents counterparts during most of the pandemic. Further data collection and analysis are needed to guarantee that this is solely/mainly due to nursing home status.
△ Less
Submitted 16 June, 2023;
originally announced June 2023.
-
Uncertainty in Fairness Assessment: Maintaining Stable Conclusions Despite Fluctuations
Authors:
Ainhize Barrainkua,
Paula Gordaliza,
Jose A. Lozano,
Novi Quadrianto
Abstract:
Several recent works encourage the use of a Bayesian framework when assessing performance and fairness metrics of a classification algorithm in a supervised setting. We propose the Uncertainty Matters (UM) framework that generalizes a Beta-Binomial approach to derive the posterior distribution of any criteria combination, allowing stable performance assessment in a bias-aware setting.We suggest mo…
▽ More
Several recent works encourage the use of a Bayesian framework when assessing performance and fairness metrics of a classification algorithm in a supervised setting. We propose the Uncertainty Matters (UM) framework that generalizes a Beta-Binomial approach to derive the posterior distribution of any criteria combination, allowing stable performance assessment in a bias-aware setting.We suggest modeling the confusion matrix of each demographic group using a Multinomial distribution updated through a Bayesian procedure. We extend UM to be applicable under the popular K-fold cross-validation procedure. Experiments highlight the benefits of UM over classical evaluation frameworks regarding informativeness and stability.
△ Less
Submitted 2 February, 2023;
originally announced February 2023.
-
A Survey on Preserving Fairness Guarantees in Changing Environments
Authors:
Ainhize Barrainkua,
Paula Gordaliza,
Jose A. Lozano,
Novi Quadrianto
Abstract:
Human lives are increasingly being affected by the outcomes of automated decision-making systems and it is essential for the latter to be, not only accurate, but also fair. The literature of algorithmic fairness has grown considerably over the last decade, where most of the approaches are evaluated under the strong assumption that the train and test samples are independently and identically drawn…
▽ More
Human lives are increasingly being affected by the outcomes of automated decision-making systems and it is essential for the latter to be, not only accurate, but also fair. The literature of algorithmic fairness has grown considerably over the last decade, where most of the approaches are evaluated under the strong assumption that the train and test samples are independently and identically drawn from the same underlying distribution. However, in practice, dissimilarity between the training and deployment environments exists, which compromises the performance of the decision-making algorithm as well as its fairness guarantees in the deployment data. There is an emergent research line that studies how to preserve fairness guarantees when the data generating processes differ between the source (train) and target (test) domains, which is growing remarkably. With this survey, we aim to provide a wide and unifying overview on the topic. For such purpose, we propose a taxonomy of the existing approaches for fair classification under distribution shift, highlight benchmarking alternatives, point out the relation with other similar research fields and eventually, identify future venues of research.
△ Less
Submitted 14 November, 2022;
originally announced November 2022.
-
Translational Lung Imaging Analysis Through Disentangled Representations
Authors:
Pedro M. Gordaliza,
Juan José Vaquero,
Arrate Muñoz-Barrutia
Abstract:
The development of new treatments often requires clinical trials with translational animal models using (pre)-clinical imaging to characterize inter-species pathological processes. Deep Learning (DL) models are commonly used to automate retrieving relevant information from the images. Nevertheless, they typically suffer from low generability and explainability as a product of their entangled desig…
▽ More
The development of new treatments often requires clinical trials with translational animal models using (pre)-clinical imaging to characterize inter-species pathological processes. Deep Learning (DL) models are commonly used to automate retrieving relevant information from the images. Nevertheless, they typically suffer from low generability and explainability as a product of their entangled design, resulting in a specific DL model per animal model. Consequently, it is not possible to take advantage of the high capacity of DL to discover statistical relationships from inter-species images.
To alleviate this problem, in this work, we present a model capable of extracting disentangled information from images of different animal models and the mechanisms that generate the images. Our method is located at the intersection between deep generative models, disentanglement and causal representation learning. It is optimized from images of pathological lung infected by Tuberculosis and is able: a) from an input slice, infer its position in a volume, the animal model to which it belongs, the damage present and even more, generate a mask covering the whole lung (similar overlap measures to the nnU-Net), b) generate realistic lung images by setting the above variables and c) generate counterfactual images, namely, healthy versions of a damaged input slice.
△ Less
Submitted 3 March, 2022;
originally announced March 2022.
-
Review of Mathematical frameworks for Fairness in Machine Learning
Authors:
Eustasio del Barrio,
Paula Gordaliza,
Jean-Michel Loubes
Abstract:
A review of the main fairness definitions and fair learning methodologies proposed in the literature over the last years is presented from a mathematical point of view. Following our independence-based approach, we consider how to build fair algorithms and the consequences on the degradation of their performance compared to the possibly unfair case. This corresponds to the price for fairness given…
▽ More
A review of the main fairness definitions and fair learning methodologies proposed in the literature over the last years is presented from a mathematical point of view. Following our independence-based approach, we consider how to build fair algorithms and the consequences on the degradation of their performance compared to the possibly unfair case. This corresponds to the price for fairness given by the criteria $\textit{statistical parity}$ or $\textit{equality of odds}$. Novel results giving the expressions of the optimal fair classifier and the optimal fair predictor (under a linear regression gaussian model) in the sense of $\textit{equality of odds}$ are presented.
△ Less
Submitted 26 May, 2020;
originally announced May 2020.
-
A survey of bias in Machine Learning through the prism of Statistical Parity for the Adult Data Set
Authors:
Philippe Besse,
Eustasio del Barrio,
Paula Gordaliza,
Jean-Michel Loubes,
Laurent Risser
Abstract:
Applications based on Machine Learning models have now become an indispensable part of the everyday life and the professional world. A critical question then recently arised among the population: Do algorithmic decisions convey any type of discrimination against specific groups of population or minorities? In this paper, we show the importance of understanding how a bias can be introduced into aut…
▽ More
Applications based on Machine Learning models have now become an indispensable part of the everyday life and the professional world. A critical question then recently arised among the population: Do algorithmic decisions convey any type of discrimination against specific groups of population or minorities? In this paper, we show the importance of understanding how a bias can be introduced into automatic decisions. We first present a mathematical framework for the fair learning problem, specifically in the binary classification setting. We then propose to quantify the presence of bias by using the standard Disparate Impact index on the real and well-known Adult income data set. Finally, we check the performance of different approaches aiming to reduce the bias in binary classification outcomes. Importantly, we show that some intuitive methods are ineffective. This sheds light on the fact trying to make fair machine learning models may be a particularly challenging task, in particular when the training observations contain a bias.
△ Less
Submitted 6 April, 2020; v1 submitted 31 March, 2020;
originally announced March 2020.
-
Confidence Intervals for Testing Disparate Impact in Fair Learning
Authors:
Philippe Besse,
Eustasio del Barrio,
Paula Gordaliza,
Jean-Michel Loubes
Abstract:
We provide the asymptotic distribution of the major indexes used in the statistical literature to quantify disparate treatment in machine learning. We aim at promoting the use of confidence intervals when testing the so-called group disparate impact. We illustrate on some examples the importance of using confidence intervals and not a single value.
We provide the asymptotic distribution of the major indexes used in the statistical literature to quantify disparate treatment in machine learning. We aim at promoting the use of confidence intervals when testing the so-called group disparate impact. We illustrate on some examples the importance of using confidence intervals and not a single value.
△ Less
Submitted 17 July, 2018;
originally announced July 2018.
